Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Exp Med. Sep 20, 2025; 15(3): 106677
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i3.106677
Fibrinogen superfamily proteins: Key regulators in hepatic disorders
Rong-Hui Qu, Yi Rong, Wen-Zhe Ni, Xing-Lin Huang, Yi-Zhuo Chen, Hai-Fang Li, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong Province, China
ORCID number: Hai-Fang Li (0000-0002-2827-5925).
Co-first authors: Rong-Hui Qu and Yi Rong.
Author contributions: Qu RH and Rong Y revised the manuscript, and they contributed equally to this article as co-first authors; Qu RH, Rong Y, Ni WZ, Huang XL, and Chen YZ wrote the original draft; Li HF supervised, conceived, verified, reviewed, and edited the manuscript; All authors were involved in the critical review of the results and have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Hai-Fang Li, Associate Professor, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, No. 61 Daizong Street, Tai’an 271018, Shandong Province, China. haifangli@sdau.edu.cn
Received: March 4, 2025
Revised: April 18, 2025
Accepted: June 20, 2025
Published online: September 20, 2025
Processing time: 161 Days and 6.3 Hours

Abstract

Liver diseases including hepatic injury, hepatitis, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma have emerged as critical public health challenges globally. The fibrinogen (FG) superfamily proteins, primarily comprising FG, FG-like protein (FGL) 1, and FGL2, have been demonstrated to exert regulatory effects on hepatic tissue regeneration, lipid metabolism homeostasis, and oncogenic processes in hepatocytes. This review systematically examines the pathophysiological correlations between FG superfamily members and major hepatic disorders. Physiologically, FG superfamily proteins function as hepatoprotective mediators through their intrinsic capacity to enhance hepatic parenchymal regeneration and extracellular matrix remodeling. However, emerging evidence reveals their dual regulatory properties, whereby overactivation of these hepatokines paradoxically induces a pathological shift characterized by pro-inflammatory cascades, metabolic derangement potentiation, and tumor invasion and metastasis promotion. Specifically, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying their involvement in hepatitis progression, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease pathogenesis, and hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis. Furthermore, we highlight their therapeutic potential in hepatic disease management, particularly emphasizing that targeting the FGL1/lymphocyte activation gene 3 immune checkpoint axis represents a novel paradigm in precision cancer immunotherapy.

Key Words: Fibrinogen superfamily; Liver injury; Hepatitis; Metabolic associated fatty liver disease; Hepatocellular carcinoma

Core Tip: In this article, we introduce three fibrinogen superfamily proteins: Fibrinogen, FG-like protein 1, and FG-like protein 2. We focus on their roles in liver injury, metabolic associated fatty liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as potential therapeutic approaches. This review aims to deepen the understanding of the relationship between the fibrinogen superfamily and liver diseases, providing new insights for the treatment of hepatic disorders.



INTRODUCTION

Liver diseases, mainly including liver injury, hepatitis, metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are huge killers of human health globally. More than 2 million people die every year worldwide due to these kinds of diseases[1]. Therefore, finding potential mechanisms of action and relevant therapeutic targets are critical to establish effective diagnostic protocols and treatment strategies for these kinds of liver diseases.

The fibrinogen (FG) superfamily includes FG, fibrinogen-like protein (FGL) 1, FGL2, and other fibrinogen-related proteins[2-4]. Many studies have shown that the FG superfamily proteins play protective roles in self-repair of damaged livers, whereas overactivation of these hepatokines paradoxically induces a pathological shift characterized by pro-inflammatory cascades, metabolic derangement potentiation, as well as tumor invasion and metastasis promotion[2]. In the current review, the origin, structure, and function of FG, FGL1, and FGL2 proteins in the FG superfamily are introduced, and their roles in liver diseases are discussed. This review would be helpful to further understand the relationship between FG superfamily proteins and liver diseases, providing a new idea for rational targeted treatment of these disorders.

LIVER DISEASES

Emerging research has demonstrated the crucial involvement of FG superfamily proteins in three major hepatic pathologies: Acute/chronic liver injury progression, MAFLD pathogenesis, and HCC tumorigenesis[2]. Thus, herein we mainly introduce these three pathological conditions. Liver injury refers to the structural and functional impairment of the liver resulting from diverse etiological factors, which can be categorized into acute and chronic forms based on the duration and progression of the damage[5]. Acute hepatic damage can be categorized into several types, including inflammation-mediated injury triggered by viral infections, hepatocyte necrosis resulting from exposure to carbon tetrachloride or acetaminophen, and physical trauma caused by partial hepatectomy or radiation exposure[5,6]. On the other hand, chronic liver injury could result from fibrin deposition and cholestatic liver injury induced by drugs[5,7]. Such hepatic injuries not only disrupt the organ’s physiological functions but also lead to severe complications, including inflammatory responses, fibrotic scarring, and potentially HCC. Furthermore, the liver’s ability to self-repair and regenerate are also impaired when it is injured[8].

