Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2014; 20(35): 12431-12444
Published online Sep 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12431
Occupational exposures and colorectal cancers: A quantitative overview of epidemiological evidence
Enrico Oddone, Carlo Modonesi, Gemma Gatta
Enrico Oddone, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Carlo Modonesi, Department of Biosciences, Natural History Museum, University of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy
Gemma Gatta, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Evaluative Epidemiology Unit , Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
Author contributions: Oddone E, Modonesi C and Gatta G contributed equally to this work; Oddone E, Modonesi C and Gatta G designed the research; Oddone E, Modonesi C and Gatta G performed the research; Oddone E, Modonesi C and Gatta G analyzed the data; Oddone E, Modonesi C and Gatta G wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Enrico Oddone, Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Medicine Unit, University of Pavia, Via Severino Boezio 24, 27100 Pavia, Italy. enrico.oddone@unipv.it
Telephone: +39-382-592838 Fax: +39-382-593796
Received: January 27, 2014
Revised: March 21, 2014
Accepted: May 29, 2014
Published online: September 21, 2014

Abstract

A traditional belief widespread across the biomedical community was that dietary habits and genetic predisposition were the basic factors causing colorectal cancer. In more recent times, however, a growing evidence has shown that other determinants can be very important in increasing (or reducing) incidence of this malignancy. The hypothesis that environmental and occupational risk factors are associated with colorectal cancer is gaining ground, and high risks of colorectal cancer have been reported among workers in some industrial branches. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiologic relationship between colorectal cancer and occupational exposures to several industrial activities, by means of a scientific literature review and meta-analysis. This work pointed out increased risks of colorectal cancer for labourers occupied in industries with a wide use of chemical compounds, such as leather (RR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.24-2.34), basic metals (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.07-1.65), plastic and rubber manufacturing (RR = 1.30, 95%CI: 0.98-1.71 and RR = 1.27, 95%CI: 0.92-1.76, respectively), besides workers in the sector of repair and installation of machinery exposed to asbestos (RR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.07-1.84). Based on our results, the estimated crude excess risk fraction attributable to occupational exposure ranged from about 11% to about 15%. However, homogeneous pattern of association between colorectal cancer and industrial branches did not emerge from this review.

Key Words: Colorectal cancer, Occupational exposures, Public health, Chemical compounds, Basic metals, Meta analysis

Core tip: The hypothesis that occupational risk factors are associated with colorectal cancer is gaining ground, and high risks of colorectal cancer have been reported among workers in some industrial branches. This study investigated the epidemiologic relationship between colorectal cancer and exposures in several industrial activities, by means of a literature review and meta-analysis. Results pointed out increased risks of colorectal cancer for labourers exposed to chemical compounds, besides workers in the sector of machinery installation exposed to asbestos. Based on our results, the estimated crude excess risk fraction attributable to occupational exposure ranged from about 11% to about 15%.



INTRODUCTION

In the world about 1234000 new colorectal cancer diagnoses were estimated in 2008[1], less than 60% of them are from developed countries. From 15% to 25% of colorectal cancer deaths can be prevented by screening using fecal occult blood test[2]. Colon cancer most commonly occurs sporadically and is estimated to be inherited in 5%-15% of cases[3-5].

Thus far, several risk factors are evaluated to be related to sporadic forms of colorectal cancer. Diet is definitely the most important exogenous factor identified up to now in the etiology of colorectal cancer. It has been estimated that 70% of colorectal cancers could be prevented by nutritional intervention[3]. Physical activity has consistently been associated with decreased risk of colon cancer in studies that have concentrated on occupational activity, leisure activity and total activity[6]. Furthermore, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption[6] and family history[7-9], showed to increase risks of this malignancy. Approximately 20% of the large bowel cancers in men appear to be attributable to smoking[10] and individuals consuming the most alcohol had 60% greater risk of colorectal cancer compared with non- or light drinkers[11]. Moreover, disparities in the incidence of colorectal cancer by economic status and other socio-ecological parameters have been described[12,13].

As above mentioned, a minor fraction of colorectal tumors shows inherited patterns, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). FAP is thought to be the effect of a deletion in tumor suppressor genes (adenomatous polyposis coli or APC genes), leading in most cases to a drastically altered protein[14]. HNPCC appeared to be linked to mutated MLH1 and MLH2 genes, that are involved in DNA repair processes[4]. However, these inherited DNA mutations frequently did not seem to represent a sufficient condition to develop a cancer because other mutations or carcinogenic events must occur to produce malignant phenotypes[15].

Evidence also showed that risk and protective factors[16-19] are differently associated with proximal and distal colon and with gender[20].

Although colorectal cancer, as other tumors[21,22] or chronic degenerative diseases[23], is not commonly considered to be occupational in etiology, elevated risks have been reported among workers in some industrial branches such as the textile industry[24,25], automobile industry[26-28], beverage industry[29] as well as in subjects exposed to asbestos[30-33], dioxin[34], wood dust[35], organic solvents[36-38] and metal-working fluids[39].

Iron and steel workers experienced higher relative risk (RR) for colorectal cancers[40-43]. These labourers could be exposed to mineral dusts and several chemical compounds. Some evidence are available on the possible relationship between exposure to oil mist and colorectal[44] and rectal cancer[45] and solvents and colon cancer[46]. A strongly increased mortality for colon cancer was observed among copper smelters[41] and steel foundry workers employed for at least 5 years in non-oven unit[40].

Dockyard workers experienced an higher mortality for colon cancer compared to general population[47,48]. This working category was likely exposed to many carcinogenic agents (e.g., asbestos, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines, welding smokes, etc.). Exposure to asbestos could account for a fraction of this risk, since several evidences are piling up on this issue[33,49-53].

Also fur production workers are exposed to a wide variety of chemical compounds, considered to be carcinogenic (formaldehyde, para-phenylenediamine or others dyes and pigments) in tanning, cleaning and dyeing fur, as well as to fur dust[54]. Tannery workers are also exposed to tanning and dyeing chemical agents, including chromium[55].

Sparse evidence of increased risk for colorectal cancers is available for workers in furniture industry[56], meat workers[57-59], workers exposed to hydrazine (contained in rocket fuels) in an aerospace industry plant[60], workers occupied in production of lens and metal spectacle frames (due to exposures to abrasives or cutting oil mists or both, possibly by ingestion)[44] and printing machine operators[61].

Rodu et al[62] observed an higher mortality for rectal cancer in workers of a petrochemical research facility, while plastic and rubber production industries showed only statistically borderline results. Workers occupied in these industrial branches were likely exposed to several chemical compounds in manufacturing of methilmetacrylate, polyurethane foam, resins and polypropylene[63-76]. Thus, these results strongly suggest a role for chemical compounds exposures, as a whole, in increasing the risk of colorectal cancers.

Results from manufacture of beverages relied on data on brewery workers[77,78] with a personal high beer intake. Thus, this observed most likely could not be referred to an occupational exposure in a narrow sense.

Despite this evidence entailing a role of occupational and environmental exposures in colorectal cancer onset, reduction in risk was observed in crop and animal production[79,80] and in some mining and quarrying activities. Agriculture, mining and quarrying are not sedentary occupations, therefore this physical activity could account for this lower risk. Moreover, farmers often have a lower prevalence of smoking compared to general population average[79] and when results are provided by cohort studies an “healthy worker” effect could be present. In spite of this, some sparse evidence of increased risk in workers exposed to pesticide or herbicide is provided by studies focused on specific compounds, such as Dicamba[81], Imazethapyr[82], Chlorpyrifos[83] or Toxaphene[83].

Thus, a detailed exploration of the relationship between occupational exposure and colorectal cancer could improve the rational base to plan measures for risk prevention and public health protection, not to say that the interruption of hazardous exposures seemed also to have a positive impact on prognosis of cancer patients[84].

To our knowledge, no comprehensive review and meta-analysis studies were carried out to date on this specific topic.

The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiologic relationship between colorectal cancer and occupational exposures in several industrial branches, by means of a scientific literature review and meta-analysis.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search for all manuscripts published up to June 2013 was performed by the authors. Queried databases were PUBMED (June 2013-form 1960) and EMBASE (June 2013-form 1960).

The search strategy included terms (free text or MeSH terms) for occupational exposures, both stated as industrial branch (e.g., textile industry) and single chemical compound (e.g., asbestos), and colon cancer, rectal cancer or colorectal cancer. Moreover, the search on PUBMED database was carried out using specific search string for the study of putative occupational determinants of diseases[85].

Authors also checked the literature cited and listed in the selected studies’ references and included any that met the criteria of this study. Manuscripts were reviewed and initially selected on the basis of title and abstract.

Prospective, case-control and meta-analysis studies were eligible for this study and article had to report at least one risk or mortality estimate to be included in quantitative analysis, [standardized mortality ratio; standardised incidence ratio; hazard ratio; RR; odds ratio (OR)] and a precision estimate (95%CI) relating exposure to an industrial branch to colon, rectal, or colorectal cancer or enough data to calculate them. Articles reporting only exposure to a single chemical compound not related to a specific job task or industrial branch were not included in the quantitative analysis. When available, fully adjusted estimates were included and analyzed. Any industrial branch exposure was taken into consideration when the same article provided more than one. Moreover, industrial branches were reclassified by the authors, using the description of productive activities within the papers, according to the United Nation International Standard Industrial Classification of all economic activities Rev. 4 (ISIC rev. 4).

Data from duplicated publications or by the same authors in the same cohorts were removed and only one estimate was retained in the analysis, using the highest adjustment and largest sample size.

Data from cohort and non-cohort studies were also separately analyzed. Pooled estimates were computed when the number of studies permitted. The within-study pooled estimate of subgroups was included in the analysis when a study provided only separate risks subgroups of workers (e.g., according to sex or job tasks or cancer site).

Studies that showed disaggregated estimates for gender allowed to calculate also pooled RR for colorectal, colon and rectal cancer separately in male and female.

Presence of heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. Pooled risks were calculated applying a random-effect model to compensate for potential between-study heterogeneity[86].

Given that positive studies are more likely to be published than negative ones (i.e., publication bias) and the interpretation of funnel plots could be subjective and misleading[87,88], the Duval and Tweedie[89] non parametric trim-and-fill procedure was used to address the publication bias issue. This statistical method assumes that the effect sizes of all the studies distribute normally around the center of a funnel plot, if asymmetry is found, it adjusts for the potential effect of non-published (imputed) studies. All statistical analysis were carried out using STATA/SE 11 (Stata College Statin, TX, United States) software.

