BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2026; 32(38): 119677
Published online Oct 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.119677
Microbiota signatures and genetic risk in pediatric celiac disease
Ruveyda Akcin, Suat Saribas, Bekir Kocazeybek, Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul 34098, Türkiye
Ruveyda Akcin, Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Health and Technology University, İstanbul 34320, Türkiye
ORCID number: Ruveyda Akcin (0000-0002-6993-0383); Suat Saribas (0000-0002-4549-3887); Bekir Kocazeybek (0000-0003-1072-3846).
Author contributions: Akcin R, Saribas S, and Kocazeybek B contributed to this paper; Kocazeybek B designed the overall concept; Akcin R contributed to the writing, discussion and design of the manuscript; Saribas S contributed to the editing the manuscript, illustrations, and review of literature. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
AI contribution statement: AI tools (Google Gemini) were used only for limited language assistance and editorial support, while the scientific content, interpretations, and intellectual framework of the manuscript were entirely developed by the authors.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Bekir Kocazeybek, Professor, Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Kocamustafapaşa St No. 53, İstanbul 34098, Türkiye. bzeybek@istanbul.edu.tr
Received: February 3, 2026
Revised: April 22, 2026
Accepted: May 22, 2026
Published online: October 14, 2026
Processing time: 216 Days and 13.2 Hours

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, most commonly those carrying human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 or human leukocyte antigen-DQ8 haplotypes. However, because these haplotypes are prevalent in the general population while only a minority of carriers develop disease, additional factors are likely to contribute to disease onset and progression. In recent years, the gut microbiota has emerged as a potential mediator between host genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers, particularly in pediatric CD. Current evidence suggests that children with CD exhibit reduced microbial diversity, depletion of beneficial commensals, enrichment of proinflammatory taxa, and broader alterations extending to fungal and viral communities. However, these findings remain heterogeneous, largely due to variability in study design, sampling sites, diet, age, and analytical methods. This review examines the interplay between host genetic risk and the intestinal microbiota in pediatric CD, with emphasis on bacterial, fungal, and viral components. Moreover, it highlights the importance of longitudinal, functionally oriented, and multi-omics approaches, particularly in genetically at-risk yet clinically unaffected children, to better clarify causality and identify early microbial markers of disease susceptibility.

Key Words: Gut microbiota; Human leukocyte antigen; Mycobiome; Pediatric celiac disease; Virome

Core Tip: Pediatric celiac disease cannot be explained by host genetics alone. Although human leukocyte antigen-DQ2 and human leukocyte antigen-DQ8 are necessary risk factors in most patients, they do not fully account for disease onset or clinical heterogeneity. Current evidence suggests that the gut microbiota, including bacterial, fungal, and viral communities, may act as a dynamic interface between genetic predisposition and environmental exposures. Longitudinal and functional studies in at-risk children may help define early microbial signatures and improve future risk stratification.



INTRODUCTION

Celiac disease (CD) is a T cell-mediated enteropathy that results from an aberrant immune response to gluten proteins present in wheat, barley, and rye[1,2]. Although it was initially defined as a malabsorption syndrome, CD is now considered a complex, multisystem disease characterized by the presence of specific autoantibodies, mucosal injury, and a broad clinical spectrum[3]. Clinical presentation is particularly heterogeneous in pediatric populations. In addition to gastrointestinal symptoms, such as chronic diarrhea, abdominal distension, and growth retardation, extraintestinal manifestations, such as iron deficiency anemia, decreased bone mineral density, and delayed puberty, are also frequently observed[4]. The global prevalence of pediatric CD is approximately 1%, and the recent observed increase in incidence cannot be attributed solely to advanced diagnostic methods, suggesting a contributory role for early-life environmental factors[4,5].

The pathogenesis of CD involves a dynamic interaction between dietary gluten, genetic predisposition, and dysregulated mucosal immune responses[6]. The high proline and glutamine content of gluten proteins renders them resistant to complete proteolytic digestion, resulting in the accumulation of immunogenic peptides in the small intestine[7]. In this context, intestinal barrier integrity emerges as a critical regulatory threshold. Gliadin-induced zonulin release disrupts tight junctions, leading to increased intestinal permeability and facilitating the translocation of immunogenic gluten peptides across the epithelial barrier into the lamina propria[8,9]. In the lamina propria, gluten peptides are deamidated by tissue transglutaminase 2, which enhances their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, specifically human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8. This interaction promotes activation of CD4+ T cells and the production of proinflammatory cytokines, particularly interferon-γ[10]. Concurrently, increased expression of interleukin-15 in the epithelium enhances the cytotoxic activity of intraepithelial lymphocytes, leading to enterocyte apoptosis, villous atrophy, and crypt hyperplasia[11].

Among the environmental triggers emphasized in the pathogenesis of CD, the gut microbiota has recently emerged as an important component. The gut microbiota constitutes a dynamic and complex ecosystem that plays a central role in the development and functional maturation of the immune system, maintenance of oral tolerance, and preservation of intestinal barrier integrity[12]. Alterations in gut microbiota composition, particularly during early life, may critically influence the onset and clinical course of CD in individuals with genetic predisposition such as HLA-DQ2/DQ8[13]. Studies conducted in pediatric patients with CD have consistently indicated dysbiosis characterized by reduced gut microbiota diversity, enrichment of proinflammatory bacterial species, and depletion of beneficial commensal bacteria compared with healthy individuals[13,14]. These changes are suggested to influence disease pathogenesis by increasing the immunogenicity of gluten peptides and modulating mucosal immune responses[14]. Moreover, microbiota differences observed among individuals with shared genetic backgrounds but divergent phenotypes (for example, siblings discordant for CD) further highlight the complex interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental factors[15].

In this context, this review aims to address the interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental factors in pediatric CD, with a particular focus on the gut microbiota, and to discuss the current literature from this perspective. Although the decisive role of genetic susceptibility in CD pathogenesis is established, the factors underlying incomplete penetrance and clinical heterogeneity remain incompletely understood. At this point, the gut microbiota emerges as a critical interface between genetic predisposition and environmental triggers. Accordingly, this review evaluates changes in microbiota composition in pediatric CD, particularly in genetically similar but phenotypically distinct individuals. In addition, the potential role of the microbiota as a biomarker and its interaction with host genetic factors will be discussed in terms of future research directions.

