Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2022; 10(34): 12637-12647
Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12637
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the central nervous system: A case report
Zhen-Jin Su, Ze-Shang Guo, Heng-Tong Wan, Xin-Yu Hong, Department of Neurosurgical Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China
ORCID number: Zhen-Jin Su (0000-0001-9695-7402); Xin-Yu Hong (0000-0002-6939-3055).
Author contributions: Su ZJ, Guo ZS, and Wan HT designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, explained the data, drafted the manuscript, and performed the literature review; Hong XY performed the surgery and contributed to preoperative and postoperative imaging and analysis and interpretation of pathological and immunohistochemical results; Su ZJ revised the language of the manuscript and made critical revisions to finalize the version submitted; Hong XY provided critical expertise, approved the submitted article, and agreed to be responsible for all aspects of the work; All authors made read and approved the submitted version.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient and her family for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xin-Yu Hong, PhD, Neurosurgeon, Professor, Department of Neurosurgical Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Street, Changchun City, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China. hongxy@jlu.edu.cn
Received: June 30, 2022
Peer-review started: June 30, 2022
First decision: August 4, 2022
Revised: September 16, 2022
Accepted: November 7, 2022
Article in press: November 7, 2022
Published online: December 6, 2022
Processing time: 154 Days and 22 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) occurring in the central nervous system is very rare, and thus its pathogenesis is unknown. This case report and literature review aimed to explore the pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging findings, pathological characteristics, immunohistochemical characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and risks of postoperative recurrence of IMT in the central nervous system.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with an exophthalmic protrusion and double vision in the left eye that had persisted for 3 mo. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 2.4 cm × 1.3 cm heterogeneous large mass in the bottom of the left anterior cranial fossa, which was closely related to the dura mater. Before surgery, we suspected the mass to be meningioma. The entire mass was successfully removed under neuronavigation and electrophysiological monitoring, and postoperative pathology indicated an IMT with extensive infiltration of chronic inflammatory cells and scattered multinucleated giant cells. Head MRI at the 3-mo follow-up showed that the tumor at the bottom of left anterior cranial fossa had been completely resected without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

From the histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses, the present case suggests that the pathogenesis of IMT-CNS is related to autoimmunity.

Key Words: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; Central nervous system; Pathogeny; Diagnosis; Treatment; Risk of postoperative recurrence; Case report

Core Tip: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) rarely occur in the central nervous system (CNS), and the pathogenesis of IMT-CNS is unknown. We present a 67-year-old woman with IMT-CNS who presented with an exophthalmic protrusion and double vision in the left eye lasting for 3 mo. A 2.4 cm × 1.3 cm mass was found by magnetic resonance imaging at the left anterior cranial fossa base, and postoperative pathology indicated an IMT. Histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses indicated that the IMT-CNS pathogenesis may be autoimmunity related. The main treatments for INT-CNS are gross tumor resection or rituximab infusion combined with high-dose prednisone.



INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are characterized by proliferation of myofibroblastic spindle cells with mixed inflammatory infiltrates of plasma cells, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and histiocytes. While the most common site for these tumors is the lung in the form of a plasma cell granuloma, IMTs can occur in nearly every organ system, including the lung, liver, mesenteric system, gastrointestinal tract, retroperitoneum, urinary bladder, upper respiratory tract, and mediastinum. However, an IMT of the central nervous system (IMT-CNS) is an extremely rare disease[1,2].

IMTs were once referred to with diverse names such as inflammatory pseudotumor, plasma cell granuloma, pseudosarcomatous myofibroblastic proliferation, and inflammatory myofibrohistiocytic proliferation[3-5]. Then in 2002 the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue tumors renamed these lesions as “inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors” and were allocated to the soft tissue tumor category. When the WHO revised the classification of soft tissue tumors in 2003 and again 2020, no changes were made regarding IMTs. However, in the latest 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors, the content related to IMTs was revised to be consistent with that of soft tissue tumors. Recent studies have shown that nearly 50% of IMTs have clonal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor tyrosine kinase gene located on 2p23 and show immunohistochemical expression of the ALK protein[6].