MAFLD is a chronic hepatic condition characterized by abnormal fat deposition in the liver and metabolic disturbances, including obesity, overweight, and insulin resistance. Previously termed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, this condition has been redefined to reflect its metabolic origins[9]. Unlike nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the diagnostic framework for MAFLD does not necessitate the exclusion of other liver disorders, such as viral hepatitis or alcohol-related liver damage[10]. The spectrum of MAFLD encompasses metabolic fatty liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and their potential progression to chronic hepatic injury, cirrhosis, and HCC[11]. Moreover, MAFLD is frequently associated with a range of metabolic comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, hyperuricemia, and obesity[12].

HCC ranks as the third most lethal malignancy globally. The tumorigenesis of HCC involves multifaceted interactions among: (1) Demographic determinants (age, sex, and ethnic predisposition); (2) Disease progression parameters (fibrosis stage, hepatic inflammatory activity, and therapeutic interventions); (3) Metabolic dysregulation (diabetes mellitus and obesity spectrum disorders); and (4) Behavioral risk factors (chronic alcohol consumption and tobacco use). Approximately 90% of HCC cases typically arise from preexisting chronic liver conditions, including hepatitis B/C viral infections, alcoholic steatohepatitis, and MAFLD[13]. Notably, while the incidence of viral hepatitis-related HCC has shown a declining trend, emerging epidemiological data reveal a progressive increase in MAFLD-associated HCC cases[14,15].

FG SUPERFAMILY PROTEINS

In this section, we are primarily focused on presenting the structure and characteristics of FG, FGL1, and FGL2. FG is a 340 kDa soluble glycoprotein primarily synthesized in hepatocytes, which is composed of three different polypeptide chains encoded by three independent genes: Aα (FGA, 52.0 kDa), Bβ (FGB, 52.0 kDa), and Gγ (FGG, 46.5 kDa)[16-18]. FG is initially formed in the endoplasmic reticulum through interactions to create Aα-γ and Bβ-γ complexes, which are then connected by disulfide bonds to form a symmetrical dimeric structure[19]. The secretion of FG is subject to a strict quality control mechanism, ensuring that only fully assembled FG is secreted into the bloodstream[20,21]. In addition to liver cells, FG synthesis also occurs in monkey kidney cells (cercopithecus aethiops SV40 transformed cells), hamster kidney fibroblasts, lung epithelial cells, and fibroblast-like cell lines of human breast cancer epithelial cells, indicating that FG assembly is not liver cell-specific (Figure 1)[22-25].

Figure 1
Figure 1 Structure of fibrinogen superfamily proteins. A: Fibrinogen (FG) is a soluble glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 340 kDa, comprising three distinct subunits: Aα, Bβ, and Gγ chains; B: The monomeric form of FG-like protein (FGL) 1 contains an N-terminal C-terminal FG-like domain and a C-terminal FG-related domain. Two identical 34 kDa subunits assemble into a functional dimer via disulfide linkages; C: Membrane-bound FGL2 is classified as a type II transmembrane glycoprotein, featuring an intracellular domain at its N-terminus, a transmembrane segment, and an extracellular region at the C-terminus; D: Soluble FGL2 exhibits structural polymorphism, existing as both monomeric and tetrameric forms. Initially, monomers dimerize through disulfide bonds, followed by further association into tetramers via additional covalent bridges. FG: Fibrinogen; FGL1: Fibrinogen-like protein 1; mFGL2: Membrane-bound fibrinogen-like protein 2; sFGL2: Soluble Fibrinogen-like protein 2.

FGL1, also known as hepatocyte-derived fibrinogen-like protein-1 or hepassocin, is primarily synthesized and secreted by hepatocytes and represents a novel hepatokine that regulates hepatic metabolism[3]. FGL1 is a 68 kD homodimeric protein, which is composed of two 34 kD subunits linked by disulfide bonds and contains approximately 312 amino acid residues[26]. It shares high homology with fibrinogen, featuring a hydrophobic signal peptide and characteristic amino acids at the carboxyl terminus, with β and γ subunits[3]. However, due to the absence of platelet binding sites and thrombin-sensitive sites, FGL1 does not participate in coagulation functions (Figure 1)[27].

FGL2, known as prothrombin, is an evolutionarily highly conserved protein that has a 36% homology to the FG beta and gamma chains and 40% homology to the fibrinogen-related domain of cytotactin[28,29]. Till now, two distinct subtypes of FGL2, membrane-associated FGL2 (mFGL2) and soluble FGL2 (sFGL2), have been identified[30]. mFGL2 is a 70 kDa transmembrane protein that is mainly expressed in epithelial cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells[30,31]. mFGL2 could activate prothrombin and transform it into thrombin that plays an important role in innate immunity[30]. sFGL2 with a size of 50 kDa is highly expressed in regulatory T cells (Tregs) rather than helper T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes. When acting as an immunosuppressor, it can restrain the proliferation of T cells and the maturation of bone marrow dendritic cells (Figure 1)[30].

