Original Articles
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1999. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 15, 1999; 5(1): 47-49
Published online Feb 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i1.47
Expression of Cx genes in liver and stomach of different embryonic stages
Jian-Xiang Zhang, Shou-Rong Shen, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Xiang Chen
Jian-Xiang Zhang, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Department of Histology and Embryology, Hunan Medical University, Changsha 410078, Hunan Province, China
Shou-Rong Shen, Department of Internal Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Hunan Medical University, Changsha 410078, Hunan Province, China
Xiang Chen, The First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing City, Zhaoqing 526000, Guangdong Province, China
Jian-Xiang Zhang, male, born on November 29, 1951 in Changsha City, Hunan Province, graduated from Hunan Medical University with a master degree in histology and embryology, now a professor, having 18 papers published.
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.39670344.
Correspondence to: Dr. Jian-Xiang Zhang, Department of Histology and Embryology Hunan Medical University, 88 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410078, China
Telephone: +86-731-4471979 Ext.2880 Fax: +86-731-4471979
Received: November 19, 1998
Revised: December 18, 1998
Accepted: December 30, 1998
Published online: February 15, 1999

Abstract

AIM To explore the relationship between the rules of Cx gene expression and cellular differ-entiation in organs of different embryonic stages.

METHODS A series of Cx gene serving as molecular probes and the Northern blot hybry-dization were employed to study the Cx gene ex-pression.

RESULTS Cx31, Cx31.1, Cx46 did not express while other Cx genes expressed in the embryon-ic liver and stomach. The Cx gene expression in the liver and stomach showed different state at different embryonic stages. The Cx gene expression had organic diversity. The expression of Cx26 gene was overlapping in the above organs. Cx43 did not express in the human liver after birth, but it expressed in the embryonic stage.

CONCLUSION The expression state of Cx genes is concordant with cellular differentiation. It might be a key candidate gene to regulate some differentiational events associated with cellular differentiation, proliferation, and morphogenesis in the early embryo.

Key Words: liver/embryology, liver/cy-tology, stomach/embryology, stomach/cytology, Cx genes, gene expression



INTRODUCTION

Cellular connexin genes are a multigene family con-sisting of more than 10 members[1-4] which encode the gap junctional channel assembled protein, con-nexin (Cx). The latter is the key composite of gap junctional intercellular commun ication (GJIC). The expression of Cx genes determines the formation, pattern, amount and the degradation of GJIC chan-nel. The specific connexin proteins transcribed and translated by different members of Cx gene family contribute to the diversity of gap junctional channel within different tissue cells or the same type of cells but in different functional states, leading to the dif-ferences in patterns and structures of gap junction. The members of connexin gene are related to the type and size of communication channel and com-munication ways of gap junction[5]. Gap junction is present in the early stage of embryonic de velop-ment. The morphological study has verified that gap junction is detected within morula and blastocyst, and dense GJICs appear in cells of embryonic ecto-derm at 20 h-30 h of developing chicks[5]. In order to investigate the relationship between the expres-sion law of Cx genes and cellular diffe rentiation in the liver and stomach during embryonic develop-ment, the Cx gene expression state was studied using Cx26, Cx31, Cx31.1, Cx32, Cx37, Cx40, Cx43 and Cx46 as molecular probes and the North-ern blot hybridization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

The liver and stomach derived from the fetals of mothers receiving natural abortion with conceptional age of 5 weeks, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mouths.The tissues or organs were stored in fluid nitrogen.

Methods

Preparation of plasmids containing Cx cDNA A small amount of bacteria containing 8 kinds of pCx plas-mids and inner control pGAPDH plasmid was recovered. An inoculum of bacteria was streaked on an a-gar plate and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The next day single bacterial colonies were picked for ampli-fication; plasmids were extracted with alkaline lysis procedure and digested and identified with appro-priate restrictive endonuclease. The termini were then isolated by electrophoresis in 10 g/L agarose gel and retried and purified with Glass Max kit (Table 1).

