Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14381-14392
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14381
Recent advances in the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Zenichi Morise, Norihiko Kawabe, Hirokazu Tomishige, Hidetoshi Nagata, Jin Kawase, Satoshi Arakawa, Rie Yoshida, Masashi Isetani
Zenichi Morise, Norihiko Kawabe, Hirokazu Tomishige, Hidetoshi Nagata, Jin Kawase, Satoshi Arakawa, Rie Yoshida, Masashi Isetani, Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Banbuntane Houtokukai Hospital, Nagoya 454-8509, Japan
Author contributions: Morise Z wrote the manuscript; Kawabe N, Tomishige H, Nagata H, Kawase J, Arakawa S, Yoshida R, and Isetani M collected the data and assisted in writing of the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Zenichi Morise, MD, PhD, FACS, Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Banbuntane Houtokukai Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi Nakagawa-ku, Aichi, Nagoya 454-8509, Japan. zmorise@fujita-hu.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-52-3235680 Fax: +81-52-3234502
Received: January 30, 2014
Revised: May 25, 2014
Accepted: July 16, 2014
Published online: October 21, 2014

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy. The treatment of HCC is complex and complicated by the severity of associated chronic liver disease, the stage of HCC, and the clinical condition of the patient. Liver resection (LR) is one of the most efficient treatments for patients with HCC, with an expected 5-year survival of 38%-61% depending on the stage of the disease. Improved liver function assessment, increased understanding of segmental liver anatomy from advanced imaging studies, and surgical technical progress are important factors that have led to reduced mortality in patients with HCC. The indication for LR may be expanded due to emerging evidences from laparoscopic hepatectomies and combined treatments with newly developed chemotherapies. Liver transplantation (LT) is considered as an ideal treatment for removal of existing tumors and the injured/preneoplastic underlying liver tissue with impaired liver function and the risk of multicentric carcinogenesis that results from chronically injured liver. However, LT is restricted to patients with minimal risk of tumor recurrence under immunosuppression. The expansion of criteria for LT in HCC patients is still under trial and discussion. Limited availability of grafts, as well as the risk and the cost of transplantation have led to considerable interest in expansion of the donor pool, living donor-related transplantation, and combined treatment involving LR and LT. This highlight presents evidence concerning recent studies evaluating LR and LT in HCC patients. In addition, alternative therapies for the treatment of early stage tumors and the management of patients on transplant waiting lists are discussed.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Surgical treatment, Hepatectomy, Liver transplantation, Laparoscopic hepatectomy, Tumor thrombi, Chemotherapy

Core tip: Liver resection (LR) is one of the most efficient treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Advances in assessment and treatment, including emerging evidence from laparoscopic hepatectomies and combined treatments with newly developed chemotherapies, may lead to expanded indications for LR. Liver transplantation (LT) is an ideal treatment for chronically injured liver tissue with impaired liver function and risk of multicentric carcinogenesis. The expansion of criteria for LT in HCC patients and combined treatment involving LR and LT are under trial and discussion. This highlight presents and discusses recent studies concerning LR and LT in HCC patients.



INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the most common primary liver malignancy[1]. The treatment of HCC is complex and challenging due to its well-known association with chronic liver disease (CLD), which can be caused by viral infection, alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome, etc. The parenchyma underlying chronically injured liver tissue can display various histologic changes, including steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and/or cirrhosis. Combined with the risk of multicentric carcinogenesis, these histologic changes limit the possibility of curative treatments, which include liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), and the local ablation of small tumors[2].

LR is one of the most efficient treatments for HCC[3,4]. Considerable progress over the past ten years in screening, early radiologic diagnosis, treatment of the underlying liver disease, and surgical techniques has resulted in revision of the indications for LR[2]. Furthermore, improved liver function assessment, understanding of segmental liver anatomy using more accurate imaging studies, and surgical technical progress are the most important factors that have led to reduced mortality, with an expected 5-year survival of 38%-61%, depending on the stage of the disease[5]. Despite these advances, less than 30% of HCC patients are eligible for LR[3,4]. However, emerging evidence from laparoscopic hepatectomies[6] and the use of combined treatments with newly developed chemotherapies[7] may lead to expansion of the indication for LR (Table 1).

Table 1 Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma within injured liver.
Local ablation therapyOnly for small tumors (in size and number)
Liver resectionMost available and efficient treatment
Applicable to < 30% of all HCC patients
5-yr survival of 38%-61% depending on the tumor stage
80% of patients recur within five years after resection
Liver transplantationIdeal treatment for removal of existing tumor and underlying injured/preneoplastic tissue
Tumor progression while on waiting list
Patients with advanced/extensive HCC have very poor outcomes

Impairment of liver function and the risk of multicentric carcinogenesis from chronically injured liver tissue lead to consideration of LT as the ideal treatment for removal of existing tumors and injured/preneoplastic underlying liver. However, LT is restricted to patients with minimal risk of tumor recurrence under immunosuppression[8]. Expansion of criteria for LT in HCC patients is still under trial and discussion[9,10]. The limited availability of donor grafts for LT, as well as the risk and cost of the procedure, has led to considerable interest for expansion of the donor pool and living donor-related transplantation[11], and combined treatments involving LR and LT[8,12].

This review presents and discusses recent advances in the surgical treatment of HCC (Table 2). Advances in the assessment of liver function are also described, along with discussion of patient management and combinatorial treatment options. In addition, a brief discussion is presented concerning nonsurgical methods that play an important role in HCC treatment, either alone or combined with surgical approaches. These methods include local ablation therapies, such as percutaneous or laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA)[13], as well as a newly developed and promising approach involving transarterial radioembolization with radioactive substances such as 131iodine-labeled Lipiodol[14] or microspheres containing yttrium-90[15].

Table 2 Summary of recent advances in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Established
Screening and early detection for high-risk patients (i.e., with HCV or HBV infection, alcoholic, metabolic chronic liver disease, etc.)
Diagnosis with contrast-enhanced imaging for the detection of early lesions
Assessment of liver function (Child-Pugh classification, indocyanine green retention test, MELD score)
Modulation of residual liver function with preoperative portal vein embolization
Anatomic resection removing undetectable disseminated tumor foci in the same portal territory
Under discussion
Three dimensional-CT-assisted preoperative surgical planning facilitates:
Unconventional types of liver resection
Laparoscopic liver resection could be beneficial:
For patients with severe liver dysfunction with lower morbidity
For repeat resection
As a bridging therapy for liver transplantation
Under trial or proposal
Adjuvant and/or combined therapy for advanced tumor
Sorafenib
Intraarterial 5-FU plus IFN therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with VTT
LIVER RESECTION

The largest study concerning LR for the treatment of HCC is from the Liver Cancer Study Group in Japan, which involved 27062 resected HCC patients treated between 1992 and 2003[16]. This study reported 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 87.8%, 69.2%, 53.4%, and 27.7%, respectively, which are comparable to rates reported by other groups worldwide, without differences between Western and Eastern countries. Survival rates as high as 60% at five years could have been achieved in Child-Pugh A patients with well-encapsulated tumors of ≤ 2 cm in diameter. Results from patients with good liver function and anatomic LR according to the architecture of the portal vein (although less than 10% of all patients) were comparable with those from patients with LT.

