Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2018; 6(15): 892-900
Published online Dec 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.892
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Patient and physician communication challenges and shared decision making
Scott Klenzak, Igor Danelisen, Grace D Brannan, Melissa A Holland, Miranda AL van Tilburg
Scott Klenzak, Department of Psychiatry, Cape Fear Valley Health System, Fayetteville, NC 28304, United States
Igor Danelisen, Grace D Brannan, School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Lillington, NC 27546, United States
Melissa A Holland, Miranda AL van Tilburg, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, United States
Miranda AL van Tilburg, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
Miranda AL van Tilburg, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Miranda AL van Tilburg, PhD, Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, 1090 PO Box, Buies Creek, NC 27506, United States. vantilburg@campbell.edu
Telephone: +1-910-8144913 Fax: +1-910-8145565
Received: September 4, 2018
Peer-review started: September 4, 2018
First decision: October 19, 2018
Revised: November 16, 2018
Accepted: November 24, 2018
Article in press: November 24, 2018
Published online: December 6, 2018
Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common upper esophageal condition and typical symptoms can include heartburn and sensation of regurgitation while atypical symptoms include chronic cough, asthma, hoarseness, dyspepsia and nausea. Typically, diagnosis is presumptive given the presence of typical and atypical symptoms and is an indication for empiric therapy. Treatment management can include lifestyle modifications and/or medication therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) class being the preferred and most effective. Complete symptom resolution is not always achieved and long-term PPI therapy can put patients at risk for serious side effects and needless expense. The brain-gut connection and hypervigilance plays an important role in symptom resolution and treatment success, especially in the case of non-PPI responders. Hypervigilance is a combination of increased esophageal sensory sensitivity in combination with exaggerated threat perception surrounding esophageal symptoms. Hypervigilance requires a different approach to GERD managements, where continued PPI therapy and surgery are usually not recommended. Rather, helping physicians and patients understand the brain-gut connection can guide and improve care. Education and reassurance should be the main pillars or treatment. However, it is important not to suggest the symptoms are due to anxiety alone, this often leads to patient dissatisfaction. Patient dissatisfaction with treatment reveals the need for a more patient-centered approach to GERD management and better communication between patients and providers. Shared decision making (SDM) with the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) promotes patient adherence and satisfaction. SDM is a joint discussion between clinician and patient in which a mutually shared solution is explored for GERD symptoms. For SDM to work the physician needs to capture patients’ perceptions which may not be obtained in the standard interview. This can be done through the use of PROs which promote a dialogue with patients about their symptoms and treatment priorities in the context of the SDM patient encounter. SDM could potentially help in the management of patient expectations for GERD treatment, ultimately positively impacting their health-related quality of life.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Psychosocial, Patient-physician communication, Shared decision making, Patient-reported outcomes, Patient satisfaction

Core tip: Gastroesophageal reflux disease management can be complex and is affected by psychosocial factors. Physician-patient communication improvement and shared decision making are two approaches that could improve patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction.