This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Author contributions: All authors equally contributed to this paper with conception and design of the study, literature review and analysis, drafting and critical revision and editing, and final approval of the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest. No financial support.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Narisorn Lakananurak, MD, MSc, Doctor, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. email@example.com
Received: December 20, 2019 Peer-review started: December 20, 2019 First decision: January 12, 2020 Revised: March 7, 2020 Accepted: April 21, 2020 Article in press: April 21, 2020 Published online: May 6, 2020
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease and the leading cause of hospital admission and healthcare burden among gastrointestinal disorders in many countries. Patients can present with varying degrees of inflammation and disease severity, ranging from self-limiting mild AP to devastating and fatal severe AP. Many factors contribute to malnutrition in AP, especially abnormal metabolism and catabolism related to inflammation. The concept of “pancreatic rest” is not evidence-based. There is however, emerging evidence that supports the use of oral or enteral nutrition to improve nutrition status and to reduce local and systemic inflammation, complications, and death. In mild disease, patients are generally able to initiate solid oral diet and do not require specialized nutrition care such as enteral or parenteral nutrition. In contrast, nutrition interventions are imperative in moderately severe and severe AP. The current article aims to review the latest evidence and suggest practical nutrition interventions in patients with AP, including nutrition requirements, routes of nutrition treatment, types of formula, and the role of nutritional supplements, such as glutamine, probiotics, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants.
Core tip: Nutrition intervention helps prevent malnutrition and is a key to reduce inflammation, complications, and death in acute pancreatitis. Current evidence supports the benefits of early enteral nutrition in severe pancreatitis. Gastric and jejunal feeding are equally effective, and polymeric formula is safe, compared to peptide-based formula. Parenteral nutrition should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate enteral nutrition. According to recent data, nutritional supplements, including glutamine, probiotics, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants, may contribute to positive outcomes. While intravenous glutamine shows promising benefits in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition, further studies in other nutritional supplements are needed.
Citation: Lakananurak N, Gramlich L. Nutrition management in acute pancreatitis: Clinical practice consideration. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(9): 1561-1573
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory process of pancreas with variable involvement of other regional tissues and remote organ systems. The diagnosis is based on two of the following three criteria: (1) Abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis; (2) A serum amylase or lipase greater than 3 times upper normal limit; and (3) Characteristic findings from abdominal imaging. The two most common etiologies of AP are gallstones (40%-70%) and alcohol (25%-35%). Other causes include medications, infectious diseases, and metabolic causes such as hypercalcemia and hypertriglyceridemia.
The incidence of AP varies between 4.9 and 73.4 cases per 100000 worldwide[3,4]. The overall mortality ranges from 5%-20%, depending on severity of pancreatitis. The severity of this disease is classified as mild, moderately severe, or severe, according to the 2012 revised Atlanta classification. While the mortality rate is very low in mild pancreatitis (1%), there is a dramatic 30% increase in mortality in severe pancreatitis. Additionally, mortality can be up to 50% in extensive pancreatic necrosis and as high as 80% in patients with sepsis. AP is associated with a hospital length of stay of about 30 d and annual health-care cost of 2.6 billion in the United States[7,8].
There are two distinctive phases of AP: (1) Early phase (within 1 wk), characterized by both local pancreatic inflammation, the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and/or organ failure; and (2) Late phase (> 1 wk), characterized by local complications and/or persistent organ failure. Hence, prevention and management of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and complications are imperative in order to decrease morbidity and mortality in this potentially fatal disorder. Nowadays, there are no specific medications found to effectively treat AP, and therefore management is focused on supportive interventions such as fluid resuscitation and nutrition intervention. Nutrition management has demonstrated necessity not only in prevention and treatment of malnutrition but also in obviating systemic inflammation, reduction of complications, and therefore modifying the course of the disease[9,10].
This article aims to review the latest evidence and recommend an evidence-based practical approach to nutrition management in AP, which includes patient evaluation, nutrition management in mild, moderately severe, and severe pancreatitis, and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) in AP.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MALNUTRITION AND NUTRIENT METABOLISM IN AP
Multiple factors are able to deteriorate nutrition status in AP, and one of the most important factors is inflammation. Inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukins 1 and 6) and stress hormones (cortisol, catecholamines, and glucagon), released during pancreatitis, result in abnormal metabolism which is similar to sepsis.
Resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients with pancreatitis is generally higher than healthy individuals because of inflammation-induced hypermetabolism and/or septic complications. REE measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) increased in 61% of patients with AP and 82% in pancreatitis complicated by infection. m ± SD of measured REE was 111% ± 15% in mild pancreatitis, 126% ± 10% in severe pancreatitis, and 120% ± 11% in pancreatic sepsis, compared to predicted REE by Harris-Benedict equation. Nutrition support may help restore energy balance and prevent malnutrition in this circumstance.
Severe inflammation leads to protein catabolism. Amino acids released from protein breakdown provide substrates for the production of acute-phase protein. This was found in 80% of patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Nitrogen balance can be negative up to 20-40 g/d[13,14] and patients with a negative balance had a ten-fold higher death rate than those with normal balance. Muscle mass and function, measured by grip strength and respiratory muscle strength, rapidly declined within 5 d without nutrition support in healthy men suffering from AP.