There are reports describing that significantly better overall and disease-free survival rates are achieved with anatomic LR for small solitary HCC compared to limited resection, without increasing the postoperative risk[17,18]. Intrahepatic metastasis of HCC along the portal vein and the presence of satellite nodules within 2 cm of the main nodule is the basis for anatomic LR[19], which involves the complete removal of tumor-bearing portal territory. Anatomic LR has the potential to remove undetected cancerous foci (portal vein metastases and satellite nodules) disseminated from the main tumor, and thus is recommended when possible in many reports.

The indication for and extent of LR in patients with HCC is influenced both by tumor extension and the severity of liver dysfunction. For the treatment of HCC patients with CLD, the degree of invasive surgical stress, especially to the impaired liver, should be considered in addition to the oncologic therapeutic effects. Patients with severe CLD can present with various signs (overt and preliminary), such as (1) deterioration of protein synthesis and metabolism; (2) gastrointestinal tract congestion, ascites, pancytopenia due to portal hypertension and hypersplenism; and (3) susceptibility to infectious diseases and hepatopulmonary syndrome (hypoxemia) due to increased shunt vessels[20]. Cirrhotic patients have high morbidity and mortality following anesthesia and surgery[21] and the risk from abdominal operations increases according to the preoperative Child-Pugh classification[22] of the patients[23].

Major histologic changes that are observed in patients with HCC can range from mild fibrosis (F1) to cirrhosis (F4). Patients with cirrhosis have a lower rate of regeneration after LR, more frequent association with portal hypertension, and a higher risk of tumor multiplicity/recurrence[12,24]. Even in the absence of extensive fibrosis, steatosis and inflammation can also have a significant influence on the course after LR. The diseased liver parenchyma presents an operative risk due to the altered texture of the liver parenchyma, impaired liver regeneration, and deteriorated liver function, which lead to coagulation defects, increased risk of infection, etc.[25]. Moreover, there is a close relationship between the volume of resected liver and postoperative morbidity/mortality of LR in patients with CLD. Therefore, there is limited indication for LR in cases of large tumors or small but centrally located tumors[26]. LR in patients with HCC and CLD is complicated by the fact that it should be curative with the resection of the tumor vascular territories yet also preserve as much liver volume as possible to prevent postoperative liver failure.

Assessment and modulation of remnant liver function

A small remnant liver volume is associated with poor postoperative liver function and a high mortality/morbidity after LR[27]. Although the safety limit for the remnant liver volume in patients with normal liver is approximately 30% of the total liver volume (TLV), it is generally thought that a remnant liver volume of 40%-50% should be preserved in patients with CLD[28]. The liver is characterized by its capacity to ensure normal function with a reduced functional volume and the ability to regenerate. However, the extent of fibrosis in the remnant liver, portal flow, and other factors can affect the ability of the liver to regenerate. Thus, the volume of future liver remnant (FLR) that is adequate will vary from patient to patient. Although the aim of preoperative assessment of liver function is to prevent postoperative liver failure, determining the postoperative functionality of a reduced-volume FLR and its capacity to regenerate is difficult. As there are no reliable stress tests to assess potential liver function, preoperative assessment in patients with CLD involves a combined interpretation of several biologic, morphologic, histologic, and hemodynamic factors.

One widely used method of biologic assessment is the Child-Pugh classification, which provides scores from grade A to C and was originally designed for predicting the prognosis of patients with portal hypertension undergoing shunting operations[19]. Resection is contraindicated in grade C cirrhotic patients and restricted to very limited resection in grade B cirrhotic patients[29]. However, the risk from liver surgery is increased even in grade A cirrhotic patients with apparently normal liver function, which necessitated the development of more sophisticated, quantitative liver function tests. Among the various methods available, the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance rate represents the most common test for predicting mortality after hepatectomy[30,31]. A normal ICG rate in healthy patients is approximately 10%, and cutoff values predictive of safe major hepatectomies range from 14% to 17%[32,33]. Minor resections can be performed for ICG clearance rates of up to 22%[34], limited hepatectomies (without sacrifice of non-tumorous liver) for values up to 40%[26], and limited wedge laparoscopic resections can possibly be tolerated for even higher values[35,36]. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, which has been validated as an accurate predictor of survival among different populations of patients with advanced liver disease[37,38], has only been retrospectively studied in two series of cirrhotic patients who had undergone LR for HCC[37,38]. These studies indicated that a MELD score > 8 was associated with a higher risk of mortality, morbidity, and impaired long-term survival in these patients.

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE), first introduced by Makuuchi et al[39], has been widely recognized as an effective method for the preoperative volume modulation of small FLR. However, the degree of hypertrophy of the FLR after PVE is variable in patients with CLD[27,40]. The absence of early hypertrophy in non-embolized liver following PVE is considered to be an indicator of low regenerative capacity that would contraindicate LR. Thus, the response to PVE represents a valid dynamic stress test before major LR[41]. It has been shown that sequential selective transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) before PVE can increase the rate of hypertrophy[41,42], which may be effective for treatment of HCC in the event of inadequate FLR hypertrophy. As an additional means of anticipating postoperative liver failure, there are several reports using volumetric data from computed tomography (CT) to evaluate FLR volume proportional to body weight, body surface area, and TLV[43,44], and to determine the hypertrophy rate from the FLR/TLV ratio[45].

Anatomic resection and imaging

The anatomic territory of HCC, determined by the tumor size and location, can range from a subsegment to an entire lobe of the liver. Although anatomic resections are effective for treating small solitary HCCs, the benefit of segmental resection may only become apparent in tumors between 2 and 5 cm. Tumors < 2 cm in size, considered to have negligible risk for dissemination, can be treated by local ablative therapy with equal efficacy. For the tumors > 5 cm, the majority of patients will already have macroscopic vascular invasion or satellite nodules, leading to a high incidence of recurrence[46]. In the case of central tumors with undefined vascular territory, recurrence rates and greater survival have been reported with 2 cm surgical margins compared to 1 cm margins[47], though other studies report no difference between margins smaller or larger than 1 cm[48,49]. However, an adequate margin of LR also depends on the tumor type (with/without capsules, with/without invasion outside the capsule, etc.), and is still under discussion.

