Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2025; 17(8): 108007
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108007
Tumor markers and multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in predicting rectal cancer stage and differentiation
Peng Wang, Jun Han, Wen-Na Zhao, Fan Wu, Sheng-He Zhang, Yi-Juan Huang
Peng Wang, Department of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
Jun Han, Wen-Na Zhao, Fan Wu, Sheng-He Zhang, Yi-Juan Huang, Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
Co-first authors: Peng Wang and Jun Han.
Author contributions: Wang P and Han J conducted the conceptualization, data organization, methodology, software, and writing of the original manuscript; they contributed equally to this article and are the co-first authors of this manuscript; Zhao WN, Wu F, and Zhang SH performed formal analysis, project management, and visualization; Huang YJ performed research, supervision, validation, writing, review and editing; all authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, No. LTGY24H160006; and Jiaxing Medical Key Discipline, No. 2023-ZC-015.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Jiaxing First Hospital Committee, approval No. 2025-LP-215.
Informed consent statement: All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset are available from the corresponding author at huangyijuan2006@zjxu.edu.cn. Participants gave informed consent for data sharing.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yi-Juan Huang, MD, Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Jiaxing, No. 1882 Central South Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China. huangyijuan2006@zjxu.edu.cn
Received: April 22, 2025
Revised: May 23, 2025
Accepted: July 8, 2025
Published online: August 15, 2025
Processing time: 113 Days and 15.7 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer is one of the common digestive system malignant tumors around the world. Its early diagnosis and staging are crucial for rectal cancer treatment and prognosis. In recent years, tumor markers have gradually received attention in early screening, treatment monitoring and prognostic evaluation of cancer, but their predictive role in rectal cancer staging and differentiation is still unclear.

AIM

To assess the prognostic value of tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alongside multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for staging and differentiating rectal cancer in patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 167 patients with rectal cancer who were treated at our institution from January 2020 to December 2024. Each patient underwent serological testing and multimodal MRI for diagnosis. Histopathological examination after surgical resection or imaging based on follow-up was used as the gold standard. According to the T stage and differentiation degree, patients were divided into low stage group (T1-T2) and high stage group (T3-T4). In addition, they were divided into low-differentiation groups and high-differentiation groups according to their differentiation degree. We compared the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of tumor marker levels and MRI in rectal cancer stage and differentiation.

RESULTS

The study's findings indicate that in the context of rectal cancer T staging, there is substantial concordance between MRI and clinicopathological assessments, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.789 (P < 0.001). Similarly, for various degrees of tumor differentiation, MRI and clinicopathological evaluations demonstrated substantial agreement, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.651 (P < 0.001). Notably, the concentrations of tumor markers CA19-9, CA72-4, CEA, and AFP were significantly elevated in the T3-T4 stage compared to the T1-T2 stage. Furthermore, these markers were significantly higher in the low-differentiation group compared to the high-differentiation group (P < 0.05). The combined use of tumor markers and MRI for preoperative T staging of rectal cancer yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 93.7% and a specificity of 94.6%, as evidenced by the receiver operating characteristic analysis, with an area under the curve of 0.947. For tumor differentiation, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 93.6% and 97.1%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.978 (95% confidence interval: 0.946-1.000), surpassing the accuracy of individual detection methods.

CONCLUSION

The CA19-9, CA72-4, CEA and AFP tumor markers combined with multimodal MRI have high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing rectal cancer stage and differentiation. Their diagnostic efficacy is significantly better than that of single tests, which can effectively improve the predictive ability of rectal cancer stage and differentiation, provide a more reliable diagnostic reference for clinical practice, and have important clinical significance.

Keywords: Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal cancer; T stage; Tumor markers; Differentiation

Core Tip: This study included 167 rectal cancer patients who underwent serological tests and multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Results showed significant concordance between magnetic resonance imaging and pathological T-staging. Combined use of tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein cancer antigen 72-4, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen) and magnetic resonance imaging had high sensitivity/specificity for staging/differentiation, outperforming single tests, thus enhancing diagnostic accuracy for clinical practice.