Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4505-4511
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4505
Figure 1
Figure 1 Intravenous pyelography. No enhancement of urinary tract at 5 min (A), 15 min (B) and 30 min (C) after administration of the contrast.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Computed tomography urogram. One 4.2 cm irregular mass was seen occupying the left renal pelvis on computed tomography urogram (A) (B); One enlarged lymph node was observed at the left renal pedicle (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3 No observed active lesions were demonstrated on whole-body bone scan.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Hematoxylin and eosin stain. A: Generally, with hematoxylin and eosin stain the tumor was seen with invasion to muscular layer; B and C: Under augmentation (400 ×), the tumor was examined with epithelial cells and lymphoid cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Magnetic resonance imaging. T1-weight (A) and T2-weight (B) image revealed destructive L2 and L5 spine. Related involvement of nearby spinal cord was also noted.