Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (8384)
All Articles published online
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
May 28, 2014 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Radiology
ISSN
1949-8470
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Torkzad MR, Ahlström H, Karlbom U. Comparison of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences for assessment of fistula-in-ano. World J Radiol 2014; 6(5): 203-209 [PMID: 24876924 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.203] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v6/i5/203.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Wafi Attaallah, Tevfik K. Uprak, Burak Kara, Aliosman Sen, Davut Tuney, Cumhur Yegen. Chemical Ablation for Treating Anal Fistulas without Surgical Intervention: Long-Term Results. Surgical Innovation 2021; 28(6): 731 doi: 10.1177/15533506211006080
|
| 2 |
Abdulla KV, Venkatesh Kasi Arunachalam, Haleema Sherene, Vijayakumaran Ethiraju, Rupa Ranganathan, Gowtham SM, Sriman Rajasekaran, Pankaj Mehta, Mathew Cherian. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced 3D Imaging with 2D Imaging in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula at 3T: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2024; 34(01): 95 doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775738
|
| 3 |
Damian J.M. Tolan. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Perianal Fistula. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2016; 37(4): 313 doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.04.004
|
| 4 |
M.N. Cerit, A.Y. Öner, A. Yıldız, E. Cindil, H.N. Şendur, S. Leventoğlu. Perianal fistula mapping at 3 T: volumetric versus conventional MRI sequences. Clinical Radiology 2020; 75(7): 563.e1 doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.03.034
|
| 5 |
Asmaa Hagagy Madany, Amr Farouk Murad, Mansour Mohammed Kabbash, Hala Maher Ahmed. Magnetic resonance imaging in the workup of patients with perianal fistulas. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2023; 54(1) doi: 10.1186/s43055-023-00975-5
|
| 6 |
Pooja Aggarwal, Rajesh Malik, Radha Sarawagi, Aman Kumar. Comparing the Efficacy of a Combination of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and T2-STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery) Imaging With Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula. Cureus 2024; doi: 10.7759/cureus.53485
|
| 7 |
Dalia M. Fahmy, Mohamed G. Dawoud. Value of diffusion weighted MRI in assessment of simple and complicated perianal fistula. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2017; 48(3): 553 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.010
|
| 8 |
Andreas Sturm, Christian Maaser, Emma Calabrese, Vito Annese, Gionata Fiorino, Torsten Kucharzik, Stephan R Vavricka, Bram Verstockt, Patrick van Rheenen, Damian Tolan, Stuart A Taylor, Jordi Rimola, Florian Rieder, Jimmy K Limdi, Andrea Laghi, Eduards Krustiņš, Paulo G Kotze, Uri Kopylov, Konstantinos Katsanos, Steve Halligan, Hannah Gordon, Yago González Lama, Pierre Ellul, Rami Eliakim, Fabiana Castiglione, Johan Burisch, Paula Borralho Nunes, Dominik Bettenworth, Daniel C Baumgart, Jaap Stoker. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 2: IBD scores and general principles and technical aspects. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 2019; 13(3): 273 doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy114
|
| 9 |
C.J. Park, J.-H. Kim, S.S. Ahn, S.-K. Lee, Y.W. Koh, J. Kim. Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Thyroid Cartilage Invasion in Patients with Laryngohypopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced 2D Spin-Echo and 3D T1-Weighted Radial Gradient Recalled-Echo Techniques. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021; 42(9): 1690 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7213
|
| 10 |
Duc Vo, Chien Phan, Linh Nguyen, Huyen Le, Tin Nguyen, Hung Pham. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of anal fistulas. Scientific Reports 2019; 9(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54441-2
|