GENETIC PREDISPOSITION: THE HLA-DQ2/DQ8 AXIS AND BEYOND

The genetic basis of CD is primarily determined by polymorphisms in the HLA class II region[16]. In particular, HLA-DQ molecules play a central role in modulating disease susceptibility[16]. Among these, HLA-DQ2.5 (DQA105:01-DQB102:01) and HLA-DQ8 (DQA103-DQB103:02) haplotypes represent the strongest genetic risk factors, while HLA-DQ2.2 (DQA102:01-DQB102:02) is associated with a lower and context-dependent risk[16-18]. Approximately 90%-95% of patients with CD carry the HLA-DQ2.5 heterodimer, while most of the remaining individuals are HLA-DQ8-positive[16,19]. However, these haplotypes are present in approximately 30%-40% of the general population, and only a small proportion of carriers develop CD, indicating that HLA predisposition is necessary but not sufficient for disease development[20].

Importantly, the effect of HLA genotype extends beyond its mere presence or absence. Allelic dose and specific combinations critically influence disease risk and clinical severity. In particular, the copy number of the DQB1*02 allele is an important parameter associated with both increased susceptibility and greater phenotypic severity[21]. Studies in pediatric cohorts demonstrate that HLA-DQ2.5 carriage, particularly in the presence of DQB1*02 homozygosity, is associated with a higher risk of CD, earlier age of onset, and more severe histological damage[21,22]. In contrast, HLA-DQ8 and HLA-DQ2.2 confer lower, but still significant, levels of risk[23]. These findings suggest that genetic susceptibility in CD follows a multilayered, combinatorial, and dose-dependent structure rather than a simple binary framework.

Although the strongest genetic associations in CD are linked to HLA-DQ2.5 and HLA-DQ8, in recent years, certain HLA variants beyond this DQ2/DQ8 axis have been discussed for their potential contributions to disease susceptibility[23]. For example, HLA-DQ7.5 (DQA105:05-DQB103:01) has been associated with CD in some populations and has been reported within the distribution of risk haplotypes, particularly in pediatric cohorts. However, large-scale screening studies have shown that confirmed CD is rare in individuals who are DQ2/DQ8-negative but DQ7-positive; therefore, the clinical utility of including this variant in routine screening algorithms remains unclear. Moreover, current evidence is still insufficient to establish a definitive role for DQ7.5 in CD pathogenesis[24-26]. Similarly, although clinical data on HLA-DQ9 (DQA103-DQB103:03) are limited, the identification of gluten-specific T-cell responses restricted by DQ9 suggests that this haplotype contributes to disease susceptibility in certain subgroups[25,26]. While extended HLA genotyping is not routinely required, it may be considered in certain pediatric cases that are HLA-DQ2/DQ8-negative but exhibit strong clinical and serological suspicion of CD[24]. Further studies are needed to clarify the roles of HLA-DQ7 and HLA-DQ9 not only in terms of disease susceptibility but also with regard to their potential effects on age at onset, clinical severity, histological damage, and long-term prognosis[24]. Although current evidence suggests that the effects of these variants are limited or secondary, it is also possible that, in reality, they may assume supportive or indirect roles alongside DQ2 and DQ8 that have not yet been fully defined.

Genetic predisposition in CD is not limited to the HLA region alone. Genome-wide association studies have revealed numerous non-HLA loci related to immune regulation, T-cell differentiation, epithelial barrier integrity, and cytokine signaling that contribute to the risk of CD[27]. These loci constitute a broader immunogenetic background that influences an individual’s threshold for loss of tolerance to gluten[28]. Therefore, the genetic background of CD cannot be reduced to a single HLA axis but instead exhibits a multilayered structure shaped by the contributions of both HLA and non-HLA genetic factors[27]. This genetic predisposition determines disease development through its interaction with environmental factors, among which the gut microbiota has emerged as an important component of this interaction[13]. Indeed, the microbiota is considered a key mediator in the translation of genetic background into disease phenotype by regulating immune responses and maintaining gluten tolerance[12,13].

ROLE OF THE GUT MICROBIOTA IN PEDIATRIC CD

The gut microbiota plays an important role in the development of the immune system, the maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity, and the metabolic functions of the host from early childhood[29]. In healthy children, this system is characterized by a eubiotic balance that supports immune tolerance[30]. It has also been reported that the microbiota shifts towards a dysbiotic direction in pediatric CD[30-35]. Generally, an increase in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Bacteroides spp., Escherichia coli and other Gram-negative taxa has been observed[30-35]. In contrast, a decrease in beneficial commensals such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus has been reported[30,31,34,35]. However, these findings should not be interpreted as representing a consistent microbial signature specific to pediatric CD. Microbiota profiles can vary depending on age, diet, disease course, treatment status, sample type (stool, duodenal biopsy, etc.) and analysis methods[36-38]. Therefore, the microbiota should be considered not only as a consequence of disease, but also as a dynamic component that interacts with host factors and can contribute to the prognosis and clinical heterogeneity of the disease[32,33,36-38].

Table 1 summarizes the major bacterial changes reported in pediatric CD and the possible functional effects associated with these changes[13,30,31,34,36,39-49]. However, the findings presented in the table should not be interpreted as a fixed and universal microbiota profile for all studies. Differences reported between studies may be affected by methodological variables such as sample size, age distribution, gluten-free diet status, sample type used, and analysis platform[13,30,31,34,36,39-49]. In particular, stool samples and duodenal biopsies do not provide the same biological information[13,30,31,34,36,39-49]. While stool samples provide a more practical and convenient sample type for longitudinal follow-up, duodenal biopsies can provide information about the mucosal-associated microbial niche more directly related to celiac pathology[13,30,31,34,36,39-49]. Therefore, Table 1 should be considered not as a definitive taxonomic signature for pediatric CD, but rather as a brief synthesis of bacterial patterns that are recurring in different studies but may vary depending on the context.

Table 1 Taxonomic changes and functional effects in pediatric celiac disease.
Bacterial taxon/group
Reported change
Context/condition
Sample type
Possible functional consequence
Nature of evidence
Bifidobacterium spp.DecreaseActive CD; may change after GFDMostly stoolDecreased SCFA production and interleukin-10-related tolerogenic response; weakened barrier supportClinical cohort findings + mechanistic support
Lactobacillus spp.DecreaseActive CD; strain-dependent effectStool; in vitro studiesReduced gluten peptide hydrolysis capacity; increased inflammatory stimulationClinical cohort findings + in vitro/functional support
Bacteroides spp.Increase/variableActive CD; GFD effect may varyStool; duodenal biopsy in some studiesIncreased permeability and proinflammatory cytokine responsesClinical cohort findings + mechanistic interpretation
ProteobacteriaIncreaseActive inflammation/dysbiosisStool; duodenal biopsy in some studiesIncreased oxidative stress, epithelial damage, and inflammationClinical cohort findings + mechanistic support
Escherichia coliIncreaseActive CD; strain-dependentStool; duodenal biopsy in some studiesIncreased virulence-associated epithelial damage and T-cell activationClinical cohort findings + strain-dependent support
StaphylococcaceaeIncreaseSome pediatric CD cohortsMostly stoolIncreased dysbiosis, inflammation, and symptom burdenLimited clinical observation
Akkermansia spp.Decrease/variableBarrier function; influenced by GFD/ageMostly stoolReduced mucus layer and barrier supportMechanistic support + limited CD-specific findings

