Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6345-6352
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6345
Table 1 Characteristics of individual studies in the meta-analysis
Ref.YearCountryIBS/controlsDiagnosis criteriaHWE of control
Kim et al[15]2012South Korea60/434Rome III0.850
Park et al[10]2012South Korea72/148Rome III0.411
Saito et al[18]2012United States385/262Rome II0.154
Lee et al[5]2010South Korea94/88Rome III0.010
Markoutsaki et al[6]2011Greece124/238Rome III0.825
de Vries et al[9]2009Netherlands136/373Rome II0.099
Andresen et al[14]2006United States214/152Rome II0.514
Table 2 Pooled results of GNB3 C825T polymorphism with irritable bowel syndrome risk
GNbeta3 C825TPvalueOR (95%CI)I2PheterogeneityBegg’s testEgger’s test
CC vs TT0.3921.12 (0.86-1.45)43.40.1020.3520.133
Caucasian0.1771.26 (0.90-1.76)57.80.068
Asian0.7500.93 (0.61-1.42)11.70.322
CC + CT vs TT0.2051.17 (0.92-1.49)39.90.1260.3080.230
Caucasian0.3641.16 (0.84-1.60)58.00.067
Asian0.3741.18 (0.82-1.70)29.60.241
TT + CT vs CC0.3470.93 (0.80-1.08)17.50.2961.0000.710
Caucasian0.1690.89 (0.75-1.05)10.30.342
Asian0.4561.14 (0.80-1.65)16.00.304
C vs T0.1571.08 (0.97-1.21)24.80.2400.7560.548
Caucasian0.0891.13 (0.98-1.29)43.70.149
Asian0.9821.00 (0.82-1.22)0.00.417