Regarding carbohydrate metabolism, hyperglycemia is often found in patients with pancreatitis. It is a result of insulin resistance, increased glucose production from liver (gluconeogenesis), and impaired insulin secretion caused by beta-cell damage. Hyperglycemia is related with pancreatic necrosis and infectious complications. As a result, blood glucose should be monitored and controlled in all patients.
Hypertriglyceridemia is common, and can be either a cause or a consequence of pancreatitis. Lipid catabolism and impaired lipid clearance, resulting from decreased insulin secretion, contribute to elevated serum triglycerides. In the absence of gallstones and significant alcohol consumption, severe hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglycerides > 11.3 mmol/L) can be considered as a cause of AP[2,19]. Serum triglycerides level should be monitored, especially in those who receive intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs).
Malnutrition in AP can arise from decreased oral intake as a result of anorexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, ileus, gastroparesis, gastric outlet obstruction, and inappropriate fasting for pancreatic rest. In addition, pancreatic exocrine dysfunction leads to maldigestion of nutrients and may persist up to 6-18 mo after acute attack.
Micronutrient abnormalities are common in AP. Chronic alcohol consumption frequently leads to micronutrient deficiencies due to inadequate intake, decreased absorption, and impaired storage and utilization of nutrients. In patients with alcoholism, biochemical data demonstrate several micronutrient deficiencies including vitamin B1, B2, B3, B12, C, A, folic acid, and zinc[22,23]. Moreover, the risk of deficiencies increases in patients with severe complicated pancreatitis, requiring prolonged admission. The etiology is multifactorial including decreased intake, maldigestion, and increased demand from severe inflammation. Hypocalcemia can occur in 40%-60% of patients. The underlying causes of hypocalcemia may be related to saponification of calcium, hypomagnesemia, decreased parathyroid hormone release, and increased calcitonin levels[24,25].
FALL OF THE “PANCREATIC REST” CONCEPT
Nutrients delivered to gastrointestinal tract proximal to mid-jejunum (around 40 cm distal to ligament of Trietz) stimulate pancreatic enzyme secretion. Traditional thinking was that this may lead to increased pancreatic autodigestion and worsening of pancreatitis. As a result, the concept of “pancreatic rest” has formerly been used to guide management of AP since the 1970s. This concept states that enteral nutrition (EN) should only be started when abdominal pain has completely resolved and the pancreatic enzymes have normalized. Based on this concept, strategies are used to minimize pancreatic stimulation such as parenteral nutrition (PN), elemental formula, and a stepwise introduction of oral diet, beginning with clear fluid. However, this concept is based on only physiologic assumption and is not supported by good scientific evidence and indeed, may result in worsening of nutritional status and poor outcomes[7,26].
Further studies have found that pancreatic enzyme secretion is significantly reduced in AP and the secretion was inversely related to the severity of pancreatitis. A lower secretion of trypsin (16-fold), amylase (22-fold), and lipase (102-fold) was found in severe pancreatitis. In addition, early EN use resulted in clinically significant exacerbation of symptoms in only 4% of cases. These data suggest that the injured acinar cells cannot fully respond to physiologic stimuli, and may explain why enteral feeding is safe and does not worsen autodigestion during an attack of pancreatitis.
Since the 1990s, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses have demonstrated safety and benefits of enteral nutrients in terms of mortality, multiorgan failure, infection, complications, and surgical intervention[29-32]. This evidence supports the administration of EN to stimulate and maintain gut function, which is opposite to “pancreatic rest” that may give rise to gut dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes. Enteral nutrients help maintain gut integrity, gut-associated lymphoid tissue, and gut microbiota composition. This strategy reduces bacterial, endotoxin, and pancreatic enzyme translocation, which may attenuate systemic inflammation, multiorgan failure, infection, and disease severity in AP[26,33-35]. Based on this evidence, the gastrointestinal tract should be considered as an important organ in pancreatitis patients.
The principal aim of patient evaluation is: (1) To plan nutrition support according to the severity of pancreatitis; (2) To evaluate nutrition status; and (3) To identify risk groups that require special nutrition needs.
Since AP has a vast spectrum of disease severity, the approach to nutritional management is different between mild, self-limited disease and severe, fulminant pancreatitis. Thus, it is useful to evaluate disease severity before deciding on a plan for nutrition treatment. The revised Atlanta 2012 classification (Table 1) defines three degrees of severity: Mild, moderately severe, severe pancreatitis according to organ failure (modified Marshall score ≥ 2, Table 2), and local or systemic complications.
Table 1 The revised Atlanta 2012 classification for grading severity of acute pancreatitis.
Grade of severity
No organ failure
No local or systemic complications
Organ failure that resolves within 48 h (transient organ failure) and/or
Local or systemic complications without persistent organ failure
Persistent organ failure (> 48 h)
Single organ failure
Multiple organ failure
Local complications include acute peripancreatic fluid collection, pancreatic pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection and walled-off necrosis. Systemic complications include exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity, such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by the acute pancreatitis.
