Copyright ©2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2010; 2(7): 275-288
Published online Jul 27, 2010. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i7.275
Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A clinical and laboratory challenge
Lucia Pacifico, Eleonora Poggiogalle, Vito Cantisani, Guendalina Menichini, Paolo Ricci, Flavia Ferraro, Claudio Chiesa
Lucia Pacifico, Eleonora Poggiogalle, Flavia Ferraro, Claudio Chiesa, Departments of 1 Pediatrics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
Vito Cantisani, Guendalina Menichini, Paolo Ricci, Departments of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
Lucia Pacifico, Claudio Chiesa, National Research Council, Institute of Neurobiology and Molecular Medicine, Rome 00133, Italy
Author contributions: Pacifico L, Poggiogalle E, and Chiesa C designed the study; Menichini G and Ferraro F were responsible for the review of the literature; Cantisani V and Ricci P analyzed the data and were responsible for the initial preparation of the paper;and Pacifico L and Chiesa C prepared the final version of the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Claudio Chiesa, MD, Institute of Neurobiology and Molecular Medicine, National Research Council, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, Rome 100 00133, Italy.
Telephone: +39-6-49979215 Fax: +39-6-49979216
Received: December 23, 2009
Revised: July 6, 2010
Accepted: July 13, 2010
Published online: July 27, 2010


The true prevalence of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unknown. Challenges in determining the population prevalence of NAFLD include the type of test (and the reference intervals used to define normal and abnormal), the type of population (general population, hospital series), the demographic characteristics of the population sampled, and the nature of the study design. The natural history of pediatric NAFLD remains uncertain. The issue of when to perform a liver biopsy in children with suspected NAFLD remains controversial. Children with NAFLD but normal alanine aminotransferase are rarely investigated. However, evidence of alterations in glucose metabolism parameters should prompt a better understanding of the natural history of pediatric NAFLD not only in terms of the progression of liver disease but also regarding its potential relationship with other health outcomes such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. This evidence could make liver biopsy mandatory in the majority of cases at risk of progressive and severe hepatic and extrahepatic disease. This conclusion, however, raises the question of the feasibility of liver biopsy assessment in an extremely large at risk population, and of the cost/effectiveness of this policy. There is a considerable, continuous interest in reliable, noninvasive alternatives that will allow the prognosis of pediatric NAFLD to be followed in large community or population-based studies.

Key Words: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Children, Insulin resistance, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging

Citation: Pacifico L, Poggiogalle E, Cantisani V, Menichini G, Ricci P, Ferraro F, Chiesa C. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A clinical and laboratory challenge. World J Hepatol 2010; 2(7): 275-288

Over the last 2 decades, the rise in the prevalence rates of overweight and obesity probably explains the emergence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as the leading cause of liver disease in the pediatric population worldwide[1]. NAFLD is a clinicopathologic condition characterized by abnormal lipid deposition in hepatocytes (steatosis) in the absence of excess alcohol intake and represents a spectrum of liver disease ranging from bland (simple) steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) that may lead to fibrosis and cirrhosis. It is a likely common cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis[2]. Once cirrhosis is present, hepatocellular carcinoma may also develop[3]. At present, the most commonly used noninvasive tests to detect NAFLD include measurement of serum aminotransferases and liver ultrasound. Although these tools are useful for the diagnosis of NAFLD, they lack the sensitivity and specificity to distinguish NASH from simple steatosis and determine the presence of fibrosis. Thus, currently, a liver biopsy remains the only reliable way to identify NASH[1]. Despite several advances, there are limited data on the epidemiology and natural history of the disease in children. This review will outline the current knowledge, recent advances, and challenges regarding the prevalence, pathogenesis, natural history, and diagnosis of pediatric NAFLD.


The true prevalence of pediatric NAFLD is unknown (Table 1)[4-21] . There are inherent challenges in determining the population prevalence of NAFLD. The first challenge is the kind of test (and the cutoff-points used to define normal and abnormal) used in making diagnosis of NAFLD[21]. Diagnosis requires liver biopsy, which is not feasible in a population-based study. Therefore, most studies use serum aminotransferase elevations as a surrogate marker for fatty liver disease (in conjunction with negative markers for other types of liver disease)[22]. Especially germane to this issue is the common use of serum levels of aminotransferases during routine health care examinations to detect unsuspected liver disease[23]. However, the spectrum of fatty liver appears to encompass a wider range of subjects than identified by elevated serum liver chemistries. Franzese et al[11] demonstrated a lack of agreement between ultrasonography and serum aminotransferase levels in cases of fatty liver. Of the 53% of obese children with fatty liver identified by ultrasound, only 32% had abnormalities in serum aminotransferases. In subjects with more severe steatosis, a higher proportion of abnormalities in serum aminotransferases (56%) existed. These findings suggest that heavy infiltration is required for abnormalities in serum aminotransferases to occur. Previous studies have also demonstrated the insensitivity of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in detecting hepatic fat accumulation in obese children as indicated by fast-gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (fast-MRI) pulse sequences. Using fast-MRI Fishbein et al[24] first showed the insensitivity of serum aminotransferases to detect low levels (< 18%) of hepatic fat fraction (HFF) in obese children. Burger et al[25] then showed that only 48% of obese children with intrahepatic fat accumulation (as evidenced by HFF ≥ 5.5% using fast-MRI) had abnormal ALT levels. Finally, we recently showed that obese children with elevated ALT had a much higher mean level of MRI HFF than obese children with normal serum ALT[26].

Table 1 Studies providing an estimate of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the pediatric population.
Authors/year/countrySample size (n)Age range (yr)Clinical characteristicsCriteriaPrevalence (%)
Tominaga et al/1995/Japan[4]8104-12Population-based (Japan)Ultrasound echogenicity2.60
Strauss et al/2000/USA[5]245012-18Population-based (NHANES III)Elevated ALT (> 30 U/L)3.00
Park et al/2005/Korea[6]159410-19Population-based (Korean NHANES)Elevated ALT (> 40 U/L)3.20
Schwimmer et al/2006/USA[7]7422-19Population-based (Autopsy data, San Diego County)Liver histology with ≥ 5% hepatocytes containing fat9.60
Tominaga et al/2009/Japan[8]8466-15Population-based (Japan)Ultrasound echogenicity4.40
Alavian et al/2009/Iran[9]9667-18Population-based (Iran)Ultrasound echogenicity7.10
Tazawa et al/1997/Japan[10]3106-11Obese cohort (% IBW/height over 120)Elevated ALT (> 30 U/L)24.00
Franzese et al/1997/Italy[11]724-15Obese cohort (% IBW/height over 120)Ultrasound echogenicty53.00
Guzzaloni et al/2000/Italy[12]3758-16Obese cohort (BMI > 2 SD for chronologic age)Ultrasound echogenicity42.00
Chan et al/2004/China[13]847-18Obese cohort (BMI > 95th percentile)Ultrasound echogenicty77.00
Flores-Calderon et al/2005/Mexico[14]808-10Overweight (> 85th) and obese (> 95th percentile) cohortElevated ALT (> 40 U/L)42.00
Louthan et al/2005/USA[15]1814-17Obese cohort (BMI > 95th percentile)Elevated ALT (> 40 U/L)8.00
Quiros-Tejeira et al/2007/USA[16]5174-19Obese cohort (BMI > 95th percentile)Elevated ALT (> 97.5th percentile for age-and sex-specific reference values)24.00
Rocha et al/2009/Brazil[17]17512-15Obese cohort (WC > 75th percentile)Ultrasound echogenicity1.70
Denzer et al/2009/Germany[18]5328-19Obese cohort (BMI > 90th percentile)Ultrasound echogenicity28.00
Papandreou et al/2009/Greece[19]439-13Obese cohortUltrasound echogenicity42.00

On the other hand, the way in which clinical laboratories determine their own upper limits of normal values for aminotransferases is critically important in determining the absence as well as the presence of fatty liver disease[23]. Validated standards are not used to establish upper normal limits for ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)[27]. Instead, laboratories use locally defined reference populations to establish their own reference intervals for these tests. Recently, Newschwander-Tetri and colleagues showed that the primary factor contributing to the widely divergent values of upper limits of normal ALT is related to the characteristics of the cohorts used by individual laboratories to establish their own reference intervals[23]. Among factors contributing to the variability in reference cohorts used to establish upper limits of normal values, obesity could be a major factor. As obesity increases in the general population, such reference populations could increasingly include individuals with unsuspected NAFLD, which would skew the upper reference limit to inappropriately high levels. Thus, laboratories should consider identifying healthy adults as well as children without risk factors for insulin resistance and fatty liver disease when establishing reference groups for testing serum ALT and AST levels[23]. Also, anthropomorphic, clinical, or demographic differences other than obesity could be responsible for the variation between laboratories. Care providers often use multiples of reported upper limits of normal values as criteria for further evaluation of the abnormality by imaging, and even liver biopsy. However, multiplying inaccurate upper limits of normal values only multiplies the errant value created by using the local reference population[23]. As expected, the sensitivity and specificity of aminotransferase measurements in the diagnosis of pediatric NAFLD is not established. Alternative approaches include imaging modalities such as liver ultrasound, although the diagnostic accuracy of this approach has its limitations (see section “Laboratory assessment of NAFLD”).