Herein, we presented a case in which an IMT was found in the bottom left anterior cranial fossa. To better understand the pathological and radiological features of IMT-CNS as well as the relevant surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy, prognosis, and important different diagnoses, we also reviewed 49 cases of IMT-CNS reported in the literature since the year 2000.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 67-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for an exophthalmic protrusion and double vision in the left eye persisting for 3 mo.

History of present illness

The patient’s symptoms had started 3 mo prior with an exophthalmic protrusion and double vision in the left eye.

History of past illness

The patient had no notable medical history.

Personal and family history

The patient had no notable personal and family history.

Physical examination

On physical examination, the patient had a temperature of 36.6 °C, heart rate of 93 bpm, respiratory rate of 16 breaths/min, blood pressure of 180/90 mmHg, and oxygen saturation in room air of 98%. The physical examination showed a fixed left eyeball, without any other pathological signs.

Laboratory examinations

The preoperative complete blood count and coagulation results were all within normal ranges. Postoperative blood analysis revealed mild leukocytosis based on a leukocyte count of 11 × 109/L with predominantly neutrophils, a mildly reduced hemoglobin level of 113 g/L, a markedly elevated C-reactive protein level of 180 mg/dL, and a normal procalcitonin level of 0.056 ng/mL. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was also normal. Arterial blood gas analysis showed mild lactic acid accumulation and metabolic acidosis. Other test results including blood glucose, urine analysis, stool analysis and coagulation were all within normal ranges.

Imaging examinations

Computed tomography showed a hypointense mass in the bottom of the left anterior cranial fossa with a Computed tomography value of 45 HU. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a large oval mass measuring 2.4 cm × 1.3 cm in the bottom of the left middle cranial fossa, with slight hyperintense signals on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and slightly hypointense signals on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) (Figure 1A and B). Isointense signal was observed on the fluid attenuated inversion recovery image (Figure 1C). After gadolinium administration, obvious heterogenous enhancement was observed (Figure 1D). MRI showed significant compression displacement of the left optic nerve. No obvious restriction was observed on diffusion weighted imaging.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Magnetic resonance imaging. A: T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image before the operation showed the left anterior fossa floor occupation (arrow); B: T2-weighted MRI before surgery showed the left anterior fossa floor occupation (arrow); C: MRI fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequence before operation showed the left anterior fossa floor occupation (arrow); D: Preoperative MRI enhancement sequence showed the left anterior fossa floor occupation (arrow); E: One week after the operation, the MRI enhanced sequence showed the left anterior fossa base occupation (arrow); F: Three months after surgery, MRI enhanced sequence showed the left anterior fossa floor occupation (arrow).
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The results of pathological examination were suggestive of IMT. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin sections predominantly showed an IMT with extensive infiltration of chronic inflammatory cells and scattered multinucleated giant cells (Figure 2A and B). Immunohistochemical analysis indicated that the tumor was negative for ALK expression (Figure 2C). However, the specimen was positive for exponential moving average (Figure 2D), immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4, Figure 2E), vimentin (Figure 2F), smooth muscle actin, CD20, and Bcl-2 as well as negative for S-100, PR, and SSTR2. In addition, in situ hybridization showed negative results for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded RNA.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Pathological section. A: Magnification of hematoxylin-eosin staining pathological section (× 100); B: Magnification of hematoxylin-eosin staining pathological section (× 400); C: Immunohistochemical anaplastic lymphoma kinase of tumor pathological section (magnification × 400); D: Immunohistochemical exponential moving average of tumor pathological section (magnification × 400); E: Tumor pathological section immunohistochemical immunoglobulin G4 (magnification × 400); F: Immunohistochemical vimentin of tumor pathological section (magnification × 400).
TREATMENT

