Perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipoma

Abstract

Myelolipomas are rare tumors consisting of both adipose and hematopoietic tissue and are typically found within the adrenal gland. Extra-adrenal involvement is rare, especially those tumors involving the perirenal space and collecting system. We report a case of a patient with an incidentally discovered perirenal mass that was initially concerning for a retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Following surgical resection and pathological analysis, the lesion was found to be an extra-adrenal myelolipoma. This case report and review of the literature demonstrates the importance of the proper work-up and management of perirenal lipoma variants while addressing the issues of tissue biopsy, surgical intervention, and pre- and post-operative surveillance.

Key Words: Myelolipoma; Lipoma; Perirenal mass; Nephrectomy; Oncology

Core tip: We report a case of a patient with an incidentally discovered perirenal mass that was initially concerning for a retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Following surgical resection and pathological analysis, the lesion was found to be an extra-adrenal myelolipoma. This case report and review of the literature demonstrates the importance of the proper work-up and management of perirenal lipoma variants while addressing the issues of tissue biopsy, surgical intervention, and pre- and post-operative surveillance.

Core tip: We report a case of a patient with an incidentally discovered perirenal mass that was initially concerning for a retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Following surgical resection and pathological analysis, the lesion was found to be an extra-adrenal myelolipoma. This case report and review of the literature demonstrates the importance of the proper work-up and management of perirenal lipoma variants while addressing the issues of tissue biopsy, surgical intervention, and pre- and post-operative surveillance.

---

INTRODUCTION

Myelolipomas are mesenchymal tumors which consist of a mixture of mature adipose tissue with hematopoietic cells. This intriguing tumor most commonly occurs within the adrenal gland; however, it has been occasionally found within the pelvis, thorax, retroperitoneal space, and various other sites throughout the body[1-7]. There have been less than 60 reported cases of extra-adrenal myelolipomas to this date, with the majority of the literature describing neoplasms found within the pre-sacral space[2,8-10]. Perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipomas are especially rare, with only 9 cases previously reported[11]. We present a case of a patient with an incidentally discovered perirenal mass which, after having shown interval growth on longitudinal surveillance imaging studies, was surgically resected along with a left nephrectomy for presumed retroperitoneal liposarcoma. On final pathological analysis the lesion was found to be an extra-adrenal myelolipoma.

CASE REPORT

A 78-year-old gentleman presented to the surgical oncology clinic to be evaluated for a left-sided retroperitoneal mass that was incidentally discovered on a computed tomography (CT) scan for a suspected case of acute pancreatitis. His prior medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, acalculous cholecystitis, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease. Initial radiographic findings revealed a non-enhancing heterogeneous mass measuring approximately 3.8 cm × 2.3 cm in longitudinal and anterior-posterior (AP) dimensions, just inferior to the left renal vein and medial to the left kidney (Figure 1). As the lesion appeared to contain mostly adipose with a small amount of soft tissue density, a well differentiated liposarcoma was suspected. The patient was initially offered surgical resection of the lesion, which he refused. Given the small size of the mass and patient’s age and health status, the decision was made to closely monitor the lesion with routine cross-sectional surveillance imaging and regular follow-up at 4 to 6 mo.

Figure 1 Initial computed tomography scan. Shows incidentally found non-enhancing heterogeneous mass measuring approximately 3.8 cm × 2.3 cm in longitudinal (A) and anterior-posterior dimensions (B), just inferior to the left renal vein (long arrow) and medial to the left kidney (arrow).

Throughout the surveillance period, the patient did not complain of any new symptoms. Physical examination repeatedly revealed a soft, non-tender abdomen with no palpable masses or hernias. Repeat cross-sectional imaging studies, however, did reveal a slowly enlarging left-sided heterogeneous perirenal mass. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained 17 mo after initial diagnosis showed that the mass had increased in size to 5.0 cm × 3.4 cm (Figure 2). Four months prior the tumor had remained unchanged. The concern for a progressing malignant lesion prompted the decision to proceed with surgical intervention. Due to its proximity to the renal vessels, as well as the fact that the preoperative diagnosis was liposarcoma, the mass was excised en bloc with the left kidney in an attempt to gain wide surgical margins. The patient tolerated the procedure well and his post-operative course was uneventful. He was discharged home in stable condition on the ninth day following the procedure.

Figure 2 Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging obtained 17 mo after the initial diagnostic computed tomography scan shows that the mass, located just inferior to the left renal vein (long arrow) and medial to the left kidney (arrow), increased in size to 5.0 cm × 3.4 cm in longitudinal (A) and anterior-posterior dimensions (B).