A further challenge in assessing population prevalence is the selection of a representative population with minimal bias[22]. However, most prevalence studies have been conducted in cohorts of children selected for overweight or obesity, many of whom were referred for medical evaluation of obesity. The prevalence of elevated ALT in obese youth has been reported as 10%-14% in the United States adolescents[5,28], 24% in Hispanic youth[16], 25% in Italian youth[11], 24% in Japanese youth[29], and 48% in youth with type 2 diabetes[30]. There are also studies using ultrasound to assess the prevalence of suspected fatty liver in obese children. The prevalence of echogenic liver in obese youth has been reported as 77% in Chinese youth[13], 28% in German youth[18], 42%-53% in Italian youth[11,12], 66% in Japanese youth[10], and 74% the United States adolescents[28].

Further challenges in assessing population prevalence are inherent variables based on the age, sex, race, and ethnicity of the population sampled[21]. Keeping this in mind, there are few population-based prevalence studies of pediatric NAFLD. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), cycle III, examined a nationally representative sample of children and adults between 1988 and 1994[5]. The sample included 2450 adolescents, ages 12 through 18 yr. Abnormal serum ALT levels were found in 75 (3%) of adolescents[5]. Other factors associated with elevated ALT levels included increasing age. Data obtained from 1594 subjects aged 10-19 yr from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1998, found that the prevalence of elevated ALT was 3.6% in boys and 2.8% in girls[6]. Population-based prevalence of pediatric NAFLD has also been estimated using imaging techniques. A study of 810 Japanese students (ages 4 to 12 yr) attending a public kindergarten and elementary school found a 2.6% prevalence of echogenic liver at ultrasound examination[4]. Fatty liver was found in children as young as 6 yr of age. Fatty liver prevalence was higher for boys than for girls.

Although liver biopsy cannot be used as a screening tool in (pediatric) population studies, autopsy series is another way of estimating prevalence based on the histological diagnosis within select populations[22]. Schwimmer et al conducted a retrospective analysis of 742 children between the ages of 2 and 19 yr who had an autopsy performed in San Diego County by a county medical examiner from 1993 to 2003. Fatty liver was defined as ≥ 5% of hepatocytes containing macrovesicular fat[7]. After standardization for age, gender, race, and ethnicity, the estimated prevalence of fatty liver was 9.6%, which represented ~70 000 children ages 2 to 19 yr in the county of San Diego[7]. Fatty liver prevalence increased with age and differed significantly by race and ethnicity. The highest rate of fatty liver was seen in obese children. The results of this study confirm that fatty liver is the most common liver abnormality in children ages 2 to 19 yr.


Liver biopsy remains an important tool in the diagnostic process in patients with NAFLD. The distinction between simple hepatic steatosis and potentially progressive NASH can only be made by liver biopsy, which can assess the presence and extent of necroinflammation and fibrosis. Nonetheless, even liver biopsy has important limitations that need to be considered. The basic assumption that the small fragment collected through percutaneous liver biopsy is representative of overall hepatic involvement has been seriously challenged. A needle biopsy sample usually represents around 1/50 000 of the total mass of the liver[31]. In addition, many studies have been published showing considerable sampling variability for most histological features[32,33]. Ratziu et al[34] compared histological findings in 51 patients with NAFLD, each of whom had two samples collected through percutaneous liver biopsy. None of the features examined displayed high levels of agreement. Substantial agreement was only seen for steatosis grade; moderate agreement was seen for hepatocyte ballooning and perisinusoidal fibrosis; and lobular inflammation displayed only slight agreement. Six of 17 patients with bridging fibrosis (35%) in one sample had only mild or no fibrosis in the other and, therefore, could have been under-staged by a single biopsy. Ratziu et al[34] concluded that histological lesions of NASH were unevenly distributed throughout the liver parenchyma and that sampling error in liver biopsy can, therefore, result in substantial misdiagnosis and staging inaccuracies. Merriman et al, through a careful comparison of paired lobar biopsies in subjects at high risk of NAFLD, have also shown significant sampling variability in NAFLD. In their study, agreement for steatosis was excellent, moderate for fibrosis and only fair for most components of necroinflammation[35]. This variability can have an important impact on the diagnostic performance of liver biopsy specimens, as well as in the staging or grading of hepatic disease. Furthermore, liver biopsy is an invasive procedure, and not suitable for repeated evaluations.

It has been demonstrated that the higher the ALT levels, the higher the risk of NASH[36,37]. Not surprisingly, children are usually selected for liver biopsy to confirm NAFLD where it appears to be the only explanation for the either persistently or intermittently elevated serum aminotransferases, associated with diffusely hyperechogenic liver tissue at ultrasound examination[22,38-43]. At present, children with NAFLD but normal ALT are rarely investigated or indicated for liver biopsy[38], and the value of performing a biopsy in this situation is still debated[42,44-47]. All patients, including children, within the spectrum of NAFLD should be considered potentially affected, not only by hepatic but also by a multisystemic disease. This suspicion would be even stronger in the presence of elevated insulin resistance, which is a sensitive predictor of both progressive liver disease and severe extrahepatic disease. Diabetes and insulin resistance have been reported as the factors most closely associated with severe liver disease in adults as well as in children with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD but in the absence of ALT abnormalities[45,46]. Hypertension, one of the main features of the metabolic syndrome, has been reported to be more prevalent in adult patients with NAFLD and normal ALT than in those with increased liver enzymes[45]. The clinician should, therefore, be aware that the metabolic alterations related to steatosis and to adipose tissue-related endocrine dysfunction occur independently of overt liver damage and that even fatty liver per se is frequently associated with extrahepatic manifestations of insulin resistance syndrome[45,48]. Furthermore, studies using a priori selection based on the exclusion of children with normal ALT levels from liver biopsy will not reflect the true extent of NASH-related liver damage in the general pediatric population. Indeed, it is known that liver enzymes may be within the reference intervals in up to 70% of patients with diagnosed NAFLD and that normal liver enzymes cannot be reliably used as a criterion to argue against the usefulness of performing liver biopsy in at risk patients[49,50]. This evidence could make liver biopsy mandatory in the majority of cases at risk of progressive and severe hepatic disease, as well as of extrahepatic manifestations, unless accurate, noninvasive tests, which are currently unavailable, prove their efficacy. This conclusion, however, raises the question of the feasibility of liver biopsy assessment in an extremely large at risk population, and of the cost/effectiveness of this policy[45].

The histological features of NAFLD in children include a wide spectrum of alterations including simple steatosis (macrovesicular steatosis, characterized by a single or a few large droplets of fat and displacement of the nucleus, in hepatocytes without inflammation), NASH (macrovesicular steatosis in hepatocytes associated with inflammation and fibrosis), and cirrhosis. The distinction between simple hepatic steatosis and potentially progressive NASH can only be made by liver biopsy, which can assess the presence and extent of necroinflammation and fibrosis. The minimum criteria for NASH are: steatosis, with macrovesicular fat greater than microvescicular fat; mixed, mild lobular inflammation with scattered polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear cells; and ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes that are most apparent near steatotic liver cells[51]. A growing body of evidence suggests that children with NASH frequently show histopathological features that differ from those of adults[38,43]. A unique histological pattern, type 2 NASH, is reported in pediatrics[51]. In this pattern, inflammation and fibrosis are accentuated in the portal areas[38,43], in contrast to the perisinusoidal-pericellular injury typically observed in adults with NASH (type 1 NASH)[38]. The single-center, retrospective study by Schwimmer et al[38] performed on 100 pediatric patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, identified type 1 NASH (characterized by steatosis, ballooning degeneration, and perisinusoidal fibrosis) in 17% of subjects, type 2 NASH (characterized by steatosis, portal inflammation, and portal fibrosis) in 51%, and an overlap in 16% of patients. Boys were significantly more likely to have type 2 NASH and less likely to have type 1 NASH than girls. The NASH type differed significantly by race and ethnicity. Type 1 NASH was more common in white children, whereas type 2 NASH was more common in children of Asian, Native American, and Hispanic ethnicity. In cases of advanced fibrosis, the pattern was that of type 2 NASH. The single-center, prospective study by Nobili et al[39] performed on 84 children (with unknown history of race and ethnicity) with biopsy-proven NAFLD, identified type 1 NASH in 2.4% of subjects, type 2 NASH in 28.6%, and an overlap in 52.4% of patients. Recently, in the multicenter, retrospective study by Carter-Kent et al[43] performed on 130 children with NAFLD (52% of patients, Caucasian; 1%, African American; 18%, Asian; and 30%, Hispanic), overlapping features of both type 1 and type 2 NASH were found in 82% of patients. Thus, it is likely that a spectrum of disease patterns exists in pediatric NASH[51].