Table 2 Modified Marshall scoring system for organ dysfunction.
1A score for patients with pre-existing chronic renal failure depends on the extent of further deterioration of baseline renal function. No formal correction exists for a baseline serum creatinine ≥ 134 μmol/L or ≥ 1.4 mg/dL.
2Off inotropic support. A score of 2 or more in any system defines the presence of organ failure. Cr: Creatinine; SBP: Systolic blood pressure.
Preexisting malnutrition was found in 30% of cases at the time of the initial attack. The risk groups of malnutrition include chronic alcoholism and elderly. Malnutrition is associated with negative outcomes (complications, higher morbidity, and prolonged hospital stay)[13,36], and therefore nutrition status should be evaluated by validated nutrition screening and assessment tools especially in high risk population.
Patients with chronic alcoholism require special attention to evaluate clinical signs and/or biochemical levels of the micronutrients (vitamin B1, B2, B3, B12, C, A, folic acid, and zinc). Obese patients may be considered and managed as at risk of severe pancreatitis. Meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly higher rate of severe pancreatitis [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-4.6], local complications (OR = 3.8, 95%CI: 2.4-6.6), systemic complications (OR = 2.3, 95%CI: 1.4-3.8), and death (OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.1-7.36) in obese patients[37,38]. The pathophysiology may be associated with unregulated lipolysis of visceral fat around pancreas, which inhibits mitochondrial complex I and V, leading to pancreatic necrosis and poor outcomes.
NUTRITION MANAGEMENT IN MILD AP
Mild AP is reported in 75%-85% of all AP episodes. It is transient, self-limiting, and therefore specialized nutrition care (EN and/or PN), is not generally required. Patients can consume oral diet when abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting are improved. A full caloric, solid diet can be started safely and a stepwise introduction of oral diet, beginning with clear liquids, is unnecessary. Randomized trials comparing a clear liquid diet and a solid diet in mild pancreatitis illustrated that initiating oral feeding with a solid diet was safe, well-tolerated, and could decrease length of hospital stay by 2 d compared with a liquid diet[40-42]. As for dietary composition, even though a low fat diet (< 30% of total energy) has been used in previous studies[40,42], this diet does not support by good scientific evidence and may lead to inadequate energy intake. Tube feeding is only recommended when oral nutrition is not feasible for more than 5 d. An example of this is patients with poor oral intake resulting from persistent nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.
NUTRITION MANAGEMENT IN MODERATELY SEVERE AND SEVERE AP
Nutrition support has been well-documented in its benefits in moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. The following aspects should be considered in this group of patients.
Energy requirement should be estimated with IC if possible, or 25 kcal/kg/d may be used as energy goal. Many non-static variables affect energy expenditure in severe pancreatitis, such as body temperature, volume status, and medications. These variables result in the poor accuracy of predictive equations. IC is the goal standard to determine energy expenditure, and thus IC measurement may help prevent over- or underfeeding. Energy requirement, whether by calorimetry or predictive equation, should be reevaluated more than once per week in order to reach appropriate energy balance. Estimated protein requirements are higher than healthy individuals (1.2-1.5 g/kg/d). This may improve nitrogen balance and is related to a decrease in 28-d mortality in critically ill patients. Mixed source of energy from carbohydrate, fat, and protein should be provided[20,44].
A daily dose of multivitamins and trace elements is recommended especially in patients receiving total PN. Micronutrients should be supplemented in patients with confirmed or suspected deficiencies.
Route of nutrition support
EN: Enteral feeding should be considered as a preferred route of nutrition support[2,13,45]. A 2018 meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (348 patients) demonstrated that EN, when compared to PN, was associated with a significant reduction in death with risk ratio (RR) of 0.36 (95%CI: 0.20-0.65) and multiple organ failure with RR of 0.39 (95%CI: 0.21-0.73). These benefits were confirmed in a recent meta-analysis of 11 studies including 562 patients. The results showed that EN significantly decreased mortality rate (RR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.23-0.78), the risk of complications (RR = 0.53; 95%CI: 0.39-0.71), and mean length of hospital stay (mean difference = -2.93, 95%CI: -4.52 to -1.34). Local complications (necrosis, fistulas, ascites, and pseudocyst) are not contraindications for enteral feeding.
EN should be started after adequate resuscitation and stable hemodynamic status. Many studies have shown advantages of early enteral feeding in severe pancreatitis. Meta-analyses illustrated that early EN within 48 h of admission was associated with significant reductions in mortality, infectious complications, multi-organ failure, surgical intervention, and length of hospitalization[46,47]. In contrast, early EN may not be better than on-demand oral diet at 72 h. A multicenter RCT in 205 patients compared early EN within 24 h vs on-demand oral diet 72 h, with tube feeding provided at day 4 if the oral diet was not tolerated. There was no significant difference between two groups in the rate of major infection or death, and tube feeding could be prevented in 69% of patients in on-demand group. Over 80% of the patients in this study were admitted to medical ward and only 18% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, which indicates that most of them may actually have moderately severe pancreatitis. This result suggests that, in non-ICU patients, on-demand oral diet may be tried for 3 d and tube feeding should be initiated at day 4 if the oral diet is unsuccessful. However, more data are required before a recommendation can be made about this issue.