Three-dimensional CT-assisted preoperative surgical planning allows for determination of resectability and changes to the operative strategy (resection modifications/extensions, intrahepatic vascular reconstructions, study of portal distribution and hepatic vein anatomy for adequate venous drainage, and study of biliary distribution for avoiding biliary fistula)[50]. Preoperative surgical planning that incorporates imaging is particularly helpful for procedures requiring unconventional resection planes and/or involving central tumors. Furthermore, it allows for the adaptation of complicated anatomic LR to a greater number of patients, such as the adaptation of sub-subsegment anatomic LR for small tumors in highly injured liver and anatomic LR of combined territories for deep centrally-located tumors.

Laparoscopic LR

First successfully reported in 1992[51], laparoscopic LR is a less invasive procedure than conventional open LR for the treatment of hepatic lesions[52]. A comprehensive meta-analysis of 26 studies involving 1678 patients found that although laparoscopic LR procedures were associated with longer operating times, the oncologic outcomes were not different from open LR[53]. However, there were advantages associated with laparoscopic LR, such as reduced blood loss, decreased portal clamp time, decreases in overall and liver-specific complications, and shorter post-operative hospital stays. The recent technologic development of devices and accumulation of experience have led to an expansion of the indication for laparoscopic LR[6,54].

Laparoscopic hepatectomy has the benefit of earlier intake, recovery and discharge, and reduced postoperative pain[55]. The safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic approach and its short-term benefits for HCC patients with CLD have been demonstrated by many studies[36]. Tranchart et al[56] also reported better postoperative outcomes, without long- or short-term oncologic consequences, following laparoscopic LR of HCC for select patients. Laparoscopic LR may be particularly advantageous for patients with severe CLD, who often develop refractory ascites with open LR, which leads to fatal complications[57,58]. Laparoscopic LR has the advantage of minimal ascites[59], due to preservation of venous and lymphatic collateral circulation, which leads to lower risk of disturbance in water and/or electrolyte balance and hypoproteinemia that could trigger fatal liver failure. This feature could be the most remarkable specific advantage for laparoscopic LR. On the other hand, there are also disadvantages of laparoscopic hepatectomy, such as the motion restriction of the forceps on manipulation, the lack of sensation and 3-dimentional view, difficulty on handling large volume mass, the lack of good overview of operative field. Several strategies, such as uses of magnified view and multiple conversions of positioning during surgery for the use of gravity on the dissection (which is more easily used in laparoscopic than open operation), preoperative simulation with 3D-CT imagings, are applied to overcome these disadvantages. Therefore, there is a learning curve for laparoscopic hepatectomy, which surgeons should be experienced. Vigano et al[59] demonstrated a learning curve effect by outcomes improvement in operative time, conversion rate, blood loss, need of pedicle clamping and its duration, postoperative morbidity, and hospital stay and reported that the shape of the learning curve is similar to left-sided colonic surgery, changing its direction after the 60th consecutive case. They also mentioned the results suggest that Laparoscopic hepatectomy is reproducible in centers regularly performing liver surgery, but requires specific training to advanced laparoscopy.

Patients who undergo LR are exposed to three different types of stresses: (1) general, whole-body surgical stress; (2) reduced liver function due to resected liver volume; and (3) surgery-induced injury of liver parenchyma and surrounding area, caused by destruction of the collateral blood/lymphatic flow by laparotomy and mobilization of the liver, and parenchymal injury by compression of the liver. Reduction of surgery-induced injury with laparoscopic LR should lower the risk for HCC patients with severe CLD. Laparoscopic LR also results in improved vision and manipulation in a small operative field under the proper conditions, including repeat hepatectomy with adhesions[60]. These characteristics indicate that laparoscopic LR may be superior to open LR under certain conditions. The laparoscopic procedure could also be an optional bridging therapy to LT for certain HCC patients with severe CLD.

Adjuvant and/or combined therapy for LR

Recurrence occurs in up to 80% of patients five years after LR[61]. Two-thirds of these are early recurrences, occurring within two years, which is considered as dissemination from the original tumor[62]. The factors related to this recurrence are tumor size, microvascular invasion, satellite nodules, α-fetoprotein levels, and nonanatomic resection. A large portion of delayed recurrences (after two years) may correspond to “de novo” tumors in the oncogenic chronically injured liver[63]. Delayed recurrences are associated with the presence of cirrhosis (F4), hepatitis activity, and multi modularity, in addition to vascular invasion, and moderately or poorly differentiated HCC[62].

Several strategies have been tested to prevent recurrence, such as preoperative chemoembolization[64], chemotherapy, internal radiation[65], adoptive immunotherapy[66], and treatment with retinoids[67]. Treatment with interferon is favored based on results of two meta-analyses[68,69], though few good-quality studies are available. The efficacy of interferon and whether the effect is on early recurrence as an anti-cancerous agent or on delayed recurrence through the control of CLD activity, are still under discussion. The efficacy of sorafenib in advanced stages[70] has encouraged evaluation of its use in earlier phases of the disease, with trials ongoing. However, there is no proven neoadjuvant therapy that can decrease or delay the incidence of intrahepatic recurrence after LR[71]. Despite the fact that TACE can downstage HCC, prospective trials have failed to show any significant benefit of this treatment before LR[72,73]. Although recurrence following LR is associated with a poor outcome in most cases, there is growing evidence that some patients with only intrahepatic recurrence will benefit from more aggressive approaches[74,75]. Multimodality therapy of recurrence, including TACE, percutaneous ablative therapy, and re-resection could result in prolonged survival for recurrent patients, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 20%[74].

Vascular invasion of HCC, particularly portal and hepatic venous tumor thrombus (VTT), is one of the indicators of patient prognosis, and the development of tumor thrombi in a major branch of the veins is a frequent terminal feature of HCC. The prognosis of such patients is extremely poor, and survival is limited to a few months after diagnosis[76-78]. For these advanced HCCs, conventional therapies like TACE and percutaneous ablative therapy are not indicated due to lack of efficacy and associated complications[78,79]. LT is also a contra-indication for such cases[80]. Although several reports suggest LR is feasible for patients with VTT, the outcome is unsatisfactory, with a median survival of 6-12 mo[76,77,81,82], except for the cases with VTT located in the segmental or sectoral branches[83]. Several approaches, including combined radiotherapy and TACE, have been attempted to improve the outcome with unsatisfactory results[84-87]. There are recent reports showing that combination therapy with interferon-α and trans-arterial 5-fluorouracil is a promising candidate for treatment of advanced HCC with VTT and intrahepatic metastasis[88-90], and as a postoperative adjuvant[91] and a multimodal treatment[7] for resectable HCC. Several clinical trials are currently underway to further evaluate this combination therapy.