RELATIONSHIPS OF FG SUPERFAMILY PROTEINS WITH LIVER DISEASES
Role of FG in liver diseases

FG plays a crucial role in liver injury and affects several specific types of damage[2]. Luyendyk et al[31] found that during cholestasis-induced liver injury, the expression of FG is enhanced, leading to the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells and local hypoxia in the liver. Additionally, FG can limit the release of bile from the damaged liver, thereby inhibiting the severity of liver injury[32]. Liu et al[33] discovered that a derivative peptide of the FGβ-chain (Bβ15-42) inhibits hepatic inflammation by preventing the release of high mobility group box 1 protein and the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), thereby inhibiting the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase to slow down the necrosis and apoptosis of hepatocytes. Poole et al[34] indicated that altering the structure of the FG γ-chain can affect the fibrin polymerization reaction induced by thrombin, thereby exacerbating the severity of acute liver injury. Kopec et al[35] demonstrated that during acetaminophen-induced liver injury repair, FG interacts with the leukocyte integrin αMβ2, upregulates the expression of Mmp12, promotes hepatocyte proliferation, and repairs damaged liver tissue. In summary, FG and its chains could play roles in hemostasis, reduce cell necrosis, and initiate targeted repair during liver injury[36].

Additionally, FG is a biomarker for pro-inflammatory responses and thrombosis in metabolic syndrome[27]. The deposition of FG in tissues can promote obesity and disrupt related metabolic balance. Hur et al[37] reported that the polymerization and cross-linking of fibrin can induce the formation of binding motifs for leukocyte integrin receptor αMβ2, thereby promoting the development of obesity, MAFLD, and hypercholesterolemia. Therefore, selectively eliminating the polymerization and cross-linking of fibrin could prevent related diseases.

FG also plays a significant role in the invasion, growth, and metastasis of tumor cells[35,36]. It deposits around tumor cells and forms platelet-fibrin microthrombi, which act as a physical barrier to hinder the clearance of tumor cells by natural killer cells, allowing them to evade recognition by the innate immune system[35,37]. Additionally, tumor cells secrete pro-coagulant factors that convert FG into fibrin, further exacerbating the hypercoagulable state of the blood and enhancing the growth, proliferation, and invasive capacity of tumor cells[38]. FG can bind to various cell growth factors, including transforming growth factor-β, vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and the fibroblast growth factor family, thereby promoting the proliferation of tumor cells[39,40]. Yan et al[41] found that in patients with liver cancer, tumor growth can compress tissue vessels, induce the aggregation and adhesion of platelets and tumor cells, inhibit the transcription of thrombomodulin, and lead to elevated FG levels. Therefore, FG could serve as a biomarker for the detection of HCC and be used as a prognostic factor for liver cancer.

Role of FGL1 in liver diseases

FGL1 serves as a hepatic protective factor, which promotes the self-repair of damaged livers. Han et al[42] found that the expression level of FGL1 is associated with the degree of radiation-induced liver injury. Hara et al[26] discovered that human FGL1 obtained through cloning can stimulate cellular uptake of 3H-thymidine and further increase DNA synthesis in primary hepatocytes. Additionally, FGL1 binds to the membrane-specific receptor of the L02 hepatocyte line, inducing cell proliferation through the epidermal growth factor receptor/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/Src family of tyrosine kinases pathway[43,44].

FGL1 is involved in the regulation of adipogenesis, gluconeogenesis, and insulin resistance[45,46]. Carbohydrates and unsaturated fatty acids enhance the transcription of FGL1 by activating signal transducer and activator of transcription 3[46-48], which in turn promotes the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and induces adipogenesis (Figure 2)[45].

Figure 2
Figure 2 Role of fibrinogen-like protein 1 in liver diseases. In liver injury, fibrinogen-like protein (FGL) 1 exerts its effects by stimulating the Src family of tyrosine kinases/epidermal growth factor receptor/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 cascade through autocrine signaling, thereby modulating hepatocyte proliferation and apoptotic processes. Under conditions of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, elevated levels of palmitate and monounsaturated fatty acids upregulate FGL1 expression in hepatocytes via activation of the interleukin-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway. This upregulation subsequently triggers lipid deposition and inflammatory responses through mechanisms dependent on extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling. In the context of hepatocellular carcinoma, the assembly of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 homeobox α/high mobility group box 1 /cyclic adenosine monophosphate-response element binding transcriptional complex boosts FGL1 transcription. Additionally, FGL1 suppresses tumor cell growth by interfering with the cell cycle and inhibiting the protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling axis. Furthermore, FGL1 interacts with lymphocyte activation gene 3 receptors expressed on CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and natural killer cells, leading to the suppression of T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. FGL: Fibrinogen-like protein; Src: Src family of tyrosine kinases; ER: Endoplasmic reticulum; EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FAS: Fatty acid synthase; ACC: Acetyl-CoA carboxylase; STAT3: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 ; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; LAG: Lymphocyte activation gene; CREB: Cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein; HNF1α: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 α; HMGB1: High mobility group box 1 protein; IL: Interleukin; mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin; AKT: Protein kinase B; MAFLD: Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

FGL1 plays paradoxical roles in normal liver cells and liver cancer cells. Cao et al[43] found that FGL1 acts as a positive regulator in non-tumor cells through autocrine signaling, whereas it inhibits cell growth through the endocrine pathway in the HCC cell line HepG2. Yu et al[49] demonstrated that hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α is an important liver-specific cis-acting element of FGL1, which activates the FGL1 promoter and promotes its transcription by binding to Box-1 protein (high mobility group box 1 protein) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein in the progression of HCC. Moreover, FGL1 inhibits the proliferation of liver cancer cells by suppressing the protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway (Figure 2)[50].

