Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 16, 2022; 10(35): 13138-13145
Published online Dec 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.13138
Unexpected delayed reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex: A case report and review of literature
Hao-Chen Wang, Cheng-Wei Lu, Tzu-Yu Lin, Ya-Ying Chang, Department of Anesthesiology, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
Cheng-Wei Lu, Tzu-Yu Lin, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Chung-Li 320, Taiwan
Ya-Ying Chang, International Program in Engineering for Bachelor, Yuan Ze University, Chung-Li 320, Taiwan
ORCID number: Ya-Ying Chang (0000-0002-0657-3876).
Author contributions: Wang HC and Lu CW contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and data collection; Wang HC and Lin TY performed the general anesthesia; Chang YY contributed to conceptualization and supervision; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Supported by Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. FEMH-2022-C-057.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ya-Ying Chang, PhD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21 Sec. 2 Nanya S. Road, Banqiao District, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan. gingerdoll@gmail.com
Received: November 3, 2022
Peer-review started: November 3, 2022
First decision: November 14, 2022
Revised: November 16, 2022
Accepted: November 18, 2022
Article in press: November 18, 2022
Published online: December 16, 2022

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Rocuronium, a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant, is usually administered during general anesthesia to facilitate endotracheal intubation and keep patients immobile during the surgery. Sugammadex, the selective reversal agent of rocuronium, fully reverses the neuromuscular blockade (NMB) at the end of surgery. Most reports show that sugammadex rapidly achieves a ratio of train-of-four (TOF), a quantitative method of neuromuscular monitoring, of 0.9 which ensures adequate recovery for safe extubation. However, very rare patients with neuromuscular diseases may respond poorly to sugammadex.

CASE SUMMARY

A 69-year-old female presented with abdominal fullness and nausea, and was diagnosed with gastroparesis. She underwent gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy under general anesthesia with rocuronium (0.7 mg/kg). At the end of surgery, sugammadex 3.6 mg/kg was administered when TOF showed 2 counts. Afterward, the TOF ratio recovered to 0.65 in 30 min. She was awake but could not fully open her eyelids. The tidal volume during spontaneous breathing was low. After additional doses of sugammadex (up to 7.3 mg/kg) in the following 3 h, the TOF ratio was 0.9, and the endotracheal tube was smoothly removed. After excluding possible mechanisms underlying the prolonged recovery course, we speculated our patient may have had an undiagnosed neuromuscular disease, hinted by her involuntary movement of the tongue and mouth. Furthermore, her poor renal function and history of delayed recovery from general anesthesia may be related to the long duration of rocuronium.

CONCLUSION

In our case, both prolonged rocuronium-induced NMB and poor response to sugammadex were noted. To optimize the dose of rocuronium, perioperative TOF combined with other neuromuscular monitoring is suggested.

Key Words: Sugammadex, Train-of-four, Rocuronium, Neuromuscular blockade, General anesthesia, Case report

Core Tip: Sugammadex reverses rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blocking effect, providing full and rapid recovery from general anesthesia. However, in rare cases, patients with neuromuscular diseases may response poorly to sugammadex. In our patient, suspected neuromuscular disease, renal insufficiency, and a history of delayed recovery from general anesthesia may indicate a delayed recovery course. An optimal dose of rocuronium adjusted by train-of-four neuromuscular monitoring throughout the surgery helps reduce the risk of prolonged recovery from general anesthesia.



INTRODUCTION

General anesthesia consisting of unconsciousness, immobility, analgesia and amnesia facilitates surgical treatment[1]. Steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents, such as rocuronium, are usually administered during general anesthesia to facilitate endotracheal intubation and to keep the patients immobile during the surgery[2,3]. Previous clinical study showed the duration of neuromuscular blocking effect induced by rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (2 × effective dose 95) is around 23-75 min in adult patients, but varies individually[4]. At the end of surgery, a reversal agent is usually employed to reverse the neuromuscular-blocking effect and helps patients regain their muscle strength. Acceleromyography train-of-four (TOF), a peripheral nerve stimulator placed over the adductor pollicis, is widely used to evaluate the level of perioperative neuromuscular blockade (NMB)[5]. This neuromuscular monitoring facilitates the quantitative measurement of muscle strength by showing the count or ratio of TOF. The TOF count ≥ 2 is considered suitable for the administration of reversal agents[6]. In addition, a TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 recommended by clinical guidelines is safe for endotracheal extubation[7], indicating a minimal risk of residual neuromuscular blocking effect. In clinical, safe extubation is critical for avoiding perioperative respiratory complications[8-12].