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

LT is the ideal treatment for the removal of existing tumors and replacement of chronically injured and preneoplastic liver. Furthermore, it also prevents the development of postoperative complications associated with portal hypertension and liver failure. LT is not limited by liver function, and in select patients with limited tumors, survival is similar to LT for other indications[92,93]. However, patients with extensive HCC have very poor outcomes, whereas most patients with small tumor loads can be cured. Due to the shortage of available organs, there are discussions concerning the selection of patients with HCC for LT, and the control of tumors in patients on the waiting list[94]. Furthermore, an international consensus conference (involving 300 experts from five continents) was recently held in order to develop internationally accepted standards and guidelines[95].

Criteria for listing candidates

A meta-analysis conducted by Germani et al[96] found that the diameter of the largest nodule or total diameter of nodules was the best predictor of post-transplant recurrence and survival. Patients with HCC within the Milan criteria (MC; solitary HCC ≤ 5 cm or up to three nodules of ≤ 3 cm)[80] had a 5-year survival of 70% after LT, which matches survivals for other indications, with recurrence in less than 10%. Mazzaferro et al[97] recently showed that the MC is an independent prognostic factor for outcome after LT. The MC was recommended by the international consensus conference as the current benchmark for the selection of HCC patients for LT and the basis for comparison with other suggested criteria[95]. However, evidence suggesting good outcomes in some patients outside the MC has led to attempts to expand the criteria. At the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), one of the first attempts was made to include single tumors ≤ 6.5 cm or two to three tumors ≤ 4.5 cm, with a total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm (UCSF criteria)[9]. Although the study was retrospective and used post-transplant pathologic staging instead of pre-transplant image staging, retrospective analyses by the authors and others showed survival rates were equivalent to those of patients who underwent LT within the MC[98-100]. An additional multicenter study that used pre-transplant image staging found that survival rates were lower in patients within the UCSF criteria compared to those meeting the MC, though the difference was not statistically significant[101]. Independent studies from the UCSF group and a group from the University of California at Los Angeles found similar results of LT in HCC cases, with 5-year survival rates of 80.9% (median follow-up: 26 mo) and 64% (mean follow-up: 6.6 years), respectively[102,103]. Although most studies have proposed expanded criteria based on tumor number and size as an estimate of tumor load, additional parameters concerning tumor biologic features related to risk of recurrence have also been proposed[10] (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of recent advances in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
EstablishedUnder discussionUnder trial or proposal
Criteria for listing candidateThe Milan criteria: Solitary tumor of ≤ 5 cm or up to 3 nodules ≤ 3 cm 5-yr survival of 70% with recurrence in less than 10%The UCSF criteria: Single tumors ≤ 6.5 cm or 2–3 tumors ≤ 4.5 cm, with a total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cmAdd parameters for biologic features of tumors related to risk of recurrence (AFP, PIVKA-II, etc.) Expansion of criteria for living donor-LT
Management on the waiting list (about 40% dropout rate at 12 mo)Local ablation therapy and TACE are performed without solid evidenceDifferent models have been developed to quantify the risk of death in neoplastic and non-neoplastic patients Association with liver resection: "bridging resection" to transplantation and "salvage transplantation" following resectionApplication of living donor-LT to shorten the waiting time Candidate selection with information from precedent therapy (histologic specimen, response to locoregional therapy, etc.)

In addition to expanding the criteria for recipients of LT, the acceptance of marginal livers (advanced age or steatotic organs, non-heart beating, hepatitis C virus-infected) and domino or split LT have been considered. Living donor-LT has emerged as the most feasible alternative to cadaveric-LT for early HCC in patients with waiting times exceeding seven months[11]. However, a massive expansion of the criteria to include patients with larger tumor loads may significantly constrain the outcomes of transplantation. With the certain morbidity/mortality of the donor, it is of concern to put a donor at risk for an uncertain recipient prognosis[104].

Management on the waiting list

While on the waiting list for LT, HCC patients can experience tumor growth beyond the LT criteria resulting in a high cumulative probability of dropout from the waiting list. This probability ranges from between 7% and 11% at six months to approximately 38% at 12 mo after enrollment as determined by two reports from the late 1990s[105,106]. Accordingly, strategies to increase the donor pool and diminish the dropout rate due to tumor progression became a priority in many centers. Allocation policies for HCC patients awaiting LT remain controversial in the era of the MELD score. Different models have been developed to quantify the risk of death in neoplastic and nonneoplastic patients[107-111]. As the neoplastic risk assessment is not considered in MELD scoring, patients with unresectable HCC within the MC have been considered exceptions in the American allocation system. Patients with HCC fulfilling the MC enter the waiting list with a MELD score equal to 22 and receive incremental points for every three months spent on the waiting list[112,113]. The 22 threshold was set to offer HCC patients the same dropout probability as patients without malignancy[114].

For HCC patients listed within the MC, a delay of over six to 12 mo for LT without bridging treatment is a well-recognized risk factor for tumor progression and dropout from the list, or interval dissemination with post-transplant tumor recurrence[105,106,114]. If a longer wait-time is needed, the use of bridging treatments is recommended in many guidelines[94,95,115]. However, there is no evidence that bridging treatments are useful in patients with early stage HCC[95]. Although no specific nonsurgical bridging therapy is recommended over another[95], RFA could be the first-line treatment for lesions up to 3 cm, in which complete tumor necrosis has been shown in more than 50% of cases[116]. Percutaneous ethanol injection appears to show lower efficacy and can be reserved for small lesions located in sites considered “dangerous” for RFA (e.g., near the gallbladder or bowel loops). TACE may be preferred for treating lesions > 3 cm, as it may be more effective in well-vascularized large tumors with thick feeding arteries. Multimodal treatment strategies, including sequentially applied TACE and RFA, are also likely to be effective[117].