RESULTS OF CASE-CONTROL AND META-ANALYSIS STUDIES

A total amount of 83 papers, from 1976 to 2012, were selected and included in the review and meta-analysis. These articles provided for 141 different risk estimates, 60 (42.6%) for colorectal cancer, 57 (40.4%) for colon cancer and 24 (17.0%) for rectal cancer. Cohort study was the most frequent used study design (68, 81.9%), while the 12 case-control studies accounted for a lower percentage (14.5%). Crop and livestock farming (ISIC code 01) were the most represented occupational branches (12 studies, 15%), followed by exposures in chemical (ISIC code 20) and rubber and plastic (ISIC code 22) industries (11, 13.8%, and 6, 7.5%, studies, respectively). Also workers exposed in glass, ceramic or cement productions (ISIC code 23) were extensively studied (8 papers, 10.0%), as well as public administration personnel (6 studies, 7.5%). Details were shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Articles included in the literature review and meta-analysis, by cancer site, International Standard Industrial Classification code and exposure features.
AuthorsCancer siteISICExposureArticle typeEstimate
Cantor et al[94]Colorectal01 - Crop and animal productionAerial pesticide applicatorsCohortRR
Greenburg et al[95]Pesticides applicatorsCohortRR
Lee et al[83]FarmingCohortRR
Lo et al[90]PesticidesCase-ControlOR
Lynch et al[96]Pesticides applicatorsCohortRR
Wiklund and Dich[97]AgricultureCohortSIR
Mikoczy and Rylander[98]03 - Fishing and aquacultureFishermenCohortSIR
Finkelstein[99]08 - Other mining and quarryingDustMeta-analysisSMR
Kusiak[100]MinersCohortSMR
Gubéran et al[57]10 - Manufacture of food productsButchersCohortSMR
Fritschi et al[58]Meat WorkersCohortSMR
McLean et al[59]Meat WorkersCohortSMR
Carstensen et al[77]11 - Manufacture of beveragesBrevery workersCohortRR
Thygesen et al[78]Brevery workersCohortSIR
Goldberg and Thériault G[101]13 - Manufacture of textileSynthetic textilesCohortSMR
Mastrangelo et al[24]TextileMeta-analysisRR
Vobecky et al[102]Carpet productionCohortSMR
Guay and Siemiatycki[54]15 - Manufacture of leather and related productsFur industryCohortSMR
Montanaro et al[55]Tannery workersCohortSMR
Sweeney et al[103]Fur industryCohortSMR
Roscoe et al[104]16 - Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and corkAutomotive wood modelistsCohortSMR
Swanson et al[26]Automobile industryCohortSMR
Rodu et al[62]19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum productsPetroleumCohortSMR
Acquavella et al[70]20 - Manufacture of chemicals and chemical productsAlachlor (herbicide)CohortSIR
Berger and Manz[64]Coke gasCohortSMR
Fraser et al[65]Fertilisers manufacturingCohortSMR
Leet et al[66]Alachlor (herbicide)CohortSMR
Schnorr et al[67]Polyurethane foamCohortSMR
Tomenson et al[68]Methil-methacrylateCohortRR
Walker et al[69]Methil-methacrylateCohortSMR
Acquavella et al[63]22 - Manufacture of rubber and plastics productsPolypropylene manufacturingCohortSIR
Cowles et al[71]Plastic and resinsCohortSMR
Kaleja et al[72]Polypropylene productionCohortSIR
Lagast et al[73]Polypropylene productionMeta-analysisRR
Lewis et al[74]Polypropylene productionCohortSIR
Sathiakumar et al[75]Rubber industryCohortSMR
McMichael et al[76]Rubber industryCohortSMR
Albin et al[106]23 - Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral productsAsbestos cement workersCohortRR
Jakobsson et al107]Cement workersCohortSMR
Seidman et al[108]AsbestosCohortSMR
Smailyte et al[52]Cement workersCohortSMR
Wingren[109]Glass WorkersCohortSIR
Zhang et al[110]Ceramic factoriesCohortSMR
Jackobsson et al[43]24 - Manufacture of basic metalsStainless steel workersCohortSIR
Redmond et al[40]Steel workersCohortSMR
Xu et al[42]Iron and steel workersCohortSMR
Wang et al[44]26 - Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical productsOptical industryCase-ControlOR
Ritz et al[60]28 - Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.cAerospace workersCohortRR
Delzell et al[111]29 - Manufacture of motor vehiclesMotor vehicle manufacturingCohortSMR
Innos et al[56]31 - Manufacture of furnitureWood dustCohortSIR
Puntoni et al[48]33 - Repair and installation of machinery and equipmentShipyardCohortRR
Puntoni et al[47]ShipyardCohortSMR
Nasterlack et al[112]37 - SewerageWastewater treatmentCohortSIR
Reynolds and Austin[113]72 - Scientific research and developmentPhysics laboratory workersCohortSIR
Ahn et al[114]84 - Public administration and defenceEmergency respondersCohortSIR
Demers et al[115]FirefightersCohortSIR
Strand et al[116]Asbestos (Military - Navy)CohortSIR
Yamane[117]United States Air Force workersCohortSIR
Czene et al[118]96 - Other personal service activitiesHairdressersCohortSIR
Brownson et al[61]Colon01 - Crop and animal productionAgricultureCase-controlOR
Cantor et al[94]Aerial pesticide applicatorsCohortSMR
Fredriksson et al[119]FarmersCase-ControlOR
Freedman et al[120]Farmer sCase-ControlOR
Koutros et al[82]Aromatic amine pesticideCohortRR
Rusiecki et al[121]PesticidesCohortRR
Wiklund and Dich[97]AgricultureCohortSIR
Fredriksson et al[119]02 - Forestry and loggingGardenersCase-ControlOR
Mikoczy and Rylander[98]03 - Fishing and aquacultureFishermenCohortSIR
Brownson et al[61]05 - Mining of coal and ligniteCoal MiningCase-ControlOR
Tomaskova et al[122]Black coal minersCohortSMR
Brownson et al[61]07 - Mining of metal oresMetal miningCase-controlOR
Gómez et al[123]Mercury minersCohortSMR
Brownson et al[61]08 - Other mining and quarryingMetal miningCase-controlOR
Fredriksson et al[119]MinersCase-ControlOR
Brownson et al[61]10 - Manufacture of food productsFood industryCase-controlOR
Johnson et al[124]Food industryCase-ControlOR
Carstensen et al[77]11 - Manufacture of beveragesBrevery workersCohortRR
Thygesen et al[78]Brevery workersCohortSIR
Fredriksson et al[119]14 - Manufacture of wearing apparelDressmakers and needle workersCase-ControlOR
Brownson et al[61]15 - Manufacture of leather and related productsLeather productionCase-controlOR
Montanaro et al[55]Tannery workersCohortSMR
Fredriksson et al[119]16 - Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and corkLumberers and sawmill workersCase-ControlOR
Roscoe et al[104]Automotive wood modelCohortSMR
Simpson et al[125]Wood dustCase-ControlOR
Swanson et al[26]Automobile industryCohortSMR
Fredriksson et al[119]17 - Manufacture of paper and paper productsPaper and pulp workersCase-ControlOR
Brownson et al[61]18 - Printing and reproduction of recorded mediaPrintingCase-controlOR
Brownson et al[61]19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum productsPetroleumCase-controlOR
Brownson et al[61]20 - Manufacture of chemicals and chemical productsChemical workersCase-controlOR
Collins et al[126]Methil-methacrylateCohortSMR
Fraser et al[65]Fertilisers manufacturingCohortSMR
Fredriksson et al[119]Chemical workersCase-ControlOR
Schnorr et al[67]Polyurethane foam industryCohortSMR
Walker et al[69]Methil-methacrylateCohortSMR
Harrington and Goldblatt[105]21 - Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparationsPharmaceutical industryCohortSMR
McMichael et al[76]22 - Manufacture of rubber and plastics productRubber industryCohortSMR
Straif et al[127]Rubber industryCohortSMR
Smailyte et al[52]23 - Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral productsCement workersCohortSIR
Jakobsson et al[107]24 - Manufacture of basic metalsStainless steel workersCohortSIR
Redmond et al[40]Steel workersCohortSMR
Tokudome and Kuratsune[41]Metal refineryCohortSMR
Brownson et al[61]25 - Manufacture of fabricated metal productsMetal manufacturingCase-controlOR
Fredriksson et al[119]Metal workersCase-ControlOR
Fredriksson et al[119]31 - Manufacture of furnitureCabinet makersCase-ControlOR
Innos et al[56]Wood dustCohortSIR
Fredriksson et al[119]33 - Repair and installation of machinery and equipmentMechanicsCase-ControlOR
Puntoni et al[48]ShipyardCohortSMR
Puntoni et al[47]ShipyardCohortSMR
Fredriksson et al[119]49 - Land transport and transport via pipelinesRail and road workersCase-ControlOR
Reynolds and Austin[113]72 - Scientific research and developmentPhysics laboratory workersCohortSIR
Fredriksson et al[119]81 - Services to buildings and landscape activitiesCleanersCase-ControlOR
Baris et al[128]84 - Public administration and defenceFirefightersCohortSMR
Brownson et al[61]National securityCase-controlOR
Youakim[129]FirefightersCohortRR
Fredriksson et al[119]86 - Human health activitiesNursesCase-ControlOR
Fredriksson et al[119]96 - Other personal service activitiesDry Cleaners and hairdresserCase-ControlOR
Cantor et al[94]Rectum01 - Crop and animal productionAerial pesticide applicatorsCohortRR
Settimi et al[130]AgricultureCase-ControlOR
Wiklund and Dich[97]AgricultureCohortSIR
Mikoczy and Rylander[98]03 - Fishing and aquacultureFishermenCohortSIR
Carstensen et al[77]11 - Manufacture of beveragesBrevery workersCohortRR
Thygesen et al[78]Brevery workersCohortSIR
Montanaro et al[55]15 - Manufacture of leather and related productsTannery workersCohortSMR
Roscoe et al[104]16 - Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and corkAutomotive wood modelCohortSMR
Rodu et al[62]19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum productsPetroleum industryCohortSMR
Fraser et al[65]20 - Manufacture of chemicals and chemical productsFertilisers manufacturingCohortSMR
Manuwald et al[131]Dioxine compoundsCohortSMR
Schnorr et al[67]Polyurethane foam industryCohortSMR
Walker et al[69]Methil-methacrylateCohortSMR
McMichael et al[76]22 - Manufacture of rubber and plastics productRubber industryCohortSMR
Smailyte et al[52]23 - Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral productsCement workersCohortSIR
Jakobsson et al[107]24 - Manufacture of basic metalsStainless steel workersCohortSIR
Langård et al[132]Ferrochromium/siliconCohortSMR
Redmond et al[40]Steel workersCohortSMR
Malloy et al[133]29 - Manufacture of motor vehiclesMetalworking fluidsCohortRR
Innos et al[56]31 - Manufacture of furnitureWood dustCohortSIR
Puntoni et al[48]33 - Repair and installation of machinery and equipmentShipyardCohortSMR
Puntoni et al[47]ShipyardCohortSMR
Reynolds and Austin[113]72 - Scientific research and developmentPhysics laboratory workersCohortSIR

Table 2 shows results of meta-analytic studies for colorectal cancer. Overall estimate underlined a slight and statistically significant increased risk, also when trim and fill adjusted result was considered. The increase in risk ranged from 12% to 19%. Taking into account only results for cohort studies, estimates were similar to overall ones and no statistical adjustment for publication bias was required. The effect size of the adjusted pooled RR carried out on non-cohort studies was close to adjusted overall results, although not statistically significant.