Table 1 A list of plasmids containing Cx cDNA.
PlasmidsVectorsRestriction enzymesInserts (kb)Species
pCx26pSG5BamH I0.68human
pCx31.1SP63TBgl II0.85mouse
pCx32pGEM3EcoR I1.5rat
pCx33SP64TBgl II0.9rat
pCx37SP64THind III/Xba I1.25mouse
pCx40pGEM4zEcoR I/Xba I1.1mouse
pCx43pSG5BamH I1.11human
pCx46BSK+EcoR I1.6human
pGAPDHEcoR I/Hind III0.6human
Preparation and purification of total RNA

Total RNA was extracted by acid guanidinium-phe-nol chloroform procedure from the liver and stom-ach in different stages of embryo respectively.

Northern blot

Total RNA (20 μg in each well) was separated by electrophoresis through formal dehyde denaturing gels and transferred onto nylon membranes by capillary transfer for 24 h in 20 × SSC. The RNA was cross-linked to the membranes by exposure to UV light.

Northern hybrydization between Cx gene probes and RNA

Connexin-specific cDNA probes were random-prime labeled with [α-32P] dCTP. The membranes were prehybridized at 42 °C for 4 h in Northern hybridiza-tion solution (500 g/L-formamide, 5 × SSPE, 5 × Denhardt’ s reagent, 1 g/L-SDS solution and 100 mg/L salmon sperm DNA) and then hybridized with the labeled probe for 16 h-24 h in the same solution.

Autoradiograph (ARG)

The membranes were washed twice at 37 °C in 2 × SSC/ (1 g/L)-SDS for 40 min and three times at 65 °C in 0.1 × SSC/ (1 g/L) SDS for 1 h. Exposure of X-ray film to the blots was conducted at -70 °C with intensifying screens. To remove probes from the membranes, the membranes were immersed in 1 g/L-SDS solution in rotating platform from boiling to RT. The process was repeated. Then the membranes were rehybridized with GAPDH probe.

RESULTS

Cx31, Cx31.1 and Cx46 did not express while other Cx genes expressed in the liver and stomach of em-bryonic stage. The expression of Cx genes showed different states in the liver and stomach at different embryonic stages. The expression of Cx genes was of organic diversity, e.g., the expression of Cx32 in the liver and Cx37 in the stomach. The Cx gene expression was overlapping in the above organs, and Cx26 presented different states of expression. Cx32 gene had high expression from the 5th week to the 5th month in the liver and the 4th to 5th month in the stomach. Cx43 did not express in human liver after birth, but it expressed in the fetal stage. Cx37 gene in the stomach of fetals highly expressed from the 3rd month to the 5th month (Table 2).

Table 2 Expression of Cx genes in different organs at different fetal ages.
Connexin genes2 month
3 month
4 month
5 month
LiverStomachLiverStomachLiverStomachLiverStomach
Cx26++++++++++++
Cx31--------
Cx31.1--------
Cx32+++-+++++++++++++++
Cx37-++-+++---++
Cx40-+-++---+++
Cx43++-+++-+++++++
Cx46--------
DISCUSSION

Cx genes showed different expression states, e.g., Cx26, Cx32, Cx43 in the liver, and Cx26, Cx32, Cx37 and Cx43 in the stomach. The diversity of ex-pression indicated that the various gap junctional channels between different cells or the same cells in different functional state was due to the expression of different members of Cx gene family[6].

Cx26 gene in the fetal liver had weak expres-sion in the 5th week, and high expression in the 3rd month, which lowerd gradually during the 4th to 5th month. The expression and nonexpression of Cx26 gene are believed to be relevant to morpho-genesis of hepatic lobule, central vein and portal area. There was no structure of hepatic lobule, central vein and portal area in the liver in the 5th week of embryo. The structures formed gradually during the 2nd month, and hepatic lobule was recognized in the 3rd month. Cx26 was in its high expression state during this stage. The structure of portal area became clear in the 4th month. Up to this stage, the Cx26 expression gradually reduced when the basal morphological structure of liver was established. The Cx26 gene expression was overlapping in the stomach, which might be related to the morphogen-esis of stomach. It is suggested that the Cx26 expression plays an important role in the morphogene-sis and structural building of the liver and stomach during embryogenesis.

