Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2022; 10(16): 5406-5413
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5406
Glomangiomatosis - immunohistochemical study: A case report
Ruo-Chen Wu, Ying-Hua Gao, Wen-Wen Sun, Shu-Peng Zhang, Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271000, Shandong Province, China
Xiang-Yun Zhang, Department of Pathology, The First People’s Hospital of Jining City, Jining 272000, Shandong Province, China
ORCID number: Ruo-Chen Wu (0000-0003-4751-9814); Ying-Hua Gao (0000-0002-4896-0014); Wen-Wen Sun (0000-0002-5424-7223); Xiang-Yun Zhang (0000-0002-4861-5376); Shu-Peng Zhang (0000-0003-0237-5159).
Author contributions: Zhang SP was the patient’s doctor in charge, was responsible for collecting the medical history, and contributed to the revision of the manuscript; Wu RC was responsible for collecting the medical history, reviewing the literature, drafting the paper, and contributing to the revising of the manuscript; Gao YH, Zhang XY, and Sun WW revised the manuscript; All authors issued final approval for the submitted version.
Supported by Academic Promotion Program of Shandong First Medical University, No. 2019QL017.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Shu-Peng Zhang, MD, Doctor, Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, No. 706 Taishan Street, Taishan District, Taian 271000, Shandong Province, China. zhangshp01@163.com
Received: September 16, 2021
Peer-review started: September 16, 2021
First decision: December 17, 2021
Revised: February 9, 2022
Accepted: April 2, 2022
Article in press: April 2, 2022
Published online: June 6, 2022

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Glomangiomatosis (also known as diffuse glomus tumor) is extremely rare, accounting for only 5% of glomus tumors. The prevalence of glomus tumors is only 2% of soft tissue tumors. Lesions can recur after resection. Although growth may be diffuse or infiltrating and invasive, definitive identifying standards for malignant glomus tumors are lacking. This article describes a case of glomangiomatosis with many nodular masses in the soft tissues of the right foot and calf. A review of the Chinese and English-language literature is included.

CASE SUMMARY

A case of glomangiomatosis in a 55-year-old Chinese woman who presented clinically with many nodular masses in the soft tissues of the right foot and calf. The tumor was examined histologically and immunostaining was performed.

CONCLUSION

Glomangiomatosis occurs most often in young people, in the distal extremities, but is rare. Multiple nodules are even rarer. Only 15 clinicopathological analyses of glomangiomatosis have been reported in the combined Chinese- and English-language literature. In the present case, microscopically, nested vascular globular cells were observed around the blood vessel wall. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse immunoreactivity for smooth muscle actin, vimentin, type IV collagen, and Bcl-2. Caldesmon, CD34, and calponin were weakly, partially, and slightly positive, respectively. There was no recurrence 1 year after resection.

Key Words: Glomangiomatosis, Glomus tumor, Foot and ankle, Perivascular tumors, Case report

Core Tip: We describe a case of glomangiomatosis with many nodular masses in the soft tissues of the right foot and calf, presented by a 55-year-old woman. Pigmented villous nodular synovitis was observed via imaging. Microscopically, nested vascular globular cells around the blood vessel wall were observed. After resection, there was no recurrence during the 1-year follow-up. Although growth may be diffuse or infiltrating and invasive, glomangiomatosis does not meet the identifying standards for malignant glomus tumors.



INTRODUCTION

The 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone[1] (Fourth Edition) defined glomus tumor as a mesenchymal tumor in normal glomus, with cells resembling modified smooth muscle cells. Glomus tumor may be classified as benign, intermediate glomangiomatosis (also known as diffuse glomus tumor), or malignant (ICD-O: 8711/0, ICD-O: 8711/1, and ICD-O: 8711/3, respectively). Glomus tumors account for fewer than 2% of soft tissue tumors, and glomus hemangioma disease makes up 5% of glomus tumors.

Glomangiomatosis is very rare but occurs most often in young people, in the distal extremities. It is multiple, deep, and wide ranging and often causes pain. The lesions can recur after resection. The tumor shows diffuse growth, with an overall structure that is similar to angiomatosis, except that the vessel wall is surrounded by nests of glomus cells[2]. Although it may be diffuse or infiltrative and aggressive, it lacks the standard morphology of malignancy.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 55-year-old female presented with idiopathic pain in the dorsum of the right foot and lateral leg, for more than 2 mo.