At this point, functional interpretation of the microbiota is increasingly recognized as more informative than diversity measurements alone[29]. Indeed, even in studies where no differences in overall diversity are detected, significant distinctions may be observed in the relative abundance of specific taxa or in microbial metabolite profiles[32]. According to research by Leonard et al[50], in children at risk for CD, changes in microbiota and metabolic structure may begin approximately 18 months before the disease is clinically diagnosed. In contrast, some birth cohort analyses have not identified similarly strong distinctions. These differences suggest that the effect of the microbiota may not be fixed at a single time point but may become more evident during specific developmental windows[45,50]. Therefore, in microbiota research related to CD, longitudinal follow-up appears to be substantially more valuable than a single time-point analyses[45,50].

From a mechanistic perspective, the role of the microbiota in the pathogenesis of pediatric CD is not limited solely to changes in microbial composition[37]. These changes, along with their effects on epithelial barrier dysfunction, antigen processing, and mucosal immune response, should be evaluated in conjunction with host genetics[37]. Intestinal barrier dysfunction can increase susceptibility to CD[13,31]. Alterations in microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, can affect the maintenance of tight junctions between epithelial cells and mucosal immune tolerance[13,31]. Disruption of this balance may contribute to increased epithelial permeability via the zonulin axis and facilitate the passage of gliadin peptides into the lamina propria[13,32,38]. Moreover, the microbiota can alter the antigenic load by directly affecting the processing of gluten peptides[32,38]. While some Lactobacillus strains can break down gluten peptides into less immunogenic forms, some bacteria convert them into more immunogenic products[7,37]. This suggests that the microbiota is an active modulator that can shape the intensity of gliadin-induced antigenic stimulus[51-53]. In addition, the microbiota can influence mucosal immune polarization, leading to increased inflammatory responses specific to CD[13,31,32,38]. Dysbiosis can contribute to increased inflammatory Th1/Th17 responses, weakened Treg-mediated immune tolerance, and disrupt tolerogenic balance in the gut by promoting interleukin-15-related immune activation[51,53]. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the microbiota should be considered as a dynamic biological interface that interacts with host genetics and shapes disease risk not only through compositional changes but also through functional outcomes such as barrier permeability, antigen processing, and immune polarization. In this context, the fundamental question should not only be “which microbial compositions are changing”? but also “how does the microbiota interact with host genetics, and what functions does the microbiota play in this disease”?

Some studies have identified significant changes in the microbiota of pediatric celiac patients compared to healthy individuals[39]. However, some studies have reported that there is no significant difference, only limited statistical differences[50]. Notably, some studies have yielded quite remarkable data. Olivares et al[54] demonstrated that HLA-DQ2 positivity can affect the gut microbiota in early childhood and therefore play an important role in the development of CD risk. By contrast, a longitudinal analysis by Leonard et al[55] suggested that significant changes in the microbiota may occur before the clinical onset of pediatric CD. In addition, in the study by Zafeiropoulou et al[43], no significant difference was found in terms of alpha diversity between pediatric celiac patients and the control group. Conversely, significant microbial differences at the taxon level have been identified in association with pediatric CD. In this context, when these data reported by Zafeiropoulou et al[43], Olivares et al[54] and Leonard et al[55] are evaluated, rather than being conflicting results, it suggests that genetic predisposition, microbiota, microbial changes and colonization in early childhood should be considered as components that evolve and influence each other over time in the development of pediatric CD.

As summarized in Table 2[43,54-57], microbiota research in pediatric CD is highly heterogeneous. However, considering the results of the researchers listed in Table 2, we believe there may be several reasons for this heterogeneity. Firstly, different dietary habits and environmental/cultural exposures can significantly affect microbiota composition[58,59]. Importantly, the type of sample used can significantly alter the results[58,59]. While stool samples mostly reflect the luminal/fecal microbiota, duodenal biopsies can provide information about microbial communities closer to the small intestinal mucosa[58,59]. Thirdly, age ranges are particularly critical in pediatric age groups. This is because the microbiota, immune system and intestinal barrier are still developing in childhood[58,59]. Therefore, even one year of age can lead to significant biological differences in terms of microbial composition and immune maturation[58,59]. Finally, the sequencing and analysis methods used can also cause variability in the results. 16S rRNA gene sequencing, shotgun metagenomics, metatranscriptomics or different platforms may differ in terms of taxonomic resolution, read length, error profile and functional interpretation capacity[58,59]. Therefore, when evaluating the results of different studies, not only the reported microbial changes but also the study population, sample type, age distribution, and methodological approach used should be considered.

Table 2 Comparative summary of microbiota studies in pediatric celiac disease.
Ref.
Focus area
Key findings
Statistical significance/status
Zafeiropoulou et al[43]New diagnosis vs GFDNo difference in diversity; GFD effect is dominantSignificant signature in taxon abundance
Olivares et al[54]Early life and HLAImpact of HLA-DQ2 on microbial colonizationSignificance at the initial stage
Leonard et al[55]Longitudinal risk monitoringMicrobial shifts occurring 18 months prior to diagnosisStrong longitudinal significance
El Mouzan et al[56]Bacteria + virus + fungiBacteria and virus combination as a robust diagnostic toolHigh AUC value (0.818)
Salamon et al[57]Bacteria + fungi + HLAIntermediate microbiota form in siblings; influence of DQ8/DQ2.2Significant difference in beta diversity

Although research in pediatric CD has long focused on bacterial composition, this approach is increasingly recognized as insufficient[60]. The gut ecosystem encompasses not only bacteria but also fungi, viruses, and particularly bacteriophages, all of which contribute to host-microbe interactions[61]. While the intestinal mycobiome has historically been considered a secondary extension of bacterial dysbiosis in pediatric CD, current evidence challenges this approach[62,63]. Despite representing only a small proportion of the total microbial load, the intestinal fungal community may be important in pathogenesis due to its extensive interactions with the mucosal immune system[64]. Therefore, fungi should not be considered merely as an “accompanying change” but as an active biological layer that may influence immune tolerance, sustain inflammation, and modulate the overall microbial ecosystem[57,61]. Particularly in the pediatric population, evaluating early fungal alterations, potentially preceding disease onset, represents a promising area of research for identifying biomarkers of the preclinical phase[50,55,64].