Table 2 Pooled estimates for colorectal cancer, by industrial branch and study design.
ISICIndustrial branchCohort studiesOther study design2All
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3
1Crop and animal production0.86-2.6-0.86-
(0.81-0.91)(1.12-6.02)(0.76-0.97)
3Fishing and aquaculture10.98---0.98-
(0.70-1.10)(0.87-1.10)
8Other mining and quarrying0.8-0.84-0.83-
(0.70-0.92)(0.77-0.92)(0.77-0.89)
10Manufacture of food products1.21---1.21-
(0.76-1.92)(0.76-1.92)
11Manufacture of beverages1.29---1.29-
(1.19-1.40)(1.19-1.40)
13Manufacture of textile2.820.731.34-2-
(0.19-41.78)(0.07-7.96)(1.12-1.61)(0.83-4.86)
15Manufacture of leather and related products1.7---1.7-
(1.24-2.34)(1.24-2.34)
16Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork1.65---1.65-
(0.60-4.58)(0.60-4.58)
19Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products11.21---1.21-
(0.69-2.12)(0.69-2.12)
20Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products1.27---1.27-
(0.92-1.76)(0.92-1.76)
22Manufacture of rubber and plastics products1.3-1.37-1.3-
(0.94-1.79)(0.86-2.18)(0.98-1.71)
23Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products1.25---1.25-
(0.85-1.85)(0.85-1.85)
24Manufacture of basic metals1.32---1.32-
(1.07-1.65)(1.07-1.65)
26Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products1--2.14-2.14-
(1.02-4.50)(1.02-4.50)
28Manufacture of machinery and equipment nec12.2---2.2-
(1.03-4.72)(1.03-4.72)
29Manufacture of motor vehicles11.27---1.27-
(0.89-1.82)(0.89-1.82)
31Manufacture of furniture11.5---1.5-
(1.21-1.87)(1.21-1.87)
33Repair and installation of machinery and equipment1.4---1.4-
(1.07-1.84)(1.07-1.84)
37Sewerage11.14---1.14-
(0.47-2.77)(0.47-2.77)
72Scientific research and development11.18---1.18-
(0.77-1.82)(0.77-1.82)
84Public administration and defence0.970.87--0.970.87
(0.62-1.52)(0.58-1.30)(0.62-1.52)(0.58-1.30)
96Other personal service activities11.09---1.09-
(0.98-1.21)(0.98-1.21)
-All industrial branches combined1.181.181.361.131.191.12
(1.08-1.30)(1.08-1.30)(0.94-1.97)(0.81-1.57)(1.09-1.33)(1.03-1.23)
Heterogeneity (I2)84.1%87.9%84.3%

Taking into account results for specific industrial branches, tannery and fur industry workers (ISIC code 15) showed to have a significant increased risk (RR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.24-2.34), while results for iron and steel workers (ISIC code 24) showed increased adjusted RR of about 30% (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.07-1.65).

Manufacture of furniture (ISIC code 31), manufacture of machinery (ISIC code 28), manufacture of electronic products (ISIC code 26) and food (ISIC code 10) industries also showed significant increased RR ranging from 1.50 to 2.14, although estimates were only based on one study each.

Results underlined a pooled RR of colorectal cancer of 1.29 for brewery workers (ISIC code 11), but it seems probably due to an high personal alcohol intake more than an occupational exposure. Moreover, pooled RR for colorectal cancer was increased and statistically significant for workers occupied in repair and installation of machinery (ISIC code 33, RR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.07-1.84): this interesting results was entirely driven from two cohort studies on Italian shipyard labourers, exposed to asbestos.

Results showed also an increased risk (RR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.12-1.61) in textile industry (ISIC code 13), mainly based on estimates of a meta-analytic study[24], while no increase in risk was observed in the adjusted cohort studies estimate. Thus, the overall result was not statistically significant, despite a two-fold increased RR.

Results of borderline significance were observed for chemical (ISIC code 20) and rubber and plastic (ISIC code 22) industries, while some mining and quarrying (ISIC code 08) and agricultural (ISIC code 01) occupations showed significant risk deficits. Moreover, the latter productive branch showed a statistically increase risk for colorectal cancer in only one case-control study on pesticide applicators[90].

Table 3 shows results of meta-analytic studies for colon cancer. Overall RR showed an increase in risk (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.05-1.23) similar to adjusted colorectal cancer one.

Table 3 Pooled estimates for colon cancer, by industrial branch and study design.
ISICIndustrial branchCohort studiesOther study design2All
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3
1Crop and animal production1-0.98-0.96-
(0.66-1.52)(0.85-1.13)(0.84-1.10)
2Forestry and logging1--1.48-1.48-
(0.28-7.92)(0.28-7.92)
3Fishing and aquaculture10.93---0.93-
(0.79-1.09)(0.79-1.09)
5Mining of coal and lignite0.9-1.1-0.920.9
(0.68-1.20)(0.42-2.91)(0.69-1.21)(0.69-1.17)
7Mining of metals0.19-1.5-0.57-
(0.05-0.71)(0.65-3.64)(0.08-4.30)
8Other mining and quarrying1--0.91-0.91-
(0.45-1.83)(0.45-1.83)
10Manufacture of food products1.06-1.32-1.28-
(0.44-2.57)(0.93-1.87)(0.98-1.70)
11Manufacture of beverages1.25---1.25-
(1.12-1.40)(1.12-1.40)
14Manufacture of wearing apparel1--0.66-0.66-
(0.20-2.20)(0.20-2.20)
15Manufacture of leather and related products1.66-1.3-1.491.49
(0.85-3.24)(0.61-2.76)(0.90-2.46)(0.90-2.46)
16Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork2.191.20.53-0.960.96
(0.56-8.52)(0.35-4.16)(0.37-0.78)(0.46-1.97)(0.46-1.97)
17Manufacture of paper and paper products1--0.66-0.66-
(0.17-2.61)(0.17-2.61)
18Printing and reproduction of recorded media1--1.8-1.8-
(1.20-2.70)(1.20-2.70)
19Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products1--1.3-1.3-
(0.51-3.29)(0.51-3.29)
20Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products1.2-1.07-1.18-
(0.99-1.45)(0.68-1.71)(0.99-1.40)
21Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations11.22---1.22-
(0.58-2.24)(0.58-2.24)
22Manufacture of rubber and plastics products1.31-1.16-1.191.16
(0.88-1.95)(0.95-1.41)(1.00-1.42)(0.99-1.36)
23Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products10.77---0.77-
(0.29-2.06)(0.29-2.06)
24Manufacture of basic metals1.751.61--1.751.61
(1.16-2.65)(1.09-2.38)(1.16-2.65)(1.09-2.38)
25Manufacture of fabricated metal products--0.83-0.83-
(0.55-1.24)(0.55-1.24)
31Manufacture of furniture1.65-0.8-1.4-
(1.24-2.20)(0.27-2.36)(0.77-2.54)
33Repair and installation of machinery and equipment1.911.810.99-1.75-
(1.39-2.62)(1.39-2.37)(0.43-2.29)(1.27-2.41)
49Land transport1--2.39-2.39-
(0.83-6.92)(0.83-6.92)
72Scientific research and development11.23---1.23-
(0.72-2.11)(0.72-2.11)
84Public administration and defence1.32-0.9-1.19-
(0.85-2.05)(0.59-1.38)(0.85-1.67)
86Human health activities1--1-1-
(0.49-2.05)(0.49-2.05)
96Other personal service activities1--1.37-1.37-
(0.51-3.72)(0.51-3.72)
-All industrial branches combined1.231.231.031.031.131.13
(1.09-1.39)(1.09-1.39)(0.92-1.15)(0.92-1.15)(1.05-1.22)(1.05-1.22)
Heterogeneity (I2)70.5%42.3%61.4%

An increased and statistically significant risk for colon cancer was observed in beverage production industry (brewery workers), steel and metal workers, and in repair and installation of machinery labourers. These results are consistent with those of colorectal cancer (Table 2).

Moreover, this analysis showed borderline results for chemical and rubber and plastic industries, also consistent with those reported in Table 2.

In addition, results showed a RR = 1.80 (95%CI: 1.20-2.70), statistically significant, for colon cancer in workers exposed in printing industry (ISIC code 18), although only based on a single case-control study.