A preoperative clinical and radiological diagnosis of meningioma was made, and surgery was performed with preoperative neuronavigation and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The tumor was located at the base of the anterior cranial fossa 3.5 cm away from the bone window. The tumor appeared kermesinus and tough with a clear boundary from the surrounding tissues. The basal part was adhered tightly to the base of the anterior cranial fossa and sellar tubercle. The tumor filled the entire left wing of the sphenoid bone and completely wrapped around the pituitary stalk, left optic nerve, left internal carotid artery, and left posterior communicating artery. The tumor was pushing the left oculomotor nerve outward. The tumor blood supply decreased significantly after the tumor base was severed. During surgery, the tumor was completely removed. The patient then developed oculomotor nerve palsy after surgery. Hence, we suspected anoculomotor schwannoma. Postoperative computed tomography (Figure 1E) showed that the lesion was completely resected, with no signs of residual tumor.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

This patient was followed up at 3 mo after surgery. Head MRI showed that the tumor at the bottom left anterior cranial fossa had been completed resected without recurrence (Figure 1F). As the tumor was completely wrapped around the left optic nerve before surgery, the nerve was inevitably injured during surgery. On general medical examination, the vision of the left eye had improved to a level only slightly lower than that preoperation. The function of the left abducens nerve had recovered. In addition, headache and ophthalmalgia were completely resolved.

DISCUSSION

IMT in the CNS, as observed in the present case, is very rare. For the purpose of characterizing the features of this disease, we performed a literature review of IMT-CNS cases. We recorded and analyzed the data for all cases that met the inclusion criteria of ALK immunohistochemical staining and treatment involving surgical resection since 2000 based on the timing of the WHO definition. After reviewing the literature related to IMT, we recorded the relevant data for 49 cases, which are presented in Table 1 in reverse chronological order.