Within this framework, Candida species represent one of the most prominent groups in the pediatric CD mycobiome[57]. In particular, the molecular mimicry hypothesis, proposed based on the structural similarity between gliadin peptides and hyphal wall protein 1 expressed by Candida albicans, suggests that fungal components act not only as consequences of inflammation but also as potential triggers in the loss of tolerance to gluten[65]. According to this model, antibody response generated during fungal exposure may facilitate cross-reactivity to gliadin in genetically predisposed children, thereby lowering the immunological threshold and contributing to early stages of CD pathogenesis[65-67]. Similarly, an increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae abundance may be interpreted not merely as a compositional shift but as an indicator of inflammation associated with anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody responses and intestinal fungal dysbiosis[68]. In contrast, a decrease in certain commensal or ecologically balancing species such as Pichia kudriavzevii may reflect weakened protective microbial competition and a loss of fungal diversity[69]. Additionally, enrichment of fungal groups such as Tricholomataceae and Saccharomycetaceae observed in some studies suggests a characteristic fungal restructuring of the fungal community in pediatric CD, whereas the detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii at low levels may indicate a distinct fungal niche selection within the duodenal mucosa[70,71].

The findings summarized in Table 3 demonstrate that in pediatric CD, the fungal community may also be a complementary layer of disease-associated microbial changes[57,65,69-75]. Nevertheless, current data are still limited, and it is not clear whether fungal changes are the cause or consequence of the disease or a reflection of a broader disruption in the gut ecosystem[57,65,69-75]. Accordingly, fungal profile should not be considered as a definitive disease signature on its own, but rather as a component to be evaluated together with study design, sample type, disease activity and bacterial microbiota findings[69,74]. One of the important studies in this area was conducted by Salamon et al[57], who made a comparison based on 16S and internal transcribed spacer 1 between children with CD, unaffected siblings and healthy controls. This study is important because it shows that the fungal community is a variable that should not be overlooked in pediatric CD and that bacteria-focused analyses alone may be limited in explaining all the changes in the gut ecosystem[57].

Table 3 Fungal taxa alterations and their pathophysiological implications in celiac disease.
Fungal taxon/group
Reported change
Context/condition
Sample type
Possible functional consequence
Nature of evidence
Candida spp./C. albicansIncreasePediatric CD; potential immune cross-reactivityStool; duodenal biopsy in some studiesMolecular mimicry via hyphal wall protein 1; possible gliadin cross-reactivity and immune activationClinical observation + mechanistic hypothesis
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeIncrease/variableFungal dysbiosis; inflammation-associated contextMostly stoolASCA-related immune response; marker of intestinal fungal dysbiosisClinical observation + immunological association
TricholomataceaeIncreasePediatric CD-associated fungal signatureFecal samplesPossible marker of altered fungal community structureStudy-dependent clinical observation
SaccharomycetaceaeIncreaseFamily-level fungal shift in CDMostly stoolFungal ecosystem imbalance; possible dysbiosis markerClinical observation + ecological interpretation
Pichia kudriavzeviiDecreaseLoss of commensal fungal diversityMostly stoolReduced protective microbial competition; weakened fungal ecosystem balanceLimited clinical observation + ecological interpretation
Pneumocystis jiroveciiDecreaseDuodenal mucosal fungal profileDuodenal biopsyPossible altered mucosal fungal niche; unclear functional relevanceStudy-dependent mucosal finding
Fungal community overallAltered/variableActive CD, at-risk siblings, and preclinical contextStool; duodenal biopsy in some studiesBarrier regulation, antigenic environment, T-cell polarization, and immune toleranceClinical cohort findings + mechanistic support

Therefore, the clinically relevant question is whether the gut microbiota, particularly the fungal profile, can serve as an early biomarker before the onset of CD? At present, a definitive answer to this question is not possible. However, current evidence supports the potential utility of longitudinal microbiota monitoring, especially in genetically at-risk yet clinically healthy children - such as unaffected siblings - for improving early disease prediction[55,59].

In light of the available data, fungi in pediatric CD should no longer be considered merely a “neglected minor component”, but rather a promising layer of research that may reflect early interactions between genetic predisposition, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and immune activation[69,70].

The virome, particularly bacteriophages, represents another underexplored microbial layer in pediatric CD[75]. Because bacteriophages infect bacteria rather than host cells, their effects on host are largely indirect, mediated through modulation of bacterial community structure and function[75]. Therefore, they may contribute to either to stabilization of the gut microbiota or, conversely, to propagation of dysbiosis[76,77]. However, the directionality of these effects in pediatric CD remains unclear and warrants further research[77].

Available data suggest that the virome composition in children with CD differs from that of healthy controls[77]. El Mouzan et al[56] reported that newly diagnosed pediatric CD cases exhibited increased abundance of certain agents such as Enterobacteria phage mEpX1/mEpX2 and human polyomavirus 2, alongside decreased levels of Lactococcus phage ul36 and Streptococcus phage Abc2 in stool samples. Notably, although no marked differences were observed in Shannon alpha diversity or Bray-Curtis beta dissimilarity, these findings at the level of differential abundance support the possibility of “viral dysbiosis”[77]. This suggests that the effect of the virome in CD is better understood not through overall diversity but through selective increases or decreases of specific viral members[77].

Beyond bacteriophages, early-life exposure to eukaryotic viruses may also play a role in CD pathogenesis[78]. Cohort data indicating that enterovirus exposure increases the risk of celiac autoimmunity suggest that viral infections create transient inflammatory windows that facilitate the loss of tolerance to gluten[78,79]. However, it remains unclear whether such viruses truly act as primary triggers of disease or as accompanying factors that accelerate pre-existing immunological vulnerability[80].

AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

To date, research on the gut microbiota in pediatric CD has been largely shaped around descriptions of bacterial dysbiosis[30,33]. However, this framework appears increasingly insufficient, particularly for explaining early and preclinical stages of disease development[81]. During childhood, the immune system, epithelial barrier, and microbial ecosystem are still undergoing dynamic maturation; consequently, even minor changes in the intestinal environment may lead to pronounced biological consequences[36,61,64]. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the microbiota may be more accurately considered not merely as an “accompanying variable” but as an active biological interface between genetic predisposition and environmental triggers[16,31,50].

For this reason, the role of the mycobiome warrants reconsideration in particular. Although historically treated as a secondary extension of bacterial dysbiosis, the effects of fungal components on intestinal homeostasis may not fit within such a passive framework[64,69]. In early life, fungal communities may have the potential to influence epithelial barrier integrity, mucosal antigen presentation, and T-cell polarization[64,69]. In particular, species such as Candida and Saccharomyces can exhibit either tolerogenic or proinflammatory effects depending on host and environmental context, suggesting that the mycobiome in CD functions not as a fixed “beneficial” or “harmful” factor but rather as a dynamic regulator of immune imbalance[64,67,69]. In genetically predisposed children, these effects may influence the delicate threshold between maintenance and breakdown of gluten tolerance[10,16].