In patients who need tube feeding, continuous feeding is recommended over bolus feeding by current guidelines[2,13]. Better feeding tolerance and fewer interruptions of EN delivery due to elevated residuals and vomiting were found in continuous infusion compared with bolus group[49,50].
Given that pancreatic enzymes stimulated by enteral nutrients may lead to pancreatic autodigestion, the role of antisecretory agents, including somatostatin and its analogues (octreotide), has been investigated in several studies. However, the result remains inconclusive. A RCT and recent Cochrane review revealed no benefit among treatment group with respect to mortality, complications, and duration of pain[51,52]. This may be due to a dramatic decrease in pancreatic secretion during AP.
Gastric vs small bowel feeding: Traditionally, it is believed that small bowel feeding was associated with less pancreatic stimulation and autodigestion. Nevertheless, a meta-analysis found that nasogastric feeding was not inferior to nasojejunal feeding in terms of exacerbation of pain (RR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.32-2.70), aspiration (RR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.14-1.53), meeting energy balance (RR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.92-1.09), and mortality (RR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.37-1.29). This is predicated by lack of impact on pancreatic secretion regardless of feeding route during AP. Initiating EN in the stomach is technically easier, cheaper, and may reduce the time to start EN while small bowel feeding generally requires special technique and takes more time for tube placement. For these reasons, nasogastric tube may be used as a first line therapy in order to achieve benefits of early EN in patients with severe pancreatitis.
Jejunal feeding should be considered in patients who cannot tolerate gastric feeding. It may be necessary in those with severe gastroparesis or partial gastric outlet obstruction either from pancreatic edema or pseudocysts. An intraoperative jejunostomy tube may be placed for postoperative feeding in patients undergoing surgery from other indications.
Polymeric vs elemental/semi-elemental formulas: Elemental and semi-elemental formulas are thought to induce less pancreatic stimulation, require less digestion, and are readily absorbed into small intestine. A physiological study in healthy subjects found that pancreatic enzyme secretion reduced by 50% when polymeric formula was changed to elemental formula. Thus, semi-elemental and elemental formulas have been used in many studies on AP. Even though few studies directly compare between elemental/semi-elemental formulas and polymeric formula, there are one RCT and one retrospective cohort study showing elemental and semi-elemental formulas were not superior over polymeric formula in terms of feeding tolerance, diarrhea, and infectious complications[56,57]. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs using indirect adjusted method illustrated that the use of semi-elemental or elemental formula did not result in a significant difference in feeding intolerance (RR = 0.62; 95%CI: 0.10-3.97), infection (RR = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.06-3.76), and death (RR = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.04-9.86). Furthermore, the weekly cost for semi-elemental formula is 7-fold higher than polymeric formula. Hence, the use of polymeric formula may be effective and practical in severe pancreatitis.
PN: PN is indicated when patients cannot tolerate EN. Some patients develop intestinal failure type I or II from systemic or local complications such as severe ileus and duodenal obstruction from pancreatic edema or pseudocyst. When PN is required, a mixed fuel solution (carbohydrate, protein, and lipids) is recommended. Glucose should not be more than the maximal level of glucose oxidation (4-7 mg/kg/min or 5-6 g/kg/d), and a target blood glucose range of 7.7-10 mmol/L is recommended[59,60]. ILEs can be safely started and the recommended dose is 0.8-1.5 g/kg/d[20,44]. ILEs dose may need to be reduced or discontinued if serum triglyceride concentrations greater than 4.5 mmol/L[18,61]. PN initiation may need to be delayed until after 5-7 d of admission[20,59]. Because initiating PN at this point may be associated with better outcomes, including decreased mortality, overall complication, and length of hospitalization. Further studies are needed to confirm appropriate time and clinical benefits of PN in AP with intestinal failure. The recommended route of nutrition support is summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Route of nutrition treatment in acute pancreatitis.
ICU: Intensive care unit; NG: Nasogastric tube; NJ: Nasojejunal tube.
Role of nutritional supplements
Glutamine: Glutamine is considered a conditionally essential amino acid with antioxidative effects that improves immune function and intestinal integrity. Its depletion has been demonstrated in critically ill patients because of the increased demand during metabolic stress. Glutamine supplementation may play a role in critical illnesses, including severe pancreatitis.
A meta-analysis of 12 RCTs demonstrated that glutamine was associated with lower infectious complications (RR = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.39-0.87) and mortality (RR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.15-0.60). In this study, only patients receiving total PN but not EN showed statistically significant benefits. Another meta-analysis confirmed these findings and, again, intravenous glutamine was related with more advantages. A recent RCT of enteral glutamine showed improvement in organ failure score without significant benefits in infected necrosis and mortality. Overall, intravenous glutamine seems to give benefits in patients with total PN while the beneficial effects of enteral glutamine needs to be investigated in the future. The recommended dose of glutamine supplementation is between 0.3-0.5 g/kg/d.