A crucial question is that of the underlying difference between people who deposit fat in their liver and those who do not[52]. Similarly, it remains to be determined why some of those who deposit fat go on to develop NAFLD, cirrhosis, and liver failure[52]. A “two-hit” theory for the development of NASH has been proposed[53]. Hepatic steatosis resulting from obesity and hyperinsulinemia is then followed by a second hit of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. However, the linkage between inflammatory changes signified by elevation of ALT and further oxidation stress is still unknown[13].

A genetic predisposition is indisputably present in NAFLD, and one possibility is that genetics influence the observed heterogeneity in the development of these traits. Clinical case series have shown familial clustering of NAFLD[54,55]. Recent research on heritability of NAFLD has shown how family members of children with NAFLD should be considered at high risk for NAFLD even in the absence of obesity or increased serum aminotransferase levels[56]. Furthermore, there are racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of NAFLD[7,57].

Genetic studies

A number of genes regulate a wide spectrum of mechanisms involved in NAFLD pathogenesis, including lipid accumulation into the liver, oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrogenesis. Their expression relates not only to fat accumulation but also to the different mechanisms implicated in disease progression[58]. Several polymorphisms capable of increasing the severity of disease have been identified[59]. For example, a number of studies have analysed genes implicated in liver fat accumulation, adipokine/cytokine networks, oxidative stress, and fibrogenesis. The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) is a key factor for the transfer of triglycerides to nascent apolipoprotein B, producing very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and removing lipid from the hepatocyte. The functional polymorphism 493 G/T in the MTP gene has been linked to the severity of liver disease in NAFLD: GG homozygosity, or carrying a lower MTP activity (which would lead to less triglyceride excretion as VLDL, and greater accumulation of lipid inside the hepatocytes) than the other genotypes, predicted more severe liver histology[60], independently of adipokine levels and insulin resistance[61]. Along the same lines, a recent study showed that adiponectin single-nucleotide polymorphisms 45GT and 276GT were more prevalent in NAFLD patients than in the general population, and independently predicted the severity of liver disease in NASH[62]. Similarly, a recent study in NASH patients and healthy volunteers evaluated the distribution of the 1183 T/C polymorphism in the mitochondrial targeting sequence of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), a potent scavenger localized to mitochondria with a key role in scavenging excessive oxidative stress to hepatocytes in NASH patients. This showed that the T/T genotype frequency was significantly higher in NASH patients in comparison with that in the controls. This results in a decrease of MnSOD capacity to detoxify superoxide anions produced in mitochondria, and, therefore, favours excessive oxidative damage inside hepatocytes and NASH progression[60]. Miele et al studied Kruppel-like factor 6, previously identified as a ubiquitous transcription factor and immediate early gene expressed in activated hepatic stellate cells after liver injury[63,64], and therefore possibly involved in the process of liver fibrogenesis. They found that the wild type gene was associated with the severity of fibrosis in NAFLD livers, independently of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and blood glucose level[65]. They also showed preferential transmission of the wild type Kruppel-like factor 6 to children with fibrotic NAFLD[65]. Finally, in a population comprising Hispanic, African American, and European American individuals, Romeo et al[66] demonstrated that an amino acid sequence variant [rs 738409 (G), encoding 1148M] in patatin-like phospholipase A3 (PNPLA3), a protein of unknown function, was strongly associated with increased hepatic fat levels [evidenced by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)] and with hepatic inflammation (as shown by release of liver enzymes into the circulation). The allele was most common in Hispanics, the group most susceptible to NAFLD; and hepatic fat content was more than twofold higher in PNPLA3 homozygotes than in noncarriers. Resequencing revealed another allele of PNPLA3 [rs6006460 (T), encoding S4531] that was associated with reduced hepatic fat content in African Americans[66], the group at lowest risk of NAFLD. Thus, variation in PNPLA3 contributes to inter-individual differences in hepatic fat content and susceptibility to NAFLD.


Current studies suggest that the rate of progression of NAFLD relates to histological severity[67]. There is significant debate about the clinical significance and prognosis of simple or “bland”steatosis. This condition is thought to be readily reversible. Once significant fibrosis is present, however, it is unclear if this can be reversed[68]. Changes in fibrosis stage have been specifically evaluated in independent series[69-72]. Overall, fibrosis progresses over time, but it may remain stable for some years and may improve spontaneously in some cases[69-73]. Increased risk of fibrosis appears to be associated with central obesity, insulin resistance states including diabetes as well as features of the metabolic syndrome, in particular high triglyceride and low HDL levels[67]. More advanced stages of NAFLD appear to be associated with older age, higher BMI, diabetes, hypertension, high triglycerides, and/or insulin resistance[67]. An AST/ALT ratio > 1 may also indicate more severe disease[68,74]. The findings from different studies are not completely consistent as to which factors are independently associated, and this may depend on the population studied (patients with elevated liver enzymes vs morbidly obese patients vs subjects in the general population)[68]. As fibrosis progresses over time, other features of NAFLD, including steatosis, inflammation and ballooning of hepatocytes, significantly improve or disappear[71]. In addition, aminotransferases, when elevated, improve or normalize spontaneously over time despite fibrosis progression[71]. Thus, fibrosis severity may be the only biopsy feature useful to predict the long-term prognosis in patients with NAFLD. Furthermore, it is possible that the long-term complications of NAFLD might have been underrecognized and underreported, as the characteristic features of macrovesicular steatosis may disappear in the late stages of the disease, leading to a picture of “bland”cirrhosis, which is frequently described as “cryptogenic”, rather than NAFLD-related cirrhosis[67].

Most studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of patients with NAFLD originate from specialized care centers at which adult patients had been selected to undergo liver biopsy[75-79]. The retrospective analysis by Matteoni et al[75] comparing clinical characteristics and outcomes of 98 adult patients with different types of NAFLD over an average (SD) follow-up of 8.3 (5.4) years, demonstrated that the outcome of cirrhosis and liver-related death was not uniform across the spectrum of NAFLD. Poor outcomes were more common in types 3 and 4 NAFLD (currently designed as NASH)[75]. This study suggested that histological findings may have prognostic value in patients with NAFLD. Other hospital-based studies of the histological subgroup of NAFLD patients with NASH have documented progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but have been limited by the small numbers of adult patients and/or average follow-up of less than 5 years[76-78]. More recently, the study by Rafiq et al, with a median follow-up period of 18.5 years, has shown that liver-related mortality of the NASH cohort [mean (SD) age, 68.9 (10.8) yr] increased to 17.5% in comparison with only 2.7% in the non-NASH NAFLD cohort [mean (SD) age, 71.7 (11.3) yr][80]. These findings confirm that with longer follow-up periods, more NASH patients die as a result of liver-related disease. It also confirms that most patients with non-NASH (simple steatosis or steatosis with nonspecific inflammation) are not subject to liver-related death. This relatively nonprogressive course of non-NASH NAFLD has been reported by others[79-81].

Accurate data are also needed on the extent to which NAFLD causes morbidity and mortality in the general population. There are few population-based studies to determine the long-term prognosis of NAFLD. Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology, Project, Adams et al[82] conducted a population-based cohort study to examine the natural history of patients [mean (SD) age, 49 (15) yr] diagnosed with NAFLD on the basis of imaging studies or liver biopsy. Mean (SD) follow-up was 7.6 (4.0) years culminating in 3192 persons/years follow-up. Liver-related death was the third most common cause of death in those with NAFLD while it was the thirteenth most common cause of death in the general population. Utilizing data from the NHANES III and the NHANES III Linked Mortality File, Ong et al[83] conducted a study to determine the overall and liver-related mortality of NAFLD in the general population including 12822 persons. Liver disease was the third cause of death among persons with NAFLD after cardiovascular disease and malignancy[83]. This risk was independent of obesity or the presence of diabetes mellitus. On the other hand, liver disease was only the eleventh most common cause of death in persons without liver disease[83].