Strikingly, FGL1 is reported to impair CD8+ T-cell function through FGL1-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) interaction, ultimately fostering a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment. LAG3 is a crucial negative regulator of T cell activation and function[51], which is expressed on the surface of lymphocytes in various tumors and exerts immunosuppressive effects by binding to its ligand[52]. FGL1 can inhibit T cell responses by binding to the functional ligand LAG3 Located on the surface of cells such as CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and natural killer cells, allowing tumor cells to evade the body’s immune tracking and promoting tumor growth by altering the immune microenvironment. Thus, blocking the interaction between LAG-3 and FGL1 can enhance T cell responses to tumors and lead to a reduction in tumor size[53]. Therefore, the FGL1/LAG3 axis has become a new target for cancer immunotherapy. Clinically, the use of anti-LAG3 monoclonal antibodies or drugs that block the interaction between LAG3 and FGL1 could enhance antitumor immunity[54]. Additionally, the use of bispecific antibodies to block the interaction between programmed death-ligand 1 and LAG3 enhances the activity of immune cells and increases the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, thereby improving antitumor efficacy[54]. Currently, monoclonal antibodies targeting LAG3 are undergoing clinical trials and have shown promising antitumor potential. However, monoclonal antibodies targeting FGL1 have not yet entered the clinical trial phase (Figure 2).

Role of FGL2 in liver diseases

FGL2 plays multifaceted roles in regulating the progression and outcomes of both acute and chronic hepatitis through its immunomodulatory functions and signaling pathway regulation. In acute liver injury settings, FGL2 demonstrates protective effects by suppressing p38 MAPK signaling to reduce drug-induced hepatotoxicity[55]. In viral hepatitis, sustained FGL2 expression contributes to hepatic stellate cell activation through both coagulation-dependent and -independent mechanisms, ultimately driving collagen deposition and fibrotic progression[30]. Additionally, FGL2 may facilitate viral immune evasion by enhancing Treg activity or suppressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, thereby promoting chronic infection. Clinical evidence suggests a positive correlation between elevated FGL2 Levels and increased hepatitis B virus load. In chronic hepatitis conditions, FGL2 is an important immunosuppressive effector of Tregs. When Tregs accumulate at the inflammatory site, the expression of FGL2 will be enhanced and bound to the inhibitory Fc fragment of IgG low-affinity IIb receptor on the upper surface of antigen-presenting cells[56]. According to the study of Liu et al[57], mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing sFGL2 can promote the differentiation of Treg cells, T helper 17 cells, and T helper 1 cells by enhancing the phosphorylation of Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2/3 that can alleviate liver damage caused by autoimmune hepatitis. While the immunosuppressive properties of FGL2 could be beneficial in certain contexts, such as mitigating excessive immune responses in autoimmune hepatitis, its dual role in fibrosis promotion and anti-inflammatory regulation necessitates careful therapeutic consideration.

FGL2 also plays an important role in metabolic disorders. Hu et al[58] indicated that in alcoholic fatty liver disease, FGL2 accelerates alcoholic liver injury by mediating the dependence of pyruvate kinase M2 subtype in pro-inflammatory macrophages on the aerobic glycolysis pathway. FGL2 deficiency alleviates hepatitis injury in MASH mice[59]. Plasma FGL2 Levels in MALFD patients are higher than those in healthy controls[60]. Hu et al[59] suggested that FGL2 overgenerates pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species through up-regulation of nuclear factor kappa B and p38-MAPK signaling pathways and production of nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat, and PYD-containing protein 3 inflammasome that result in liver lipid metabolism disorder and severe liver injury in MASH. Therefore, FGL2 may be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for MASH in the future.

FGL2 is highly expressed in liver cancer, whose expression is positively correlated with the expression levels of CD11b, CD33, and surface markers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells[61]. Knocking out Fgl2 can significantly inhibit the growth of liver tumors and retard the development of liver cancer[62]. FGL2 facilitates the development of HCC by promoting the differentiation of macrophages and the proliferation of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment[63]. In addition, FGL2 promotes the development of liver cancer by affecting the proliferation of CD8+ T cells and the activation of dendritic cells[64]. Wu et al[65] evidenced that FGL2 regulates the differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by activating the X-box binding protein 1 signal to generate reactive oxygen species, thus promoting the development of liver cancer. FGL2 is also involved in the regulation of the FGL2-Fc fragment of IgG low-affinity IIb receptor pathway during the development of HCC[66]. Knocking down Fgl2 would hinder the activation of PAR2 and impair downstream c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation, which gives rise to the arrest of the tumor cell cycle, thus inhibiting tumor proliferation and angiogenesis[62,67]. In conclusion, FGL2 serves as a new target for tumor immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The liver serves as the central hub for systemic energy regulation, orchestrating metabolic processes through hepatokines, a class of liver-derived signaling proteins including FG, FGL1, and FGL2[68]. These pleiotropic mediators significantly influence hepatic pathophysiology and interorgan communication. Emerging evidence positions hepatokine research as a pivotal frontier in understanding liver-systemic crosstalk, with particular focus on their dual roles in tissue repair and disease progression[69,70]. FG acts as an acute-phase protein, participating in the inflammatory process and the activation and migration of leukocytes. In the liver tumor microenvironment, it is involved in the regulation of the cell cycle and the expression of metabolism-related genes, promoting liver tumor growth and inhibiting tumor cell senescence[2,27]. Additionally, FG levels are associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and pro-thrombotic and inflammatory conditions in MAFLD[71]. FGL1 functions as a protective hepatokine in tissues that could promote cell growth[72]. Under high-fat conditions, elevated levels of hepatic FGL1 can lead to lipid accumulation and trigger inflammatory responses, thereby accelerating the progression of metabolic fatty liver disease. FGL1 can also act as a ligand to promote the proliferation of tumor cells and accelerate the transformation of liver cancer[53]. FGL2 functions as a prothrombin and exerts pro-coagulant effects. Its immunomodulatory functions play a vital role in combating hepatitis, immune rejection in organ transplantation, and cancer progression[73].