Probiotics: Intestinal barrier dysfunction may induce bacterial translocation and infected necrosis, being the major cause of morbidity and mortality in severe pancreatitis. Probiotics may help improve gut integrity and immune function, and thus prevent bacterial translocation[67,68]. Lactobacillus plantarum decreased intestinal permeability, infectious complications, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure, but did not improve mortality rate in small RCTs[69-71]. In contrast, a multispecies probiotic preparation did not reduce infection and was associated with an increased mortality (RR = 2.53; 95%CI: 1.22-5.25). These data suggest the potential benefits of single strain probiotic (Lactobacillus plantarum) in severe pancreatitis; however, further validated studies are needed before its advantages could be confirmed.
Omega-3 fatty acids: Omega-3 fatty acids have shown beneficial anti-inflammatory effects and may improve systemic inflammation, multiorgan failure, and clinical outcomes in severe pancreatitis. A meta-analysis of 8 small RCTs demonstrated that the administration of omega-3 fatty acids was beneficial for reducing mortality, infectious complications, and length of hospital stay, especially when received parenterally. Nonetheless, large and rigorously designed RCTs are required to elucidate the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplement in severe pancreatitis.
Antioxidants: Antioxidants (vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and N-acetyl cysteine) may reduce inflammation and improve outcomes in severe pancreatitis. Nevertheless, few small studies with varied dose and duration of antioxidants leaded to mixed outcomes. Larger and well-designed clinical trials are needed to confirm potential benefits of antioxidants in this disorder.
PEI IN AP
Although no data supports routine use of pancreatic enzymes during the first 5-10 d of AP, the evidence supports that some patients experience exocrine dysfunction for a period of time after acute attack of pancreatitis[74,75]. A meta-analysis in 2018, containing 32 studies (1495 patients), showed that the prevalence of PEI after pancreatitis was 27.1%. This condition is directly related to the degree of pancreatic parenchymal injury and is more common in alcoholic pancreatitis (22.7%), severe pancreatitis (33.4%), and necrotizing pancreatitis (32%). Patients should be monitored for symptoms of maldigestion (diarrhea, steatorrhea) and/or non-invasive pancreatic function tests (e.g., fecal fat and fecal elastase) for at least 6-18 mo after AP, especially in alcoholic, severe, and necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatic enzyme supplement should be started as indicated.
A 48 years old woman presented with acute onset of severe epigastric pain with nausea, and vomiting. She had no significant past medical history and denied alcohol drinking. Her body weight was stable and her body mass index was 24 kg/m2. Initial laboratory results showed lipase 560 U/L (0-60 U/L). Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated several gallstones with normal bile duct. She had no organ failure at admission, and therefore mild acute gallstones pancreatitis was diagnosed. Her abdominal pain and nausea were improved after receiving analgesia and antiemetic medications. What is the most appropriate nutrition management in this patient?
Comment: The patient presented with classic acute gallstone pancreatitis. Given that her disease severity was mild, and her abdominal pain and nausea were improved, solid oral diet should be initiated. Stepwise approach starting from clear fluid is unnecessary and may be associated with longer length of hospital stay in this patient.
A 55 years old man presented with acute severe epigastric pain, accompanied by alteration of consciousness, vomiting, and fever. He had history of chronic alcohol drinking 100 g/d for more than 20 years. His body weight was stable with body mass index of 22 kg/m2. Initial laboratory results demonstrated lipase 720 U/L (0-60 U/L) and creatinine 180 μmol/L (50-120 μmol/L). He was intubated in order to protect airway and was admitted to intensive care unit. Initial management included intravenous crystalloid solution and symptomatic treatment. On day 2 of admission, his creatinine was rising to 190 μmol/L. Severe acute alcoholic pancreatitis was diagnosed. What is the most appropriate nutrition treatment in this patient?
Comment: This patient was diagnosed with acute alcoholic pancreatitis with persistent organ failure. He was intubated and was admitted to intensive care unit. Therefore, early EN should be initiated after adequate resuscitation. Nasogastric tube can be used to achieve early EN. A standard polymeric formula may be initiated at the rate of 20 ml per hour and should be titrated to meet protein and energy requirements (1.2-1.5 g/kg/d and 25 kcal/kg/d, respectively). Given the history of chronic alcoholism, micronutrient levels, including vitamin B1, B2, B3, B12, C, A, folic acid, and zinc may be evaluated and treatment should be initiated if there is an evidence of micronutrient deficiencies.
On day 5 of admission, he still had fever and severe abdominal pain required around the clock intravenous opioid injection. Physical examination revealed hypotension, absent bowel sound, marked abdominal distension, and generalized abdominal tenderness. He could not tolerate enteral feeding due to vomiting. Computer tomography demonstrated extensive pancreatic necrosis with gas at body and tail of pancreas, and generalized small and large bowel dilatation. Vasopressor agents and antibiotics were initiated and surgical debridement was planned. What is the most appropriate nutrition treatment according to his clinical status?
Comment: The patient was complicated by infected pancreatic necrosis with septic shock. He could not tolerate EN due to severe ileus. As a result, PN was indicated in this case. ILEs can be given if serum triglycerides levels was less than 4.5 mmol/L, and the dose should be 0.8-1.5 g/kg/d. Blood glucose should be monitored and controlled in range 7.7-10 mmol/L. In this case, intravenous glutamine may be considered with the dose 0.3-0.5 g/kg/d.
