Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2025; 16(6): 107292
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of modeled femurs
Measure | Mean | SD | Median | IQR |
Anatomical axis (mm) | 438 | 29.5 | 438 | 414-454 |
Native mechanical axis (mm) | 431 | 29.0 | 427 | 407-450 |
Native femoral neck length (mm) | 48.4 | 5.2 | 44.9 | 45.7-51.9 |
Native aMFA (degrees) | 6.3 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 6.1-6.8 |
Table 2 Rate and degree of leg length difference between each implant option, n (%)
Leg length difference in millimeters | Median (mm) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Standard vs high offset | 1 | 5 | 35 | 3 | - | - | - |
High offset vs plus head | 2 | - | - | 29 | 13 | 1 | - |
Standard vs plus head | 3 | - | - | - | 31 | 11 | 1 |
- Citation: Tung WS, Eslam Pour A, Sieberer J, Donnelley CA, Tommasini SM, Wiznia DH. Pure high-offset stems can cause an unexpected increase in femoral length in robotic-assisted primary total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2025; 16(6): 107292
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i6/107292.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292