In practical applications, FGL1 acts as a ligand for LAG3, and their interaction can stimulate the activation and proliferation of T cells in the tumor microenvironment. The discovery of immunotherapy through the LAG3/FGL1 axis represents a milestone in cancer treatment, which also prompts us to consider whether FGL1 regulates tumor progression through other mechanisms as well[74,75]. Monitoring FGL2 Levels is crucial for assessing the severity of viral hepatitis. In liver transplantation, FGL2 exhibits immunosuppressive functions, protecting both the host and the graft. Dynamic monitoring of FGL2 Levels has been proven to be beneficial for evaluating transplant tolerance. In cases of MAFLD, it has been found that Fgl2 depletion could improve ethanol-induced hepatic steatosis, oxidative damage, and pro-inflammatory cytokines[58]. Targeting FGL2 in hepatic macrophages may hold promise as an intervention for MAFLD and alcoholic hepatitis. Therefore, elucidation of these mechanisms would yield the following significant implications: (1) Uncovering shared regulatory checkpoints in the liver inflammation-fibrosis transition; and (2) Establishing a novel paradigm for developing multi-target interventions based on the FGL molecular network. Additionally, their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets is of significant value in detecting liver diseases and identifying new treatment strategies.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Patel K S-Editor: Bai Y L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Yu HG