History of present illness

There was no obvious cause for pain on the back of the right foot and the outside of the lower leg for more than 2 mo. When the pain was severe, it affected movement of the affected limb.

History of past illness

The patient had no significant medical history.

Personal and family history

The personal and family history did not reveal any problems.

Physical examination

Physical examination revealed pigmentation of about 6 cm × 6 cm on the right foot dorsum, with a clear boundary and pain upon pressure; local pressing pain on the lateral side of the right leg; limited ankle joint activity; good peripheral blood supply; and normal sensation. During surgery, many nodular masses around the ankle joint were observed, and the incision surface of the tumor was brown.

Laboratory examinations

The prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times were slightly low, and D-dimers were normal. The blood biochemistries and urinalysis were normal. The blood analysis, electrocardiogram, chest x-ray, and arterial blood gas were also normal.

Imaging examinations

Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple nodules and soft tissue swelling around the right ankle, which was consistent with pigmented villonodular synovitis.

Pathological examination

Pathological examination revealed grayish-yellow irregular tissues, with a total volume of 7 cm × 6 cm × 1.5 cm, with multiple nodules within. The largest was 2.5 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.2 cm, and the smallest was 0.8 cm × 0.7 cm × 0.5 cm. The section was grayish-white and grayish-yellow and slightly tough (Figure 1). Under the microscope, the tumor cells in the fibrous connective tissue were nodular and lobulated, and the tumor cells grew around blood vessels. The blood vessels consisted of small arteries and veins, capillaries, and dilated veins showing diffuse hyperplasia (Figure 2A). With eosinophilic staining, the tumor cells appeared round or oval, uniform in size, with abundant cytoplasm and clear boundary. Necrosis and pleomorphism were absent. In the surrounding adipose tissue, a proliferation of oval cells adjacent to small vessels was observed, which was consistent with tumor cell morphology (Figure 2B). Mast cells were scattered in the stroma (Figure 2C).

Figure 1
Figure 1 There are many nodules in the gray-yellow tissue, ranging in diameter from 0.5 cm to 2.5 cm. The section was gray and grayish-yellow, and the texture slightly tough.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Images under the microscope. A: Diffuse proliferation of small vessels with oval cell proliferation around, mild cell morphology, abundant cytoplasm, close relationship with blood vessels, no obvious atypia, and clear mitosis (hematoxylin and eosin 10 ×); B: Oval cells beside small vessels can be seen in the surrounding tissues, which is consistent with the shape of tumor cells. Mast cells are scattered in the stroma. (Hematoxylin and eosin 20 ×); C: The tumor infiltrates the surrounding adipose connective tissue. (Hematoxylin and eosin 20 ×).

Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse immunoreactivity for smooth muscle actin (SMA, Figure 3), vimentin, type IV collagen, and Bcl-2. Caldesmon was weakly positive, CD34 was partially positive, and calponin was slightly positive. The Ki-67 value-added index was about 3%. Desmin, S-100, and HMB-45 were negative.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Immunohistochemical staining of smooth muscle actin showed that tumor cells and surrounding vascular wall were positive. (Smooth muscle actin 4 ×).
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The pathological diagnosis was glomangiomatosis of the right ankle joint.

TREATMENT

Extended resection of the tumor.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

After the extensive resection, no recurrence was found at the 2-year follow-up, and the prognosis was good.

DISCUSSION

The 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone (Fourth Edition) defined glomus tumor as a mesenchymal tumor in normal glomus, with cells similar to modified smooth muscle cells. Glomus tumor may be classified as benign, intermediate glomangiomatosis (also known as diffuse glomus tumor), or malignant (ICD-O: 8711/0, ICD-O: 8711/1, and ICD-O: 8711/3, respectively). Glomus tumors account for fewer than 2% of soft tissue tumors, and glomus hemangioma disease makes up 5% of glomus tumors[1].