Although NAFLD is very common in the pediatric population, data on the prognosis of NAFLD in children remain scant. Given the large number of children affected, it is imperative that we establish a better understanding of the natural history of pediatric fatty liver in terms of the progression of liver disease[7]. Although some series have reported documented cases of cirrhotic stage disease in children[7,84] or cases of children with NAFLD who developed cirrhosis in young adulthood[85,86], cirrhosis is not considered to be a common component of pediatric NASH. Some Authors have speculated that the delay in presentation of cirrhosis until adulthood may be due to the short duration of the process or to introduction of a cofactor after childhood[87]. Notably, cirrhosis is reported, though rarely, in patients with NAFLD associated with pituitary dysfunction[88-90]. This liver disease, which is more likely to present with or include hepatopulmonary syndrome[88,91], will add to the morbidity and mortality of this patient population. Despite careful monitoring and treatment of endocrine abnormalities, recurrence of NASH after liver transplantation has been documented in two children who had a history of hypothalamic/pituitary dysfunction[88,89] and developed decompensated liver disease from NAFLD[91].

In contrast, hepatic fibrosis is frequently observed in pediatric NASH. Kinugasa et al[84] found, by routine laboratory examination, elevated levels of serum transaminases in 36 (12%) of the 299 obese children studied. Liver biopsies carried out in 11 of the 36 children showed fibrous changes in five patients. One patient, a 15-year-old girl with a long history of obesity, had cirrhosis along with maturity-onset diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. Baldridge et al[87] reported on a series of 14 obese children with idiopathic hepatic steatosis, identified by retrospective review of all liver biopsies performed in a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. Thirteen of the 14 children had portal fibrosis, and many also had central sclerosis, central portal bridging, and portal-portal bridging. Rashid and Roberts reported on a series of 24 children who were predominantly obese and who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy; all showed large-droplet steatosis, and many had fibrosis (17% or 71%) of varying severity[92]. Fibrosis was moderately severe in seven patients. One additional patient had cirrhosis at diagnosis. In a retrospective study, defining the liver biopsy findings in 100 predominantly obese children with clinical features consistent with NAFLD, Schwimmer et al[38] found that simple steatosis was present in 16% of subjects, and advanced fibrosis in 8%. In the study by Nobili et al[39], involving 84 obese/overweight children with elevated aminotransferases and diagnosis of NAFLD confirmed via liver biopsy, increased fibrosis was noted in 49 (58%) patients but was mostly of mild (stage 1) severity, with only 4 (4.7%) patients showing septal fibrosis (stage 3). None of the patients showed cirrhosis-stage disease on liver biopsy.

Feldstein et al[91] recently reported the first longitudinal study describing the long-term survival of children with NAFLD who underwent a follow-up for up to 20 years. That study demonstrated that NAFLD in children is a disease of progressive potential. Some children presented with cirrhosis, others progressed to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis during follow-up, and some developed end-stage liver disease with the consequent need for liver transplantation. Feldstein et al[91] also showed that NAFLD in children is associated with significantly shorter long-term survival as compared to the expected survival in the general population of the same age and sex. Children with NAFLD had a 13.8-fold higher risk of dying or requiring liver transplantation than the general population of the same age and sex[91].

On the basis of the above information, an important goal must be to identify those children with advanced fibrosis, as well as the ones most likely to progress to end-stage liver disease. It is also imperative that noninvasive means be developed to identify children at greatest risk for progressive disease[40]. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, and severity of obesity have been reported to be associated with the steatohepatitis pattern types[38]. Older age has been found to be independently associated with increased liver fibrosis in some series[39]. However, in other series children with advanced stages of fibrosis tended to be younger than those with lesser degrees of fibrosis[40], suggesting that yet unidentified susceptibility genes predispose to the more aggressive course in these children[40]. Most published reports of pediatric NAFLD have reported males to be affected more commonly[4,12,41,87,92-94]. Sex-related differences have been also shown in an animal model of NASH, with male sex associated with more severe and diffuse injury[95]. In the study by Schwimmer et al[38], who tested potential associations of distinct patterns of NASH in children, girls with type 2 NASH were more likely to be prepubertal and, therefore, have a hormone profile more similar to young boys with type 2 NASH, whereas girls with type 1 NASH were more likely to be postmenarcheal and thus have higher estrogen levels. Thus, sex hormones are attractive candidates for mediators of the development of and/or protection from NASH. Beside changes in sex steroid hormones, another potential mediator of disease expression and progression is pubertal development[40]. During puberty, plasma insulin levels increase, and insulin sensitivity decreases along with multiple other physical and hormonal changes[96]. This decrease in sensitivity occurs early in puberty, between Tanner stages I and II, with a nadir at Tanner stage III and recovery by stage V[96,97]. A longitudinal study examining 60 children at Tanner stage I (ages 9.2 ± 1.4 yr) as well as after 2.0 ± 0.6 yr, showed that, at follow-up, 29 children remained at Tanner stage I while 31 had progressed to Tanner stage III or IV[98]. In children remaining at Tanner stage I, there was a slight increase in insulin sensitivity with no significant change in acute insulin response or fasting glucose and insulin. Pubertal transition from Tanner stage I to Tanner stage III was associated with a 32% reduction in insulin sensitivity, and increase in fasting glucose, insulin, and acute insulin response[98]. These changes were similar across sex, ethnicity, and obesity. Thus, sex steroid hormones and insulin resistance associated with pubertal development may account for the significance of developmental stage in the onset of fatty liver. In that context, the recent study of Patton et al[40] may be of significant interest. These authors found that lower Tanner stage was predictive of higher fibrosis scores, suggesting that hormonal changes associated with pubertal development may influence disease severity[40]. However, as pointed out by Patton et al [40], whether children with borderline zone 1 pattern may evolve into definite NASH and/or children with definite NASH regress to borderline zone 3 or simple steatosis upon further developmental maturation is unknown and will require longitudinal data to determine.

In some recent series, the presence and severity of fibrosis was associated with a higher BMI[39,41,42]. However, data obtained prospectively from children enrolled in the NASH Clinical Research Network reported no association of BMI with fibrosis severity[40], although the percentage of body fat was lower among subjects without fibrosis[40]. It may be that body fat distribution (or adiposity with a central distribution[99]) is a more important determinant of fibrosis than BMI. Body fat distribution affects insulin sensitivity and varies by race and ethnicity[41]. Ellis et al[100] showed that, after adjustment for body size, Hispanic children have significantly higher body fat and percentage fat than white or black children. In a study evaluating clinical correlation of histopathology in pediatric NAFLD, Hispanic ethnicity was predictive of fibrosis severity when comparing those with mild and moderate degrees of fibrosis[40]. In another study aiming to define key differences between the NASH subtypes, the majority of biopsies from children of the white race had type 1 NASH, while type 2 NASH was the major form seen in children of Asian and Native American race and Hispanic ethnicity[38]. In the same report, biopsies from children of the black race mostly showed simple steatosis[38].

Previous studies in adults with NAFLD have shown that components of metabolic syndrome may contribute to severe liver steatosis, NASH activity, fibrosis or isolated portal fibrosis[42]. It is, therefore, also important that we establish a better understanding of the natural history of pediatric NAFLD in terms of its potential relationship with other health outcomes including type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease[7]. Studies in children have demonstrated the relationship between fasting hyperinsulinemia and dyslipidemia[101-103], hypertension[101,104-106],and impaired glucose tolerance[107]. Schwimmer et al[41] first extended these data to include NAFLD in children as being related to fasting hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. They showed that, even after subjects with diabetes were excluded, almost all children with biopsy-proven NAFLD had insulin resistance. Portal inflammation was predicted by the combination of ALT and fasting insulin, while portal fibrosis was indicated by the combination of right upper quadrant pain and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance[41]. In another series of pediatric NAFLD, higher insulin levels also were predictive of moderate versus mild fibrosis[40]. Recently, Manco et al[42] showed that fasting insulin secretion trended to be increased in children with fibrosis compared to those without fibrosis. More recently, Patton et al[108] showed that severity of insulin resistance was the component most consistently associated with histological features of NAFLD, showing significant associations with severity of steatosis, fibrosis, hepatocellular ballooning, and NAFLD pattern. Although in clinical practice insulin resistance is unlikely to be of use in distinguishing fibrosis stage, the above findings support insulin resistance as key variable in disease progression[109-111]. Evidence of alterations in glucose metabolism parameters should prompt a careful follow-up of pediatric patients to prevent major complications[44].