References
1.  Devarbhavi H, Asrani SK, Arab JP, Nartey YA, Pose E, Kamath PS. Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update. J Hepatol. 2023;79:516-537.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 834]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
2.  Luyendyk JP, Schoenecker JG, Flick MJ. The multifaceted role of fibrinogen in tissue injury and inflammation. Blood. 2019;133:511-520.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 313]  [Cited by in RCA: 344]  [Article Influence: 57.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Liu XH, Qi LW, Alolga RN, Liu Q. Implication of the hepatokine, fibrinogen-like protein 1 in liver diseases, metabolic disorders and cancer: The need to harness its full potential. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:292-300.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Wang C, Sun H, Wang R, Ma X, Sun Y. FGL2: A new target molecule for coagulation and immune regulation in infectious disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;143:113505.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Huang R, Zhang X, Gracia-Sancho J, Xie WF. Liver regeneration: Cellular origin and molecular mechanisms. Liver Int. 2022;42:1486-1495.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Thawley V. Acute Liver Injury and Failure. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2017;47:617-630.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sharma A, Nagalli S.   Chronic Liver Disease. 2023 Jul 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Hora S, Wuestefeld T. Liver Injury and Regeneration: Current Understanding, New Approaches, and Future Perspectives. Cells. 2023;12:2129.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Pipitone RM, Ciccioli C, Infantino G, La Mantia C, Parisi S, Tulone A, Pennisi G, Grimaudo S, Petta S. MAFLD: a multisystem disease. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2023;14:20420188221145549.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 108]  [Article Influence: 54.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Völzke H. Multicausality in fatty liver disease: is there a rationale to distinguish between alcoholic and non-alcoholic origin? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3492-3501.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 45]  [Cited by in RCA: 51]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
11.  Apostolo D, Ferreira LL, Vincenzi F, Vercellino N, Minisini R, Latini F, Ferrari B, Burlone ME, Pirisi M, Bellan M. From MASH to HCC: the role of Gas6/TAM receptors. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1332818.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Kaya E, Yilmaz Y. Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD): A Multi-systemic Disease Beyond the Liver. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022;10:329-338.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in RCA: 110]  [Article Influence: 36.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022;400:1345-1362.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1284]  [Cited by in RCA: 1219]  [Article Influence: 406.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (41)]
14.  Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Mapakshi S, Natarajan Y, Chayanupatkul M, Richardson PA, Li L, Desiderio R, Thrift AP, Asch SM, Chu J, El-Serag HB. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1828-1837.e2.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 332]  [Cited by in RCA: 570]  [Article Influence: 81.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Gawrieh S, Dakhoul L, Miller E, Scanga A, deLemos A, Kettler C, Burney H, Liu H, Abu-Sbeih H, Chalasani N, Wattacheril J. Characteristics, aetiologies and trends of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis: a United States multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:809-821.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in RCA: 86]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Weisel JW. Fibrinogen and fibrin. Adv Protein Chem. 2005;70:247-299.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 546]  [Cited by in RCA: 624]  [Article Influence: 31.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Tennent GA, Brennan SO, Stangou AJ, O'Grady J, Hawkins PN, Pepys MB. Human plasma fibrinogen is synthesized in the liver. Blood. 2007;109:1971-1974.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 241]  [Cited by in RCA: 220]  [Article Influence: 12.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Wu X, Yu X, Chen C, Chen C, Wang Y, Su D, Zhu L. Fibrinogen and tumors. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1393599.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Redman CM, Xia H. Fibrinogen biosynthesis. Assembly, intracellular degradation, and association with lipid synthesis and secretion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;936:480-495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Bonifacino JS, Weissman AM. Ubiquitin and the control of protein fate in the secretory and endocytic pathways. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14:19-57.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 479]  [Cited by in RCA: 486]  [Article Influence: 18.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Vu D, Di Sanza C, Caille D, de Moerloose P, Scheib H, Meda P, Neerman-Arbez M. Quality control of fibrinogen secretion in the molecular pathogenesis of congenital afibrinogenemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3271-3280.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Hartwig R, Danishefsky KJ. Studies on the assembly and secretion of fibrinogen. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:6578-6585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Farrell DH, Mulvihill ER, Huang SM, Chung DW, Davie EW. Recombinant human fibrinogen and sulfation of the gamma' chain. Biochemistry. 1991;30:9414-9420.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Guadiz G, Sporn LA, Simpson-Haidaris PJ. Thrombin cleavage-independent deposition of fibrinogen in extracellular matrices. Blood. 1997;90:2644-2653.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Rybarczyk BJ, Simpson-Haidaris PJ. Fibrinogen assembly, secretion, and deposition into extracellular matrix by MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2033-2039.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Hara H, Uchida S, Yoshimura H, Aoki M, Toyoda Y, Sakai Y, Morimoto S, Fukamachi H, Shiokawa K, Hanada K. Isolation and characterization of a novel liver-specific gene, hepassocin, upregulated during liver regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1492:31-44.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Sulimai NH, Brown J, Lominadze D. Fibrinogen, Fibrinogen-like 1 and Fibrinogen-like 2 Proteins, and Their Effects. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1712.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Parr RL, Fung L, Reneker J, Myers-Mason N, Leibowitz JL, Levy G. Association of mouse fibrinogen-like protein with murine hepatitis virus-induced prothrombinase activity. J Virol. 1995;69:5033-5038.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in RCA: 60]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Chan CW, Kay LS, Khadaroo RG, Chan MW, Lakatoo S, Young KJ, Zhang L, Gorczynski RM, Cattral M, Rotstein O, Levy GA. Soluble fibrinogen-like protein 2/fibroleukin exhibits immunosuppressive properties: suppressing T cell proliferation and inhibiting maturation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2003;170:4036-4044.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in RCA: 129]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Yang G, Hooper WC. Physiological functions and clinical implications of fibrinogen-like 2: A review. World J Clin Infect Dis. 2013;3:37-46.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