Similarly, the gut virome, and especially bacteriophages, represents another important yet underexplored layer in pediatric CD[60,80]. Phages predominantly influence host cells indirectly by selective reshaping bacterial communities[75-77]. Therefore, their potential role in CD should be considered in terms of which bacterial networks are supported or suppressed, and how this, in turn, affects mucosal immune balance[75-77]. In particular, phage-mediated modulation of commensal bacteria associated with Th17 responses may have downstream effects on the Th17/Treg balance[16,38]. Although CD has classically been defined primarily through the Th1 axis, considering that Th17 responses may also contribute to disease immunobiology, phages may represent one of the less visible ecological regulators influencing this balance[16,25,38,76].

The critical point here is that fungal and viral components should be considered within a combined model, not as separate microbial entities independent of bacteria. In general, the current literature on pediatric CD focuses mostly on a specific microorganism. Some studies evaluate bacterial composition, others fungal profile, and still others virome patterns separately. However, the gut microbiota is not simply the sum of isolated groups of microorganisms. The microbiota is a dynamic ecosystem in which bacteria, fungi, and viruses interact with each other. Therefore, the multi-kingdom approach proposed in this opinion review aims to evaluate the interrelationships of microbial changes within the gut ecosystem and their functional consequences reflected in the host immune response, rather than interpreting microbial changes individually in pediatric CD. As shown in Figure 1A, host genetic predisposition is a fundamental basis. Along with bacteria, fungi, and viruses, it can shape epithelial barrier integrity, the antigenic environment, cytokine balance, and the Th17/Treg axis. Another unique aspect of this model is that it also examines how the functional outputs of microorganisms interact with host genetics. Bacterial and fungal gene expression profiles, metabolite production, surface antigens, and secreted proteins can influence HLA-mediated antigen presentation, the immunogenicity of gluten peptides, and the maintenance of mucosal tolerance. Therefore, in addition to well-known genetic risk factors such as HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8, it is necessary to investigate how less studied subtypes such as HLA-DQ7 and HLA-DQ9, which are thought to play a role in celiac susceptibility, interact with the microbial ecosystem. In this context, the multi-kingdom model conceptualized in Figure 1A aims to answer the questions: “Which genes do these microorganisms express, which proteins or metabolites do they produce, and what immunological consequences do these products have in a genetically susceptible host”?

Figure 1
Figure 1 Proposed multi-kingdom model of pediatric celiac disease and the role of at-risk siblings. A: Genetic susceptibility interacts with bacterial, fungal, and viral components to modulate immune homeostasis and promote loss of gluten tolerance; B: Unaffected siblings may represent a preclinical window characterized by early microbial and immunological signatures relevant for risk stratification. HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; IL: Interleukin; TGF: Transforming growth factor.

One of the most important aspects of this holistic model we propose is that biological changes associated with the disease can be monitored before the disease develops. In this respect, we consider healthy siblings of pediatric celiac patients to be a special group for understanding the preclinical phase of the disease. These children are not entirely randomly selected healthy controls. Healthy siblings share a common genetic predisposition, similar environmental exposures, and dietary conditions with their siblings who have CD. However, they do not have clinically active CD either. Therefore, healthy siblings can be considered a potential bridge between genetic predisposition and clinical disease. Indeed, some studies show that the microbiota profiles of these individuals may differ from both healthy controls and their siblings with CD, suggesting that they may be an intermediate form carrying early ecological and immunological changes associated with susceptibility to the disease[57,63]. As shown in Figure 1B, this group can offer a unique window for evaluating transitional signatures that may emerge before clinical disease develops. Longitudinal monitoring of healthy siblings and the simultaneous assessment of bacterial, fungal, and viral components within a multi-kingdom framework will be of considerable importance. In addition, metabolites, proteins, surface antigens, and gene expression profiles produced by microorganisms should be considered together with host genetic predisposition. Thus, healthy siblings of celiac patients should be considered not only as a control group, but also as an intermediate biological model that allows us to understand the transition process between genetic predisposition, microbial ecosystem changes, and immune response.

Similarly, the holistic model we propose reinforces the importance of preclinical monitoring and early risk assessment. Although shotgun metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, and other omics approaches offer powerful tools for understanding the compositional and functional structure of the gut microbiota, applying these analyses for routine clinical screening or early diagnosis is not yet feasible. High cost, technical infrastructure requirements, complexity of data analysis, and lack of standardization are the main limitations in this field. Accordingly, for now, multi-omics approaches should be considered not as direct clinical tests, but rather as research-based tools to elucidate the preclinical biology of pediatric CD and to identify more applicable biomarkers for future use. If specific bacterial, fungal, viral, or metabolic signatures are later confirmed to be associated with disease risk, this information could pave the way for the development of simpler, more targeted, and cost-effective biomarker panels. Such an approach can contribute to earlier identification of at-risk children, more precise biological monitoring, and the development of targeted preventive strategies in the future.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric CD, the key issue is not merely to demonstrate the presence of alterations in the microbiota but to determine in which children, at what stage of the disease, and within which immunogenetic context these changes become relevant. Within this framework, evaluating fungal profiles, bacteriophage dynamics, and immune balance not as separate entities but as components of a single, integrated disease model may provide a more explanatory approach. Such a model suggests that, against a background of genetic predisposition, multi-kingdom microbial interactions may shape the epithelial barrier and mucosal immune responses, thereby influencing the direction of preclinical disease.

In particular, integrated microbial-immune patterns identified in genetically predisposed yet clinically unaffected children hold significant potential for early risk assessment. While maintaining appropriate caution, it can be suggested that this approach offers a stronger conceptual framework for advancing early diagnosis, improving risk stratification, and guiding the development of future preclinical intervention strategies in pediatric CD. Therefore, the next step in the field should be not only to describe dysbiosis but also to identify which integrated microbial-immune signals truly reflect disease risk.