Glomangiomatosis is very rare but occurs most often in young people, in the distal extremities. It is multiple, deep, and wide ranging and often produces pain. The lesions can recur after resection. The tumor shows diffuse growth, with an overall structure that is similar to angiomatosis, except that the vessel wall is surrounded by nests of glomus cells[2]. Although it may be diffuse or infiltrative and aggressive, it lacks the standard morphology of malignancy.

Due to its rarity, only 15 clinicopathological analyses have been reported in the Chinese and English literature (Tables 1 and 2)[2-16]. In total, there have been 16 patients, of which 5 and 11 were women and men, respectively. The average and median ages were 32 years and 31.5 years. Eleven and 3 cases (68.75% and 18.75%) involved the lower and upper limbs. Other sites (25%) included the head and neck, chest wall, and paravertebral region. Unlike classic glomus tumor, none of these tumors were found under the nail but mostly in the hand, wrist, and foot, and the location was deep. The sizes of the lesions ranged from 1.5 to 22 cm. Therefore, glomangiomatosis is larger than glomus tumor, with extensive lesions and deep location, and all cases were infiltrative. In the present case, lesions were on the back of the right foot and the outer side of the calf and ranged from 0.8 to 2.5 cm in diameter. The deep location and clinical and imaging considerations led to a diagnosis of pigmented villous nodular synovitis.

Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical features in reported literature.
Ref.
Age (yr)/sex
Clinical symptoms
Site
Size1
Depth of tumor
Fan et al[9]33, MPain in the R ankle recurred for 2 yr and aggravated for 1 wkMedial part of the lower leg and 2 medial malleolus of the R foot1.5 × 1.2 × 1; 2 × 1.5 × 1, 1.8 × 1.2 × 1 Invaded the surrounding striated muscle and adipose tissue
Fitzhugh et al[10]33, MMultiple leg pain; lumps present at birth; neurofibromatosis considered in imagingR leg and joint, 25; 1.5Infiltrative growth with adipose tissue
Folpe et al[4]25, FUnknownAnkle Deep soft tissue
Gould et al[11]17, FPalpable massHand and palm2-4 mmSkeletal muscle
29, MTumorRight parotid gland4 × 2 × 1.8Skeletal muscle
Hayes et al[12]32, FSlow growing massNasal regionDeep soft tissue
Jalali et al[2]17, MPain; enlargementForearm, hand, and finger tips
Kim et al[5]48, MTwo masses in the R plantar and R ankle, intermittent pain; history of traumaR plantar and R ankle 22; 1 × 1.5 × 1.7; 0.9 × 1.4 × 1.7Invasion of surrounding soft tissue
Kumar et al[6]14, ML leg cramp for 4 yClosely related to the sciatic nerve6.7 × 4.3 × 3Infiltrative growth
Laughlin et al[7]56, MSudden pain in the R foot, aggravating symptoms, extended to the foot and ankle for 3 moSural nerve, 7-cm long distended area7Infiltrating nerve
Lumley et al[13]24, FPainR foot; legUnknownDeep in Achilles tendon
Negri et al[14]21, FPainL thigh22 × 11 × 6Skeletal muscle
Rao et al[15]36, MUnknownChest wall > 3Skeletal muscles and ribs
Sano et al[8]59, MMultiple glomus tumor of R ankleR ankle, 55; 1 × 1 × 1 to 8 × 3 × 2Unknown
Skelton et al[16]32, MSlow growing painful noduleR wristDeep skin
Zhou et al[3]39, M20 yr chronic low back pain, 10 yr severe painParaspinal region5 × 4 × 3.3Deep
Table 2 Preoperative course, treatment, and outcome in reported literature, by first author and year of publication.
Ref.
Preop course1
Treatment
Margin2
Outcome
FU
Fan et al[9]2 yrResectionPositivePatients FU for 4 mo4 mo
Fitzhugh et al[10]5 yrResectionUnknownNo recurrence 5 yr after resection5 yr
Folpe et al[4]NSExcisionPositiveRecurrence 3 × in 5 yr60 mo
UnknownExcisionNegativeNo recurrence48 mo
Gould et al[11]1 yrResectionUnknownNo recurrence24 mo
2 yrIncomplete resectionPositiveRecurrence 4 yr later and resected48 mo
Hayes et al[12]4 moComplete resection, eachPositiveSix relapses in 14 yr180 mo
Jalali et al[2]7 moSecond resectionNSSmall recurrence within 26 mo26 mo
Kim et al[5]Trauma; no family historyResectionUnknownUnknownUnknown
Kumar et al[6]4 yrPalliative resectionPositiveAfter 16 mo, the tumor became larger and new nodules appeared7 mo3
Laughlin et al[7]3 moResectionUnknownUnknownUnknown
Lumley et al[13]4 yrIncomplete resection, amputationPositiveOne 1 yr later the pain continued; 42 mo later, the knee was excised56 mo
Negri et al[14]> 2 yrResection/extensive resection of cutting edgeNegativeUnknownUnknown
Rao et al[15]UnknownResectionUnknownRecurrence 6 yr later72 mo
Sano et al[8]30 yrResectionUnknownNo recurrence2 yr
Skelton et al[16]1 moComplete resectionNegativeNo recurrence12 mo
Zhou et al[3]20 yrIncomplete resectionPositiveSurvival with disease15 mo