Excluding manufacture of wood and cork industries (ISIC code 16) and metal mining (ISIC code 07), no significant risk deficits for colon cancer were observed. These decreased risks were observed only in non-cohort and cohort studies, respectively.

Table 4 shows results of meta-analytic studies for rectal cancer. Increased RR was observed in overall analysis, although the 95%CI includes the 1 value. This result is consistent with those of colon and colorectal cancer analyses.

Table 4 Pooled estimates for rectal cancer, by industrial branch and study design.
ISICIndustrial branchCohort studiesOther study design2All
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
(95%CI)
Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3Crude RRAdjusted RR3
1Crop and animal production0.86-1.5-0.97-
(0.74-1.00)(0.55-2.45)(0.67-1.41)
3Fishing and aquaculture11.05---1.05-
(0.86-1.25)(0.87-1.26)
10Manufacture of food products10.75---0.75-
(0.33-1.70)(0.33-1.70)
11Manufacture of beverages1.45--1.45-
(1.13-1.85)(1.13-1.85)
15Manufacture of leather and related products2.06---2.06-
(0.36-3.76)(0.91-4.65)
16Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork10.4--0.4-
(0.06-2.53)(0.06-2.53)
19Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products12.49---2.49-
(1.02-6.07)(1.02-6.07)
20Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products1.22---1.22-
(0.62-2.41)(0.62-2.41)
22Manufacture of rubber and plastics products0.82---0.82-
(0.55-1.22)(0.55-1.22)
23Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products11.25---1.25-
(0.61-2.55)(0.61-2.55)
24Manufacture of basic metals1.25--1.25-
(0.77-2.04)(0.77-2.04)
29Manufacture of motor vehicles1.7---1.7-
(0.53-5.43)(0.53-5.43)
31Manufacture of furniture1.32---1.32-
(0.93-1.88)(0.93-1.88)
33Repair and installation of machinery and equipment0.76---0.76-
(0.42-1.38)(0.42-1.38)
72Scientific research and development11.1---1.1-
(0.26-1.95)(0.52-2.34)
-All industrial branches combined1.151.151.51.51.151.15
(0.99-1.34)(0.99-1.34)(0.55-2.45)(0.55-2.45)(0.99-1.34)(0.99-1.34)
Heterogeneity (I2)53.8%-53.8%

Increased and significant risk estimates for rectal cancer were observed only in beverage industry, related to brewery workers, and in the manufacture of coke and refined petroleum product (ISIC code 19), though only based on a single cohort study each.

Risk in male did not significantly differ from risk in female, except for colorectal cancer in which the analysis showed an increased pooled estimate of borderline significance in men (Table 5).

Table 5 Colorectal cancer risk in occupational exposures, by gender.
SiteGenderCrude RR95%CIAdjusted RR195%CI
ColorectalM1.211.09-1.351.101.00-1.22
F0.940.85-1.040.930.84-1.04
ColonM1.070.97-1.18--
F0.950.76-1.20--
RectumM1.110.93-1.32--
F1.530.47-4.93--
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES

Occupational exposures, in a broad sense, appear to be a risk factor for colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. Probably, a fraction of the total amount of cases of these malignancies could be explained considering occupational exposures as cofactors in the process leading to cancer.

Slight but significant increased RR were observed for colorectal and colon cancers, though the pooled estimate for rectal cancer did not reach the conventional statistical significance. Despite this issue, results were consistent each other and showed a similar effect size ranging from 12% to 15%. Consequently, a crude excess fraction of risk, attributable to occupational exposure considered as a whole, could be calculated, and its results range from 10.7% to 13.0%.

No significant difference between male and female was observed in analyses carried out by gender, although some evidences suggested a different association in the two sexes[20].

Most of the papers included in this review reported a cohort design and, limiting the analysis to this sort of studies, the effect size appeared to be stronger than the overall results, except for rectal cancer. The large amount of cohort studies could be an advantage to investigate an etiologic relationship between risk factors and cancer, thus these results firmly stressed a role of exposures in workplace in increasing the risk of colon and colorectal cancers.

Moreover, results from this review could promote public health measures: workers exposed in industrial branches with increased risk of colorectal cancers could be effectively addressed to screening and counselling programs, in order to prevent the onset of the neoplasia or to anticipate the diagnosis, with a positive effect on the chance of cure and survival.

Adjustment by possible bias

The effect size of occupational exposures, considered as a whole, on colorectal cancers is probably lower than tobacco smoke[10] and alcohol consumption[11], though in some industrial branches such as leather, beverages, manufacture of metals, repair and installation of machinery, rubber and plastic industries, the risk could rise to levels comparable to these major risk factors.

Furthermore, not all studies provided estimates fully adjusted for well known risk or protective factors, especially those not recent, and thus a residual confounding can not be excluded.

The choice of excluding studies devoted to analyse exposure to single substances or chemical compound if not specifically related to a definite industrial branch, may be questionable, but our aim was to show quantitative estimates in several productive divisions to provide a general overview on occupational exposures at a productive branch level.

In addition, an evident between-studies heterogeneity was observed, while the publication bias seemed to be weak. The latter issue was controlled adjusting the pooled estimates with the Duval and Tweedie[89] non parametric trim-and-fill procedure. The former was not surprisingly observed in a study collecting several different results from papers diverging in terms of study design, exposures assessment, adjustment for potential confounders, geographical area, thus this may have affected the precision of the pooled estimates.

Interaction between working activity and genetic susceptibility

The most relevant findings emerged from this review indicate that, though there is no homogeneous pattern of association between colorectal cancer and working activities (in a broad sense), risk evaluation for this disease deserves much attention in occupational setting. The exposure to some industrial branches such as that for processing animal furs and leather, or others where toxic chemicals (e.g., asbestos) are used, significantly increases the risk of colorectal cancer. As reported above, also agricultural activities should enter this domain even if a reduction in risk of colorectal cancer was observed in this work maybe due to a “healthy worker” effect or to some personal habits. Evidence on colorectal malignancies of farmers is provided by investigations strictly focused on the exposure to specific agro-chemicals.

Traditionally epidemiological and experimental data on colorectal cancer supported associations with diet and familial genetic factors[7,8]. Interestingly, a genetic susceptibility was thought to be involved not only in rare familial colon cancers but in more common sporadic forms as well[9]. Thus, a common belief in scientific community was that both dietary habits and genetic predisposition were the basic factors causing colorectal carcinogenesis[9]. In more recent times, however, a growing evidence has shown the relevant carcinogenic role played by general lifestyles (cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, diet, etc.) and much more important here - exposure to environmental chemicals, so the attention on simple mechanisms of genetic-environmental determination of disease has been strongly resized.

On the other hand, studies based on genome-wide association approaches suggested that familial predisposition to develop malignancies does not depend on mendelian patterns but to complex interactions between genomic, epigenomic and environmental conditions[91]. In many cases, misconceptions on these inherited diseases depend on the erroneous assumption that heritability means “genetic determination”. Estimates on heritability of multifactorial diseases do not provide reliable information on the proportion of cases really due to simple genetic factors, furthermore these estimates cannot be used to discover how many cases are due to environmental effects[92].

Other studies on detrimental effects of the environment emphasize the essential role played by the environmental exposures on the environment residing within the organism. These studies revealed that both early and advanced stages of carcinogenesis can be promoted by means of chemical (or other) influences on the stromal micro-environment[84,93]. The nature of these dynamics is far from being clear and the relationship between micro- and macro-environment in tumor initiation and progression is only now starting to be appreciated. This picture provides strong reasons to act on environmental carcinogens by planning effective efforts to control incidence rates of colorectal and other tumors.