The expression state of Cx genes is conformed to the cellular differentiation. It may be related to its own differentiation and proliferation of liver cells. This is compatible with Zeng’s report in which the cells of primeval region will acquire fur-ther differentiative capacity, which is closely related to a high level of expression of Cx genes among the same cells[7]. Cx32 gene expression in the sto-mach is related to development of gastric gland, it was low during gastric gland bud stage in the 3rd month, and increased gradually during the develop-ing stage of primordial gastric gland in the 4th month, and reac hed a peak in the 5th month when the gastric gland grew completely.

Eghbali[8] transfected cDNA of whole length Cx32 gene into the hepat ocellular cancer lacking Cx32, and found mRNA expression level, and gap junction were increased markedly, and ion coupling and metabolite coupling reappeared in the tests of dye transfer and electric current of intercellular communicati on, meanwhile the growth rate of carcinoma cells transfected with Cx32 decreased rapid-ly, and cellular structure of neoplastic cells differen-tiated towards normal cells. It is indicated that the expression of Cx32 gene plays a significant role in the cellular differentiation.

Cx43 does not express in the human liver after birth[9], but it expresses in the fetal stage. It may be related to hematopoietic function of the liver during the fetal stage. Hematopoietic stem cells mi-grate to liver from yolk sac at early embryonic stage; at this time, Cx43 expression is low and turns high when the weight of hematopoietic tissues amounts to 30%-40% of the liver by the 3rd to 4th month of embryonic development. With the forma-tion of the spleen, thymus and bone marrow, most of the hematopoietic stem cells in the liver migrate to the above organs, and the Cx43 gene expression lowers distinctly in the 5th month of the fetal liver, indicating the lowered hematopoietic function of the liver. It may be related to the smooth muscle devel-opment in stomach[4].

Wang SQ[10] held that gap junction appeared in the early embryonic stage made it possible the inter-cellular transfer of substances which regulated cellular differentiation, morphological formation and growth control. For example, in archiga-strula and nuerula, gap junctions made notochord-induced eco-derm develop into neural tubes. During embryonic development, the expression state of Cx genes is ba-sically concordant with the formation and degrada-tion of gap junctional communication channel. It is suggested that Connexin gene may be a key candi-date gene to regulate some differentiational events associated with cellular differentiation, prolifera-tion and morphogenesis and organ devolopment.

Footnotes

Edited by Jing-Yun Ma

References
1.  Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Connexin family of gap junction proteins. J Membr Biol. 1990;116:187-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Kumar NM, Gilula NB. The gap junction communication channel. Cell. 1996;84:381-388.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL. Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:475-502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Zhang ZQ, Lin ZX. [The connexin family, gap junctional intercellular communication and tumor suppression]. Shengli Kexue Jinzhan. 1994;25:121-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Cheng LZ. Histology.2nd Ed. Beijing: People's Public Health Press. 1994;188-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Willecke K, Hennemann H, Dahl E, Jungbluth S, Heynkes R. The diversity of connexin genes encoding gap junctional proteins. Eur J Cell Biol. 1991;56:1-7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Zeng MB. Determination, differentiation and intercellullar communication. Chin J Cell Biol. 1994;16:97-100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Eghbali B, Kessler JA, Reid LM, Roy C, Spray DC. Involvement of gap junctions in tumorigenesis: transfection of tumor cells with connexin 32 cDNA retards growth in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:10701-10705.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Wilgenbus KK, Kirkpatrick CJ, Knuechel R, Willecke K, Traub O. Expression of Cx26, Cx32 and Cx43 gap junction proteins in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:522-529.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Wang SQ. Gap junction and development. Chin J Cell Biol. 1988;10:20-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]