31.  Luyendyk JP, Mackman N, Sullivan BP. Role of fibrinogen and protease-activated receptors in acute xenobiotic-induced cholestatic liver injury. Toxicol Sci. 2011;119:233-243.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Luyendyk JP, Kassel KM, Allen K, Guo GL, Li G, Cantor GH, Copple BL. Fibrinogen deficiency increases liver injury and early growth response-1 (Egr-1) expression in a model of chronic xenobiotic-induced cholestasis. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:1117-1125.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Liu A, Fang H, Yang Y, Sun J, Fan H, Liu S, Dirsch O, Dahmen U. The fibrin-derived peptide bβ15-42 attenuates liver damage in a rat model of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. Shock. 2013;39:397-403.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Poole LG, Schmitt LR, Schulte A, Groeneveld DJ, Cline HM, Sang Y, Hur WS, Wolberg AS, Flick MJ, Hansen KC, Luyendyk JP. Altered fibrinogen γ-chain cross-linking in mutant fibrinogen-γ(Δ5) mice drives acute liver injury. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21:2175-2188.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Kopec AK, Abrahams SR, Thornton S, Palumbo JS, Mullins ES, Divanovic S, Weiler H, Owens AP 3rd, Mackman N, Goss A, van Ryn J, Luyendyk JP, Flick MJ. Thrombin promotes diet-induced obesity through fibrin-driven inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3152-3166.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 90]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Wang GY, Jiang N, Yi HM, Wang GS, Zhang JW, Li H, Zhang J, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Chen GH. Pretransplant Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen Level is a Novel Prognostic Predictor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence and Patient Survival Following Liver Transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2016;21:125-130.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Hur WS, King KC, Patel YN, Nguyen YV, Wei Z, Yang Y, Juang LJ, Leung J, Kastrup CJ, Wolberg AS, Luyendyk JP, Flick MJ. Elimination of fibrin polymer formation or crosslinking, but not fibrinogen deficiency, is protective against diet-induced obesity and associated pathologies. J Thromb Haemost. 2022;20:2873-2886.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Huang G, Jiang H, Lin Y, Wu Y, Cai W, Shi B, Luo Y, Jian Z, Zhou X. Prognostic value of plasma fibrinogen in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5027-5041.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Holzinger D, Danilovic I, Seemann R, Kornek G, Engelmann J, Pillerstorff R, Holawe S, Psyrri A, Erovic BM, Farwell G, Perisanidis C. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Plasma Fibrinogen in Patients with Locally Advanced Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158697.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Martino MM, Briquez PS, Ranga A, Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Heparin-binding domain of fibrin(ogen) binds growth factors and promotes tissue repair when incorporated within a synthetic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:4563-4568.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 339]  [Cited by in RCA: 347]  [Article Influence: 28.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Yan QT. [Correlations among D-dimer and fibrinogen levels and prognosis of patients after radical resection of liver cancer]. Zhongguo Minkang Yixue. 2023;35:127-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
42.  Han NK, Jung MG, Jeong YJ, Son Y, Han SC, Park S, Lim YB, Lee YJ, Kim SH, Park SC, Lee HJ. Plasma Fibrinogen-Like 1 as a Potential Biomarker for Radiation-Induced Liver Injury. Cells. 2019;8:1042.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Cao MM, Xu WX, Li CY, Cao CZ, Wang ZD, Yao JW, Yu M, Zhan YQ, Wang XH, Tang LJ, Chen H, Li W, Ge CH, Yang XM. Hepassocin regulates cell proliferation of the human hepatic cells L02 and hepatocarcinoma cells through different mechanisms. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:2882-2890.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Gao M, Zhan YQ, Yu M, Ge CH, Li CY, Zhang JH, Wang XH, Ge ZQ, Yang XM. Hepassocin activates the EGFR/ERK cascade and induces proliferation of L02 cells through the Src-dependent pathway. Cell Signal. 2014;26:2161-2166.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Wu HT, Ou HY, Hung HC, Su YC, Lu FH, Wu JS, Yang YC, Wu CL, Chang CJ. A novel hepatokine, HFREP1, plays a crucial role in the development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2016;59:1732-1742.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in RCA: 70]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Wu HT, Lu FH, Ou HY, Su YC, Hung HC, Wu JS, Yang YC, Wu CL, Chang CJ. The role of hepassocin in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2013;59:1065-1072.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 70]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Kucukoglu O, Sowa JP, Mazzolini GD, Syn WK, Canbay A. Hepatokines and adipokines in NASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2021;74:442-457.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 85]  [Article Influence: 21.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
48.  Ou HY, Wu HT, Lin CH, Du YF, Hu CY, Hung HC, Wu P, Li HY, Wang SH, Chang CJ. The Hepatic Protection Effects of Hepassocin in Hyperglycemic Crisis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:2407-2415.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Yu HT, Yu M, Li CY, Zhan YQ, Xu WX, Li YH, Li W, Wang ZD, Ge CH, Yang XM. Specific expression and regulation of hepassocin in the liver and down-regulation of the correlation of HNF1alpha with decreased levels of hepassocin in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:13335-13347.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Nayeb-Hashemi H, Desai A, Demchev V, Bronson RT, Hornick JL, Cohen DE, Ukomadu C. Targeted disruption of fibrinogen like protein-1 accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;465:167-173.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Zuo D, Zhu Y, Wang K, Qin Y, Su Y, Lan S, Li Y, Dong S, Liang Y, Feng M. A novel LAG3 neutralizing antibody improves cancer immunotherapy by dual inhibition of MHC-II and FGL1 ligand binding. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;175:116782.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Shi AP, Tang XY, Xiong YL, Zheng KF, Liu YJ, Shi XG, Lv Y, Jiang T, Ma N, Zhao JB. Immune Checkpoint LAG3 and Its Ligand FGL1 in Cancer. Front Immunol. 2021;12:785091.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 101]  [Article Influence: 33.