Table 1 Summary of 49 cases of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the central nervous system reported in the literature since 2000.
Ref.
Age in yr/sex
Duration of symptom in mo
Main symptoms and signs
Location
Contrast enhancement
Tumor diameter in cm
ALK expression
Main treatment
Chemotherapy
Prognosis
Present case67/F3DiplopiaLeft middle cranial fossaIntense2.4NegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Wang et al[5], 201921/F0.5Blurred visionRight frontal lobeIntense10.0NegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Wang et al[5], 201960/MN/AGait disturbanceCerebellar hemisphereIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Wang et al[5], 201948/FSeveralParanoidRight temporal lobeIntense5.3NegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Wang et al[5], 201920/F0.75HeadacheRight temporal lobeIntense5.0PositiveGTRNone7 mo after 1st surgery
Wang et al[5], 201982/F6Memory decreaseRight temporal lobeIntenseN/AN/AGTRNoneNo recurrence
Wang et al[5], 201951/F1.5HeadacheCerebellar hemisphereIntenseN/AN/ABiopsySteroidN/A
Kuang et al[5], 201653/M12Blurred visionPinealIntenseN/AN/AGTRNoneNo recurrence
PascualGallego et al[7], 201347/FN/AHeadacheLeft temporooccipital lobeIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNone4 mo after 1st surgery
Denis et al[19], 201326/M3Headache, blurred visionLeft frontal lobeIntense2.0PositiveGTRNone2 mo after 1st surgery
Denis et al[19], 201317/FN/ASeizuresLeft frontal lobeN/AN/APositiveGTRNone2.5 yr after 1st surgery
Denis et al[19], 201365/FN/ABlurred visionOccipital lobeIntense5.0NegativeSTRNoneNo recurrence
Denis et al[19], 201343/M6HeadacheOrbitIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Denis et al[19], 20137/MN/AN/ARight temporal fossaN/A2.0PositiveGTRNone1.5 yr after 1st surgery
Denis et al[19], 201324/MN/AN/ALeft temporal lobeN/AN/APositiveGTRNone2 yr after 1st surgery
Kolenc et al[18], 201377/FN/ARight partial motoric seizuresLeft temporal lobeIntenseN/ANegativeBiopsyCorticosteroidsNo recurrence
Moss et al[14], 201236/FN/ADiplopiaLeft middle cranial fossaIntenseN/ANegativeSTRCorticosteroids24 mo after 1st surgery
Moss et al[14], 201250/F5HeadacheCavernous sinusIntenseN/ANegativeSteroidNoneN/A
Kato et al[28], 201160/MN/AGait disturbanceCerebellarIntense1.8NegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
de Oliveira et al[27], 20097/M3HeadacheRight temporal fossaIntense4.0PositiveGTRNone24 mo after 1st surgery
Lui et al[2], 200960/FN/ABlurred visionCerebral falxIntenseN/ANegativeGTRRadiation therapyNo recurrence
Lui et al[2], 200952/FN/AN/ARight ventricleIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Lui et al[2], 200945/MN/ALeft-sided weaknessRight frontal lobeN/AN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Lui et al[2], 200926/F6Blurred visionLeft occipital lobeIntenseN/ANegativeBiopsyCorticosteroids, thalidomideNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 20088/MN/AAttention deficiencyLeft temporal lobeIntenseN/ANegativeSTRNoneNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 200828/FN/ASeizureLeft occipital lobeIntense0.8PositiveGTRNoneNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 200830/MN/AHeadachePosterior fossaN/AN/ANegativeGTRRadiation therapyNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 200831/F1HeadacheRight frontal lobeN/AN/AN/AGTRNoneNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 200874/FN/AHeadache, seizuresRight parietal lobeN/A3.8GTRNoneNo recurrence
Swain et al[6], 20080.8/FN/ASeizuresRight temporal lobeN/A8.4GTRNoneNo recurrence
Miyahara et al[20], 200873/M1Gait disturbanceParaceleN/AN/AN/AGTRSteroidDied of complications
Miyahara et al[20], 200848/MN/AMemory decreaseParaceleN/AN/AN/AGTRSteroidNo recurrence
Miyahara et al[20], 200818/MN/AN/AParaceleN/AN/AN/AGTRSteroidNo recurrence
Miyahara et al[20], 200863/FN/AHeadacheParaceleN/AN/AN/AGTRSteroidNo recurrence
Miyahara et al[20], 200850/M0.3BlepharoptosisLeft orbit, cavernous sinusIntense1.5NegativeBiopsyCorticosteroidsProgressive reduction
Jeon et al[1], 200543/MN/ADizzinessOrbit, falx, sup. sagittal sinus, tentoriumN/AN/ANegativeSTRCorticosteroids12 yr after 1st surgery
Jeon et al[1], 200531/MN/AHeadache, ptosisCavernous sinusIntense1.5NegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200541/MN/AN/ATemporal lobeIntenseN/ANegativeSTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200529/MN/AAphasiaTemporal and frontal lobesIntenseN/ANegativeSteroidNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200542/MN/AN/ASubduraIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200550/MN/ASeizuresFrontal lobeIntense5.0NegativeSTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200552/FN/ASeizuresOccipital lobeIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200524/FN/ADiplopiaOrbitIntenseN/ANegativeGTRNoneNo recurrence
Jeon et al[1], 200565/FN/AN/AOccipital lobeIntense4.0NegativeGTRNone7 yr after 1st surgery
Roche et al[10], 200420/F0.3HeadacheLeft temporal lobeIntenseN/AN/ASTRCorticosteroidsDramatic decrease in the mass size
Hausler et al[11], 2003N/A/MN/ASeizuresLeft temporal lobeN/AN/ANegativeSTRNoneNo recurrence
Hausler et al[11], 200315/MN/ASeizuresOccipital lobeIntenseN/AN/ASTRRadiation therapyNo recurrence
Hausler et al[11], 200317/FN/AHeadacheLeft frontal lobeIntense6.0PositiveGTRNone20 mo after 1st surgery
Buccoliero et al[9], 200370/M6Partial loss of visionThe bottom of the frontal lobesIntense2.0NegativeBiopsyCorticosteroids, radiation therapyNo remission

Among the 49 cases, 27 cases (55.1%) were treated by simple complete resection of the mass, 5 cases (10.2%) by simple partial resection of the mass, and the other 17 cases (34.7%) with comprehensive treatment. We found that the method of resection did not affect the recurrence of IMT (P = 0.521; Table 1). Postoperative immunohistochemical results showed that a total of 10 cases (20.4%) were ALK positive. A total of 9 cases (18.4%) experienced recurrence within 5 years after comprehensive treatment (Table 1). We observed that positive ALK expression in IMTs was associated with a higher recurrence rate (6/10) than negative ALK expression (1/14; P = 0.009).