Higher levels of serum AST have been found associated with fibrosis in some series of pediatric NAFLD[40,41,43]. However, neither AST levels alone nor the combination of routinely available laboratory data have shown sufficient specificity or sensitivity to predict the presence of severe fibrosis in children with NAFLD[43]. Recent data from adult as well as pediatric patients underscore that NAFLD has to be considered a potentially progressive disease even in the presence of normal ALT levels[42,45,46]. In that vein, it is remarkable that in one series of pediatric NAFLD 23% of patients had normal values of ALT at the time of biopsy even though fibrosis was observed in 60% of them[42]. Not surprisingly, the issue of when to perform a liver biopsy in children with suspected NAFLD remains controversial[38,42,47], and there is no clear standard[47]. Unfortunately, none of the clinical and laboratory predictors of histology appear sufficiently powerful to replace liver biopsy as an accurate noninvasive means of identifying the progression of disease[40]. Nonetheless, there is a considerable, continuous interest in reliable, noninvasive alternatives that will allow the prognosis of pediatric NAFLD to be followed in large community or population-based studies. Recently, transient elastography (TE), using the Fibroscan apparatus, has received increasing attention as a noninvasive means to measure liver stiffness and thus progression in chronic liver disease patients[112]. Accordingly, the study by Nobili et al[113] indicated that TE is an accurate and reproducible methodology to identify, in children and adolescents affected by NASH, those without any degree of fibrosis, or with advanced fibrosis. However, in that study an overlap was observed among patients with lower degrees of liver fibrosis (stages 0 and 1 and stages 1 and 2). Further limitations of that study are related to the acquisition of a highly selected cohort typical of a specialized tertiary care referral center[113]. Thus the conclusions of the study cannot be applied to pediatric populations seen in primary care settings. Nonetheless, the recent results reported in a cohort of pediatric NAFLD indicate that measurement of specific circulating markers of fibrinogenesis or fibrosis through the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test appears to be a promising alternative for discriminating between different stages of fibrosis[114]. Again, further characterization of this test’s performance in larger and less selected cohorts of patients is needed before proposing the use of the ELF panel in clinical practice. Studies in this area are likely to continue.


Most children with NAFLD are asymptomatic[47,51], and elevated levels of aminotransferases are frequently found incidentally or after screening for obesity-related comorbidites[51]. Children may also complain of vague right upper quadrant or epigastric pain, fatigue or malaise.

The typical child with NAFLD is an 11-13 year-old, usually male, usually overweight or obese[47]. Some children with NAFLD are tall with large bones and proportionally heavy body weight[92], consistent with being overnourished. A thorough history often reveals comorbid conditions related to metabolic syndrome, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dysplipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, and polycystic ovarian syndrome[51]. In 36%-49% of children with NAFLD acanthosis nigricans, a brown to black pigmentation of skin folds and axillae, has been found[41,92]. Acanthosis nigricans may be subtle and can be missed without careful examination[92]. Although acanthosis nigricans may occur in simple childhood obesity, it has been shown to be a cutaneous marker of hyperinsulinemia[115,116]. Keratinocytes have receptors for insulin, and insulin-like growth factors. In hyperinsulinemia, circulating insulin, because of its structural similarity to insulin-like growth factors, binds to these receptors and stimulates cell division, leading to acanthosis[92].

More than 90% of children with NAFLD are obese, with central adiposity[41]. On abdominal examination hepatomegaly, with or without splenomegaly, is evident in 33%-51% of patients[41,92]. Central adiposity can make organomegaly difficult to identify.

Laboratory assessment

The NASH Clinical Research Network recently failed to identify routine laboratory tests with an adequate discriminating power to replace liver biopsy in evaluating NAFLD pattern and fibrosis severity in children and adolescents[40]. Serum aminotransferases are usually slightly to moderately elevated (less than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal) in NAFLD, but may be higher[114]. The AST: ALT ratio is usually less than one, but this ratio increases as fibrosis advances[73]. However, aminotransferase levels may remain normal, even with biopsy-proven NASH[117]. In one study evaluating clinical correlation of histopathology in pediatric NAFLD[40], Patton et al showed that AST was superior to ALT in distinguishing NAFLD patterns and that the addition of ALT to AST did not improve performance. Although these results did not support the use of AST in place of liver biopsy, the strong association found in that study between AST and meaningful histological features in pediatric NAFLD supports current recommendations to use serum aminotransferase levels in screening overweight children[118]. Total and direct bilirubin are typically normal. One laboratory value that may be useful is gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT). In one series of pediatric NAFLD[91], GGT was elevated in 88% of patients. However, most of them (83.3%) presented with at least one feature of the metabolic syndrome whereas overt metabolic syndrome (i.e. > 3 features) was present in 28.8% children. Recently, elevated serum levels of GGT have been associated with several cardiovascular disease risk factors[119-120]. GGT may also act as a marker of the metabolic syndrome[121]. It mediates the uptake of glutathione, an important component of intracellular antioxidant defenses. Although the relationship between the metabolic syndrome and NAFLD in children has not been characterized, GGT may be used as a clinical marker in pediatric NAFLD because its expression is enhanced by oxidative stress. and it may be released by conditions inducing cellular stress and insulin resistance[91], which are key components in the development of NAFLD[122]. Prothrombin time and serum albumin levels are normal, until the development of cirrhosis and liver failure. Thirty per cent of adults with NAFLD have high serum ferritin and 6%-14% have elevated transferrin saturation[109]. These iron indices, however, are not routinely measured in youth, as hemochromatosis is rare in children[109]. Decreased serum adiponectin predicts severity of liver disease in NAFLD, even in the absence of diabetes and obesity, although it remains a research tool and not a diagnostic criterion[47]. Nonspecific autoantibodies, usually against smooth muscle determinants, may be detected in relatively low titers in up to 3% of adults with NAFLD. However, the prevalence in children is unknown[123].

In diagnosis of NAFLD, a through evaluation and systematic exclusion of other causes of liver disease is necessary, including Wilson’s disease, viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, fatty acid oxidation defects, lipodystrophy, and total parenteral nutrition. Furthermore,drug-induced liver injury (i.e. valproate, methotrexate, tetracycline, amiodarone, prednisone, and synthetic estrogens) should be considered and excluded. Alcohol use, especially in adolescents, must also be excluded.

Radiological assessment

Noninvasive imaging techniques, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), MRI, and MRS may detect fatty infiltration of the liver but, unlike liver biopsy, they are limited in their ability to detect coexisting inflammation and fibrosis[124]. It has been suggested that unenhanced CT might be useful in the noninvasive quantification of the degree of hepatic steatosis in experimental and in vivo human studies[125,126]. However, a recent study by Pak et al[127] concluded that diagnostic performance of unenhanced CT for quantitative assessment of macrovesicular steatosis is not clinically acceptable. Unenhanced CT does not provide high performance in qualitative diagnosis of macrovesicular steatosis of less than 30%[127]. In addition, CT scanning has the drawback of exposing subjects to ionizing radiation. These two factors limit its potential use in pediatric longitudinal studies[124]. The diagnosis of fatty liver on contrast-enhanced helical CT may also be accurate but is protocol-specific[128].


Hepatic ultrasound is a relatively inexpensive, noninvasive technique, which is easy to perform and is, therefore, widely used in clinical practice to detect fatty infiltration of the liver. However, sonography is not typically quantitative and a hepatocyte fat content of ≥ 15% to 30% is required to detect ultrasonographic changes[129]. In adults, ultrasound sensitivity has been shown to range from 60% to 94% and specificity from 84% to 95%, respectively[130-133]. In the presence of hepatic fat content of 10% to 19%, ultrasound has a sensitivity of 55%, which rises to 80% in the presence of > 30% fatty infiltration[134]. Furthermore, ultrasound may be technically challenging to perform in patients with significant central obesity. In the presence of morbid obesity[135], the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound fall to 49% and 75%, respectively, possibly due to technical problems in performing ultrasound in such patients. Furthermore, ultrasound is operator-dependent[124,136], and the sonographic evaluation of the liver is based mainly on the subjective visual assessment of hepatic echogenicity and posterior attenuation of the ultrasound beam, with consequent substantial observer variability. In the report by Strauss et al[136], the mean interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates for the presence of fatty liver were 72% and 76%, respectively. In the same report by Strauss et al[136], on severity of fatty liver, the initial reading for pairs of observers had 47%-59% interobserver agreement, while the interobserver agreement for the second reading was 59%-64%. The mean agreement rates for pairs of observers were 53% and 62% on the first and second readings. Intraobserver agreement for severity of fatty liver ranged from 55% to 68%. Grading of hepatic fat content using ultrasound has been reported, but it is somewhat subjective and only broad categories of involvement have been reported[130,133,137,138].

