Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 108847
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.108847
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.108847
Table 1 Population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design criteria
Criteria | Description | |
Population | Does the review involve children or adolescents (≤ 18 years) | Included: Children and adolescents aged 0–18 years from both clinical and general populations. Excluded: Adults (> 18 years); animal or in vitro studies; populations not reporting age-specific outcomes for youth; individuals in institutionalized or inpatient settings (unless specifically specifically targeting mental or cognitive outcomes) |
Intervention | Does the review involve technology-enhanced physical activity interventions | Included: Interventions that incorporate PA enhanced by technology (e.g., virtual reality-based exercise, mobile health applications, gamified programs, internet-based platforms, wearable-integrated training, or multicomponent digital PA modules). Excluded: Conventional PA interventions without a technological component; sedentary behavior interventions without PA emphasis |
Comparator | Does the review include a control or comparator condition | Included: Wait-list, usual care, no intervention, or traditional non-digital PA programs. Excluded: Reviews without any comparator condition reported |
Outcomes | Does the review report on brain or MH outcomes | Included: Cognitive function (e.g., memory, attention, executive function). Psychological wellbeing (e.g., anxiety, depression, emotional regulation, self-esteem). Excluded: Non-MH-related outcomes only (e.g., musculoskeletal fitness, nutrition-only outcomes, motor coordination in isolation) |
Study design | Is the review secondary research | Included: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, umbrella reviews, or overview of reviews. Excluded: Primary research (e.g., randomized controlled trials, observational studies). Non-systematic narrative reviews or protocols without results |
Table 2 Summary of included studies by intervention type
Ref. | A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews | Executive function | Cognitive function | Mental health | Quality of evidence (/4) |
Virtual reality | |||||
Zhang et al[14] | Moderate | Sufficient evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | 3 |
Hao et al[15] | Moderate | Sufficient evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | ND | 3 |
App | |||||
Langarizadeh et al[16] | Moderate | ND | Some evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | 3 |
Exergame | |||||
Chen and Wilkosz[17] | High | ND | ND | Some evidence in favor | 4 |
Liang et al[18] | Moderate | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | 3 |
Internet | |||||
Lalanza et al[19] | High | Some evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | 4 |
Multicomponent | |||||
Henderson et al[20] | Moderate | ND | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | 3 |
Technology-enhanced physical activity | |||||
Li et al[21] | Moderate | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | 3 |
Cognitive bias modification/attention bias modification | |||||
Cristea et al[22] | High | ND | Some evidence in favor | Some evidence in favor | 4 |
Unguided/guided digital self-help | |||||
Bennett et al[23] | Moderate | ND | Some evidence in favor | Sufficient evidence in favor | 3 |
School-based digital interventions | |||||
Hugh-Jones et al[24] | Moderate | Some evidence in favor | ND | Sufficient evidence in favor | 3 |
Table 3 Effects of technology-enhanced physical activity intervention variables on executive function, cognitive function, and mental health
Intervention category | Executive function | Cognitive function | Mental health |
Virtual reality | Overall: 1 review (n = 304)1,4 | 1 review (n = 304)3 | 1 review (n = 304)3 |
App | Overall2 | 2 reviews (n = 978)3 | 2 reviews (n = 978)5 |
Augmented reality | Overall2 | 5 | 1 review (n = 912)3,5 |
Heart rate variability | Overall1 | ND | 2 reviews (n = 795)3 |
Electroencephalogram | Overall1 | ND | 1 review (n = 215)3 |
Comprehensive program | Overall1 | 1 review (n = 404)3 | 2 reviews (n = 3299)4 |
Traditional + online | Overall1 | 2 reviews (n = 200)3 | 2 reviews (n = 711)5 |
Table 4 Summary of included systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Ref. | Year | Country | Number of studies | Sample size | Intervention | Outcome measure | Limitations |
HughJones et al[24] | 2020 | United Kingdom | 20 | 20 studies (RCT and non-RCT) | School-based prevention interventions for anxiety (cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, skills training etc.) | Anxiety symptoms reduction (various scales used) | Heterogeneity in setting and delivery |
Bennett et al[23] | 2019 | Multi-country (Mainly United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany) | NR | N = 3396 (self-help); n = 1100 (face-to-face); n = 2366 (control) | Unguided and guided self-help (bibliotherapy, computerised, online materials) | Depression, anxiety, disruptive behaviour symptoms, treatment acceptability | Lacked EF/CF outcomes |
Cristea et al[22] | 2015 | Multi-country (Mainly Romania, Italy, Netherlands, United States) | NR | 23 RCTs, n = 28 per condition | CBM, including attention bias modification and interpretation bias modification (CBM-I) | MH symptoms (anxiety, depression), cognitive bias change, treatment acceptability | Short duration; mostly single-session |
Chen and Wilkosz[17] | 2014 | United States | 14 | 14 studies included; n ranged from 21 to 473 per study | Technology-based interventions (internet-based programs, active video games) focused on diet and PA | BMI, body fat percentage, PA level, dietary behavior, psychosocial outcomes | Mixed tech modalities; small sample |
Hao et al[15] | 2024 | Multi-country (Mainly United States, Australia, Taiwan, United Kingdom, Belgium) | 18 | 18 studies included; n ranged from 8 to 51 per study | Home-based VR rehabilitation (Nintendo Wii, Kinect, customized VR systems, VR-integrated constraint-induced therapy) | Motor function (upper extremity, gross motor), strength, balance, bone density, cognition, daily activity performance, Participation | Cerebral palsy only; small samples |
Henderson et al[20] | 2025 | Multi-country (Mainly Canada, United States, Australia, Europe) | NR | 73 RCTs included; Total n = 6305; 53% female | Behavioural and psychological interventions including PA, nutrition, psychological therapy, technology-based, multicomponent interventions | BMI, BMI z-score, weight, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, cardiometabolic outcomes (blood pressure, lipids, insulin resistance), adverse events | No subgroup; varied designs |
Lalanza et al[19] | 2023 | Multi-country (Mainly Spain, United States, Netherlands, Australia) | 143 | 143 studies included; n varies across studies | HRV biofeedback with different protocols: Optimal RF, individual RF, preset-pace RF | Cardiovascular health, MH (anxiety, stress reduction), performance outcomes, HRV parameters | Varied tech tools; lacked follow-up |
Langarizadeh et al[16] | 2021 | Multi-country (Mainly United States, Canada, Australia, Italy, Sweden) | 9 | 9 studies included; n = 19 to 361 per study; Total n = 978 | Mobile app-based interventions for weight management (diet, PA, behavior change) | Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, PA level (step count) | No EF/CF analysis |
Li et al[21] | 2021 | China | NR | 50 students in a middle school | Exercise intervention based on medical imaging monitoring; different intensities (low, medium, high) aerobic exercise intervention | Inhibitory control function (stroop task response time and accuracy), cardiopulmonary function, vital capacity, step test index | No control group; varying protocols |
- Citation: Wang ZQ, Hong SY, Jia ZX, Zhang Y, Ma SS, Bu XG, Wang WJ. Effects of technology-enhanced physical activity on brain and mental health in youth: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(9): 108847
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i9/108847.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.108847