Yan M, Yang H, Cui D, Zhang YS. Endocrine psychiatric comorbidity in metabolic disorders: Integrative mechanisms and traditional Chinese medicine. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(9): 120241 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.120241]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yi-Shuo Zhang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, No. 1035 Boshuo Road, Jingyue National High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Changchun 130117, Jilin Province, China. 202400904@ccucm.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Psychiatry
Article-Type of This Article
review-article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Yan M, Yang H, Cui D, Zhang YS. Endocrine psychiatric comorbidity in metabolic disorders: Integrative mechanisms and traditional Chinese medicine. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(9): 120241 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.120241]
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2026; 16(9): 120241 Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.120241
Endocrine psychiatric comorbidity in metabolic disorders: Integrative mechanisms and traditional Chinese medicine
Miao Yan, Han Yang, Di Cui, Yi-Shuo Zhang
Miao Yan, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, College of Science and Technology Changchun, Changchun 130600, Jilin Province, China
Han Yang, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
Di Cui, School of Basic Medicine, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, Jilin Province, China
Yi-Shuo Zhang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, Jilin Province, China
Author contributions: Yan M, Yang H, and Cui D conceived and designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Zhang YS collected and processed the data, conducted literature research, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Yi-Shuo Zhang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, No. 1035 Boshuo Road, Jingyue National High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Changchun 130117, Jilin Province, China. 202400904@ccucm.edu.cn
Received: March 13, 2026 Revised: April 17, 2026 Accepted: May 29, 2026 Published online: September 19, 2026 Processing time: 163 Days and 21.4 Hours
Abstract
Metabolic-endocrine disorders frequently co-occur with psychiatric and behavioural disturbances that are clinically consequential yet often under-recognised when care is organised around single-disease targets. In this narrative review, we synthesise evidence across major metabolic-endocrine conditions to propose a closed-loop framework in which immunometabolic stress (low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and metabolic toxicity) initiates or amplifies central symptom burden, while neuroendocrine axes and the gut-brain-metabolic interface act as bidirectional bridge modules that embed peripheral dysregulation into sleep disturbance, affective symptoms, appetite dysregulation, and cognitive inefficiency. These downstream changes are not merely comorbid “outcomes”; through impaired executive control and altered reward processing they erode behavioural feasibility, leading to inactivity, emotionally driven eating, reduced adherence, and disrupted follow-up, thereby reinforcing metabolic deterioration and sustaining relapse-prone trajectories. Within this systems view, traditional Chinese medicine offers a pragmatic, potentially complementary approach when positioned as adjunctive, module-targeted care rather than as a parallel diagnostic paradigm. We frame traditional Chinese medicine patterns as clinically useful phenotypic stratifiers that integrate symptom clusters relevant to sleep-stress regulation, eating behaviour, fatigue, and function, and we appraise clinical evidence using a matrix that prioritises dual-endpoint capture (metabolic and mental health/sleep/function outcomes), population relevance, and methodological transparency. Current evidence suggests potential benefit across modalities, including Chinese herbal medicine, acupuncture/electroacupuncture, and mind-body practices, but remains constrained by inconsistent dual-endpoint measurement, limited mediator capture, heterogeneous intervention protocols, and insufficient safety and interaction monitoring in polypharmacy-prone populations. We therefore propose an integrative care pathway that operationalises minimal screening, risk stratification, module-based intervention sequencing, and iterative dual-endpoint follow-up, alongside minimum methodological standards for future trials. Finally, we outline a precision and digital research agenda that leverages clinically feasible phenotyping and longitudinal monitoring of key mediators (sleep regularity, activity, autonomic markers, eating behaviour, and care persistence) to test mechanism, personalise sequencing, and strengthen real-world implementability.
Core Tip: Endocrine-psychiatric comorbidity in metabolic disorders is conceptualised as a bidirectional, self-reinforcing state in which sleep and behavioural feasibility are clinically actionable leverage points that can shape metabolic trajectories. Traditional Chinese medicine is framed as adjunctive, module-targeted care, with pattern phenotyping used pragmatically for stratification rather than as a parallel diagnostic system. Credible integration requires paired metabolic and mental health endpoints, mediator tracking, and structured safety monitoring within an iterative care pathway.