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI, though more costly, is more sensitive than ultrasound in detecting fat and allows for more definitive hepatic fat quantification when performed using the modified Dixon technique[24,138-140]. Like ultrasound, hepatic MRI involving fast gradient echo does not require conscious sedation in (compliant) children. In fact, the sequence of scan parameters allows simultaneous acquisition of both in-phase and out-of-phase images during the multibreath-hold interval required to cover the entire liver. However, MRI is more appealing than ultrasound to detect minor changes in hepatic fat content associated with steatogenic disorders[138]. While hepatic fibrosis can limit the ability of ultrasound to grade hepatic steatosis, hepatic MRI, based upon chemical shift imaging, is not influenced by the presence of fibrosis in the accurate quantification of the hepatic fat content[138]. In a previous study evaluating hepatic steatosis severity in a series of obese children through both MRI and ultrasound, we found evidence of limitations in ultrasound with regard to grading of steatosis, in comparison with quantitative assessment of HFF by MRI[26]. Ultrasound scores varied across MRI hepatic fat contents. In children in whom ultrasound revealed moderate to severe steatosis, MRI delineated a wide range of hepatic fat content within both categories of ultrasound steatosis severity[26]. This suggests that the utility of ultrasound would appear to be limited by its incapacity to identify fat regression or progression in subjects with NAFLD[138]. The progression of NAFLD in children can be prevented by early weight reduction, which can lessen the degree of fatty infiltration and elicit reversion of the biochemical abnormalities. Thus, a child with NAFLD undergoing a reduction of MRI HFF from 40% to 20% through successful intervention would be unlikely to have a corresponding alteration in ultrasound appearance[141]. However, in our series of children with mild steatosis severity as determined by ultrasound, the pattern of a slight increase in liver echogenicity conflicted with the finding of normal, minimal levels of MRI HFF[26]. Previous investigations have found the slight alterations or accumulation of hepatic fat content as indicated by ultrasound to be equivocal[12]. In contrast, HFF, which is derived from the signal differences between fat and water, gives unequivocal data for the entire spectrum of fatty liver and unlike sonography, is not subject to interpretation or interobserver variation[24]. The clinical efficacy of this technique has been previously demonstrated. Burgert et al showed that obese children with a high HFF were significantly more insulin resistant, compared with those with a low HFF, and had higher triglycerides and lower adiponectin, even after adjustment for BMI-z scores, race/ethnicity, gender, and age[25]. Furthermore, obese children with a high HFF had a significantly greater prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, after controlling for the above confounders[25]. We also previously showed that the increasing severity of MRI fat accumulation were strongly related to fasting hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance after correction for confounding variables such as SD score-BMI, sex, age and pubertal status[26].

MRS is currently considered being the most accurate for determination of HFF (as a measure of liver triglyceride concentration[21]), especially in patients with less than 10% of fat in the liver[22]. However, MRS demonstrates some limitations in that it is time-consuming, restricted in spatial coverage, and requires off-scan analysis by an expert[21]. Because of these limitations, MRS is not appropriate for widespread use. Furthermore, the main limitation of MRS is that it provides information from small regions of interest in the liver. By contrast, MRI (using the modified Dixon technique) allows evaluation of the presence of fat in the entire liver. To date, however, none of the above imaging modalities allow differentiation of benign steatosis from NASH or have the ability to grade the severity of inflammation[51].


Over the last decade, pediatric NAFLD has become the most common form of liver disease in the preadolescent and adolescent age groups. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard and is currently the only way to diagnose NASH. However, the issue of when to perform a liver biopsy in children with suspected NAFLD remains controversial, and there is no clear standard. Thus, it is imperative that reliable, noninvasive means be developed to identify children at greatest risk for progressive disease. Large population-based epidemiologic studies in children are needed to understand the true impact of pediatric NASH on long-term morbidity and mortality.


Peer reviewers: Papandreou Dimitrios, PhD, MD, RD, Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Department of Health Science, University of Nicosia, Cyprus; Head of Pediatric Obesity Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Ahepa General Hospital, P. Mela 22 GR 54622, Greece; Henning Gronbaek, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine V (Hepatology and Gastroenterology), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C8000, Denmark