The first selective binding reversal agent for steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents, sugammadex (Bridon®), encapsules rocuronium and reverses the neuromuscular blocking effect[13-15]. Many clinical studies have shown full and rapid recovery of muscle strength by sugammadex, even in circumstances of moderate to profound muscular blockade[12,14-20]. A dose of 2 mg/kg sugammadex is recommended when TOF count > 2[21]. Restoration of neuromuscular function using the recommended dose of sugammadex is demonstrated in 95% of patients within 5 min[21]. Here we report a case of prolonged rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blocking effect and delayed reversal by sugammadex. The underlying mechanism and the role of TOF are discussed.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 69-year-old female (140 cm/55 kg) complained of poor appetite, nausea and vomiting.

History of present illness

The patient had persistent abdominal fullness with intermittent nausea for several years. She visited our hospital for further evaluation because of a recent exacerbation of gastrointestinal symptoms. The gastric emptying scan showed a significantly prolonged oatmeal-based gastric emptying time, particularly in the first hour. The percentage of gastric retention after one hour (93%), two hours (50.25%), three hours (25.10%) or four hours (14.40%) was higher than the normal limit. Due to gastroparesis, the patient was admitted in our hospital for gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy.

History of past illness

The patient had history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and α-thalassemia. She regularly took antihypertensive drugs and oral hypoglycemic agents.

Personal and family history

The patient was neither a drinker nor a smoker. No family history of myasthenia gravis, neuromuscular disease or autoimmune diseases was recorded. Her surgical history included laparoscopic cholecystectomy, lumbar spinal surgery and functional endoscopy sinus surgery.

Physical examination

Physical examination revealed dry eye and dry mouth, which may be DM-related, and pale conjunctiva that may be a sign of anemia. Hypoactive bowel sound and mild epigastric tenderness were also noted. Raynaud's phenomena or arthritis-related symptoms were not observed. Notably, non-specific involuntary movement of mouth and twitching of the tongue for years were reported by the patient herself. Since these hyperkinetic movements did not cause any daily functional impairment, she did not seek any medical consultation. Slow movement while changing position and poor hand grip muscle strength were found at the bedside.

Laboratory examinations

Before the surgery, routine examinations including levels of electrolytes (potassium 4.1 mmol/L and sodium 140 mmol/L), coagulation function and liver function (alanine transaminase 9 U/L) were all unremarkable. The complete blood count test showed anemia (Hgb 7.8 g/dL). Furthermore, preoperative laboratory findings displayed an increased level of creatinine (1.52 mg/dL) and blood urea nitrogen (26 mg/dL). A low estimated glomerular filtration rate, 34 mL/min/1.73 m2, was noted during this admission.

Imaging examinations

Preoperative chest X-ray revealed normal heart size with no significant lung lesion. Electrocardiography revealed a normal sinus rhythm. Abdominal sonography showed bilateral renal cysts and parenchymal renal diseases. Panendoscopy revealed a gastric ulcer scar in the deformed antrum. No obvious obstruction or gastroesophageal reflux was observed in the subsequent barium study.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

DM-related refractory gastroparesis.

TREATMENT
Surgical procedure

As the endoscope traveled down the esophagus, increased resistance was noted at the pyloric ring. A mucosal incision was made at 5 cm proximal to the pyloric ring, followed by a submucosal tunneling. One 1.5 cm long myotomy was performed at the pylorus. Finally, the mucosal entry point was closed by endoclips.

Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia

On arrival at the operating room, hypertension (190/97 mmHg) with oxygen saturation of 96% on room air was noted. After preoxygenation, rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia was conducted with propofol (100 mg), fentanyl (75 μg) and rocuronium (40 mg). Anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane (1-1.3 minimum alveolar concentration) through a 7.0# endotracheal tube. During the entire surgery, the Bispectral Index value was kept between 40-60. No supplemental rocuronium was administered intraoperatively.

Recovery from general anesthesia

Surgery was completed smoothly within 1.5 h. Before administration of the reversal agent, we turned off sevofluorane and applied TOF to this patient. Her body temperature was 36.5 oC. The TOF count was 2, therefore, the first dose of sugammadex 200 mg (3.6 mg/kg) was administered. After 30 min, the TOF count increased to 4 with a TOF ratio of 0.65. Though the patient was fully awake and able to follow our instructions by slight nodding, spontaneous breathing with a low tidal volume (30-50 mL) was noted. She tried to lift her eyelids but failed. During the following 2 h, her TOF ratio slowly increased to 0.8 after the second and third doses of sugammadex 200 mg. The patient was able to open her eyes and grip her hands. About 3.5 h after the end of surgery, the TOF ratio was 0.9, and her tidal volume during spontaneous breathing increased to 200 mL. The arterial blood gas analysis data were within normal ranges. About 4.5 h after the end of the surgery, her tidal volume reached 350 mL (TOF ratio = 0.95), followed by smooth removal of the endotracheal tube. The course of recovery from general anesthesia in this patient is shown in Figure 1. The patient was then sent to the post-anesthetic care unit for further care. She was transferred to the ward in 1 h without any discomfort.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Timeline for the trend of train-of-four count or train-of-four ratio at the end of surgery. TOFc: Train-of-four count; TOFr: Train-of-four ratio; TV: Tidal volume.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day three. She was followed for 3 mo after the surgery, without recurrent symptoms.

DISCUSSION

According to previous clinical studies, a variety of predisposing factors prolong the neuromuscular blocking effect of rocuronium, including drug interaction or pathological states. First, rocuronium may have an enhanced effect when interacting with anti-arrhythmic agents, aminoglycosides or local anesthetic agents[22]. During the perioperative period, we did not use these drugs in our patient. Second, low calcium or high magnesium levels lead to delay recovery from NMB[23]. In our case, a normal calcium level (1.25 mmol/L) and mildly low magnesium level (0.43 mmol/L) were found at the end of surgery. Third, some autoimmune diseases such as myasthenia gravis may be linked to prolonged postoperative recovery. In our case, undiagnosed myasthenia gravis was ruled out based on the normal level of acetylcholine receptor antibody (< 0.2 nmol/L). In addition, the levels of Anti-Ro antibody (7 U/mL) or Anti-La antibody (9 U/mL) were within the normal ranges, which excluded Sjogren's syndrome. We also excluded other possible mechanism underlying the observed prolonged effect of rocuronium, including hypothermia, human errors, intravenous infusion problems and inaccurate TOF placement.

In addition to the aforementioned factors, the duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blocking effect varies individually. After reviewing our patient’s medical record, delayed extubation was also found after functional endoscopy sinus surgery in 2010, when cisatracurium (10 mg) and neostigmine (3.5 mg) were used. This document led us to speculate that our case was an outlier who was extremely sensitive to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Furthermore, in our case, renal insufficiency may lead to the long duration of rocuronium. Although a previous study has proven the safe and effective use of rocuronium in patients of renal insufficiency[24], poor clearance leads to a longer duration of rocuronium in patients with renal insufficiency than in patients with normal renal function[25]. Moreover, females are more sensitive to rocuronium than males[26,27]. Taken together, in our case, there were multiple predisposing factors for the long duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blocking effect.

