Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients and tumors
CharacteristicsTAMIS, n = 44EMR, n = 53P value
Age, yr64.25 ± 10.8560.70 ± 10.380.104
Gender, n (%)0.383
Male21 (47.7)30 (56.6)
Female23 (52.3)23 (44.4)
BMI, kg/m222.88 ± 2.4622.43 ± 1.980.322
Tumor size, cm1.47 ± 0.961.14 ± 0.530.033
Benign1.46 ± 1.021.06 ± 0.500.024
Carcinoid1.52 ± 0.721.64 ± 0.450.702
Distance from the anal verge, cm7.39 ± 1.868.83 ± 2.950.006
Final pathology, n (%)10.220
Benign34 (77.3)46 (86.8)
Carcinoid10 (22.7)7 (13.2)
Table 2 Operative characteristics and outcome of transanal minimally invasive surgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery
CharacteristicsTAMIS, n = 44EMR, n = 53P value
Operative time, min49.95 ± 15.2821.19 ± 9.49< 0.001
Blood loss, mL12.48 ± 8.0011.45 ± 7.820.527
Length of stay, d3.50 ± 1.872.72 ± 1.980.065
Resection margins, n (%)0.109
Negative44 (100)50 (94.3)
Positive0 (0)3 (5.7)
Fragmentation, n (%)0 (0)12 (22.6)0.001
Table 3 Complication rate of transanal minimally invasive surgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery
ComplicationTAMIS, n = 44EMR, n = 53P value
Any, n (%)7 (15.9)17 (32.1)
Hemorrhage, n (%)0 (0)10 (18.9)0.002
Urinary retention, n (%)6 (13.6)1 (1.9)0.026
Postoperative infection, n (%)1 (2.3)1 (1.9)0.894
Reoperation, n (%)10 (0)5 (9.4)0.036
Resection margin involvement, n03
Postoperative Bleeding, n201
Perforation, n01