AP is a common gastrointestinal disease with varying degree of disease severity ranging from self-limiting mild AP to devastating and fatal severe AP. At present, disease-specific treatment remains obscure and supportive care, including nutrition intervention, are crucial. Nutrition treatment not only helps prevent malnutrition, but it is also a key to reduce systemic inflammation, complications, and death. Severity assessment is the first step to guide nutrition intervention. In mild pancreatitis, patients are generally able to initiate solid oral diet and do not require specialized nutrition care. In moderately severe or severe pancreatitis, gut should be considered as an important organ, and early EN should be given to maintain gut function and achieve positive clinical outcomes. Gastric and jejunal feeding are equally effective in severe pancreatitis. Polymeric formula is safe and inexpensive, compared to elemental formula. PN should be administered only in patients who cannot tolerate EN. Some nutritional supplements, such as intravenous glutamine in patients with total PN, may lead to positive outcomes. However, further studies are still needed in the others. Table 3 summarizes all recommendations and areas that need future study in AP.
Table 3 Summary of nutrition management in severe acute pancreatitis and areas for future research.
Areas for future research
Energy requirement should be measured by IC, or 25 kcal/kg/d may be used
Role of on-demand oral diet
Protein requirements are 1.2-1.5 g/kg/d
Polymeric formula vs elemental/semi- elemental formula
Early EN within 48 h is recommended
Timing and benefits of PN in intestinal failure type I or II
Gastric or Jejunal feeding is acceptable
Role of enteral glutamine, probiotics, omega-3 FAs, antioxidants
Intravenous glutamine may be considered in patients with TPN
PEI should be monitored, especially in alcoholic, severe, and necrotizing pancreatitis
P-Reviewer: Huan C, Manenti A, Neri V S-Editor: Tang JZ L-Editor: A E-Editor: Xing YX
Tenner S, Steinberg WM. Acute Pancreatitis. 10th ed. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, editors. In: Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease.
Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc., 2016: 969-993.
Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1400-1415; 1416.
Fagenholz PJ, Castillo CF, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Increasing United States hospital admissions for acute pancreatitis, 1988-2003.Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:491-497.
Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.Pancreas. 2006;33:323-330.
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.Gut. 2013;62:102-111.
Renner IG, Savage WT, Pantoja JL, Renner VJ. Death due to acute pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis of 405 autopsy cases.Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30:1005-1018.
Fagenholz PJ, Fernández-del Castillo C, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Direct medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations in the United States.Pancreas. 2007;35:302-307.
Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis.BMJ. 2004;328:1407.
Pan LL, Li J, Shamoon M, Bhatia M, Sun J. Recent Advances on Nutrition in Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis.Front Immunol. 2017;8:762.
Shaw JH, Wolfe RR. Glucose, fatty acid, and urea kinetics in patients with severe pancreatitis. The response to substrate infusion and total parenteral nutrition.Ann Surg. 1986;204:665-672.
Dickerson RN, Vehe KL, Mullen JL, Feurer ID. Resting energy expenditure in patients with pancreatitis.Crit Care Med. 1991;19:484-490.
Meier R, Ockenga J, Pertkiewicz M, Pap A, Milinic N, Macfie J; DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine), Löser C, Keim V; ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Pancreas.Clin Nutr. 2006;25:275-284.
Bouffard YH, Delafosse BX, Annat GJ, Viale JP, Bertrand OM, Motin JP. Energy expenditure during severe acute pancreatitis.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989;13:26-29.
Sitzmann JV, Steinborn PA, Zinner MJ, Cameron JL. Total parenteral nutrition and alternate energy substrates in treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;168:311-317.
Hill GL. Jonathan E. Rhoads Lecture. Body composition research: implications for the practice of clinical nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:197-218.
Solomon SS, Duckworth WC, Jallepalli P, Bobal MA, Iyer R. The glucose intolerance of acute pancreatitis: hormonal response to arginine.Diabetes. 1980;29:22-26.
Meier RF, Beglinger C. Nutrition in pancreatic diseases.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:507-529.
Khan R, Jehangir W, Regeti K, Yousif A. Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Pancreatitis: Choice of Treatment.Gastroenterology Res. 2015;8:234-236.
Krueger K, McClave SA, Martindale RG. Pancreatitis. In: Mueller CM, editor The ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum. 3rd ed.
the United States: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2017: 549-564.
Working Party of the Australasian Pancreatic Club. Smith RC, Smith SF, Wilson J, Pearce C, Wray N, Vo R, Chen J, Ooi CY, Oliver M, Katz T, Turner R, Nikfarjam M, Rayner C, Horowitz M, Holtmann G, Talley N, Windsor J, Pirola R, Neale R. Summary and recommendations from the Australasian guidelines for the management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.Pancreatology. 2016;16:164-180.
Lugli AK, Carli F, Wykes L. The importance of nutrition status assessment: the case of severe acute pancreatitis.Nutr Rev. 2007;65:329-334.
De Waele B, Vierendeels T, Willems G. Vitamin status in patients with acute pancreatitis.Clin Nutr. 1992;11:83-86.