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Wang J, Sanmamed MF, Datar I, Su TT, Ji L, Sun J, Chen L, Chen Y, Zhu G, Yin W, Zheng L, Zhou T, Badri T, Yao S, Zhu S, Boto A, Sznol M, Melero I, Vignali DAA, Schalper K, Chen L. Fibrinogen-like Protein 1 Is a Major Immune Inhibitory Ligand of LAG-3. Cell. 2019;176:334-347.e12.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 326]  [Cited by in RCA: 627]  [Article Influence: 89.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Guo M, Yuan F, Qi F, Sun J, Rao Q, Zhao Z, Huang P, Fang T, Yang B, Xia J. Expression and clinical significance of LAG-3, FGL1, PD-L1 and CD8(+)T cells in hepatocellular carcinoma using multiplex quantitative analysis. J Transl Med. 2020;18:306.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 105]  [Article Influence: 21.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Sun HJ, Chen J, Zhang H, Ni B, van Velkinburgh JC, Liu Y, Wu YZ, Yang X. Von Willebrand factor protects against acute CCl(4)-induced hepatotoxicity through phospho-p38 MAPK signaling pathway inhibition. Immunol Res. 2017;65:1046-1058.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
56.  Chruscinski A, Sadozai H, Rojas-Luengas V, Bartczak A, Khattar R, Selzner N, Levy GA. Role of Regulatory T Cells (Treg) and the Treg Effector Molecule Fibrinogen-like Protein 2 in Alloimmunity and Autoimmunity. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2015;6:e0024.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Liu XG, Liu Y, Chen F. Soluble fibrinogen like protein 2 (sFGL2), the novel effector molecule for immunoregulation. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3711-3723.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Hu X, Wan X, Diao Y, Shen Z, Zhang Z, Wang P, Hu D, Wang X, Yan W, Yu C, Luo X, Wang H, Ning Q. Fibrinogen-like protein 2 regulates macrophage glycolytic reprogramming by directly targeting PKM2 and exacerbates alcoholic liver injury. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;124:110957.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Hu J, Wang H, Li X, Liu Y, Mi Y, Kong H, Xi D, Yan W, Luo X, Ning Q, Wang X. Fibrinogen-like protein 2 aggravates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis via interaction with TLR4, eliciting inflammation in macrophages and inducing hepatic lipid metabolism disorder. Theranostics. 2020;10:9702-9720.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in RCA: 75]  [Article Influence: 15.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Colak Y, Senates E, Ozturk O, Yilmaz Y, Coskunpinar E, Kahraman OT, Sahin O, Zemheri E, Enc FY, Ulasoglu C, Kiziltas S, Kurdas OO, Tuncer I. Plasma fibrinogen-like protein 2 levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:2087-2090.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Liu BQ, Bao ZY, Zhu JY, Liu H. Fibrinogen-like protein 2 promotes the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the hepatocellular carcinoma tumor microenvironment. Oncol Lett. 2021;21:47.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Liu Y, Xu L, Zeng Q, Wang J, Wang M, Xi D, Wang X, Yang D, Luo X, Ning Q. Downregulation of FGL2/prothrombinase delays HCCLM6 xenograft tumour growth and decreases tumour angiogenesis. Liver Int. 2012;32:1585-1595.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Latha K, Yan J, Yang Y, Gressot LV, Kong LY, Manyam G, Ezhilarasan R, Wang Q, Sulman EP, Eric Davis R, Huang S, Fuller GN, Rao A, Heimberger AB, Li S, Rao G. The Role of Fibrinogen-Like Protein 2 on Immunosuppression and Malignant Progression in Glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:292-300.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Yang M, Zhang Z, Chen J, Xu M, Huang J, Wang M, Li W, Wan X, Yuen MF, Luo X, Xi D, Ning Q. Soluble fibrinogen-like protein 2 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma via attenuating dendritic cell-mediated cytotoxic T cell activity. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:351.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Wu L, Liu X, Lei J, Zhang N, Zhao H, Zhang J, Deng H, Li Y. Fibrinogen-like protein 2 promotes tumor immune suppression by regulating cholesterol metabolism in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11:e008081.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Liu H, Shalev I, Manuel J, He W, Leung E, Crookshank J, Liu MF, Diao J, Cattral M, Clark DA, Isenman DE, Gorczynski RM, Grant DR, Zhang L, Phillips MJ, Cybulsky MI, Levy GA. The FGL2-FcgammaRIIB pathway: a novel mechanism leading to immunosuppression. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:3114-3126.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Wang M, Liu J, Xi D, Luo X, Ning Q. Adenovirus-mediated artificial microRNA against human fibrinogen like protein 2 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth. J Gene Med. 2016;18:102-111.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Esfahani M, Baranchi M, Goodarzi MT. The implication of hepatokines in metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13:2477-2480.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Watt MJ, Miotto PM, De Nardo W, Montgomery MK. The Liver as an Endocrine Organ-Linking NAFLD and Insulin Resistance. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:1367-1393.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 233]  [Cited by in RCA: 415]  [Article Influence: 69.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
70.  Jensen-Cody SO, Potthoff MJ. Hepatokines and metabolism: Deciphering communication from the liver. Mol Metab. 2021;44:101138.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in RCA: 144]  [Article Influence: 28.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Marquis K, Maltais F, Duguay V, Bezeau AM, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Poirier P. The metabolic syndrome in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2005;25:226-32; discussion 233.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in RCA: 114]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Michalopoulos GK, Bhushan B. Liver regeneration: biological and pathological mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:40-55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 647]  [Cited by in RCA: 577]  [Article Influence: 144.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
73.  Liu H, Yang PS, Zhu T, Manuel J, Zhang J, He W, Shalev I, Zhang L, Cybulsky MI, Grant DR, Phillips MJ, Levy GA. Characterization of fibrinogen-like protein 2 (FGL2): monomeric FGL2 has enhanced immunosuppressive activity in comparison to oligomeric FGL2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:408-418.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Ruffo E, Wu RC, Bruno TC, Workman CJ, Vignali DAA. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3): The next immune checkpoint receptor. Semin Immunol. 2019;42:101305.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in RCA: 244]  [Article Influence: 48.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Wang J, Wei W, Tang Q, Lu L, Luo Z, Li W, Lu Y, Pu J. Oxysophocarpine suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth and sensitizes the therapeutic blockade of anti-Lag-3 via reducing FGL1 expression. Cancer Med. 2020;9:7125-7136.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]