Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2022; 10(23): 8212-8223
Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8212
Table 1 Clinicopathological features of GB-NEC and GB-ADC
Clinical variable
GB-NEC (n = 287)
GB-ADC (n = 19 484)
P value
Age, mean (range), yr68 (32-98)70 (11-104)0.175
Race, n (%)0.372
Black35 (12.2%)2187 (11.2%)
White227 (79.1%)15121 (77.6%)
Other25 (8.7%)2127 (10.9%)
Sex, n (%)0.239
Female192 (66.9%)13679 (70.2%)
Male95 (33.1%)5805 (29.8%)
Grade, n (%)< 0.001
I9 (3.1%)2220 (11.4%)
II7 (2.4%)5853 (30.0%)
III98 (34.1%)5980 (30.7%)
IV68 (23.7%)445 (2.3%)
Unknown105 (36.6%)4986 (25.6%)
Survival time, median, 95%CI (mo)8 (6.6-9.4)7 (6.8-7.2)0.079
Histologic type, n (%)
Neuroendocrine carcinoma149 (51.9%)
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma29 (10.1%)
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma109 (38.0%)
SEER Combined Mets at DX-liver, n (%)53 (18.5%)
Table 2 2019 World Health Organization and 2017 international Agency for Research on Cancer classification and grading criteria for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and hapatopancreatobiliary organs
Terminology
Differentiation
Grade
Mitotic1 rate (mitoses/2 mm2)
Ki-67 index
Molecular differences
NET GlWell-differentiated NET (carcinoid)Low< 2< 3%Mutations in MEN1, DAXX .ATRX
NET G2Intermediate2-203% - 20%Mutations in MEN1, DAXX .ATRX
NET G3High> 20> 20%Mutations in MEN1, DAXX .ATRX
NEC2Poorly differentiated NECHigh> 20> 20%Mutations in TP53 or RB1
Mixed NENs2Well or poorly differentiatedVariable3VariableVariable
Table 3 Clinical manifestations and laboratory tests of GB-NEC
Clinical features of GB-NEC
Immunohistochemical
Biomarker
Discomfort or pain in the upper abdomen[4,7,10,18,22,33-43]CgA synaptophysin, CD5 (most frequent)[4,17,22,33,34,44-47]CA-125[4,18]
Physical examination found[34,39]cytokeratin 7 (CK7 cytoplasmic positivity)[4,33,37,38,40,41,44,48,49]CA-199[4,10,18]
Weight loss[27,45,48]TTF-1[33,38,41,48]CEA[4,18,36,46]
Poor appetite[4,18,33,50]Cytokeratin[4,18,38,48]Blood CgA[45,49]
Jaundice[4,27]CD117[38]soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R)[34]
Fever[40]loss of Rbl expression with intense pl6 labeling[38]NSE[4,17,34]
Carcinoid syndrome[7,17]EMA[10,49]
Abnormal liver function[41]CA199[42]
nausea and vomiting[36]P53[10]
Table 4 Application of surgical treatment of GB-NEC
Tumor stage
Treatment
T1aN0M0Cholecystectomy
T1bNOMOCholecystectomy + gallbladder bed cautery/wedge resection1
T2-T3NOMOCholecystectomy + wedge resection/cholecystectomy + resection of liver segments (IVb + V/> 3 segments)/hepatectomy + pancreaticoduodenectomy
T1-T3N1MOCholecystectomy + resection of liver segments + lymph node resection (D1/D22)/hepatectomy+pancreaticoduodenectomy + lymph node resection (D1/D2)
IVA and IVB (advanced stage)Systemic comprehensive therapy
Table 5 Currently effective chemoradiotherapy regiments that have been tried
Ref.
Chemoradiotherapy regiments
Moris et al[44]XELOX and Zometaf
Chen et al[36], Meoni et al[45], Furrukh et al[46], Abutaka et al[49]CBP and ETP
Tidjane et al[39]ETP+CP four cycles + 5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin
Okuyama et al[34]Intravenous CP (60 mg/m2) and DXT (60 mg/m2) every 3 wk for four cycles, followed by intravenous CBP (120 mg/m2) and DXT (60 mg/m2) every 3 wk for three cycles
Duffy et al[3]VP-16 150 mg/dL; CP 50 mg/dL
Chen et al[4]Radiotherapy with 10 MV-X-ray and 3D-CRT, (50 Gy/25f)
Shimono et al[10]3D-CRT (40 Gy/20 fractions per 4 wk and to give 10 Gy/20 fractions per 4 wk, respectively, resulting in a total dose of 50 Gy) + CP + ETP and CAV followed by CP + ETP alone
Shimono et al[10]Three cycles of CP (50 mg/body) + ETP (80 mg/body) as systemic chemotherapy
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival
Variables
Univariate P value
Multivariate P value
HR (95%CI)
Race0.842NANA
Histology0.931NANA
Grade0.123NANA
Liver metastasis> 0.001> 0.0013.055 (1.839-5.075)
Age0.0040.011.027 (1.006-1.049)