Belghiti et al[118] demonstrated that surgical resection before LT does not increase the surgical risk nor impair survival and stated that resection and transplantation could be associated rather than considered separately. The authors proposed that resection could be used as a bridge to transplantation, especially for tumors located in the upper part of the right liver, which can be easily and completely removed through a transthoracic incision. Similarly, some superficial tumors that are not easily accessible by a percutaneous approach could be resected through a laparoscopic approach. Additional studies have confirmed that LT for recurrence after LR does not increase the operative risk and offers a chance of long-term survival when HCC recurrence is limited[118-120]. Initial LR of HCC as a primary therapy in patients who otherwise would have received transplants offers a good quality of life and is less demanding than LT. Patients do not need long-term immunosuppression, and grafts can be re-allocated to patients with no alternative to LT[8,118,119]. “Salvage transplantation” was first proposed by Majno et al[121] for tumor recurrence or deterioration of liver function in patients after LR as a primary therapy. This concept is applicable to a significant proportion of patients, with long-term survivals similar to those of patients who undergo LT as a primary treatment[118-120]. Moreover, the response to pre-LT locoregional therapies, including LR, and histologic analysis of specimens (from LR), either in “bridging” or “salvage” settings, can aid in the selection of patients who could most benefit from subsequent LT.

NONSURGICAL TREATMENTS

In addition to surgical treatments, local ablation therapies play important roles in HCC treatment, either alone or combined with surgical approaches. RFA is effective for treatment of early stage (small in number and size) HCC, with complete ablation of lesions smaller than 2 cm in more than 90% of cases[13]. The advantage of RFA treatment for HCC in cirrhotic patients is that it allows selective destruction of the tumor, sparing the surrounding parenchyma, and can be easily repeated in case of recurrence. In addition to tumor size, the use of RFA is limited in cases where the tumor is adjacent to a major blood vessel, or with subcapsular lesions that can undergo rupture and/or injure adjacent organs. However, the benefit of RFA in the treatment of HCC has been well demonstrated, with overall 5-year survival rates between 33% and 55%[122]. Rather than competing techniques, RFA and LR are effective therapeutic options that can be chosen based on the severity of CLD as well as the size and location of the tumor. Microwave coagulation therapy (MCT) also has been shown to be an effective thermal ablation procedure for the percutaneous treatment of HCC. Compared to RFA, this technique could theoretically provide a larger volume of necrosis and be more effective when treating nodules adjacent to large vessels; however, a clear advantage of MCT with respect to RFA has not been demonstrated[123,124] (Table 4).

Table 4 Overview of current outcomes of liver resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Liver resection
Overall survival after liver resection
1 yr3 yr5 yr
87.8%69.2%53.4%(Japanese registry, n = 27062)[16]
90% 72% 56% (Multi-center study of the HCC East-West Study Group, n = 2046)[5]
Disease free survival after liver resection
67%38%23%(Multi-centrer study of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) East-West Study Group, n = 2046)[5]
90 d mortality rate: 2.7% Morbidity rate: 42% (Multi-central study of the HCC East-West Study Group, n = 2046)[5]
Overall survival of the patients with massive portal vein invasion after liver resection
50.4%25.8%18.4%(Japanese registry, n = 976)[16]
Liver transplantation
Overall survival after liver transplantation
1 yr3 yr5 yr
Within Milan
91%85%79%(72% of 5 yr DFS, UCLA, n = 467)
60.1%(Multi-centrer study of 14 French institutes, n = 479)
Beyond Milan and Within UCSF
88%74%64%(64% of DFS, UCLA, n = 467)
45.6%(Multi-center study of 14 French institutes, n = 479)
Beyond UCSF
71%49%41%(UCLA, n = 467)
34.7%(Multi-central study of 14 French centers, n = 479)
30 d mortality rate: 5.3% Re-transplantation rate: 4.2% (UCLA, n = 467)