References
1.  Rallabhandi P. Gluten and celiac disease--an immunological perspective. J AOAC Int. 2012;95:349-355.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  du Pré MF, Sollid LM. T-cell and B-cell immunity in celiac disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29:413-423.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Semrad C, Kelly CP, Greer KB, Limketkai BN, Lebwohl B. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118:59-76.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 365]  [Cited by in RCA: 325]  [Article Influence: 108.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
4.  Sahin Y. Celiac disease in children: A review of the literature. World J Clin Pediatr. 2021;10:53-71.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 181]  [Cited by in RCA: 130]  [Article Influence: 26.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
5.  Myleus A, Catassi C. Epidemiology of Celiac Disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2025;35:693-706.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
6.  Iversen R, Sollid LM. The Immunobiology and Pathogenesis of Celiac Disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2023;18:47-70.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 167]  [Cited by in RCA: 155]  [Article Influence: 51.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Mamone G, Di Stasio L, Vitale S, Picascia S, Gianfrani C. Analytical and functional approaches to assess the immunogenicity of gluten proteins. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1049623.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Fasano A. All disease begins in the (leaky) gut: role of zonulin-mediated gut permeability in the pathogenesis of some chronic inflammatory diseases. F1000Res. 2020;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-F1000 Faculty R69.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 395]  [Cited by in RCA: 338]  [Article Influence: 56.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
9.  Damianos JA, Bledsoe A, Camilleri M, Murray JA. Coeliac disease and the intestinal barrier: mechanisms of disruption and strategies for restoration. Gut. 2026;75:826-838.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Voisine J, Abadie V. Interplay Between Gluten, HLA, Innate and Adaptive Immunity Orchestrates the Development of Coeliac Disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12:674313.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Patt YS, Lahat A, David P, Patt C, Eyade R, Sharif K. Unraveling the Immunopathological Landscape of Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15482.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Almansour N, Al-Rashed F, Choudhry K, Alqaderi H, Sindhu S, Al-Mulla F, Ahmad R. Gut microbiota: a promising new target in immune tolerance. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1607388.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Matera M, Guandalini S. How the Microbiota May Affect Celiac Disease and What We Can Do. Nutrients. 2024;16:1882.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Leo S, Leonard MM, Valitutti F, Fasano A. Gut dysbiosis: cause or consequence of intestinal inflammation in celiac disease? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;19:505-513.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Kauma S, Kaukinen K, Huhtala H, Kivelä L, Pekki H, Salmi T, Saavalainen P, Lindfors K, Kurppa K. The Phenotype of Celiac Disease Has Low Concordance between Siblings, Despite a Similar Distribution of HLA Haplotypes. Nutrients. 2019;11:479.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Abadie V, Sollid LM, Barreiro LB, Jabri B. Integration of genetic and immunological insights into a model of celiac disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:493-525.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 421]  [Cited by in RCA: 358]  [Article Influence: 23.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
17.  Berryman MA, Ilonen J, Triplett EW, Ludvigsson J. Important denominator between autoimmune comorbidities: a review of class II HLA, autoimmune disease, and the gut. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1270488.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Sollid LM. The roles of MHC class II genes and post-translational modification in celiac disease. Immunogenetics. 2017;69:605-616.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in RCA: 100]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
19.  Leonard MM, Sapone A, Catassi C, Fasano A. Celiac Disease and Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Review. JAMA. 2017;318:647-656.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 349]  [Cited by in RCA: 255]  [Article Influence: 28.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
20.  Zubkiewicz-Kucharska A, Jamer T, Chrzanowska J, Akutko K, Pytrus T, Stawarski A, Noczyńska A. Prevalence of haplotype DQ2/DQ8 and celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14:128.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Bajor J, Szakács Z, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Illés A, Solymár M, Pétervári E, Balaskó M, Pár G, Sarlós P, Szűcs Á, Czimmer J, Szemes K, Huszár O, Varjú P, Vincze Á. Classical celiac disease is more frequent with a double dose of HLA-DQB1*02: A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0212329.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (7)]
22.  Martínez-Ojinaga E, Fernández-Prieto M, Molina M, Polanco I, Urcelay E, Núñez C. Influence of HLA on clinical and analytical features of pediatric celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19:91.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Fallang LE, Bergseng E, Hotta K, Berg-Larsen A, Kim CY, Sollid LM. Differences in the risk of celiac disease associated with HLA-DQ2.5 or HLA-DQ2.2 are related to sustained gluten antigen presentation. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1096-1101.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 125]  [Cited by in RCA: 109]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
24.  Schirru E, Rossino R, Jores RD, Corpino M, Muntoni S, Cucca F, Congia M. Clinical settings in which human leukocyte antigen typing is still useful in the diagnosis of celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2025;31:104397.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
25.  Nilsen EM, Lundin KE, Krajci P, Scott H, Sollid LM, Brandtzaeg P. Gluten specific, HLA-DQ restricted T cells from coeliac mucosa produce cytokines with Th1 or Th0 profile dominated by interferon gamma. Gut. 1995;37:766-776.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 247]  [Cited by in RCA: 261]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bodd M, Tollefsen S, Bergseng E, Lundin KE, Sollid LM. Evidence that HLA-DQ9 confers risk to celiac disease by presence of DQ9-restricted gluten-specific T cells. Hum Immunol. 2012;73:376-381.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Gaba K, Malhotra P, Kumar A, Suneja P, Dang AS. Understanding the Genetic Basis of Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2024;82:1797-1808.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Escudero-Hernández C, Peña AS, Bernardo D. Immunogenetic Pathogenesis of Celiac Disease and Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016;18:36.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Di Vincenzo F, Del Gaudio A, Petito V, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern Emerg Med. 2024;19:275-293.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1010]  [Cited by in RCA: 921]  [Article Influence: 460.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
30.  Lupu VV, Trandafir LM, Raileanu AA, Mihai CM, Morariu ID, Starcea IM, Mocanu A, Butnariu LI, Stoleriu G, Salaru DL, Chisnoiu T, Munteanu D, Mitrofan C, Lupu A. Advances in Understanding the Human Gut Microbiota and Its Implication in Pediatric Celiac Disease-A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023;15:2499.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Cenit MC, Olivares M, Codoñer-Franch P, Sanz Y. Intestinal Microbiota and Celiac Disease: Cause, Consequence or Co-Evolution? Nutrients. 2015;7:6900-6923.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 143]  [Cited by in RCA: 131]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
