Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292
Revised: April 17, 2025
Accepted: May 24, 2025
Published online: June 18, 2025
Processing time: 82 Days and 22.9 Hours
Certain implant combinations change leg length and offset in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Poor restoration of leg biomechanics is a frequently cited reason for patient dissatisfaction following primary THA. A pure high-offset stem should provide direct lateralization without affecting femoral length when compared to a standard stem. However, clinical experience with preoperative planning software based on computed tomography-based three-dimensional-models reveals that using pure high-offset stems in THA may cause a difference between expected (no change in femoral length) and actual (small increase) in postoperative femoral length.
To elucidate the causes of these femoral length discrepancies using preoperative planning software.
Preoperative templating for 43 robotic-assisted THAs, optimizing acetabular size and orientation, center of rotation, stem size and offset, and prosthetic head diameter were obtained. The preoperative planning software was used to calculate differences between preoperative and postoperative femoral length for standard and pure high-offset stems, unique to each patient.
Whilst the increase in femoral length between standard and high-offset stems was not significant (P = 0.93), 35 femurs (81.4%) experienced a 1-mm increase, and 3 (7.0%) experienced a 2-mm increase in femoral length while using high-offset stem compared to the standard stem. The incidence of femoral length increase was lower for patients with shorter femurs (18/22; 81.8%) compared to patients with longer femurs (20/21; 95.2%).
When pure high-offset stems were used in preoperative planning software, we demonstrated an unexpected increase in leg length between 1-2-mm in 88.4% of patients. This unexpected increase in femoral length is due to a function of the preoperative planning software’s planned stem alignment with the anatomical axis, and not an inherent fault in the stem design. With expanding accessibility of robotic-assisted THA platforms, all potential sources of postoperative leg length discrepancy should be identified during preoperative templating and necessary alterations to the surgical plan should be made to accommodate this unexpected difference when using a pure high-offset stem.
Core Tip: Discrepancies in leg length can result in patient dissatisfaction, complications, or even a need for revision. Surgeons should be aware of this unexpected increase in femoral length when using a pure high-offset stem in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty, especially for patients who may benefit from precise restoration of lower extremity biomechanics. With expanding accessibility of computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty platforms, any potential sources of postoperative leg length discrepancy should be identified during preoperative templating and necessary alterations to the surgical plan should be made to accommodate this unexpected difference when using a pure high-offset stem.