Kohn CL, Brozenec S, Foster PF. Nutritional support for the patient with pancreatobiliary disease.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1993;5:37-45.
Ong JP, Fock KM. Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis.J Dig Dis. 2012;13:445-452.
Petrov MS, Windsor JA. Nutritional management of acute pancreatitis: the concept of 'gut rousing'.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16:557-563.
O'Keefe SJ, Lee RB, Li J, Stevens S, Abou-Assi S, Zhou W. Trypsin secretion and turnover in patients with acute pancreatitis.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289:G181-G187.
McClave SA, Greene LM, Snider HL, Makk LJ, Cheadle WG, Owens NA, Dukes LG, Goldsmith LJ. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:14-20.
Al-Omran M, Albalawi ZH, Tashkandi MF, Al-Ansary LA. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD002837.
Yi F, Ge L, Zhao J, Lei Y, Zhou F, Chen Z, Zhu Y, Xia B. Meta-analysis: total parenteral nutrition versus total enteral nutrition in predicted severe acute pancreatitis.Intern Med. 2012;51:523-530.
Yao H, He C, Deng L, Liao G. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with severe pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:66-68.
Wu P, Li L, Sun W. Efficacy comparisons of enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.Biosci Rep. 2018;38.
Rinninella E, Annetta MG, Serricchio ML, Dal Lago AA, Miggiano GA, Mele MC. Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: from physiopathology to practice. An evidence-based approach.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:421-432.
Xu CF, Huang XX, Shen YZ, Wang XP, Gong L, Wang YD. The effects of enteral nutrition versus total parenteral nutrition on gut barrier function in severe acute pancreatitis.Zhonghua Neike Zazhi. 2011;50:370-373.
Kotani J, Usami M, Nomura H, Iso A, Kasahara H, Kuroda Y, Oyanagi H, Saitoh Y. Enteral nutrition prevents bacterial translocation but does not improve survival during acute pancreatitis.Arch Surg. 1999;134:287-292.
Kittikundecha T, Lakananurak N, Rerknimitr R. Using Nutrition Risk Scores to Predict Hospital Length of Stay in Mild Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.J Med Assoc Thai. 2019;102:38-42.
Martínez J, Johnson CD, Sánchez-Payá J, de Madaria E, Robles-Díaz G, Pérez-Mateo M. Obesity is a definitive risk factor of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis.Pancreatology. 2006;6:206-209.
Dobszai D, Mátrai P, Gyöngyi Z, Csupor D, Bajor J, Erőss B, Mikó A, Szakó L, Meczker Á, Hágendorn R, Márta K, Szentesi A, Hegyi P; Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group. Body-mass index correlates with severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:729-743.
Jacobson BC, Vander Vliet MB, Hughes MD, Maurer R, McManus K, Banks PA. A prospective, randomized trial of clear liquids versus low-fat solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:946-951.
Sathiaraj E, Murthy S, Mansard MJ, Rao GV, Mahukar S, Reddy DN. Clinical trial: oral feeding with a soft diet compared with clear liquid diet as initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:777-781.
Lariño-Noia J, Lindkvist B, Iglesias-García J, Seijo-Ríos S, Iglesias-Canle J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Early and/or immediately full caloric diet versus standard refeeding in mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized open-label trial.Pancreatology. 2014;14:167-173.
Allingstrup MJ, Esmailzadeh N, Wilkens Knudsen A, Espersen K, Hartvig Jensen T, Wiis J, Perner A, Kondrup J. Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients.Clin Nutr. 2012;31:462-468.
Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.Pancreatology. 2013;13:e1-e15.
Li JY, Yu T, Chen GC, Yuan YH, Zhong W, Zhao LN, Chen QK. Enteral nutrition within 48 hours of admission improves clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis by reducing complications: a meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013;8:e64926.
Song J, Zhong Y, Lu X, Kang X, Wang Y, Guo W, Liu J, Yang Y, Pei L. Enteral nutrition provided within 48 hours after admission in severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11871.
Bakker OJ, van Brunschot S, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Bosscha K, Ahmed Ali U, Bouwense S, van Grevenstein WM, Heisterkamp J, Houdijk AP, Jansen JM, Karsten TM, Manusama ER, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schaapherder AF, van der Schelling GP, Schwartz MP, Spanier BW, Tan A, Vecht J, Weusten BL, Witteman BJ, Akkermans LM, Bruno MJ, Dijkgraaf MG, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Early versus on-demand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pancreatitis.N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1983-1993.
Steevens EC, Lipscomb AF, Poole GV, Sacks GS. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: perceptions and practice.Nutr Clin Pract. 2002;17:118-122.
Van Dyck L, Casaer MP. Intermittent or continuous feeding: any difference during the first week?Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:356-362.
Uhl W, Büchler MW, Malfertheiner P, Beger HG, Adler G, Gaus W. A randomised, double blind, multicentre trial of octreotide in moderate to severe acute pancreatitis.Gut. 1999;45:97-104.
Moggia E, Koti R, Belgaumkar AP, Fazio F, Pereira SP, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD011384.
Chang YS, Fu HQ, Xiao YM, Liu JC. Nasogastric or nasojejunal feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2013;17:R118.
