Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2022; 10(31): 11638-11645
Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11638
Figure 1
Figure 1 Images of the pancreatic tumor. A: Non-contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) image. White arrow indicates the strip calcification in the mass; B: Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT showed that the mass was significantly enhanced, and the abundant intratumoral vessels could be seen in the tumor; C: Maximum intensity projection (MIP) of the arterial phase in a coronal view. Red arrow indicates the draining vein into the portal vein; D-E: Abdominal MRI showed a low-intensity lesion on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and a hyper-intensity lesion on T2WI; F: MRCP shows no dilation of the bile duct and pancreatic duct.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Spectral imaging of the pancreatic tumor. A-D: Conventional computed tomography images (A and B), iodine density overlay image (C), and Z-effective (D) image showing no involvement of the gastric wall.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Histological examinations of the pancreatic tumor. Hematoxylin-eosin staining demonstrating the classic Zellballen pattern of paraganglioma (magnification, × 100).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Region of interest plot of Hounsfield unit attenuation. The Hounsfield unit attenuation plots of the tumor (purple) and lymph nodes 2 (red) and 3 (blue) have similar slopes, suggesting that the lymph nodes 2 and 3 were most likely metastatic lymph nodes (confirmed by pathological examination). LN: Lymph node; HU: Hounsfield unit.