Despite advancements in developing tools to strengthen surveillance on occupational cancer, in Western countries still many workers are exposed to carcinogens in the workplace: a serious challenge not only for workers but also for entrepreneurs, trade unions, decision makers and health institutions. Managing the exposure to chemicals causing malignancies and other degenerative pathologies is not a mere biomedical affair but is a prerequisite for reducing the economic burden of work-related morbidity/mortality and avoiding social conflicts. In short, it is a matter of social cohesion and equity. This entails new political and economic paradigms in planning occupational safety and, especially, in addressing health expenditures. Education and public communication programs on primary prevention in the workplace will be essential. After all, innovative actions to protect human health often require solely good science, culture and common sense. Improving our environment and lifestyles is much more feasible and infinitely less expensive than improving our genetics.

To our knowledge, this article provides the largest review of papers regarding the risk of colorectal cancers in workers of several industrial branches. Our results pointed out increased risks for labourers occupied in industries with a wide use of chemical compounds, such as leather, basic metals, plastic and rubber manufacturing, besides workers in the sector of repair and installation of machinery exposed to asbestos.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Rutegard J S- Editor: Gou SX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu XM

References
1.  Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893-2917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1541-1549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Stewart BW, Kleihus P.  World Cancer Report. Lyon: IARC Press 2003; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Papadopoulos N, Nicolaides NC, Wei YF, Ruben SM, Carter KC, Rosen CA, Haseltine WA, Fleischmann RD, Fraser CM, Adams MD. Mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science. 1994;263:1625-1629.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Jackson-Thompson J, Ahmed F, German RR, Lai SM, Friedman C. Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal cancer in the United States, 1998-2001. Cancer. 2006;107:1103-1111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Food, Nutrition Phiysical Activity and Prevention of Cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AIRC 2007; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  National Research Council Committee on Diet, Nutrition and Cancer. Diet, nutrition and cancer. Washington DC: National Academy Press 1982; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  National Research Council Committee on Diet and Health. Implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington DC: National Academy Press 1989; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Shike M, Winawer SJ, Greenwald PH, Bloch A, Hill MJ, Swaroop SV. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. The WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68:377-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Giovannucci E, Martínez ME. Tobacco, colorectal cancer, and adenomas: a review of the evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1717-1730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Huxley RR, Ansary-Moghaddam A, Clifton P, Czernichow S, Parr CL, Woodward M. The impact of dietary and lifestyle risk factors on risk of colorectal cancer: a quantitative overview of the epidemiological evidence. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:171-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Matanoski G, Tao X, Almon L, Adade AA, Davies-Cole JO. Demographics and tumor characteristics of colorectal cancers in the United States, 1998-2001. Cancer. 2006;107:1112-1120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Wu X, Cokkinides V, Chen VW, Nadel M, Ren Y, Martin J, Ellison GL. Associations of subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis with county-level poverty, by race and sex. Cancer. 2006;107:1121-1127.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization. J Biosci. 2005;30:103-118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Voorrips LE, Goldbohm RA, van Poppel G, Sturmans F, Hermus RJ, van den Brandt PA. Vegetable and fruit consumption and risks of colon and rectal cancer in a prospective cohort study: The Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:1081-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Toyomura K, Yamaguchi K, Kawamoto H, Tabata S, Shimizu E, Mineshita M, Ogawa S, Lee KY, Kono S. Relation of cigarette smoking and alcohol use to colorectal adenomas by subsite: the self-defense forces health study. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:72-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Mizoue T, Yamaji T, Tabata S, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu E, Mineshita M, Ogawa S, Kono S. Dietary patterns and colorectal adenomas in Japanese men: the Self-Defense Forces Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:338-345.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1679-1687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Moradi T, Gridley G, Björk J, Dosemeci M, Ji BT, Berkel HJ, Lemeshow S. Occupational physical activity and risk for cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden among men and women by anatomic subsite. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17:201-208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Oddone E, Edefonti V, Scaburri A, Vai T, Crosignani P, Imbriani M. Female breast cancer in Lombardy, Italy (2002-2009): a case-control study on occupational risks. Am J Ind Med. 2013;56:1051-1062.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Saberi Hosnijeh F, Christopher Y, Peeters P, Romieu I, Xun W, Riboli E, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Tjønneland A, Becker N, Nieters A. Occupation and risk of lymphoid and myeloid leukaemia in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Occup Environ Med. 2013;70:464-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Oddone E, Scaburri A, Modonesi C, Montomoli C, Bergamaschi R, Crosignani P, Imbriani M. Multiple sclerosis and occupational exposures: results of an explorative study. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2013;35:133-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Milan G, Lange JH. Epidemiologic evidence of cancer risk in textile industry workers: a review and update. Toxicol Ind Health. 2002;18:171-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Andersen A, Barlow L, Engeland A, Kjaerheim K, Lynge E, Pukkala E. Work-related cancer in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 Suppl 2:1-116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Swanson GM, Belle SH, Burrows RW. Colon cancer incidence among modelmakers and patternmakers in the automobile manufacturing industry. A continuing dilemma. J Occup Med. 1985;27:567-569.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Hoar SK, Bang KM, Tillett S, Rodriguez M, Cantor KP, Blair A. Screening for colorectal cancer and polyps among pattern makers. J Occup Med. 1986;28:704-708.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Tilley BC, Johnson CC, Schultz LR, Buffler PA, Joseph CL. Risk of colorectal cancer among automotive pattern and model makers. J Occup Med. 1990;32:541-546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Garabrant DH, Peters JM, Mack TM, Bernstein L. Job activity and colon cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:1005-1014.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Ehrlich A, Rohl AN, Holstein EC. Asbestos bodies in carcinoma of colon in an insulation worker with asbestosis. JAMA. 1985;254:2932-2933.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Neugut AI, Murray TI, Garbowski GC, Treat MR, Forde KA, Waye JD, Fenoglio-Preiser C. Association of asbestos exposure with colorectal adenomatous polyps and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83:1827-1828.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Vineis P, Ciccone G, Magnino A. Asbestos exposure, physical activity and colon cancer: a case-control study. Tumori. 1993;79:301-303.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon: Vol. 100 2012; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Bertazzi PA, Consonni D, Bachetti S, Rubagotti M, Baccarelli A, Zocchetti C, Pesatori AC. Health effects of dioxin exposure: a 20-year mortality study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:1031-1044.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Dement J, Pompeii L, Lipkus IM, Samsa GP. Cancer incidence among union carpenters in New Jersey. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:1059-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Berlin K, Edling C, Persson B, Ahlborg G, Hillert L, Högstedt B, Lundberg I, Svensson BG, Thiringer G, Orbaek P. Cancer incidence and mortality of patients with suspected solvent-related disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995;21:362-367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Anttila A, Pukkala E, Riala R, Sallmén M, Hemminki K. Cancer incidence among Finnish workers exposed to aromatic hydrocarbons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998;71:187-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Dumas S, Parent ME, Siemiatycki J, Brisson J. Rectal cancer and occupational risk factors: a hypothesis-generating, exposure-based case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:874-879.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Calvert GM, Ward E, Schnorr TM, Fine LJ. Cancer risks among workers exposed to metalworking fluids: a systematic review. Am J Ind Med. 1998;33:282-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Redmond CK, Strobino BR, Cypess RH. Cancer experience among coke by-product workers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;271:102-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Tokudome S, Kuratsune M. A cohort study on mortality from cancer and other causes among workers at a metal refinery. Int J Cancer. 