Ramanathan M, Aadam AA. Nutrition Management in Acute Pancreatitis.Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34 Suppl 1:S7-S12.
O'Keefe SJ, Lee RB, Anderson FP, Gennings C, Abou-Assi S, Clore J, Heuman D, Chey W. Physiological effects of enteral and parenteral feeding on pancreaticobiliary secretion in humans.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;284:G27-G36.
Tiengou LE, Gloro R, Pouzoulet J, Bouhier K, Read MH, Arnaud-Battandier F, Plaze JM, Blaizot X, Dao T, Piquet MA. Semi-elemental formula or polymeric formula: is there a better choice for enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis? Randomized comparative study.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:1-5.
Endo A, Shiraishi A, Fushimi K, Murata K, Otomo Y. Comparative effectiveness of elemental formula in the early enteral nutrition management of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8:69.
Petrov MS, Loveday BP, Pylypchuk RD, McIlroy K, Phillips AR, Windsor JA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis.Br J Surg. 2009;96:1243-1252.
McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, McCarthy MS, Davanos E, Rice TW, Cresci GA, Gervasio JM, Sacks GS, Roberts PR, Compher C; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.).JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40:159-211.
NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, Bellomo R, Cook D, Dodek P, Henderson WR, Hébert PC, Heritier S, Heyland DK, McArthur C, McDonald E, Mitchell I, Myburgh JA, Norton R, Potter J, Robinson BG, Ronco JJ. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283-1297.
Mirtallo J, Canada T, Johnson D, Kumpf V, Petersen C, Sacks G, Seres D, Guenter P; Task Force for the Revision of Safe Practices for Parenteral Nutrition. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004;28:S39-S70.
He XL, Ma QJ, Lu JG, Chu YK, DuXL. Effect of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with and without glutamine dipeptide supplementation on outcome in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).Clin Nutr Supp. 2004;1:43-47.
Hall JC, Heel K, McCauley R. Glutamine.Br J Surg. 1996;83:305-312.
Asrani V, Chang WK, Dong Z, Hardy G, Windsor JA, Petrov MS. Glutamine supplementation in acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Pancreatology. 2013;13:468-474.
Yong L, Lu QP, Liu SH, Fan H. Efficacy of Glutamine-Enriched Nutrition Support for Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40:83-94.
Arutla M, Raghunath M, Deepika G, Jakkampudi A, Murthy HVV, Rao GV, Reddy DN, Talukdar R. Efficacy of enteral glutamine supplementation in patients with severe and predicted severe acute pancreatitis- A randomized controlled trial.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38:338-347.
van Minnen LP, Timmerman HM, Lutgendorff F, Verheem A, Harmsen W, Konstantinov SR, Smidt H, Visser MR, Rijkers GT, Gooszen HG, Akkermans LM. Modification of intestinal flora with multispecies probiotics reduces bacterial translocation and improves clinical course in a rat model of acute pancreatitis.Surgery. 2007;141:470-480.
Akyol S, Mas MR, Comert B, Ateskan U, Yasar M, Aydogan H, Deveci S, Akay C, Mas N, Yener N, Kocar IH. The effect of antibiotic and probiotic combination therapy on secondary pancreatic infections and oxidative stress parameters in experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis.Pancreas. 2003;26:363-367.
Oláh A, Belágyi T, Issekutz A, Gamal ME, Bengmark S. Randomized clinical trial of specific lactobacillus and fibre supplement to early enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis.Br J Surg. 2002;89:1103-1107.
Kecskés G, Belágyi T, Oláh A. [Early jejunal nutrition with combined pre- and probiotics in acute pancreatitis--prospective, randomized, double-blind investigations].Magy Seb. 2003;56:3-8.
Qin HL, Zheng JJ, Tong DN, Chen WX, Fan XB, Hang XM, Jiang YQ. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum enteral feeding on the gut permeability and septic complications in the patients with acute pancreatitis.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:923-930.
Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Buskens E, Boermeester MA, van Goor H, Timmerman HM, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Witteman BJ, Rosman C, Ploeg RJ, Brink MA, Schaapherder AF, Dejong CH, Wahab PJ, van Laarhoven CJ, van der Harst E, van Eijck CH, Cuesta MA, Akkermans LM, Gooszen HG; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2008;371:651-659.
Lei QC, Wang XY, Xia XF, Zheng HZ, Bi JC, Tian F, Li N. The role of omega-3 fatty acids in acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Nutrients. 2015;7:2261-2273.
Patankar RV, Chand R, Johnson CD. Pancreatic enzyme supplementation in acute pancreatitis.HPB Surg. 1995;8:159-162.
Toouli J, Biankin AV, Oliver MR, Pearce CB, Wilson JS, Wray NH; Australasian Pancreatic Club. Management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: Australasian Pancreatic Club recommendations.Med J Aust. 2010;193:461-467.
Hollemans RA, Hallensleben NDL, Mager DJ, Kelder JC, Besselink MG, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: Systematic review and study level meta-analysis.Pancreatology. 2018;18:253-262.
Dominguez-Muñoz JE. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018;34:349-354.