Unlike classic glomus tumor, there have been no reports of symptoms related to glomangiomatosis in childhood, although the possibility cannot be ruled out. If perhaps it is present in childhood, symptoms do not develop until early adulthood. Pain is an obvious symptom of the disease[3,4].

Histologically, the overall structure of glomangiomatosis resembles diffuse angiomatosis, except that in the former, glomus cells surround blood vessels. Among the 16 reported cases, all showed a diffuse and infiltrative growth pattern. Skeletal muscle infiltration was observed in 5 cases, and extensive nerve and peripheral invasion was seen in 1 case. However, some authors suggest that the glomus cells and angiomatosis components in glomus hemangioma, often accompanied by adipose tissue, are a sign of mesenchymal proliferation and not simple glomus cell proliferation[3,10]. Further study is necessary to determine whether adipose is one of its components or whether it infiltrates into the adipose tissue.

Fan et al[9] reported a case of glomus angiomatosis in a 33-year-old man who showed multiple glomus angiomatosis on the medial right foot and right lower leg. The patient developed repeated pain in the right ankle during 2 years, worsening in the week before presentation. Immunohistochemistry was positive for SMA and negative for CD34. Fitzhugh et al[10] reported a 33-year-old man with a mass on the distal right calf. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were diffusely and strongly positive for SMA, and the vascular components were strongly positive for CD31 and CD34. In the current case, the tumor cells are diffusely and strongly positive for SMA, and negative for CD31 and CD34, which is consistent with the immunohistochemical expression of the above cases.

Masson proposed in 1924 that glomus angiomatosis may be caused by the overgrowth of normal globular cells[17]. Glomus tumor is a kind of interstitial tumor composed of variant smooth muscle cells similar to normal blood vessels. Glomus cells are located around the wall of the small bulb arteriovenous anastomosis. They are a variant of smooth muscle cells. Pericytes include vascular glomus cells. Pericytes were first discovered by Rouget in 1873 and further described by Zimmerman in 1923[3]. Most glomus hemangioma clinically manifests as small benign tumors, most often found in the dermis of the hand, especially in the subungual area, and distributed throughout the body. Most globular tumors have occurred at all ages.

Glomangiomatosis is a rare type of glomus tumor. Its overall structure resembles diffuse hemangioma, but the vessel wall surrounds the nest bulb cells. Combined with histological morphology and immunohistochemical staining of SMA and collagen IV, a diagnosis of glomus hemangioma is not difficult. The disease may be differentiated from other suspects by the characteristic features of each. For example, epithelioid angiomyolipoma is composed of blood vessels, smooth muscle, and fat. The tumor cells immunohistochemically show the presence of HMB45 and Melan A[10]. In paraganglioma, the tumor cells are arranged in an organ-like structure, and the stroma is rich in capillaries. Synaptophysin and chromogranin A can be observed in the main cells, while Sertoli cells show S-100 protein but not SMA[1]. The cells in malignant glomus tumor are heteromorphic, and the mitosis is pathological. Angiomatosis is composed of blood vessels of different sizes, but globular angiomatosis is surrounded by spheroid cells around the blood vessel wall, while the former is not surrounded by spheroid cells.