Epidemiology

IMT is a type of mesenchymal neoplasm, which frequently occurs in the lung[5,7]. IMT most commonly affects children and young adults, with a median age at first onset of 36 years[5]. The youngest reported age at onset was 3 mo[8] (age range: 3 mo to 82 years). Among the 49 cases reviewed, the mean patient age at onset was 41.0 years (range: 7–82 years), and there were 24 male and 25 female patients. Among these patients, the presenting sites were the hemicerebrum (n = 26), cerebellum (n = 3), basis cranii (n = 6), ventricle (n = 5), cavernous sinus (n = 3), and other CNS sites (n = 6; Table 1). By comparison, our patient was a 67-year-old woman who had an IMT in the bottom of the left anterior cranial fossa, and thus this case was extremely rare.

Pathogenesis

The exact pathogenesis of IMT remains unclear to date. Some authors have suggested that the disease is related to bacterial and viral infections such as EBV and human herpesvirus[6,9,10]. However, EBV and human herpesvirus type 8 were negative in the majority of cases. In the report by Haüsler et al[11], PCR analysis of the patient’s cerebrospinal fluid proved negative for Mycobacteria, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, the human neurotropic polyomavirus JC, EBV, human herpesvirus type 6, and human herpesvirus type 8. The majority of our reviewed cases also showed no viral infection. However, these negative findings do not rule out a viral etiology, as it is possible the viral load may have been too low, viruses not being specifically investigated may be involved, and viruses may have triggered inflammatory or even neoplastic processes before being eliminated from the brain tissue[11-13]. Some patients had pulmonary nodules prior to the discovery of intracranial space-occupying lesions, and we believe that the occurrence of IMT may be associated with such lesions[4]. Because some researchers discovered polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, hyper-leukocytosis, and an increased sedimentation rate in some cases, it is also believed that IMT is an immune-related disorder[10,13,14]. Accordingly, corticosteroids have been used in IMT treatment. Post-traumatic or post-surgical mechanisms have also been proposed without convincing evidence[10,13].

Clinical manifestations

Primary intracranial IMT is associated with a variety of clinical manifestations, mainly related to tumor location, size, relationship with surrounding tissues, and degree of edema. In the cases we reviewed, clinical symptoms included headache (n = 6, 35.3%), blurred vision (n = 5, 29.4%), ptosis (n = 2, 11.8%), seizure (n = 2, 11.8%), attention deficiency (n = 1, 5.9%), diplopia (n = 1, 5.9%), and dizziness (n = 1, 5.8%). The average duration of clinical symptoms was 2.7 mo (range, 9 d to 6 mo). The duration of the clinical presentation in our patient matched that reported in the literature. Unusual clinical signs including polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, hyperleukocytosis, and increased sedimentation rate have been reported in some studies[10]. Hence, it is advisable to screen for these during clinical evaluation. In our case report, the patient’s major complaint was exophthalmic protrusion and double vision, suggesting a mass in the bottom left middle cranial fossa.

Imaging features

After reviewing the previous literature, we found that IMT-CNS presents diverse results on T1WI, with most presenting isointense or hyperintense signals in T2WI[1,3,5,10,13-15]. The relative hypointensity of these lesions on T2WI, as seen in our case, can probably be attributed to the decreased free water content and is associated with a lack of mobile protons relative to a high degree of fibrosis and an elevated cellularity or high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio[16,17]. In most of the reviewed cases, heterogenous enhancement was observed after gadolinium administration. Our patient’s findings were consistent with the aforementioned findings. According to Häusler et al[11], the anatomical location is highly variable, with meningeal lesions being the most frequently encountered type. Some authors believe that IMT originates in the dura mater[2,13]. Lesions in approximately 28% of cases showed local thickening and/or radiologic enhancement of the dura mater[3,6,18], and this is consistent with our findings.