Gross pathology revealed an encapsulated, well-defined, focally hemorrhagic mass measuring 7.2 cm × 4.1 cm × 3.3 cm in size. The tumor did not extend into the renal capsule or adrenal gland. Histology revealed that the mass was composed of mostly mature adipocytes mixed with islands of hematopoietic cells. Trilineage hematopoiesis was present, including nucleated red blood cells and megakaryocytes (Figure 3). Tumor resection margins were free. The above mentioned morphological features were consistent with the diagnosis of “perirenal (extra-adrenal) myelolipoma”.

Figure 3 Hematoxylin and eosin stain at 10 × (A) and 60 × (B) magnification. Shows mature adipose cells with hematopoietic cells including erythroid precursors, granulocytic precursors, and megakaryocytes.

DISCUSSION

Myelolipoma is a unique mesenchymal tumor that is composed of a mixture of adipose and hematopoietic cells. The first case of an adrenal lesion containing both fat and myeloid elements was described by Gierke[12] in 1905. The reported incidence of myelolipoma on autopsy ranges from 0.08% to 0.4%[13]. This type of tumor is most commonly localized to the adrenal gland; however, there are rare but well-documented cases of extra-adrenal involvement[1]. To our knowledge, less than 60 cases of extra-adrenal myelolipomas have been reported[2,8-10], most of them involving the pre-sacral space. Tumors involving the mediastinum, lung, spleen, mandible, and nasal cavity have also been described[2-7]. Perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipomas are especially rare, with only 9 cases described so far[11].

A review of the literature shows that extra-adrenal myelolipomas exhibit a slight female predominance and are typically discovered between the ages of 50 to 70 years old[4,7,11]. Most tumors are unilateral and have been found to range from 2 to 26 cm in size at the time of diagnosis[14,15]. The etiology of extra-adrenal myelolipomas is still to be established. Several theories exist regarding their embryologic origin and pathogenesis. Amin et al[16] suggest that there may be a relationship between the re-activation of primitive peritoneal foci of extramedullary hematopoiesis under pathological stresses (i.e., severe anemia, sepsis, myeloproliferative disease) and the origin and progression of extra-adrenal myelolipomas. Another theory postulates that myelolipomas originate from metaplasia of previously uncommitted adrenal cortical mesenchymal cells or hematopoietic stem cells that normally migrate to the adrenal gland during intrauterine development[16].

The widespread application of modern imaging techniques has led to a dramatic increase in the detection of extra-adrenal myelolipomas. The majority of patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and lesions are discovered incidentally on imaging for alternative medical problems. Typically, physical examination and routine blood tests fail to yield any conclusive diagnostic findings. Depending on the size and location of the lesion, some patients may present with vague flank or abdominal pain due to hemorrhage, mechanical compression, or tumor infarction[17]. CT and MRI have been used to diagnose extra-adrenal myelolipomas. When a myelolipoma is contained within the adrenal gland, the diagnosis is straightforward because it is the only known entity composed of adipose tissue occurring in this location[18]. A fatty mass within the retroperitoneal space represents a diagnostic challenge because the differential diagnosis includes an angiomyolipoma, a retroperitoneal teratoma, or a well-differentiated liposarcoma. A study that reviewed the MRI results of 126 consecutively imaged grossly fatty masses found that the sensitivity of MRI in diagnosing well-differentiated liposarcomas is 100%; however, its specificity is merely 83% due to the inability to differentiate between liposarcomas and other lipoma variants[19].

Fine needle biopsy under ultrasound or CT guidance may be useful for the diagnosis of extra-adrenal myelolipoma. Well-differentiated liposarcoma differs from myelolipoma in that the former contains atypical stromal cells, variable-sized adipocytes, some of them with nuclear atypia, and lipoblast which, however, are not diagnostic, being absent in some cases. By contrast, extra-adrenal myelolipomas are composed of mature adipocytes with scattered hematopoietic cells, including megakaryocytes[20]. Although these histological differences between the two tumors, in many cases the final diagnosis is difficult, if not impossible, based on tissue biopsy[11]. Furthermore, the risks of hemorrhage, rupture, or infection that are associated with biopsy must factor into a clinician’s decision to proceed with this invasive diagnostic procedure[11]. In our patient, tissue biopsy was deferred due to the patient’s preference to forego the procedure.

There is currently no standard treatment for patients with this disease. Daneshmand et al[21] suggest that small asymptomatic tumors (< 4 cm) should be monitored with routine cross-sectional surveillance imaging, while large symptomatic tumors (> 7 cm) should be surgically removed. Extra-adrenal myelolipomas have been removed using a thoracoabdominal incision, but recently a laparoscopic approach has proven to be just as effective[10]. Early detection and proper management of myelolipomas is important due to the potential for tumor growth and hemorrhage. A study of 86 myelolipomas found that hemorrhage is more common in larger lesions with a diameter measuring greater than 10 cm[22].