32.  Rossi RE, Dispinzieri G, Elvevi A, Massironi S. Interaction between Gut Microbiota and Celiac Disease: From Pathogenesis to Treatment. Cells. 2023;12:823.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 13.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Akobeng AK, Singh P, Kumar M, Al Khodor S. Role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of coeliac disease and potential therapeutic implications. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59:3369-3390.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
34.  Yemula N. Gut microbiota in celiac disease. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024;37:125-132.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Saviano A, Petruzziello C, Brigida M, Morabito Loprete MR, Savioli G, Migneco A, Ojetti V. Gut Microbiota Alteration and Its Modulation with Probiotics in Celiac Disease. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2638.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Cukrowska B, Sowińska A, Bierła JB, Czarnowska E, Rybak A, Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk U. Intestinal epithelium, intraepithelial lymphocytes and the gut microbiota - Key players in the pathogenesis of celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:7505-7518.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 89]  [Cited by in RCA: 82]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Chander AM, Yadav H, Jain S, Bhadada SK, Dhawan DK. Cross-Talk Between Gluten, Intestinal Microbiota and Intestinal Mucosa in Celiac Disease: Recent Advances and Basis of Autoimmunity. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2597.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Kim CH. Complex regulatory effects of gut microbial short-chain fatty acids on immune tolerance and autoimmunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20:341-350.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 315]  [Cited by in RCA: 298]  [Article Influence: 99.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Said HA, Elmoumou L, Rherissi B, El Kadmiri N. Variations in gut microbiota in celiac disease patients: a systematic review. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18:147-163.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Pecora F, Persico F, Gismondi P, Fornaroli F, Iuliano S, de'Angelis GL, Esposito S. Gut Microbiota in Celiac Disease: Is There Any Role for Probiotics? Front Immunol. 2020;11:957.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Zoghi S, Abbasi A, Heravi FS, Somi MH, Nikniaz Z, Moaddab SY, Ebrahimzadeh Leylabadlo H. The gut microbiota and celiac disease: Pathophysiology, current perspective and new therapeutic approaches. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64:2176-2196.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
42.  Mo C, Lou X, Xue J, Shi Z, Zhao Y, Wang F, Chen G. The influence of Akkermansia muciniphila on intestinal barrier function. Gut Pathog. 2024;16:41.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 139]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Zafeiropoulou K, Nichols B, Mackinder M, Biskou O, Rizou E, Karanikolou A, Clark C, Buchanan E, Cardigan T, Duncan H, Wands D, Russell J, Hansen R, Russell RK, McGrogan P, Edwards CA, Ijaz UZ, Gerasimidis K. Alterations in Intestinal Microbiota of Children With Celiac Disease at the Time of Diagnosis and on a Gluten-free Diet. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:2039-2051.e20.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in RCA: 64]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Palmieri O, Castellana S, Bevilacqua A, Latiano A, Latiano T, Panza A, Fontana R, Ippolito AM, Biscaglia G, Gentile A, Gioffreda D, Decina I, Tricarico M, Sinigaglia M, Corbo MR, Mazza T, Perri F, Lamacchia C. Adherence to Gluten-Free Diet Restores Alpha Diversity in Celiac People but the Microbiome Composition Is Different to Healthy People. Nutrients. 2022;14:2452.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Girdhar K, Dogru YD, Huang Q, Yang Y, Tolstikov V, Raisingani A, Chrudinova M, Oh J, Kelley K, Ludvigsson JF, Kiebish MA, Palm NW, Ludvigsson J, Altindis E. Dynamics of the gut microbiome, IgA response, and plasma metabolome in the development of pediatric celiac disease. Microbiome. 2023;11:9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
46.  Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Darzi Y, Faust K, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Valles-Colomer M, Vandeputte D, Tito RY, Chaffron S, Rymenans L, Verspecht C, De Sutter L, Lima-Mendez G, D'hoe K, Jonckheere K, Homola D, Garcia R, Tigchelaar EF, Eeckhaudt L, Fu J, Henckaerts L, Zhernakova A, Wijmenga C, Raes J. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science. 2016;352:560-564.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2017]  [Cited by in RCA: 1743]  [Article Influence: 174.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
47.  Tropini C, Earle KA, Huang KC, Sonnenburg JL. The Gut Microbiome: Connecting Spatial Organization to Function. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:433-442.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 339]  [Cited by in RCA: 493]  [Article Influence: 54.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
48.  Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:20-32.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2123]  [Cited by in RCA: 1754]  [Article Influence: 175.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
49.  Knight R, Vrbanac A, Taylor BC, Aksenov A, Callewaert C, Debelius J, Gonzalez A, Kosciolek T, McCall LI, McDonald D, Melnik AV, Morton JT, Navas J, Quinn RA, Sanders JG, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Tripathi A, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhu Q, Caporaso JG, Dorrestein PC. Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:410-422.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1542]  [Cited by in RCA: 1221]  [Article Influence: 152.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
50.  Leonard MM, Karathia H, Pujolassos M, Troisi J, Valitutti F, Subramanian P, Camhi S, Kenyon V, Colucci A, Serena G, Cucchiara S, Montuori M, Malamisura B, Francavilla R, Elli L, Fanelli B, Colwell R, Hasan N, Zomorrodi AR, Fasano A; CD-GEMM Team. Multi-omics analysis reveals the influence of genetic and environmental risk factors on developing gut microbiota in infants at risk of celiac disease. Microbiome. 2020;8:130.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in RCA: 86]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
51.  Caminero A, Galipeau HJ, McCarville JL, Johnston CW, Bernier SP, Russell AK, Jury J, Herran AR, Casqueiro J, Tye-Din JA, Surette MG, Magarvey NA, Schuppan D, Verdu EF. Duodenal Bacteria From Patients With Celiac Disease and Healthy Subjects Distinctly Affect Gluten Breakdown and Immunogenicity. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:670-683.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 216]  [Cited by in RCA: 192]  [Article Influence: 19.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Herrán AR, Pérez-Andrés J, Caminero A, Nistal E, Vivas S, Ruiz de Morales JM, Casqueiro J. Gluten-degrading bacteria are present in the human small intestine of healthy volunteers and celiac patients. Res Microbiol. 2017;168:673-684.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in RCA: 71]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
53.  Francavilla R, De Angelis M, Rizzello CG, Cavallo N, Dal Bello F, Gobbetti M. Selected Probiotic Lactobacilli Have the Capacity To Hydrolyze Gluten Peptides during Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e00376-e00317.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Olivares M, Neef A, Castillejo G, Palma GD, Varea V, Capilla A, Palau F, Nova E, Marcos A, Polanco I, Ribes-Koninckx C, Ortigosa L, Izquierdo L, Sanz Y. The HLA-DQ2 genotype selects for early intestinal microbiota composition in infants at high risk of developing coeliac disease. Gut. 2015;64:406-417.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 253]  [Cited by in RCA: 230]  [Article Influence: 20.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
55.  Leonard MM, Valitutti F, Karathia H, Pujolassos M, Kenyon V, Fanelli B, Troisi J, Subramanian P, Camhi S, Colucci A, Serena G, Cucchiara S, Trovato CM, Malamisura B, Francavilla R, Elli L, Hasan NA, Zomorrodi AR, Colwell R, Fasano A; CD-GEMM Team. Microbiome signatures of progression toward celiac disease onset in at-risk children in a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2020322118.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 135]  [Cited by in RCA: 126]  [Article Influence: 25.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (11)]