S- Editor Zhang HN L- Editor Hughes D E- Editor Liu N

1.  Dunn W, Schwimmer JB. The obesity epidemic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008;10:67-72.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, Hespenheide EE, Battle EH, Driscoll CJ. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology. 1999;29:664-669.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, Marchesini G, Brunello F, Carucci P, Musso A, De Paolis P, Capussotti L, Salizzoni M. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:134-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Tominaga K, Kurata JH, Chen YK, Fujimoto E, Miyagawa S, Abe I, Kusano Y. Prevalence of fatty liver in Japanese children and relationship to obesity. An epidemiological ultrasonographic survey. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2002-2009.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Strauss RS, Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Prevalence of abnormal serum aminotransferase values in overweight and obese adolescents. J Pediatr. 2000;136:727-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Park HS, Han JH, Choi KM, Kim SM. Relation between elevated serum alanine aminotransferase and metabolic syndrome in Korean adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:1046-1051.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1388-1393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Tominaga K, Fujimoto E, Suzuki K, Hayashi M, Ichikawa M, Inaba Y. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and relationship to metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and waist circumference. Environ Health Prev Med. 2009;14:142-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Alavian SM, Mohammad-Alizadeh AH, Esna-Ashari F, Ardalan G, Hajarizadeh B. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence among school-aged children and adolescents in Iran and its association with biochemical and anthropometric measures. Liver Int. 2009;29:159-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Tazawa Y, Noguchi H, Nishinomiya F, Takada G. Serum alanine aminotransferase activity in obese children. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:238-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Franzese A, Vajro P, Argenziano A, Puzziello A, Iannucci MP, Saviano MC, Brunetti F, Rubino A. Liver involvement in obese children. Ultrasonography and liver enzyme levels at diagnosis and during follow-up in an Italian population. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:1428-1432.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Guzzaloni G, Grugni G, Minocci A, Moro D, Morabito F. Liver steatosis in juvenile obesity: correlations with lipid profile, hepatic biochemical parameters and glycemic and insulinemic responses to an oral glucose tolerance test. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:772-776.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Chan DF, Li AM, Chu WC, Chan MH, Wong EM, Liu EK, Chan IH, Yin J, Lam CW, Fok TF. Hepatic steatosis in obese Chinese children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1257-1263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Flores-Calderón J, Gómez-Díaz RA, Rodríguez-Gómez G, Morán-Villota S. Frequency of increased aminotransferases levels and associated metabolic abnormalities in obese and overweight children of an elementary school in Mexico City. Ann Hepatol. 2005;4:279-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Louthan MV, Theriot JA, Zimmerman E, Stutts JT, McClain CJ. Decreased prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in black obese children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:426-429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Quirós-Tejeira RE, Rivera CA, Ziba TT, Mehta N, Smith CW, Butte NF. Risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Hispanic youth with BMI > or =95th percentile. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44:228-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Rocha R, Cotrim HP, Bitencourt AG, Barbosa DB, Santos AS, Almeida Ade M, Cunha B, Guimarães I. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in asymptomatic Brazilian adolescents. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:473-477.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Denzer C, Thiere D, Muche R, Koenig W, Mayer H, Kratzer W, Wabitsch M. Gender-specific prevalences of fatty liver in obese children and adolescents: roles of body fat distribution, sex steroids, and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3872-3881.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Papandreou D, Rousso I, Economou I, Makedou A, Moudiou T, Malindretos P, Pidonia I, Pantoleon A, Mavromichalis I. Is there any association between high-density lipoprotein, insulin resistance and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children? Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60:312-318.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Papandreou D, Rousso I, Mavromichalis I. Update on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Clin Nutr. 2007;26:409-415.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Loomba R, Sirlin CB, Schwimmer JB, Lavine JE. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;50:1282-1293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Patton HM, Sirlin C, Behling C, Middleton M, Schwimmer JB, Lavine JE. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a critical appraisal of current data and implications for future research. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:413-427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Unalp A, Creer MH. Influence of local reference populations on upper limits of normal for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:663-666.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Fishbein MH, Miner M, Mogren C, Chalekson J. The spectrum of fatty liver in obese children and the relationship of serum aminotransferases to severity of steatosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;36:54-61.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Burgert TS, Taksali SE, Dziura J, Goodman TR, Yeckel CW, Papademetris X, Constable RT, Weiss R, Tamborlane WV, Savoye M. Alanine aminotransferase levels and fatty liver in childhood obesity: associations with insulin resistance, adiponectin, and visceral fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4287-4294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Pacifico L, Celestre M, Anania C, Paolantonio P, Chiesa C, Laghi A. MRI and ultrasound for hepatic fat quantification:relationships to clinical and metabolic characteristics of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:542-547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Canalias F, Camprubí S, Sánchez M, Gella FJ. Metrological traceability of values for catalytic concentration of enzymes assigned to a calibration material. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:333-339.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Nadeau KJ, Ehlers LB, Zeitler PS, Love-Osborne K. Treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with metformin versus lifestyle intervention in insulin-resistant adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009;10:5-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Kawasaki T, Hashimoto N, Kikuchi T, Takahashi H, Uchiyama M. The relationship between fatty liver and hyperinsulinemia in obese Japanese children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;24:317-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Nadeau KJ, Klingensmith G, Zeitler P. Type 2 diabetes in children is frequently associated with elevated alanine aminotransferase. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:94-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:495-500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, Cooppan RM, Naran AD, Pirie D, Pudifin DJ. Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet. 1986;1:523-525.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, Milikowski C, Molina EG, Pyrsopoulos NT, Feng ZZ, Reddy KR, Schiff ER. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2614-2618.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Capron F, Poynard T. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1898-1906.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Merriman RB, Ferrell LD, Patti MG, Weston SR, Pabst MS, Aouizerat BE, Bass NM. Correlation of paired liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:874-880.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Amarapurka DN, Amarapurkar AD, Patel ND, Agal S, Baigal R, Gupte P, Pramanik S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with diabetes: predictors of liver fibrosis. Ann Hepatol. 2006;5:30-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC, Enders F, Saksena S, Burt AD, Bida JP. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45:846-854.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Deutsch R, Nievergelt C, Schork NJ, Lavine JE. Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:641-649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Nobili V, Marcellini M, Devito R, Ciampalini P, Piemonte F, Comparcola D, Sartorelli MR, Angulo P. NAFLD in children: a prospective clinical-pathological study and effect of lifestyle advice. Hepatology. 2006;44:458-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Patton HM, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Schwimmer JB, Kleiner D, Molleston J. Clinical correlates of histopathology in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1961-1971.e2.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Rauch JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Lavine JE. Obesity, insulin resistance, and other clinicopathological correlates of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr. 2003;143:500-505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Manco M, Marcellini M, Devito R, Comparcola D, Sartorelli MR, Nobili V. Metabolic syndrome and liver histology in paediatric non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:381-387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Carter-Kent C, Yerian LM, Brunt EM, Angulo P, Kohli R, Ling SC, Xanthakos SA, Whitington PF, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Yap J. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children: a multicenter clinicopathological study. Hepatology. 2009;50:1113-1120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Fargion S. Risk of severe liver disease in NAFLD with normal ALT levels: a pediatric report. Hepatology. 2008;48:2088.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, Andreoletti M, Colli A, Vanni E, Bertelli C, Fatta E, Bignamini D, Marchesini G. Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology. 2008;48:792-798.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Manco M, Alisi A, Nobili V. Risk of severe liver disease in NAFLD with normal ALT levels: a pediatric report. Hepatology. 2008;48:2087-2088; author reply 2088.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Roberts EA. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a “growing” problem? J Hepatol. 2007;46:1133-1142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Ciba I, Widhalm K. The association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in 20 obese children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:109-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Targher G, Franchini M, Guidi GC, Muggeo M, Lippi G. Alanine aminotransferase as an independent predictor of incident nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1159; author reply 1159-1161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Adams LA, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. CMAJ. 2005;172:899-905.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  Sundaram SS, Zeitler P, Nadeau K. The metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21:529-535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Speliotes EK. Genetics of common obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1492-1495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Day CP, James OF. Steatohepatitis: a tale of two “hits”? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:842-845.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Struben VM, Hespenheide EE, Caldwell SH. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis within kindreds. Am J Med. 2000;108:9-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
55.  Willner IR, Waters B, Patil SR, Reuben A, Morelli J, Riely CA. Ninety patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: insulin resistance, familial tendency, and severity of disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2957-2961.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
56.  Schwimmer JB, Celedon MA, Lavine JE, Salem R, Campbell N, Schork NJ, Shiehmorteza M, Yokoo T, Chavez A, Middleton MS. Heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1585-1592.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
57.  Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobbs HH. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387-1395.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
58.  Petta S, Muratore C, Craxì A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pathogenesis: the present and the future. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:615-625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
59.  Wilfred de Alwis NM, Day CP. Genetics of alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27:44-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
60.  Namikawa C, Shu-Ping Z, Vyselaar JR, Nozaki Y, Nemoto Y, Ono M, Akisawa N, Saibara T, Hiroi M, Enzan H. Polymorphisms of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene and manganese superoxide dismutase gene in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:781-786.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
61.  Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G, Durazzo M, Musso G. Polymorphism in microsomal triglyceride transfer protein: a link between liver disease and atherogenic postprandial lipid profile in NASH? Hepatology. 2007;45:1097-1107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
62.  Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Durazzo M, Pagano G, Cassader M. Adiponectin gene polymorphisms modulate acute adiponectin response to dietary fat: Possible pathogenetic role in NASH. Hepatology. 2008;47:1167-1177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
63.  Lalazar A, Wong L, Yamasaki G, Friedman SL. Early genes induced in hepatic stellate cells during wound healing. Gene. 1997;195:235-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
64.  Ratziu V, Lalazar A, Wong L, Dang Q, Collins C, Shaulian E, Jensen S, Friedman SL. Zf9, a Kruppel-like transcription factor up-regulated in vivo during early hepatic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:9500-9505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
65.  Miele L, Beale G, Patman G, Nobili V, Leathart J, Grieco A, Abate M, Friedman SL, Narla G, Bugianesi E. The Kruppel-like factor 6 genotype is associated with fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:282-291.e1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
66.  Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, Pertsemlidis A, Cox D, Pennacchio LA, Boerwinkle E, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1461-1465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
67.  Liou I, Kowdley KV. Natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40 Suppl 1:S11-S16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
68.  Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40 Suppl 1:S5-S10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
69.  Harrison SA, Torgerson S, Hayashi PH. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical histopathological study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2042-2047.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
70.  Fassio E, Alvarez E, Domínguez N, Landeira G, Longo C. Natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a longitudinal study of repeat liver biopsies. Hepatology. 2004;40:820-826.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
71.  Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol. 2005;42:132-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