Diagnosis

IMT can occur in virtually every organ system, but intracranial cases are extremely rare[1,9]. There is no gold standard diagnostic marker yet for IMT, and diagnosis is currently mainly dependent on a combination of histological examination, immunohistochemical analysis, and molecular genetic analyses. In general, IMTs consist of a large number of myofibroblastic spindle cells with mixed inflammatory infiltrates of plasma cells, lymphocytes, eosinophils, multinuclear giant cells, and histiocytes[1,6,19,20]. These cells coexist in a collagen matrix with differing degrees of vascularization[9,11].

Many other lesions such as lymphoplasmacyte-rich meningioma, schwannoma, lymphoma, and plasmacytoma have similar histological features as IMT. Lymphoma diagnosis can be ruled out by determining whether the cells are polyclonal. In addition, IMT is often closely associated with the dura, wherein the spindle cells are often mistaken for meningioma cells. This can be identified by concentric fibrosis in small vessels, which would not be present in meningioma[2,11,12].

Immunohistochemical analysis is an extremely important means of diagnosis of IMT. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with a probe flanking the ALK gene at 2p23 typically demonstrates a genetic rearrangement. While tumors with ALK gene rearrangements are readily considered a unique neoplastic category, histologically similar neoplastic lesions may lack this genetic alteration[6]. ALK expression is positive in nearly 50% of patients with IMT, especially in children, and is associated with local recurrence and distant metastasis[7]. However, in the literature we reviewed, only about 25% of cases were positive for ALK expression.

All other immunohistochemical markers are equally important. Spindle cells have the immunohistochemical characteristics of myofibroblasts and often express vimentin and smooth muscle actin[12]. Meningioma also shows infiltration by fibrous ground tissue and mononuclear cells, but the finding of meningeal whorls and positive exponential moving average were not observed in IMT-CNS[11]. S-100 is used to differentiate Rosai–Dorfman disease.

In recent years, IgG4 and programmed death receptor-1 have been proposed as markers to assist the diagnosis and treatment of IMT. IgG4-associated IMT was first detected in masses at sites other than the CNS. Some are part of a systemic disorder known as IgG4-related sclerosing disease. We found that intracranial IMTs had similar characteristics with IgG4-associated IMTs, except for the absence of granulomas and reactive lymphatic follicles[2]. Therefore, IgG4 may be useful for the diagnosis of IMT. Unfortunately, serum IgG4 levels have not been measured for most reported cases to date.

Cottrell et al[21] recently studied the relationship between programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and IMT. They found that in IMT programmed cell death ligand 1 is highly expressed in both tumor and immune cells and that it was also commonly expressed in ALK-negative cases (88%), whereas adaptive programmed cell death ligand 1 expression was present in the majority of tumors.

Our review of previous cases showed that immune-related mechanisms play an important role in the pathogenesis of IMT; thus, we should aim to detect the levels of relevant antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid as well as measure the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and other laboratory indicators to assist in the diagnosis of IMT.

Treatment strategy

Due to the rarity of IMT-CNS, no gold standard therapy has yet been identified. Currently, complete surgical resection of the tumor is the preferred treatment. In addition to surgical treatment, several other treatment options have emerged in recent years. Many researchers have treated IMT with corticosteroids for autoimmune pathogenesis, and the clinical and radioimaging findings showed improvement in most cases after such treatment[2,3,9,12]. Radiation therapy is rarely used in the treatment of IMT, and its efficacy is uncertain[12]. Several reportedly active regimens have been described in the literature, including vincristine plus methotrexate, vincristine plus etoposide, cisplatin/carboplatin-based regimes, ifosfamide-based regimens, and doxorubicin in combination with other drugs and taxanes[22-24].

Mycophenolate mofetil is commonly used in the treatment of IgG4-related immune diseases, and Moss et al[14] proposed the use of mycophenolate mofetil in IgG4-positive IMT patients. In 2 cases, the side effects of corticosteroids were greatly improved after mycophenolate mofetil treatment, and clinical symptoms were relieved. In some cases, rituximab also helped shrink the IMT and improve the patient’s symptoms[4]. The exact mechanism of action of rituximab is unknown, but it is believed to induce apoptosis via complement and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity[25].