There are also promising results involving the use of transarterial radioembolization with radioactive substances such as 131iodine-labeled Lipiodol[14] or microspheres containing yttrium-90[15], which has been shown to be safe and feasible for the treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients[125,126]. This treatment involves the delivery of high-energy and low-penetration radiation to the tumor area. Radioembolization can be safely performed in patients with VTT due to the minimally embolic effect of yttrium-90 microspheres[127]. The reported rate of complete tumor necrosis is 90% for patients with HCC < 3 cm[128], whereas the rate of complete necrosis after TACE varies widely in the literature, from 15% to 70%[129]. However, Y90 is contraindicated in patients with significant hepatopulmonary shunting because it could result in very high levels of pulmonary radiation exposure[130]. This new and promising treatment should be further examined and the 2010 Clinical Practice Guidelines from the AASLD state that radioembolization cannot be recommended as standard therapy for advanced HCC outside of clinical trials.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Abbasoglu O, Chiou YY, Zaniboni A S- Editor: Gou SX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893-2917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10555]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9059]  [Article Influence: 1055.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
2.  Rahbari NN, Mehrabi A, Mollberg NM, Müller SA, Koch M, Büchler MW, Weitz J. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and perspectives for the future. Ann Surg. 2011;253:453-469.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 282]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 160]  [Article Influence: 28.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, Reddy KR. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1752-1763.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 690]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 610]  [Article Influence: 53.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J. Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:61-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 657]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 589]  [Article Influence: 59.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, Takayama T, Capussotti L, Nuzzo G, Vauthey JN, Choti MA, De Santibanes E, Donadon M. A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations?: an observational study of the HCC East-West study group. Ann Surg. 2013;257:929-937.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 283]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140]  [Article Influence: 35.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825-830.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 969]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 357]  [Article Influence: 80.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Nagano H, Miyamoto A, Wada H, Ota H, Marubashi S, Takeda Y, Dono K, Umeshita K, Sakon M, Monden M. Interferon-alpha and 5-fluorouracil combination therapy after palliative hepatic resection in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, portal venous tumor thrombus in the major trunk, and multiple nodules. Cancer. 2007;110:2493-2501.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Cucchetti A, Vitale A, Del Gaudio M, Ravaioli M, Ercolani G, Cescon M, Zanello M, Morelli MC, Cillo U, Grazi GL. Harm and benefits of primary liver resection and salvage transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:619-627.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001;33:1394-1403.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1444]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1247]  [Article Influence: 72.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Fujiki M, Takada Y, Ogura Y, Oike F, Kaido T, Teramukai S, Uemoto S. Significance of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in selection criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2362-2371.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Sarasin FP, Majno PE, Llovet JM, Bruix J, Mentha G, Hadengue A. Living donor liver transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma: A life-expectancy and cost-effectiveness perspective. Hepatology. 2001;33:1073-1079.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 179]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Fuks D, Dokmak S, Paradis V, Diouf M, Durand F, Belghiti J. Benefit of initial resection of hepatocellular carcinoma followed by transplantation in case of recurrence: an intention-to-treat analysis. Hepatology. 2012;55:132-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 173]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 160]  [Article Influence: 19.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Livraghi T, Meloni F, Di Stasi M, Rolle E, Solbiati L, Tinelli C, Rossi S. Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Is resection still the treatment of choice? Hepatology. 2008;47:82-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 705]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 613]  [Article Influence: 54.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Raoul JL, Guyader D, Bretagne JF, Heautot JF, Duvauferrier R, Bourguet P, Bekhechi D, Deugnier YM, Gosselin M. Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1997;26:1156-1161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Ibrahim S, Atassi B, Baker T, Gates V, Miller FH. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using Yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:52-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 650]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 527]  [Article Influence: 59.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Ikai I, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Kojiro M, Takayasu K, Nakanuma Y, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y. Report of the 17th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:676-691.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1032-1038.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 160]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 155]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Kaneko K, Cruz PV, Akazawa K, Hatakeyama K. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1356-1365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Roayaie S, Blume IN, Thung SN, Guido M, Fiel MI, Hiotis S, Labow DM, Llovet JM, Schwartz ME. A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:850-855.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 298]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 274]  [Article Influence: 24.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Hoeper MM, Krowka MJ, Strassburg CP. Portopulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Lancet. 2004;363:1461-1468.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 317]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 18.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Ziser A, Plevak DJ, Wiesner RH, Rakela J, Offord KP, Brown DL. Morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:42-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 247]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 168]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646-649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Mansour A, Watson W, Shayani V, Pickleman J. Abdominal operations in patients with cirrhosis: still a major surgical challenge. Surgery. 1997;122:730-735; discussion 735-736.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 290]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 12.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function: implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation. Ann Surg. 2002;235:373-382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, Takahashi M, Inoue Y, Sano K, Imamura H, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are surgical contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1908-1916.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 435]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 414]  [Article Influence: 33.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Makuuchi M, Sano K. The surgical approach to HCC: our progress and results in Japan. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:S46-S52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Farges O, Malassagne B, Flejou JF, Balzan S, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Risk of major liver resection in patients with underlying chronic liver disease: a reappraisal. Ann Surg. 1999;229:210-215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Belghiti J, Fuks D. Liver resection and transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2012;1:71-82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Belghiti J, Regimbeau JM, Durand F, Kianmanesh AR, Dondero F, Terris B, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Degos F. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience on 328 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:41-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K, Takayama T, Sakamoto Y, Sugawara Y, Kubota K, Zucchi A. No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients: is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach. Arch Surg. 1999;134:984-992.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Wakabayashi H, Ishimura K, Izuishi K, Karasawa Y, Maeta H. Evaluation of liver function for hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver with damaged parenchyma. J Surg Res. 2004;116:248-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Ng IO, Wong J. Hospital mortality of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis. Arch Surg. 1995;130:198-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Lam CM, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong J. Major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with an unsatisfactory indocyanine green clearance test. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1012-1017.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Fan ST. Liver functional reserve estimation: state of the art and relevance for local treatments: the Eastern perspective. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:380-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Belli G, Fantini C, Belli A, Limongelli P. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: long-term outcomes. Dig Surg. 2011;28:134-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Morise Z, Kawabe N, Kawase J, Tomishige H, Nagata H, Ohshima H, Arakawa S, Yoshida R, Isetani M. Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with chronic liver disease. World J Hepatol. 2013;5:487-495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Hsu KY, Chau GY, Lui WY, Tsay SH, King KL, Wu CW. Predicting morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. World J Surg. 2009;33:2412-2419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Delis SG, Bakoyiannis A, Biliatis I, Athanassiou K, Tassopoulos N, Dervenis C. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, as a prognostic factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients, undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:351-357.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunvén P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Ozaki H. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1990;107:521-527.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Yamakado K, Takeda K, Matsumura K, Nakatsuka A, Hirano T, Kato N, Sakuma H, Nakagawa T, Kawarada Y. Regeneration of the un-embolized liver parenchyma following portal vein embolization. J Hepatol. 1997;27:871-880.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Ogata S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Varma D, Sibert A, Vilgrain V. Sequential arterial and portal vein embolizations before right hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1091-1098.