BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2025; 16(3): 110709
Published online Sep 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709
Safety and efficacy of efruxifermin in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A systematic review
Abul Bashar Mohammad Kamrul-Hasan, Sanja Borozan, Sweekruti Jena, Lakshmi Nagendra, Deep Dutta, Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Md Saiful Islam, Joseph M Pappachan
Abul Bashar Mohammad Kamrul-Hasan, Department of Endocrinology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
Sanja Borozan, Department of Endocrinology, Clinical Centre of Montenegro, Podgorica 81000, Montenegro
Sanja Borozan, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montenegro, Podgorica 81000, Montenegro
Sweekruti Jena, Department of Endocrinology, Kalinga Hospital, Bhubaneshwar 751023, Odisha, India
Lakshmi Nagendra, Department of Endocrinology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore 570004, Karnataka, India
Deep Dutta, Department of Endocrinology, CEDAR Superspeciality Healthcare, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075, India
Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Department of Endocrinology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
Md Saiful Islam, Department of Hepatology, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
Joseph M Pappachan, Faculty of Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Joseph M Pappachan, Department of Endocrinology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal and Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
Author contributions: Kamrul-Hasan ABM and Borozan S conceptualized and designed the study; Dutta D, Bhattacharya S, Islam MS, and Jena S performed the full-text review and data identification; Nagendra L, Dutta D and Islam MS evaluated the quality of the literature; Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Nagendra L and Pappachan JM collected and analyzed the data and drew the tables and figures; Borozan S and Pappachan JM adjudicated any disagreements; Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Borozan S and Pappachan JM wrote the draft; Nagendra L, Dutta D, Borozan S, Islam MS, Jena S, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Kamrul-Hasan ABM and Pappachan JM were responsible for the integrity of the work as a whole; all author made contributions to the article and endorsed the submitted version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this paper.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Joseph M Pappachan, MD, MRCP, FRCP, Professor, Senior Researcher, Faculty of Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Oxford Road, Manchester M15 6BH, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom. drpappachan@yahoo.co.in
Received: June 13, 2025
Revised: June 21, 2025
Accepted: July 15, 2025
Published online: September 5, 2025
Processing time: 83 Days and 24 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Efruxifermin (EFX), a fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, has demonstrated the potential to improve liver fat and markers of liver injury, fibrosis, and key metabolic biomarkers in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in phase 2 clinical trials.

AIM

To summarize the safety and effectiveness of EFX in managing MASH.

METHODS

Electronic databases and registries were systematically searched from their inception to May 15, 2025, for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that included EFX in the intervention arm and placebo in the control arm in individuals with MASH. The primary outcome was the safety of EFX, while additional outcomes included its efficacy in altering hepatic and metabolic parameters. Meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan web computer program with the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four phase 2 RCTs (five reports), mostly with low risk of bias, involving 450 subjects, were analyzed. Compared to the placebo, EFX 50 mg was associated with higher risks of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) [risk ratio (RR) = 1.05], TEAEs leading to discontinuation (RR = 3.05), nausea (RR = 1.78), and diarrhea (RR = 1.9). EFX 28 mg increased risks of vomiting (RR = 2.17) and frequent bowel movements (RR = 8.98). Both doses of EFX were associated with higher risks of drug-related TEAEs (28 mg: RR = 1.45; 50 mg: RR = 1.67) and increased appetite (28 mg: RR = 3.16; 50 mg: RR = 5.66). EFX (28 and 50 mg) and placebo exhibited identical risks for severe TEAEs, serious AEs, abdominal pain, fatigue, headache, injection site erythema, and injection site reactions. EFX (28 and 50 mg) was associated with improvements in hepatic safety outcomes, including liver enzymes and urate levels. EFX outperformed the placebo in both relative and absolute reductions in hepatic fat fraction. Reductions in enhanced liver fibrosis score, Pro-C3, and liver stiffness were also more robust with EFX. EFX was superior in terms of MASH resolution and improvement in fibrosis stage, MASH resolution and no worsening of the fibrosis stage, and fibrosis regression by ≥ 1 stage and no worsening in steatohepatitis. Furthermore, EFX also improved metabolic parameters, including reductions in HbA1c and insulin resistance, as well as improvements in adiponectin and lipid parameters.

CONCLUSION

EFX demonstrates promising dual efficacy on liver histology and metabolic markers in MASH. However, gastrointestinal side effects and the need for parenteral administration require caution. Long-term data are still necessary to fully evaluate safety and long-term effectiveness.

Keywords: Efruxifermin; Fibroblast growth factor 21; Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Safety; Hepatic fat fraction

Core Tip: This one is the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses specifically targeting efruxifermin (EFX)’s safety as well as liver histological and metabolic impacts in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We analyzed four randomized-controlled trials (five reports) involving 450 subjects and found that EFX, imparts greater risks for drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and gastrointestinal AEs but does not increase the occurrence of severe TEAEs or serious AEs. EFX surpassed the placebo in lowering liver enzymes, urate levels, hepatic fat fraction, liver fibrosis score, Pro-C3, and liver stiffness, while also improving the fibrosis stage. Furthermore, EFX demonstrated metabolic benefits, including reductions in HbA1c and insulin resistance, along with improvements in adiponectin and lipid parameters. The outcomes of the current phase 3 trials are eagerly anticipated to verify its safety and effectiveness in MASH.