Risk of postoperative recurrence

Although IMT is a benign disease, the risk of recurrence is high[11]. The histological features of the recurrent tumor have been consistent with IMT. However, the morphology of the recurrent tumor showed a more sarcomatous pattern[26]. In this review, we sought to identity the high-risk factors related to IMT recurrence. We divided 47 cases of IMT-CNS into groups according to the resection method, ALK expression, and sex and counted the number of cases with tumor recurrence in each group. Seven patients treated with total tumor resection experienced recurrence within 5 years, and 5 patients with subtotal tumor resection experienced recurrence. Postoperative immunohistochemistry showed that only 1 ALK-positive case did not experience recurrence within 5 years, while only 1 ALK-negative case experienced recurrence within 5 years. We applied the Fisher exact probability method to analyze these data, using SPSS software (version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). We found that ALK expression had an effect on recurrence of IMT-CNS (P < 0.05; Table 2).

Table 2 Recurrence of inflammatory myofibroblastic-tumor-central nervous system in the 49 reviewed patients according to surgical treatment type.
Surgery type
Recurrence in 5 yr
No recurrence in 5 yr
Total
GTR11314
STR156
Total21820

The expression of some immunohistochemical factors is related to drug sensitivity, which affects disease prognosis[11,19]. In general, gross total resection should be used as a surgical target. Interestingly, statistical analysis showed that the method of resection had no effect on the recurrence of IMT (P > 0.05; Table 3). We think this may be related to the fact that IMT is a low-grade aggressive tumor. However, we should still use total resection as the first option whenever possible. Immunohistochemistry and other data should be used to determine the follow-up treatment to reduce disease recurrence. Finally, we believe that as our understanding of IMT continues to grow, a prognosis based on the biological profile of tumors is possible.

Table 3 Recurrence of inflammatory myofibroblastic-tumor-central nervous in the 49 reviewed patients according to results for immunohistochemical staining of anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
Staining result
Recurrence in 5 yr
No recurrence in 5 yr
Total
ALK (+)6410
ALK (-)11314
Total71724
CONCLUSION

Intracranial IMT is a very rare disease. We summarized and analyzed 49 cases of intracranial IMT and found that the incidence rates in male and female patients were similar. Headache is the most common initial symptom in clinical manifestations, but it is also closely related to the location of tumor growth. MRI is an important means of IMT diagnosis, and expression of ALK as an important molecular marker of IMT has been widely used in recent years. Complete surgical resection of the tumor is the preferred treatment, and continued treatment after operation cannot be ignored. For tumors that are difficult to remove, glucocorticoids, radiotherapy, and other treatments can be administered to limit tumor growth or even eliminate tumors. ALK expression was closely related to the recurrence of IMT. Further analyses of more cases of IMT-CNS and long-term follow-up investigations are needed. We believe our case report provides an additional reference for clinicians for the pathogenetic diagnosis and treatment of IMT-CNS.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Cao X, China; Shalli K, United Kingdom S-Editor: Liu GL L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Liu GL