1976;17:310-317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Xu Z, Pan GW, Liu LM, Brown LM, Guan DX, Xiu Q, Sheng JH, Stone BJ, Dosemeci M, Fraumeni JF. Cancer risks among iron and steel workers in Anshan, China, Part I: Proportional mortality ratio analysis. Am J Ind Med. 1996;30:1-6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Jakobsson K, Mikoczy Z, Skerfving S. Deaths and tumours among workers grinding stainless steel: a follow up. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54:825-829.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Wang JD, Wegman DH, Smith TJ. Cancer risks in the optical manufacturing industry. Br J Ind Med. 1983;40:177-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Weiderpass E, Vainio H, Kauppinen T, Vasama-Neuvonen K, Partanen T, Pukkala E. Occupational exposures and gastrointestinal cancers among Finnish women. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:305-315.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Spiegelman D, Wegman DH. Occupation-related risks for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;75:813-821.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Puntoni R, Russo L, Zannini D, Vercelli M, Gambaro RP, Valerio F, Santi L. Mortality among dock-yard workers in Genoa, Italy. Tumori. 1977;63:91-96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Puntoni R, Vercelli M, Merlo F, Valerio F, Santi L. Mortality among shipyard workers in Genoa, Italy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1979;330:353-377.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Raffn E, Villadsen E, Lynge E. Colorectal cancer in asbestos cement workers in Denmark. Am J Ind Med. 1996;30:267-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Kang SK, Burnett CA, Freund E, Walker J, Lalich N, Sestito J. Gastrointestinal cancer mortality of workers in occupations with high asbestos exposures. Am J Ind Med. 1997;31:713-718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  Reid A, Ambrosini G, de Klerk N, Fritschi L, Musk B. Aerodigestive and gastrointestinal tract cancers and exposure to crocidolite (blue asbestos): incidence and mortality among former crocidolite workers. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:757-761.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Smailyte G, Kurtinaitis J, Andersen A. Cancer mortality and morbidity among Lithuanian asbestos-cement producing workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30:64-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Clin B, Morlais F, Launoy G, Guizard AV, Dubois B, Bouvier V, Desoubeaux N, Marquignon MF, Raffaelli C, Paris C. Cancer incidence within a cohort occupationally exposed to asbestos: a study of dose--response relationships. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:832-836.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Guay D, Siemiatycki J. Historic cohort study in Montreal’s fur industry. Am J Ind Med. 1987;12:181-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
55.  Montanaro F, Ceppi M, Demers PA, Puntoni R, Bonassi S. Mortality in a cohort of tannery workers. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54:588-591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
56.  Innos K, Rahu M, Rahu K, Lang I, Leon DA. Wood dust exposure and cancer incidence: a retrospective cohort study of furniture workers in Estonia. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37:501-511.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
57.  Gubéran E, Usel M, Raymond L, Fioretta G. Mortality and incidence of cancer among a cohort of self employed butchers from Geneva and their wives. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50:1008-1016.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
58.  Fritschi L, Fenwick S, Bulsara M. Mortality and cancer incidence in a cohort of meatworkers. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:E4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
59.  McLean D, Cheng S, ‘t Mannetje A, Woodward A, Pearce N. Mortality and cancer incidence in New Zealand meat workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:541-547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
60.  Ritz B, Zhao Y, Krishnadasan A, Kennedy N, Morgenstern H. Estimated effects of hydrazine exposure on cancer incidence and mortality in aerospace workers. Epidemiology. 2006;17:154-161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
61.  Brownson RC, Zahm SH, Chang JC, Blair A. Occupational risk of colon cancer. An analysis by anatomic subsite. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130:675-687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
62.  Rodu B, Delzell E, Beall C, Sathiakumar N. Mortality among employees at a petrochemical research facility. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:29-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
63.  Acquavella JF, Douglass TS, Phillips SC. Evaluation of excess colorectal cancer incidence among workers involved in the manufacture of polypropylene. J Occup Med. 1988;30:438-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
64.  Berger J, Manz A. Cancer of the stomach and the colon-rectum among workers in a coke gas plant. Am J Ind Med. 1992;22:825-834.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
65.  Fraser P, Chilvers C, Day M, Goldblatt P. Further results from a census based mortality study of fertiliser manufacturers. Br J Ind Med. 1989;46:38-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
66.  Leet T, Acquavella J, Lynch C, Anne M, Weiss NS, Vaughan T, Checkoway H. Cancer incidence among alachlor manufacturing workers. Am J Ind Med. 1996;30:300-306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
67.  Schnorr TM, Steenland K, Egeland GM, Boeniger M, Egilman D. Mortality of workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate in the polyurethane foam industry. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53:703-707.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
68.  Tomenson JA, Bonner SM, Edwards JC, Pemberton MA, Cummings TF, Paddle GM. Study of two cohorts of workers exposed to methyl methacrylate in acrylic sheet production. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57:810-817.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
69.  Walker AM, Cohen AJ, Loughlin JE, Rothman KJ, DeFonso LR. Mortality from cancer of the colon or rectum among workers exposed to ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17:7-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
70.  Acquavella JF, Riordan SG, Anne M, Lynch CF, Collins JJ, Ireland BK, Heydens WF. Evaluation of mortality and cancer incidence among alachlor manufacturing workers. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104:728-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
71.  Cowles SR, Tsai SP, Gilstrap EL, Ross CE. Mortality among employees at a plastics and resins research and development facility. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:799-803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
72.  Kaleja R, Horbach L, Amsel J. Polypropylene production workers and colorectal cancer in Germany: a brief report. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:784-785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
73.  Lagast H, Tomenson J, Stringer DA. Polypropylene production and colorectal cancer: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Med (Lond). 1995;45:69-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
74.  Lewis RJ, Schnatter AR, Lerman SE. Colorectal cancer incidence among polypropylene manufacturing workers. An update. J Occup Med. 1994;36:652-659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
75.  Sathiakumar N, Graff J, Macaluso M, Maldonado G, Matthews R, Delzell E. An updated study of mortality among North American synthetic rubber industry workers. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:822-829.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
76.  McMichael AJ, Andjelkovic DA, Tyroler HA. Cancer mortality among rubber workers: an epidemiologic study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;271:125-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
77.  Carstensen JM, Bygren LO, Hatschek T. Cancer incidence among Swedish brewery workers. Int J Cancer. 1990;45:393-396.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
78.  Thygesen LC, Albertsen K, Johansen C, Grønbaek M. Cancer incidence among Danish brewery workers. Int J Cancer. 2005;116:774-778.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
79.  Alavanja MC, Sandler DP, Lynch CF, Knott C, Lubin JH, Tarone R, Thomas K, Dosemeci M, Barker J, Hoppin JA. Cancer incidence in the agricultural health study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31 Suppl 1:39-45; discussion 5-7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
80.  Alexander DD, Weed DL, Mink PJ, Mitchell ME. A weight-of-evidence review of colorectal cancer in pesticide applicators: the agricultural health study and other epidemiologic studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85:715-745.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
81.  Samanic C, Rusiecki J, Dosemeci M, Hou L, Hoppin JA, Sandler DP, Lubin J, Blair A, Alavanja MC. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to dicamba in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1521-1526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
82.  Koutros S, Lynch CF, Ma X, Lee WJ, Hoppin JA, Christensen CH, Andreotti G, Freeman LB, Rusiecki JA, Hou L. Heterocyclic aromatic amine pesticide use and human cancer risk: results from the U.S. Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1206-1212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
83.  Lee WJ, Sandler DP, Blair A, Samanic C, Cross AJ, Alavanja MC. Pesticide use and colorectal cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:339-346.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
84.  Oddone E, Crosignani P, Modonesi C. Cancer as a continuum: a literature review and a biological interpretation. Cancer Oncol Res. 2013;1: 40-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
85.  Mattioli S, Zanardi F, Baldasseroni A, Schaafsma F, Cooke RM, Mancini G, Fierro M, Santangelo C, Farioli A, Fucksia S. Search strings for the study of putative occupational determinants of disease. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67:436-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
86.  DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
87.  Tang JL, Liu JL. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:477-484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