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Yoo H, Kim JH, Ko GY, Kim KW, Gwon DI, Lee SG, Hwang S. Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization versus portal vein embolization only before major hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1251-1257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Truant S, Oberlin O, Sergent G, Lebuffe G, Gambiez L, Ernst O, Pruvot FR. Remnant liver volume to body weight ratio & gt; or =0.5%: A new cut-off to estimate postoperative risks after extended resection in noncirrhotic liver. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:22-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Chun YS, Ribero D, Abdalla EK, Madoff DC, Mortenson MM, Wei SH, Vauthey JN. Comparison of two methods of future liver remnant volume measurement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:123-128.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Farges O, Belghiti J, Kianmanesh R, Regimbeau JM, Santoro R, Vilgrain V, Denys A, Sauvanet A. Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy: prospective clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:208-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Ueno S, Kubo F, Sakoda M, Hiwatashi K, Tateno T, Mataki Y, Maemura K, Shinchi H, Natsugoe S, Aikou T. Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:493-500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, Lau WY, Li JQ. Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:36-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Arii S, Tanaka S, Mitsunori Y, Nakamura N, Kudo A, Noguchi N, Irie T. Surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with special reference to anatomical hepatic resection and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Oncology. 2010;78 Suppl 1:125-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:500-507.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, Molmenti EP, Schroeder T, Peitgen HO, Frilling A, Broering DC, Broelsch CE, Malago’ M. Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections: when is it helpful? A single-center experience over an 8-year period. Ann Surg. 2010;252:876-883.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc. 1992;6:97-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Kaneko H, Tsuchiya M, Otsuka Y, Yajima S, Minagawa T, Watanabe M, Tamura A. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:433-438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K, Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW, Primrose JN, Sutcliffe RP. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:295-308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Tsuchiya M, Otsuka Y, Tamura A, Nitta H, Sasaki A, Wakabayashi G, Kaneko H. Status of endoscopic liver surgery in Japan: a questionnaire survey conducted by the Japanese Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:405-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Viganò L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:410-421.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 112]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, Roudie J, Agostini H, Franco D, Dagher I. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1170-1176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:38-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 769]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 283]  [Article Influence: 36.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Lai EC, Fan ST, Lo CM, Chu KM, Liu CL, Wong J. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. An audit of 343 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221:291-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 297]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 285]  [Article Influence: 11.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009;250:772-782.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 261]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 21.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Morise Z, Sugioka A, Kawabe N, Umemoto S, Nagata H, Ohshima H, Kawase J, Arakawa S, Yoshida R. Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with severe liver cirrhosis. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011;4:143-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Cha CH, Ruo L, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Shia J, Blumgart LH, DeMatteo RP. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients otherwise eligible for transplantation. Ann Surg. 2003;238:315-321; discussion 321-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E, Ohkubo T, Hasegawa K, Miyagawa S, Sugawara Y, Minagawa M, Takayama T, Kawasaki S. Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol. 2003;38:200-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Kobayashi M, Peix J, Chiang DY, Camargo A, Gupta S, Moore J, Wrobel MJ, Lerner J. Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1995-2004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 886]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 473]  [Article Influence: 68.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Zhou WP, Lai EC, Li AJ, Fu SY, Zhou JP, Pan ZY, Lau WY, Wu MC. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009;249:195-202.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 9.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Lau WY, Leung TW, Ho SK, Chan M, Machin D, Lau J, Chan AT, Yeo W, Mok TS, Yu SC. Adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labelled lipiodol for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:797-801.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Takayama T, Sekine T, Makuuchi M, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Ohashi Y. Adoptive immunotherapy to lower postsurgical recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356:802-807.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Muto Y, Moriwaki H, Ninomiya M, Adachi S, Saito A, Takasaki KT, Tanaka T, Tsurumi K, Okuno M, Tomita E. Prevention of second primary tumors by an acyclic retinoid, polyprenoic acid, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1561-1567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Breitenstein S, Dimitroulis D, Petrowsky H, Puhan MA, Müllhaupt B, Clavien PA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interferon after curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with viral hepatitis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:975-981.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Shen YC, Hsu C, Chen LT, Cheng CC, Hu FC, Cheng AL. Adjuvant interferon therapy after curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a meta-regression approach. J Hepatol. 2010;52:889-894.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7495]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3684]  [Article Influence: 576.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Lau WY. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:389-399.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Luo YQ, Wang Y, Chen H, Wu MC. Influence of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization on liver resection in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2002;1:523-526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Schwartz JD, Schwartz M, Mandeli J, Sung M. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: review of the randomised clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:593-603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Poon RT, Fan ST, O’Suilleabhain CB, Wong J. Aggressive management of patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma by combined resection and locoregional therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:311-318.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kokudo N. Selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:703-710.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
76.  Asahara T, Itamoto T, Katayama K, Nakahara H, Hino H, Yano M, Ono E, Dohi K, Nakanishi T, Kitamoto M. Hepatic resection with tumor thrombectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombi in the major vasculatures. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:1862-1869.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
77.  Ohkubo T, Yamamoto J, Sugawara Y, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M, Kosuge T. Surgical results for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:657-660.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Lee HS, Kim JS, Choi IJ, Chung JW, Park JH, Kim CY. The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction. A prospective controlled study. Cancer. 1997;79:2087-2094.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
79.  Poon RT, Ng KK, Lam CM, Ai V, Yuen J, Fan ST, Wong J. Learning curve for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: prospective analysis of initial 100 patients in a tertiary institution. Ann Surg. 2004;239:441-449.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 146]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, Montalto F, Ammatuna M, Morabito A, Gennari L. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693-699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4631]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1325]  [Article Influence: 185.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J. Prognosis after hepatic resection for stage IVA hepatocellular carcinoma: a need for reclassification. Ann Surg. 2003;237:376-383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Yamamoto Y, Ozaki N, Sakai Y, Satoh S, Shinkura N, Yamamoto M. Surgical intervention for patients with stage IV-A hepatocellular carcinoma without lymph node metastasis: proposal as a standard therapy. Ann Surg. 1998;227:433-439.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Shi J, Lai EC, Li N, Guo WX, Xue J, Lau WY, Wu MC, Cheng SQ. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2073-2080.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 170]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 158]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Tazawa J, Maeda M, Sakai Y, Yamane M, Ohbayashi H, Kakinuma S, Miyasaka Y, Nagayama K, Enomoto N, Sato C. Radiation therapy in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with extensive portal vein involvement. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:660-665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Ishikura S, Ogino T, Furuse J, Satake M, Baba S, Kawashima M, Nihei K, Ito Y, Maru Y, Ikeda H. Radiotherapy after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:189-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Ohtomo K. Selection criteria for hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus. Ann Surg. 2001;233:379-384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Peng BG, He Q, Li JP, Zhou F. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization improves efficacy of hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus. Am J Surg. 2009;198:313-318.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Sakon M, Nagano H, Dono K, Nakamori S, Umeshita K, Yamada A, Kawata S, Imai Y, Iijima S, Monden M. Combined intraarterial 5-fluorouracil and subcutaneous interferon-alpha therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombi in the major portal branches. Cancer. 2002;94:435-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 147]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 126]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Ota H, Nagano H, Sakon M, Eguchi H, Kondo M, Yamamoto T, Nakamura M, Damdinsuren B, Wada H, Marubashi S. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein thrombosis by combined therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha and intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil; role of type 1 interferon receptor expression. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:557-564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Nagano H, Wada H, Kobayashi S, Marubashi S, Eguchi H, Tanemura M, Tomimaru Y, Osuga K, Umeshita K, Doki Y. Long-term outcome of combined interferon-α and 5-fluorouracil treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein thrombosis. Oncology. 2011;80:63-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Nagano H, Sakon M, Eguchi H, Kondo M, Yamamoto T, Ota H, Nakamura M, Wada H, Damdinsuren B, Marubashi S. Hepatic resection followed by IFN-alpha and 5-FU for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the major portal branch. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:172-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