References
1.  Jeon YK, Chang KH, Suh YL, Jung HW, Park SH. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the central nervous system: clinicopathologic analysis of 10 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005;64:254-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lui PC, Fan YS, Wong SS, Chan AN, Wong G, Chau TK, Tse GM, Cheng Y, Poon WS, Ng HK. Inflammatory pseudotumors of the central nervous system. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:1611-1617.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  McKinney AM, Short J, Lucato L, SantaCruz K, McKinney Z, Kim Y. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the orbit with associated enhancement of the meninges and multiple cranial nerves. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:2217-2220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Patel A, Kocoglu MH, Kaul A. Therapeutic strategies for durable response in plasma cell granulomas in the central nervous system. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:1027-1029.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Wang X, Chen Y, Wu X, Zhang H. Intracranial Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor with Negative Expression of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:117-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Swain RS, Tihan T, Horvai AE, Di Vizio D, Loda M, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Kim GE. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the central nervous system and its relationship to inflammatory pseudotumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:410-419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Pascual-Gallego M, Yus-Fuertes M, Jorquera M, Gonzalez-Mat A, Ortega L, Martinez-Martinez A, Zimman H. Recurrent meningeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a case report and literature review. Neurol India. 2013;61:644-649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:859-872.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 990]  [Article Influence: 34.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Buccoliero AM, Caldarella A, Santucci M, Ammannati F, Mennonna P, Taddei A, Taddei GL. Plasma cell granuloma--an enigmatic lesion: description of an extensive intracranial case and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:e220-e223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Roche PH, Figarella-Branger D, Pellet W. Mixed meningeal and brain plasma-cell granuloma: an example of an unusual evolution. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146:69-72; discussion 72.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Häusler M, Schaade L, Ramaekers VT, Doenges M, Heimann G, Sellhaus B. Inflammatory pseudotumors of the central nervous system: report of 3 cases and a literature review. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:253-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Saint-Blancard P, Harket A, Tine I, Daumas-Duport C, de Soultrait FR. [A rare lesion of the central nervous system: inflammatory pseudotumor]. Neurochirurgie. 2008;54:37-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Buccoliero AM, Caldarella A, Santucci M, Ammannati F, Mennonna P, Taddei A, Taddei GL. Plasma cell granuloma--an enigmatic lesion: description of an extensive intracranial case and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:e220-e223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Moss HE, Mejico LJ, de la Roza G, Coyne TM, Galetta SL, Liu GT. IgG4-related inflammatory pseudotumor of the central nervous system responsive to mycophenolate mofetil. J Neurol Sci. 2012;318:31-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Kuang PD, Li QH, Liu ZY, Tang JL, Dong F, Wang Y, Zhu XL. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the pineal region: First reported case. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:2127-2130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Han MH, Chi JG, Kim MS, Chang KH, Kim KH, Yeon KM, Han MC. Fibrosing inflammatory pseudotumors involving the skull base: MR and CT manifestations with histopathologic comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:515-521.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Nakayama K, Inoue Y, Aiba T, Kono K, Wakasa K, Yamada R. Unusual CT and MR findings of inflammatory pseudotumor in the parapharyngeal space: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1394-1397.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Kolenc D, Dotlić S, Adamec I, Zadro I, Stambuk C, Ozretić D, Habek M. Isolated plasma cell granuloma of the meninges. Neurol Sci. 2013;34:2245-2247.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Denis DJ, Elayoubi K, Weil AG, Berthelet F, Bojanowski MW. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the central nervous system that express anaplastic lymphoma kinase have a high recurrence rate. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Miyahara K, Fujitsu K, Yagishita S, Takemoto Y, Ichikawa T, Matsunaga S, Takeda Y, Niino H, Shiina T. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the choroid plexus. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:365-369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Cottrell TR, Duong AT, Gocke CD, Xu H, Ogurtsova A, Taube JM, Belchis DA. PD-L1 expression in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1155-1163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R, Koniaris LG. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:385-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 194]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 195]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Dishop MK, Warner BW, Dehner LP, Kriss VM, Greenwood MF, Geil JD, Moscow JA. Successful treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with malignant transformation by surgical resection and chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:153-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Trojan A, Stallmach T, Kollias S, Pestalozzi BC. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with CNS involvement. Onkologie. 2001;24:368-372.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Garcia BA, Tinsley S, Schellenberger T, Bobustuc GC. Recurrent inflammatory pseudotumor of the jaw with perineural intracranial invasion demonstrating sustained response to Rituximab. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2452-2455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Chuah YY, Tashi T, Shy CG, Shyu JS, Dong MJ, Hsueh EJ. Intracranial Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor with Sarcomatous Local Recurrence. World Neurosurg. 2016;93:484.e1-484.e4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  de Oliveira RS, Amato MC, Brassesco MS, Valera ET, Jucá CE, Neder L, Tone LG, Machado HR. Clinical and cytogenetic analysis of an intracranial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor induced by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4:372-377.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kato K, Moteki Y, Nakagawa M, Kadoyama S, Ujiie H. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the cerebellar hemisphere--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51:79-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]