Sugammadex reverses the neuromuscular blocking effect by directly binding to rocuronium[13]. This novel agent encapsulates rocuronium and promotes its dissociation from the acetylcholine receptor[13]. One molecule of sugammadex binds to one molecule of rocuronium, and antagonizes its effect[28]. Therefore, in our case, 600 mg sugammadex (2.75 × 10-4 moles) was sufficient to antagonize the effect of 40 mg rocuronium (6.55 × 10-5 moles). Theoretically, the effect of sugammadex is poor if the binding affinity between sugammadex and rocuronium is low. To date, very few published reports have discussed about the mechanism underlying the possible poor effect of sugammadex. Only one in vitro study revealed that dexamethasone may mitigate the reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB by sugammadex in a dose-dependent manner[29]. In our case, only 0.09 mg/kg dexamethasone was used, which should not significantly impede the action of sugammadex. Furthermore, sugammadex can be used safely and effectively in patients with renal insufficiency[30,31], although the recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9 may be prolonged in patients with end-stage renal disease[32].

Based on our literature review, there are sporadic previously published case reports about delayed reversal of neuromuscular blocking effect by sugammadex, as summarized in Table 1. Notably, except for patients with high magnesium levels, nearly all cases refractory to the rapid effect of sugammadex are patients with neuromuscular or movement disorders, including myasthenia gravis[33], Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease[34] or Parkinson’s disease[35]. A previous study showed that although most researchers have reported the successful use of sugammadex in patients with neuromuscular diseases, unpredictability in response or individual differences still remains an issue[36]. The possible mechanism was reported to be the redistribution of unbound neuromuscular blocking agent molecules from the peripheral compartments to the central compartments[37]. Interestingly, our patient reported tremor of her tongue with involuntary movement of her mouth for years. The associated signs included poor hand grip strength. Since tongue tremor is a rare initial presentation of essential tremor[38], our patient may be a case of undiagnosed essential tremor or other movement disorders. The correlation between muscle weakness and essential tremor had also been demonstrated[39]. In addition, essential tremor or other movement disorders are known to involve gastrointestinal symptoms such as gastroparesis[40] that was our patient’s diagnosis during this admission. Taken together, we speculated that our case may have undiagnosed neuromuscular diseases, which may partially explain her poor response to sugammadex. Further research and evaluation are required to confirm our hypotheses.

Table 1 Summary of previously reported cases about delayed recovery after sugammadex.
Ref.
Patient data
Past history
Surgery (duration)
Total dose of muscle relaxants; total dose of sugammadex
Time to extubation from first dose of sugammadex
Possible causes of delayed recovery after sugammadex
Ortiz-Gómez et al[28], 2014 60 yr/Male (115 kg/175 cm)HTNSigmoid colon resection (360 min)SCC 100 mg + rocuronium 83 mg; 1120 mg208 minAn extreme outlier with resistance to sugammadex
Altıparmak et al[35], 201958 yr/Female (75 kg)HTN, CVD, PDHysterectomy (90 min)Rocuronium 45 mg; 800 mg30 minPD
Brown et al[44], 201958 yr/Male (69 kg/170 cm)GlaucomaRobot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (not mentioned)Vecuronium 9 mg; 400 mg27 minHigh magnesium
Fernandes et al[33], 201927 yr/Female (110 kg/172 cm)Myasthenia gravisLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (not mentioned)Rocuronium 20 mg; 800 mg45 minMyasthenia gravis
Moriwaki and Kayashima[23], 201937 yr/Female (42 kg/144 cm)HTN, GDM; preeclampsiaC/S (95 min)Rocuronium 40 mg; 200 mg> 15 minHigh magnesium, pregnancy
Hiramatsu et al[34], 202263 yr/Male (68 kg/164 cm)RA, DM, Af, restrictive lung diseaseHip arthroplasty (273 min)Rocuronium 50 mg; 1200 mg18 hCMTD type 1A
Kiss et al[37], 201325 yr/Male (BMI: 32)Myasthenia gravisThymectomy (120 min)Rocuronium 50 mg; 12 mg/kgNot mentionedMyasthenia gravis

To date, there have been few studies on the use of TOF in patients of neuromuscular diseases. Some researchers argued about the accuracy of TOF ratio in cases of myasthenia gravis, and recommended the concomitant use of other neuromuscular monitoring techniques such as tetanic stimulation[41]. Others emphasized the placement of neuromuscular monitoring at multiple sites in patients of neuromuscular disorders[42]. We suggest the employment of TOF throughout the surgery to avoid consumption of rocuronium more than the patient’s requirement, since preanesthetic TOF helps predict the requirement of muscle relaxants in patients of myasthenia gravis[43].