92.  Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362:1907-1917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
93.  Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208-1236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
94.  Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020-1022.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5422]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4843]  [Article Influence: 542.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Clavien PA, Lesurtel M, Bossuyt PM, Gores GJ, Langer B, Perrier A. Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e11-e22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 600]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 221]  [Article Influence: 60.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
96.  Germani G, Gurusamy K, Garcovich M, Toso C, Fede G, Hemming A, Suh KS, Weber A, Burroughs AK. Which matters most: number of tumors, size of the largest tumor, or total tumor volume? Liver Transpl. 2011;17 Suppl 2:S58-S66.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Mazzaferro V, Bhoori S, Sposito C, Bongini M, Langer M, Miceli R, Mariani L. Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience. Liver Transpl. 2011;17 Suppl 2:S44-S57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 320]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 282]  [Article Influence: 35.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Bacchetti P, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the proposed UCSF criteria with the Milan criteria and the Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:765-774.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
99.  Leung JY, Zhu AX, Gordon FD, Pratt DS, Mithoefer A, Garrigan K, Terella A, Hertl M, Cosimi AB, Chung RT. Liver transplantation outcomes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicenter study. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1343-1354.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
100.  Patel SS, Arrington AK, McKenzie S, Mailey B, Ding M, Lee W, Artinyan A, Nissen N, Colquhoun SD, Kim J. Milan Criteria and UCSF Criteria: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Liver Transplantation Outcomes in the United States. Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:253517.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Decaens T, Roudot-Thoraval F, Hadni-Bresson S, Meyer C, Gugenheim J, Durand F, Bernard PH, Boillot O, Sulpice L, Calmus Y. Impact of UCSF criteria according to pre- and post-OLT tumor features: analysis of 479 patients listed for HCC with a short waiting time. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1761-1769.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 140]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Duffy JP, Vardanian A, Benjamin E, Watson M, Farmer DG, Ghobrial RM, Lipshutz G, Yersiz H, Lu DS, Lassman C. Liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma should be expanded: a 22-year experience with 467 patients at UCLA. Ann Surg. 2007;246:502-509; discussion 509-511.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 331]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 23.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
103.  Yao FY, Xiao L, Bass NM, Kerlan R, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2587-2596.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 348]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 303]  [Article Influence: 24.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Strong RW. Whither living donor liver transplantation? Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5:536-538.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
105.  Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999;30:1434-1440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1259]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1099]  [Article Influence: 57.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, Davern TJ, Kerlan R, Wu V, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:873-883.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 291]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 269]  [Article Influence: 16.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
107.  Toso C, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Majno P, Berney T, Kneteman NM, Perneger T, Morel P, Mentha G, Combescure C. A model for dropout assessment of candidates with or without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list. Hepatology. 2012;56:149-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
108.  Vitale A, Morales RR, Zanus G, Farinati F, Burra P, Angeli P, Frigo AC, Del Poggio P, Rapaccini G, Di Nolfo MA. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and transplant survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:654-662.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
109.  Avolio AW, Cillo U, Salizzoni M, De Carlis L, Colledan M, Gerunda GE, Mazzaferro V, Tisone G, Romagnoli R, Caccamo L. Balancing donor and recipient risk factors in liver transplantation: the value of D-MELD with particular reference to HCV recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2724-2736.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
110.  Vitale A, D’Amico F, Frigo AC, Grigoletto F, Brolese A, Zanus G, Neri D, Carraro A, D’Amico FE, Burra P. Response to therapy as a criterion for awarding priority to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2290-2302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
111.  Avolio AW, Siciliano M, Barbarino R, Nure E, Annicchiarico BE, Gasbarrini A, Agnes S, Castagneto M. Donor risk index and organ patient index as predictors of graft survival after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:1899-1902.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
112.  Wiesner RH, Freeman RB, Mulligan DC. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: the impact of the MELD allocation policy. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S261-S267.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 208]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 166]  [Article Influence: 12.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
113.  Roayaie K, Feng S. Allocation policy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the MELD era: room for improvement? Liver Transpl. 2007;13:S36-S43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
114.  Freeman RB, Edwards EB, Harper AM. Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver diseases. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1416-1421.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
115.  European Association for The Study of The Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908-943.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
116.  Pompili M, Mirante VG, Rondinara G, Fassati LR, Piscaglia F, Agnes S, Covino M, Ravaioli M, Fagiuoli S, Gasbarrini G. Percutaneous ablation procedures in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma submitted to liver transplantation: Assessment of efficacy at explant analysis and of safety for tumor recurrence. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1117-1126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
117.  Pompili M, Francica G, Ponziani FR, Iezzi R, Avolio AW. Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7515-7530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
118.  Belghiti J, Cortes A, Abdalla EK, Régimbeau JM, Prakash K, Durand F, Sommacale D, Dondero F, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A. Resection prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:885-892; discussion 892-893.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
119.  Cherqui D, Laurent A, Mocellin N, Tayar C, Luciani A, Van Nhieu JT, Decaens T, Hurtova M, Memeo R, Mallat A. Liver resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term survival and role of secondary liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:738-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 193]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 16.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
120.  Del Gaudio M, Ercolani G, Ravaioli M, Cescon M, Lauro A, Vivarelli M, Zanello M, Cucchetti A, Vetrone G, Tuci F. Liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis after liver resection: University of Bologna experience. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1177-1185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
121.  Majno PE, Sarasin FP, Mentha G, Hadengue A. Primary liver resection and salvage transplantation or primary liver transplantation in patients with single, small hepatocellular carcinoma and preserved liver function: an outcome-oriented decision analysis. Hepatology. 2000;31:899-906.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
122.  Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, Franchini C, Pina CD, Lera J, Bartolozzi C. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2005;234:961-967.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 608]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 505]  [Article Influence: 38.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
123.  Lu MD, Xu HX, Xie XY, Yin XY, Chen JW, Kuang M, Xu ZF, Liu GJ, Zheng YL. Percutaneous microwave and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1054-1060.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 160]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 138]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
124.  Boutros C, Somasundar P, Garrean S, Saied A, Espat NJ. Microwave coagulation therapy for hepatic tumors: review of the literature and critical analysis. Surg Oncol. 2010;19:e22-e32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
125.  Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R, Golfieri R, Gasparini D, Ezziddin S, Paprottka PM, Fiore F, Van Buskirk M, Bilbao JI. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology. 2011;54:868-878.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 401]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 337]  [Article Influence: 40.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
126.  Vente MA, Wondergem M, van der Tweel I, van den Bosch MA, Zonnenberg BA, Lam MG, van Het Schip AD, Nijsen JF. Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:951-959.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
127.  Kulik LM, Carr BI, Mulcahy MF, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Benson A, Nemcek AA, Gates VL. Safety and efficacy of 90Y radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology. 2008;47:71-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 401]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 334]  [Article Influence: 30.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
128.  Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Ryu RK, Giakoumis Spear G, Mulcahy MF, Abecassis M, Baker T, Gates V, Nayar R. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology. 2009;49:1185-1193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 185]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 15.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
129.  Gerunda GE, Neri D, Merenda R, Barbazza F, Zangrandi F, Meduri F, Bisello M, Valmasoni M, Gangemi A, Faccioli AM. Role of transarterial chemoembolization before liver resection for hepatocarcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2000;6:619-626.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
130.  El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma: recent trends in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S27-S34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]