Studies of the molecular genetics of glomangiomatosis mainly focus on multiple familial cases. These studies show an autosomal dominant hereditary disease, caused by an inactivation mutation of the gene that encodes glomulin in the short arm of chromosome 1. It is possible that there is a family history of glomus angiomatosis, because genetic studies have revealed the truncation of the globulin gene on chromosome 1p21-22, and four germline mutations have been found[17]. However, there are also cases reported in which there was no familial genetic predisposition.

The treatment of glomangiomatosis is surgical resection. Although glomangiomatosis grows diffusely, conservative treatment is still advocated[3]. Local recurrence is related to the difficulty of resection. Zhou et al[3] retrospectively analyzed 11 cases of glomus tumors at home and abroad: 3 cases were not completely resected, 5 had positive margins at the first operation, 5 recurred after surgery, and 1 relapsed six times during 14 years. The patient described in the present article was followed for 1 year after resection, and no recurrence was found. Since the tumors in some cases were palliatively removed, glomangiomatosis should be regarded as a persistent disease rather than local recurrence. Therefore, complete resection of the mass is the most important prognostic factor. Due to the small number of known cases, the effect of adjuvant therapy is uncertain.

CONCLUSION

Glomangiomatosis is very rare but occurs most often in young people, in the distal extremities. Its overall structure resembles diffuse hemangioma, but the vessel wall surrounds the nest bulb cells. Multiple nodules in glomangiomatosis are even rarer. The treatment of glomangiomatosis is surgical resection.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, general and internal

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Bredt LC, Brazil S-Editor: Ma YJ L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Ma YJ

References
1.  The WHO Classification of Tumours of Editorial Board  WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, 2020: 179-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Jalali M, Netscher DT, Connelly JH. Glomangiomatosis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2002;6:326-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Zhou P, Zhang H, Bu H, Yin X, Zhang R, Fu J, Zhang Z, Chen H, Wei B, Liu X. Paravertebral glomangiomatosis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:272-277.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Weiss SW. Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 405]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 368]  [Article Influence: 16.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Kim M, Choi YS, Young KW, Joo JE. A Case of Glomangiomatosis of the Ankle and Foot: Ultrasonographic Appearance Correlated With the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. Ultrasound Q. 2016;32:180-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kumar R, Vu L, Madewell JE, Herzog CE, Bird JE. Glomangiomatosis of the sciatic nerve: a case report and review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:807-815.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
7.  Laughlin RS, Suanprasert N, Dyck PJ, Spinner RJ, Folpe AL. Glomangiomatosis of the sural nerve. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67:190-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Sano K, Hosaka K, Ozeki S. Glomangiomatosis concentrated in the ankle with varied appearances: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:468-471.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Fan S, Liu Y, Lu M, Qi Q. [Multiple glomangiomatosis: report of a case]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2016;45:53-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Fitzhugh VA, Beebe KS, Wenokor C, Blacksin M. Glomangiomatosis: a case report. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:1427-1433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Gould EW, Manivel JC, Albores-Saavedra J, Monforte H. Locally infiltrative glomus tumors and glomangiosarcomas. A clinical, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical study. Cancer. 1990;65:310-318.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Hayes MM, Van der Westhuizen N, Holden GP. Aggressive glomus tumor of the nasal region. Report of a case with multiple local recurrences. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993;117:649-652.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Lumley JS, Stansfeld AG. Infiltrating glomus tumour of lower limb. Br Med J. 1972;1:484-485.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Negri G, Schulte M, Mohr W. Glomus tumor with diffuse infiltration of the quadriceps muscle: a case report. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:750-752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Rao VK, Weiss SW. Angiomatosis of soft tissue. An analysis of the histologic features and clinical outcome in 51 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:764-771.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Skelton HG, Smith KJ. Infiltrative glomus tumor arising from a benign glomus tumor: a distinctive immunohistochemical pattern in the infiltrative component. Am J Dermatopathol. 1999;21:562-566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Goldblum JR, Folpe AL, Weiss SW.   Perivascular tumors. In Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors, 6th Edition. Philadelphia, PA. Elsevier Saunders. 2014749-768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]