Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2022; 10(31): 11338-11348
Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11338
Figure 1
Figure 1 Patient flowchart. BC: Breast cancer; TNBC: Triple-negative breast cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Nomogram predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival for Chinese triple-negative breast cancer patients after surgery. OS: Overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Calibration curves predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival. OS: Overall survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Analysis of the decision curve showing the performance comparison. On the black line, it is assumed that no patient should take the necessary measures, and on the green line, it is assumed that all patients should. By adding benefits points and subtracting harm points, the y axis represents the net benefit. Our results indicated that the nomogram (red line) provided a higher net benefit than the tumor, node and metastasis staging model (blue line), based on threshold probabilities. TNM: Tumor, node, metastasis.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Risk stratification of the nomogram. A: Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival in the entire cohort; B: Stage I; C: Stage II; D: Stage III triple-negative breast cancer patients after surgery. TNM: Tumor, node, metastasis.