CONCLUSION

Our patient’s subclinical symptoms may have been related to an undiagnosed neuromuscular disease. Poor renal function and a history of delayed recovery from general anesthesia also hint at the possible prolonged effect of rocuronium. Our case may be an outlier who was extremely sensitive to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents or has poor response to sugammadex. The role of perioperative TOF in optimizing the dose of neuromuscular blocking agents cannot be overemphasized.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: Taiwan

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Gao C, China; Velnar T, Slovenia S-Editor: Fan JR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Fan JR

References
1.  Forman SA, Chin VA. General anesthetics and molecular mechanisms of unconsciousness. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;46:43-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  England AJ, Margarson MP, Feldman SA. Tracheal intubation conditions after one minute: rocuronium and vecuronium, alone and in combination. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:336-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Fuchs-Buder T, Schlaich N, Ziegenfuss T. [Rocuronium for anesthesia induction in elective procedures. Time course of muscular blockade and intubation after administration of 2-compartment ED95 (0.6 mg/kg) and dose reduction (0.4 mg/kg)]. Anaesthesist. 1999;48:164-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:913-918.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 294]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 255]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Fuchs-Buder T, Schreiber JU, Meistelman C. Monitoring neuromuscular block: an update. Anaesthesia. 2009;64 Suppl 1:82-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kim KS, Cheong MA, Lee HJ, Lee JM. Tactile assessment for the reversibility of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1080-1085.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Difficult Airway Society Extubation Guidelines Group; Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A. Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:318-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 289]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 295]  [Article Influence: 24.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Duţu M, Ivaşcu R, Tudorache O, Morlova D, Stanca A, Negoiţă S, Corneci D. Neuromuscular monitoring: an update. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;25:55-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:946-954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 110]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Alenezi FK, Alnababtah K, Alqahtani MM, Olayan L, Alharbi M. The association between residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) and critical respiratory events: a prospective cohort study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021;10:14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear T, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E. Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade is associated with impaired clinical recovery. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:133-141.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 104]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Plaud B, Baillard C, Bourgain JL, Bouroche G, Desplanque L, Devys JM, Fletcher D, Fuchs-Buder T, Lebuffe G, Meistelman C, Motamed C, Raft J, Servin F, Sirieix D, Slim K, Velly L, Verdonk F, Debaene B. Guidelines on muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;39:125-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 13.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Gijsenbergh F, Ramael S, Houwing N, van Iersel T. First human exposure of Org 25969, a novel agent to reverse the action of rocuronium bromide. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:695-703.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 195]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 190]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Groudine SB, Soto R, Lien C, Drover D, Roberts K. A randomized, dose-finding, phase II study of the selective relaxant binding drug, Sugammadex, capable of safely reversing profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:555-562.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Suy K, Morias K, Cammu G, Hans P, van Duijnhoven WG, Heeringa M, Demeyer I. Effective reversal of moderate rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex, a selective relaxant binding agent. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:283-288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MA, Kerkkamp H, Heeringa M, Klimek M. Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex: a multicenter, dose-finding and safety study. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:239-244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 138]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 142]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sacan O, White PF, Tufanogullari B, Klein K. Sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate and edrophonium-atropine. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:569-574.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 158]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Sparr HJ, Vermeyen KM, Beaufort AM, Rietbergen H, Proost JH, Saldien V, Velik-Salchner C, Wierda JM. Early reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:935-943.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 156]  [Article Influence: 9.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, Blobner M. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1054-1060.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Pongrácz A, Szatmári S, Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Tassonyi E. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex at the reappearance of four twitches to train-of-four stimulation. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:36-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Cammu G. Sugammadex: Appropriate Use in the Context of Budgetary Constraints. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018;8:178-185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Kim YB, Sung TY, Yang HS. Factors that affect the onset of action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70:500-510.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Moriwaki K, Kayashima K. Prolonged neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal after sugammadex administration in cesarean section under general anesthesia: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2019;5:28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Della Rocca G, Pompei L, Coccia C, Costa MG, Cecchini V, Vilardi V, Pietropaoli P. Atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium in patients with renal failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2003;69:605-611, 612, 5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Craig RG, Hunter JM. Neuromuscular blocking drugs and their antagonists in patients with organ disease. Anaesthesia. 2009;64 Suppl 1:55-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Adamus M, Gabrhelik T, Marek O. Influence of gender on the course of neuromuscular block following a single bolus dose of cisatracurium or rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:589-595.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Xue FS, Tong SY, Liao X, Liu JH, An G, Luo LK. Dose-response and time course of effect of rocuronium in male and female anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:667-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Ortiz-Gómez JR, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Fornet-Ruiz I. Failure of sugammadex to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: a case report. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:708-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Rezonja K, Sostaric M, Vidmar G, Mars T. Dexamethasone produces dose-dependent inhibition of sugammadex reversal in in vitro innervated primary human muscle cells. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:755-763.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Panhuizen IF, Gold SJ, Buerkle C, Snoeck MM, Harper NJ, Kaspers MJ, van den Heuvel MW, Hollmann MW. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex 4 mg kg-1 for reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade in patients with severe renal impairment. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:777-784.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Min KC, Lasseter KC, Marbury TC, Wrishko RE, Hanley WD, Wolford DG, Udo de Haes J, Reitmann C, Gutstein DE. Pharmacokinetics of sugammadex in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment . Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;55:746-752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Kim YS, Lim BG, Won YJ, Oh SK, Oh JS, Cho SA. Efficacy and Safety of Sugammadex for the Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Fernandes HDS, Ximenes JLS, Nunes DI, Ashmawi HA, Vieira JE. Failure of reversion of neuromuscular block with sugammadex in patient with myasthenia gravis: case report and brief review of literature. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:160.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Hiramatsu S, Moriwaki K, Nakao M, Tsutsumi YM. Rocuronium-induced respiratory paralysis refractory to sugammadex in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Can J Anaesth. 2022;69:364-368.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal A, Pınarbaşı A, Gümüş Demirbilek S. Delayed recovery from neuromuscular block after sugammadex in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:e459-e460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Gurunathan U, Kunju SM, Stanton LML. Use of sugammadex in patients with neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review of case reports. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Kiss G, Lacour A, d'Hollander A. Fade of train-of-four ratio despite administration of more than 12 mg kg(-1) sugammadex in a myasthenia gravis patient receiving rocuronium. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:854-855.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Kusanale A, Wilson A, Brennan P. Tongue tremor: a rare initial presentation of essential tremor. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:e82-e83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Özer G, Kirmaci ZİK, Adigüzel H, Ergun N. Correlation of proximal and distal muscle strength with upper limb functional ability in patients with essential tremor. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120:601-607.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Pradeep S, Mehanna R. Gastrointestinal disorders in hyperkinetic movement disorders and ataxia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021;90:125-133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Itoh H, Shibata K, Nitta S. Neuromuscular monitoring in myasthenic syndrome. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:562-567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Matsui S, Tanaka S, Kiyosawa K, Tanaka T, Kawamata M. [Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Importance of Monitoring Neuromuscular Function at Multiple Sites]. Masui. 2015;64:1273-1276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Mann R, Blobner M, Jelen-Esselborn S, Busley R, Werner C. Preanesthetic train-of-four fade predicts the atracurium requirement of myasthenia gravis patients. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:346-350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Brown AF, Cobert J, Dierkes J, Kuhn CM, Grant SA. Delayed Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal With Sugammadex After Vecuronium, Desflurane, and Magnesium Administration: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2019;13:295-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]