A review of 9 reported cases perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipomas, shows that the average age at diagnosis is 62 years of age (Table 1). Perirenal lesions exhibited a male-to-female ratio of 7:2. At the time of diagnosis, patients were either asymptomatic or complained of various symptoms including flank pain, dysuria, frequency, urgency, weight loss, hematuria, or abdominal distention. CT and ultrasound were the imaging modalities used to characterize the masses. Biopsy was used in only 2 of the 9 cases prior to surgical intervention. The average size on imaging is 8.7 cm × 7.4 cm, while the size of the resected masses on gross pathological evaluation is 11.8 cm × 8.0 cm × 5.9 cm. Treatment included open and laparoscopic mass excision with or without nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy depending on concern for adequate surgical margins. Upon reviewing the literature, we felt it was reasonable to monitor the lesion with routine surveillance imaging until the tumor increased in size and to perform a mass resection with a nephrectomy to ensure adequate surgical margins.

Table 1 Review of reported cases of perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipomas.

Age at timeof diagnosis (yr)	Sex	Presentation	Diagnostic imaging	Biopsy	Gross pathology	Treatment
45	Male	Asymptomatic	CT (5 cm × 5 cm)	No	6.0 cm × 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm	Partial nephrectomy
45	Female	Flank pain Dysuria Frequency Urgency	CT (10 cm × 7 cm)	Yes	9.0 cm × 6.4 cm × 5.5 cm	Laparoscopic mass resection
60	Male	Abdominal pain	CT (4.2 cm × 3.7 cm)	No	Not reported	Radical nephrectomy
63	Male	Asymptomatic	CT (6.5 cm × 5.5 cm)	No	Not reported	Open mass resection
65	Male	Flank pain, Weight loss Hematuria	CT (5.5 cm × 4.5 cm)	No	7.0 cm × 5.0 cm × 1.5 cm	Radical nephrectomy
66	Female	Abdominal distention	CT (20 cm × 20 cm)	No	20 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm	Open mass resection
67	Male	Asymptomatic	CT (7 cm × 5 cm)	No	Not reported	Radical nephrectomy
70	Male	Flank pain Fever	Ultrasound (12 cm × 8.5 cm)	No	17.0 cm × 10.0 cm × 5.0 cm	Open mass resection
77	Male	Abdominal distension Hypertension	CT (Bilateral fat-containing masses)	Yes	Not reported	Follow-up CT 3 mo showed no change

CT: Computed tomography.

Since an extra-adrenal myelolipoma is such a rare entity, a retroperitoneal mass that has imaging characteristics of a well-differentiated liposarcoma should ultimately end up being approached and treated as such. However, this report demonstrates that extra-adrenal myelolipoma should be considered as part of the list of differential diagnoses. In cases in which surgical extirpation of an extra-adrenal myelolipoma is performed, there are no clear recommendations for post-operative surveillance. Our review did not reveal a case of local recurrence of a retroperitoneal myelolipoma, however, routine radiographic surveillance would certainly be helpful to detect potential locally recurrent disease.

In summary, perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipoma is extremely rare. This neoplasm is typically discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging and commonly thought to be a liposarcoma. It can be managed conservatively or surgically depending on the patient’s symptoms or level of concern for a malignant lesion. Early detection and proper management of myelolipomas are important due to the potential for tumor growth and hemorrhage.

COMMENTS

Case characteristics

This case features a left-sided retroperitoneal mass that was incidentally discovered on a computed tomography (CT) scan for a suspected case of acute pancreatitis.

Clinical diagnosis

Imaging revealed a non-enhancing heterogeneous mass measuring approximately 3.8 cm x 2.3 cm in longitudinal and anterior-posterior dimensions, just inferior to the left renal vein and medial to the left kidney, and histological evaluation revealed that the mass was composed of mostly mature adipocytes mixed with islands of hematopoietic cells.

Differential diagnosis

Differential diagnosis was most concerning for liposarcoma, lipoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, or a fibrosarcoma.

Laboratory diagnosis

Laboratory findings were non-contributory to arriving at the final diagnosis.

Imaging diagnosis

CT and MRI were used to initially detect and follow the progression of the mass.

Pathological diagnosis

Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stain at 10 x and 60 x magnification revealed mature adipose cells with hematopoietic cells including erythroid precursors, granulocytic precursors, and megakaryocytes.

Treatment

The mass was excised en bloc with the left kidney in an attempt to gain wide surgical margins.

Related reports

The list of references to this article contains several related reports to aid readers to further understand this topic.

Term explanation

Myelolipoma is a unique mesenchymal tumor that is composed of a mixture of adipose and hematopoietic cells.

Experiences and lessons

Perirenal extra-adrenal myelolipomas are neoplasms that are typically discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging, they can be managed conservatively or surgically depending on the patient’s symptoms or level of concern for a malignant lesion, and early detection and proper management of myelolipomas are critical due to the potential for tumor growth and hemorrhage.

Peer review

This study describes a lesion which is not a unique phenomenon. Nevertheless, it is well writen with a good review of the literature.