88.  Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ. 2006;333:597-600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
89.  Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455-463.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
90.  Lo AC, Soliman AS, Khaled HM, Aboelyazid A, Greenson JK. Lifestyle, occupational, and reproductive factors and risk of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:830-837.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
91.  Brena RM, Costello JF. Genome-epigenome interactions in cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 Spec No 1:R96-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
92.  Vineis P, Pearce NE. Genome-wide association studies may be misinterpreted: genes versus heritability. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1295-1298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
93.  Maffini MV, Calabro JM, Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Stromal regulation of neoplastic development: age-dependent normalization of neoplastic mammary cells by mammary stroma. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:1405-1410.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
94.  Cantor KP, Silberman W. Mortality among aerial pesticide applicators and flight instructors: follow-up from 1965-1988. Am J Ind Med. 1999;36:239-247.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
95.  Greenburg DL, Rusiecki J, Koutros S, Dosemeci M, Patel R, Hines CJ, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MC. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to captan in the Agricultural Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:1401-1407.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
96.  Lynch SM, Rusiecki JA, Blair A, Dosemeci M, Lubin J, Sandler D, Hoppin JA, Lynch CF, Alavanja MC. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to cyanazine in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1248-1252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
97.  Wiklund K, Dich J. Cancer risks among female farmers in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control. 1994;5:449-457.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
98.  Mikoczy Z, Rylander L. Mortality and cancer incidence in cohorts of Swedish fishermen and fishermen’s wives: updated findings. Chemosphere. 2009;74:938-943.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
99.  Finkelstein MM. Does occupational exposure to dust prevent colorectal cancer? Occup Environ Med. 1995;52:145-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
100.  Kusiak R. Does occupational exposure to dust prevent colorectal cancer? Occup Environ Med. 1995;52:699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
101.  Goldberg MS, Thériault G. Retrospective cohort study of workers of a synthetic textiles plant in Quebec: II. Colorectal cancer mortality and incidence. Am J Ind Med. 1994;25:909-922.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
102.  Vobecky J, Devroede G, Lacaille J, Water A. An occupational group with a high risk of large bowel cancer. Gastroenterology. 1978;75:221-223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
103.  Sweeney MH, Walrath J, Waxweiler RJ. Mortality among retired fur workers. Dyers, dressers (tanners) and service workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985;11:257-264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
104.  Roscoe RJ, Steenland K, McCammon CS, Schober SE, Robinson CF, Halperin WE, Fingerhut MA. Colon and stomach cancer mortality among automotive wood model makers. J Occup Med. 1992;34:759-768; discussion 769-770.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
105.  Harrington JM, Goldblatt P. Census based mortality study of pharmaceutical industry workers. Br J Ind Med. 1986;43:206-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
106.  Albin M, Jakobsson K, Attewell R, Johansson L, Welinder H. Mortality and cancer morbidity in cohorts of asbestos cement workers and referents. Br J Ind Med. 1990;47:602-610.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
107.  Jakobsson K, Horstmann V, Welinder H. Mortality and cancer morbidity among cement workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50:264-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
108.  Seidman H, Selikoff IJ, Gelb SK. Mortality experience of amosite asbestos factory workers: dose-response relationships 5 to 40 years after onset of short-term work exposure. Am J Ind Med. 1986;10:479-514.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
109.  Wingren G. Mortality and cancer incidence in a Swedish art glassworks--an updated cohort study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:599-603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
110.  Zhang X, Wang H, Zhu X, Liu Y, Wang L, Dai Q, Cai N, Wu T, Chen W. Cohort mortality study in three ceramic factories in Jingdezhen in China. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2008;28:386-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
111.  Delzell E, Beall C, Macaluso M. Cancer mortality among women employed in motor vehicle manufacturing. J Occup Med. 1994;36:1251-1259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
112.  Nasterlack M, Messerer P, Pallapies D, Ott MG, Zober A. Cancer incidence in the wastewater treatment plant of a large chemical company. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:851-856.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
113.  Reynolds P, Austin DF. Cancer incidence among employees of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1969-1980. West J Med. 1985;142:214-218.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
114.  Ahn YS, Jeong KS, Kim KS. Cancer morbidity of professional emergency responders in Korea. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55:768-778.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
115.  Demers PA, Checkoway H, Vaughan TL, Weiss NS, Heyer NJ, Rosenstock L. Cancer incidence among firefighters in Seattle and Tacoma, Washington (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1994;5:129-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
116.  Strand LA, Martinsen JI, Koefoed VF, Sommerfelt-Pettersen J, Grimsrud TK. Asbestos-related cancers among 28,300 military servicemen in the Royal Norwegian Navy. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53:64-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
117.  Yamane GK. Cancer incidence in the U.S. Air Force: 1989-2002. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006;77:789-794.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
118.  Czene K, Tiikkaja S, Hemminki K. Cancer risks in hairdressers: assessment of carcinogenicity of hair dyes and gels. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:108-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
119.  Fredriksson M, Bengtsson NO, Hardell L, Axelson O. Colon cancer, physical activity, and occupational exposures. A case-control study. Cancer. 1989;63:1838-1842.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
120.  Freedman DM, Dosemeci M, McGlynn K. Sunlight and mortality from breast, ovarian, colon, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer: a composite death certificate based case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:257-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
121.  Rusiecki JA, Hou L, Lee WJ, Blair A, Dosemeci M, Lubin JH, Bonner M, Samanic C, Hoppin JA, Sandler DP. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to metolachlor in the Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:3118-3123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
122.  Tomaskova H, Jirak Z, Splichalova A, Urban P. Cancer incidence in Czech black coal miners in association with coalworkers’ pneumoconiosis. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012;25:137-144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
123.  Gómez MG, Boffetta P, Klink JD, Español S, Quintana JG, Colin D. [Cancer mortality in mercury miners]. Gac Sanit. 2007;21:210-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
124.  Johnson ES, Dalmas D, Noss J, Matanoski GM. Cancer mortality among workers in abattoirs and meatpacking plants: an update. Am J Ind Med. 1995;27:389-403.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
125.  Simpson CL, Garabrant DH, Fryzek J, Homa DM, Peters RK. Wood-dust exposures and cancer of the colon. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998;4:179-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
126.  Collins JJ, Page LC, Caporossi JC, Utidjian HM, Saipher JN. Mortality patterns among men exposed to methyl methacrylate. J Occup Med. 1989;31:41-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
127.  Straif K, Weiland SK, Werner B, Chambless L, Mundt KA, Keil U. Workplace risk factors for cancer in the German rubber industry: Part 2. Mortality from non-respiratory cancers. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:325-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
128.  Baris D, Garrity TJ, Telles JL, Heineman EF, Olshan A, Zahm SH. Cohort mortality study of Philadelphia firefighters. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:463-476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
129.  Youakim S. Risk of cancer among firefighters: a quantitative review of selected malignancies. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2006;61:223-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
130.  Settimi L, Comba P, Bosia S, Ciapini C, Desideri E, Fedi A, Perazzo PL, Axelson O. Cancer risk among male farmers: a multi-site case-control study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14:339-347.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
131.  Manuwald U, Velasco Garrido M, Berger J, Manz A, Baur X. Mortality study of chemical workers exposed to dioxins: follow-up 23 years after chemical plant closure. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:636-642.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
132.  Langård S, Andersen A, Ravnestad J. Incidence of cancer among ferrochromium and ferrosilicon workers: an extended observation period. Br J Ind Med. 1990;47:14-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
133.  Malloy EJ, Miller KL, Eisen EA. Rectal cancer and exposure to metalworking fluids in the automobile manufacturing industry. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64:244-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]