56.  El Mouzan M, Assiri A, Al Sarkhy A. Gut microbiota predicts the diagnosis of celiac disease in Saudi children. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29:1994-2000.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Salamon D, Krawczyk A, Zapała B, Duplaga M, Kowalska-Duplaga K, Gosiewski T. Gut bacterial and fungal signatures in relation to human leukocyte antigen-DQ2/DQ8 in children with celiac disease and siblings. World J Gastroenterol. 2026;32:116128.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Sacchetti L, Nardelli C. Gut microbiome investigation in celiac disease: from methods to its pathogenetic role. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58:340-349.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
59.  Milletich PL, Ahrens AP, Russell JT, Petrone JR, Berryman MA, Agardh D, Ludvigsson JF, Triplett EW, Ludvigsson J. Gut microbiome markers in subgroups of HLA class II genotyped infants signal future celiac disease in the general population: ABIS study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:920735.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Luz VCC, Pereira SG. Celiac disease gut microbiome studies in the third millennium: reviewing the findings and gaps of available literature. Front Med Technol. 2024;6:1413637.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Krishnamurthy HK, Pereira M, Bosco J, George J, Jayaraman V, Krishna K, Wang T, Bei K, Rajasekaran JJ. Gut commensals and their metabolites in health and disease. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1244293.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in RCA: 70]  [Article Influence: 23.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Mukherjee PK, Sendid B, Hoarau G, Colombel JF, Poulain D, Ghannoum MA. Mycobiota in gastrointestinal diseases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:77-87.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 118]  [Cited by in RCA: 161]  [Article Influence: 14.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Kelley K, Dogru D, Huang Q, Yang Y, Palm NW, Altindis E, Ludvigsson J. Children who develop celiac disease are predicted to exhibit distinct metabolic pathways among their gut microbiota years before diagnosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2025;13:e0146824.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Iliev ID, Leonardi I. Fungal dysbiosis: immunity and interactions at mucosal barriers. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:635-646.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 255]  [Cited by in RCA: 319]  [Article Influence: 35.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (8)]
65.  Nieuwenhuizen WF, Pieters RH, Knippels LM, Jansen MC, Koppelman SJ. Is Candida albicans a trigger in the onset of coeliac disease? Lancet. 2003;361:2152-2154.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Corouge M, Loridant S, Fradin C, Salleron J, Damiens S, Moragues MD, Souplet V, Jouault T, Robert R, Dubucquoi S, Sendid B, Colombel JF, Poulain D. Humoral immunity links Candida albicans infection and celiac disease. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121776.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Renga G, Bellet MM, Stincardini C, Pariano M, Oikonomou V, Villella VR, Brancorsini S, Clerici C, Romani L, Costantini C. To Be or Not to Be a Pathogen: Candida albicans and Celiac Disease. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2844.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Honkanen J, Vuorela A, Muthas D, Orivuori L, Luopajärvi K, Tejesvi MVG, Lavrinienko A, Pirttilä AM, Fogarty CL, Härkönen T, Ilonen J, Ruohtula T, Knip M, Koskimäki JJ, Vaarala O. Fungal Dysbiosis and Intestinal Inflammation in Children With Beta-Cell Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:468.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Ost KS, Round JL. Commensal fungi in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20:723-734.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in RCA: 51]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  El Mouzan M, Al-Hussaini A, Fanelli B, Assiri A, AlSaleem B, Al Mofarreh M, Al Sarkhy A, Alasmi M. Fungal Dysbiosis in Children with Celiac Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:216-223.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Valitutti F, Cavalli E, Leter B, Leonard M, Alessio F, Cucchiara S. Coeliac disease and microbiota: is it time for personalised biotics intervention? A scoping review. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025;8:e001100.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
72.  El Jaddaoui I, Sehli S, Al Idrissi N, Bakri Y, Belyamani L, Ghazal H. The Gut Mycobiome for Precision Medicine. J Fungi (Basel). 2025;11:279.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  San-Martin MI, Chamizo-Ampudia A, Sanchiz Á, Ferrero MÁ, Martínez-Blanco H, Rodríguez-Aparicio LB, Navasa N. Microbiome Markers in Gastrointestinal Disorders: Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Colorectal Cancer, and Celiac Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:4818.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Huffnagle GB, Noverr MC. The emerging world of the fungal microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:334-341.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 354]  [Cited by in RCA: 410]  [Article Influence: 31.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Barr JJ, Auro R, Furlan M, Whiteson KL, Erb ML, Pogliano J, Stotland A, Wolkowicz R, Cutting AS, Doran KS, Salamon P, Youle M, Rohwer F. Bacteriophage adhering to mucus provide a non-host-derived immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:10771-10776.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 842]  [Cited by in RCA: 686]  [Article Influence: 52.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
76.  Gogokhia L, Buhrke K, Bell R, Hoffman B, Brown DG, Hanke-Gogokhia C, Ajami NJ, Wong MC, Ghazaryan A, Valentine JF, Porter N, Martens E, O'Connell R, Jacob V, Scherl E, Crawford C, Stephens WZ, Casjens SR, Longman RS, Round JL. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:285-299.e8.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 538]  [Cited by in RCA: 473]  [Article Influence: 67.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (10)]
77.  Clooney AG, Sutton TDS, Shkoporov AN, Holohan RK, Daly KM, O'Regan O, Ryan FJ, Draper LA, Plevy SE, Ross RP, Hill C. Whole-Virome Analysis Sheds Light on Viral Dark Matter in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:764-778.e5.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 400]  [Cited by in RCA: 334]  [Article Influence: 47.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Kahrs CR, Chuda K, Tapia G, Stene LC, Mårild K, Rasmussen T, Rønningen KS, Lundin KEA, Kramna L, Cinek O, Størdal K. Enterovirus as trigger of coeliac disease: nested case-control study within prospective birth cohort. BMJ. 2019;364:l231.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in RCA: 87]  [Article Influence: 12.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Oikarinen M, Puustinen L, Lehtonen J, Hakola L, Simell S, Toppari J, Ilonen J, Veijola R, Virtanen SM, Knip M, Hyöty H. Enterovirus Infections Are Associated With the Development of Celiac Disease in a Birth Cohort Study. Front Immunol. 2020;11:604529.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Cohen R, Mahlab-Guri K, Atali M, Elbirt D. Viruses and celiac disease: what do we know? Clin Exp Med. 2023;23:2931-2939.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
81.  Olivares M, Walker AW, Capilla A, Benítez-Páez A, Palau F, Parkhill J, Castillejo G, Sanz Y. Gut microbiota trajectory in early life may predict development of celiac disease. Microbiome. 2018;6:36.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in RCA: 111]  [Article Influence: 13.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Türkiye

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or innovation: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Scientific significance: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Tonch-Cerbu AK, Doctorate Student, MD, Romania; Zeng JQ, Academic Fellow, Associate Chief Nurse, China S-Editor: Hu XY L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang YL

Write to the Help Desk