72.  Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, Kechagias S. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44:865-873.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
73.  Angulo P. GI epidemiology: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:883-889.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
74.  García-Monzón C, Martín-Pérez E, Iacono OL, Fernández-Bermejo M, Majano PL, Apolinario A, Larrañaga E, Moreno-Otero R. Characterization of pathogenic and prognostic factors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis associated with obesity. J Hepatol. 2000;33:716-724.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
75.  Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1413-1419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
76.  Lee RG. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a study of 49 patients. Hum Pathol. 1989;20:594-598.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
77.  Powell EE, Cooksley WG, Hanson R, Searle J, Halliday JW, Powell LW. The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years. Hepatology. 1990;11:74-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
78.  Evans CD, Oien KA, MacSween RN, Mills PR. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a common cause of progressive chronic liver injury? J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:689-692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
79.  Dam-Larsen S, Franzmann M, Andersen IB, Christoffersen P, Jensen LB, Sørensen TI, Becker U, Bendtsen F. Long term prognosis of fatty liver: risk of chronic liver disease and death. Gut. 2004;53:750-755.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
80.  Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, Srishord M, McCullough A, Gramlich T, Younossi ZM. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:234-238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
81.  Teli MR, James OF, Burt AD, Bennett MK, Day CP. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver: a follow-up study. Hepatology. 1995;22:1714-1719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
82.  Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, Angulo P. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:113-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
83.  Ong JP, Pitts A, Younossi ZM. Increased overall mortality and liver-related mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008;49:608-612.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
84.  Kinugasa A, Tsunamoto K, Furukawa N, Sawada T, Kusunoki T, Shimada N. Fatty liver and its fibrous changes found in simple obesity of children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984;3:408-414.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
85.  Molleston JP, White F, Teckman J, Fitzgerald JF. Obese children with steatohepatitis can develop cirrhosis in childhood. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2460-2462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
86.  Suzuki D, Hashimoto E, Kaneda K, Tokushige K, Shiratori K. Liver failure caused by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in an obese young male. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:327-329.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
87.  Baldridge AD, Perez-Atayde AR, Graeme-Cook F, Higgins L, Lavine JE. Idiopathic steatohepatitis in childhood: a multicenter retrospective study. J Pediatr. 1995;127:700-704.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
88.  Jonas MM, Krawczuk LE, Kim HB, Lillehei C, Perez-Atayde A. Rapid recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after transplantation in a child with hypopituitarism and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:108-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
89.  Jankowska I, Socha P, Pawlowska J, Teisseyre M, Gliwicz D, Czubkowski P, Kalicinski P, Cielecka-Kuszyk J, Socha J. Recurrence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis after liver transplantation in a 13-yr-old boy. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11:796-798.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
90.  Adams LA, Feldstein A, Lindor KD, Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with hypothalamic and pituitary dysfunction. Hepatology. 2004;39:909-914.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
91.  Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, Benson JT, Enders FB, Angulo P. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut. 2009;58:1538-1544.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
92.  Rashid M, Roberts EA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30:48-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
93.  Schwimmer JB, McGreal N, Deutsch R, Finegold MJ, Lavine JE. Influence of gender, race, and ethnicity on suspected fatty liver in obese adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e561-e565.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
94.  Manton ND, Lipsett J, Moore DJ, Davidson GP, Bourne AJ, Couper RT. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in children and adolescents. Med J Aust. 2000;173:476-479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
95.  Kirsch R, Clarkson V, Shephard EG, Marais DA, Jaffer MA, Woodburne VE, Kirsch RE, Hall Pde L. Rodent nutritional model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: species, strain and sex difference studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1272-1282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
96.  Cook JS, Hoffman RP, Stene MA, Hansen JR. Effects of maturational stage on insulin sensitivity during puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:725-730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
97.  Roemmich JN, Clark PA, Lusk M, Friel A, Weltman A, Epstein LH, Rogol AD. Pubertal alterations in growth and body composition. VI. Pubertal insulin resistance: relation to adiposity, body fat distribution and hormone release. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:701-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
98.  Goran MI, Gower BA. Longitudinal study on pubertal insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2001;50:2444-2450.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
99.  Stranges S, Dorn JM, Muti P, Freudenheim JL, Farinaro E, Russell M, Nochajski TH, Trevisan M. Body fat distribution, relative weight, and liver enzyme levels: a population-based study. Hepatology. 2004;39:754-763.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
100.  Ellis KJ. Body composition of a young, multiethnic, male population. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:1323-1331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
101.  Raitakari OT, Porkka KV, Rönnemaa T, Knip M, Uhari M, Akerblom HK, Viikari JS. The role of insulin in clustering of serum lipids and blood pressure in children and adolescents. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Diabetologia. 1995;38:1042-1050.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
102.  Jiang X, Srinivasan SR, Webber LS, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS. Association of fasting insulin level with serum lipid and lipoprotein levels in children, adolescents, and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:190-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
103.  Steinberger J, Moorehead C, Katch V, Rocchini AP. Relationship between insulin resistance and abnormal lipid profile in obese adolescents. J Pediatr. 1995;126:690-695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
104.  Sinaiko AR, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ. Relation of fasting insulin to blood pressure and lipids in adolescents and parents. Hypertension. 1997;30:1554-1559.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
105.  Jiang X, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Berenson GS. Association of fasting insulin with blood pressure in young individuals. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:323-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
106.  Taittonen L, Uhari M, Nuutinen M, Turtinen J, Pokka T, Akerblom HK. Insulin and blood pressure among healthy children. Cardiovascular risk in young Finns. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:194-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
107.  Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, Tamborlane WV, Banyas B, Allen K, Savoye M, Rieger V, Taksali S, Barbetta G. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:802-810.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
108.  Patton HM, Yates K, Unalp-Arida A, Behling CA, Huang TT, Rosenthal P, Sanyal AJ, Schwimmer JB, Lavine JE. Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Liver Histology Among Children With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
109.  Bugianesi E, Manzini P, D’Antico S, Vanni E, Longo F, Leone N, Massarenti P, Piga A, Marchesini G, Rizzetto M. Relative contribution of iron burden, HFE mutations, and insulin resistance to fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver. Hepatology. 2004;39:179-187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
110.  Haukeland JW, Konopski Z, Linnestad P, Azimy S, Marit Løberg E, Haaland T, Birkeland K, Bjøro K. Abnormal glucose tolerance is a predictor of steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1469-1477.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
111.  Angulo P, Alba LM, Petrovic LM, Adams LA, Lindor KD, Jensen MD. Leptin, insulin resistance, and liver fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2004;41:943-949.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
112.  Pinzani M, Vizzutti F, Arena U, Marra F. Technology Insight: noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by biochemical scores and elastography. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;5:95-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
113.  Nobili V, Vizzutti F, Arena U, Abraldes JG, Marra F, Pietrobattista A, Fruhwirth R, Marcellini M, Pinzani M. Accuracy and reproducibility of transient elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2008;48:442-448.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
114.  Nobili V, Parkes J, Bottazzo G, Marcellini M, Cross R, Newman D, Vizzutti F, Pinzani M, Rosenberg WM. Performance of ELF serum markers in predicting fibrosis stage in pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:160-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
115.  Brockow K, Steinkraus V, Rinninger F, Abeck D, Ring J. Acanthosis nigricans: a marker for hyperinsulinemia. Pediatr Dermatol. 1995;12:323-326.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
116.  Stuart CA, Gilkison CR, Smith MM, Bosma AM, Keenan BS, Nagamani M. Acanthosis nigricans as a risk factor for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1998;37:73-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
117.  Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the pediatric population. Clin Liver Dis. 2004;8:549-558, viii-ix.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
118.  Barlow SE. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;120 Suppl 4:S164-S192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
119.  Lee DH, Ha MH, Kim JH, Christiani DC, Gross MD, Steffes M, Blomhoff R, Jacobs DR Jr. Gamma-glutamyltransferase and diabetes--a 4 year follow-up study. Diabetologia. 2003;46:359-364.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
120.  Kim DJ, Noh JH, Cho NH, Lee BW, Choi YH, Jung JH, Min YK, Lee MS, Lee MK, Kim KW. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase within its normal concentration range is related to the presence of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. Diabet Med. 2005;22:1134-1140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
121.  Kang YH, Min HK, Son SM, Kim IJ, Kim YK. The association of serum gamma glutamyltransferase with components of the metabolic syndrome in the Korean adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77:306-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
122.  Day CP. From fat to inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:207-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
123.  Cotler SJ, Kanji K, Keshavarzian A, Jensen DM, Jakate S. Prevalence and significance of autoantibodies in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:801-804.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
124.  Mehta SR, Thomas EL, Bell JD, Johnston DG, Taylor-Robinson SD. Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3476-3483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
125.  Kawata R, Sakata K, Kunieda T, Saji S, Doi H, Nozawa Y. Quantitative evaluation of fatty liver by computed tomography in rabbits. AJR. 1984;142:741-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
126.  Ricci C, Longo R, Gioulis E, Bosco M, Pollesello P, Masutti F, Crocè LS, Paoletti S, de Bernard B, Tiribelli C. Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver. J Hepatol. 1997;27:108-113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
127.  Park SH, Kim PN, Kim KW, Lee SW, Yoon SE, Park SW, Ha HK, Lee MG, Hwang S, Lee SG. Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment. Radiology. 2006;239:105-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
128.  Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Shapiro MA, Langlotz CP, Slosman F, Rubesin SE, Horii SC. Diagnostic criteria for fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast-enhanced helical CT. AJR. 1998;171:659-664.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
129.  Siegelman ES, Rosen MA. Imaging of hepatic steatosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2001;21:71-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
130.  Joseph AE, Saverymuttu SH, al-Sam S, Cook MG, Maxwell JD. Comparison of liver histology with ultrasonography in assessing diffuse parenchymal liver disease. Clin Radiol. 1991;43:26-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
131.  Foster KJ, Dewbury KC, Griffith AH, Wright R. The accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of fatty infiltration of the liver. Br J Radiol. 1980;53:440-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
132.  Debongnie JC, Pauls C, Fievez M, Wibin E. Prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of liver ultrasonography. Gut. 1981;22:130-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
133.  Saverymuttu SH, Joseph AE, Maxwell JD. Ultrasound scanning in the detection of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:13-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
134.  Ryan CK, Johnson LA, Germin BI, Marcos A. One hundred consecutive hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:1114-1122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
135.  Mottin CC, Moretto M, Padoin AV, Swarowsky AM, Toneto MG, Glock L, Repetto G. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2004;14:635-637.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
136.  Strauss S, Gavish E, Gottlieb P, Katsnelson L. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of fatty liver. AJR. 2007;189:W320-W323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
137.  Needleman L, Kurtz AB, Rifkin MD, Cooper HS, Pasto ME, Goldberg BB. Sonography of diffuse benign liver disease: accuracy of pattern recognition and grading. AJR. 1986;146:1011-1015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
138.  Fishbein M, Castro F, Cheruku S, Jain S, Webb B, Gleason T, Stevens WR. Hepatic MRI for fat quantitation: its relationship to fat morphology, diagnosis, and ultrasound. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:619-625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
139.  Fishbein MH, Gardner KG, Potter CJ, Schmalbrock P, Smith MA. Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15:287-293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
140.  Fishbein MH, Stevens WR. Rapid MRI using a modified Dixon technique: a non-invasive and effective method for detection and monitoring of fatty metamorphosis of the liver. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31:806-809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
141.  Promrat K, Lutchman G, Uwaifo GI, Freedman RJ, Soza A, Heller T, Doo E, Ghany M, Premkumar A, Park Y. A pilot study of pioglitazone treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2004;39:188-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]