Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2017; 23(8): 1345-1352
Published online Feb 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1345
Autoantibody profiles in autoimmune hepatitis and chronic hepatitis C identifies similarities in patients with severe disease
Kawa Amin, Aram H Rasool, Ali Hattem, Taha AM Al-Karboly, Taher E Taher, Jonas Bystrom
Kawa Amin, Department of Medical Science, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Clinical Chemistry and Asthma Research Centre, Uppsala University and University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
Kawa Amin, Department of Microbiology/Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani 334, Iraq
Aram H Rasool, Laboratory Department, General Hospital of Derbandixan, Derbandixan 332, Iraq
Ali Hattem, Department of Community Health, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaimani 334, Iraq
Taha AM Al-Karboly, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sulaimani; Kurdistan Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sulaimani 334, Iraq
Taher E Taher, Jonas Bystrom, Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London, Queen Mary, University of London, Charterhouse Square, EC1M 6BQ London, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Amin K, Rasool AH, Hattem A, Al-Karboly TAM, Taher TE and Bystrom J designed the experiments for this study; Rasool AH, Hattem A and Al-Karboly TAM performed the experiments; Amin K, Rasool AH, Hattem A, Al-Karboly TAM, Taher TE and Bystrom J analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Supported by Bror Hjerpstedts Foundation, Sweden.
Institutional review board statement: Approval of the study was received from the Ethics board and the Office of the vice president for scientific affairs and postgraduate studies at the Sulimani University.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict to interest.
Data sharing statement: If they received a written request, for scientific purposes, the authors would be able to share the (anonymized) raw data used in this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:
Correspondence to: Kawa Amin, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology/Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani 334, Iraq.
Telephone: +964-7701958515
Received: September 23, 2016
Peer-review started: September 26, 2016
First decision: October 28, 2016
Revised: November 17, 2016
Accepted: December 8, 2016
Article in press: December 8, 2016
Published online: February 28, 2017


To determine how the auto-antibodies (Abs) profiles overlap in chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and correlate to liver disease.


Levels of antinuclear Ab, smooth muscle antibody (SMA) and liver/kidney microsomal-1 (LKM-1) Ab and markers of liver damage were determined in the sera of 50 patients with CHC infection, 20 AIH patients and 20 healthy controls using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and other immune assays.


We found that AIH patients had more severe liver disease as determined by elevation of total IgG, alkaline phosphatase, total serum bilirubin and serum transaminases and significantly higher prevalence of the three non-organ-specific autoantibodies (auto-Abs) than CHC patients. Antinuclear Ab, SMA and LKM-1 Ab were also present in 36% of CHC patients and related to disease severity. CHC cases positive for auto-Abs were directly comparable to AIH in respect of most markers of liver damage and total IgG. These cases had longer disease duration compared with auto-Ab negative cases, but there was no difference in gender, age or viral load. KLM-1+ Ab CHC cases showed best overlap with AIH.


Auto-Ab levels in CHC may be important markers of disease severity and positive cases have a disease similar to AIH. Auto-Abs might have a pathogenic role as indicated by elevated markers of liver damage. Future studies will unravel any novel associations between these two diseases, whether genetic or other.

Key Words: Autoantibody, Inflammatory diseases, Immune system, Hepatitis C virus, Smooth muscle antibody, Liver/kidney microsomal-1 autoantibody, Anti-nuclear antibody

Core tip: This paper aims to determine what patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) produce autoantibodies. Disease duration in CHC is linked to disease severity and autoantibodies. Patients with severe CHC resemble AIH.


Antibodies are a vital part of the immune response for recognition and elimination of invading organisms. However, when the immune system is dysfunctional, it can develop antibodies that react to self. The development of autoantibodies (auto-Abs) generally occurs during auto-immune disease, but their induction can also be a consequence of a chronic infection in susceptible individuals. A number of auto-Abs with different specificities have been identified. As some auto-Abs occurrence in plasma is disease specific, they can be used in the diagnosis and classification of autoimmune diseases[1-3]. The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes liver damage by inducing cirrhosis and can also lead to hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent studies have demonstrated that the virus may be involved in loss of tolerance to self-antigens and thereby promotion of auto-Ab production[4-6]. In particular, non-organ-specific auto-Abs (NOSAs) including smooth muscle ab (SMA), anti-nuclear ab (ANA) and liver/kidney microsomal-1 (LKM-1) ab are common and frequently found in sera of patients with chronic HCV (CHC)[7,8]. NOSA in HCV-infected patients correlate with the severity of necro-inflammation, fibrosis development, markers of liver damage: aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and levels of IgG[9].

Clinical and laboratory features of CHC can sometimes lead to a mistaken diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). AIH is characterized by a liver-specific autoimmune response, infiltrating immune cells, auto-Abs in circulation, elevated immunoglobulin and serum transaminase level, and a favourable response to immunosuppression[10,11]. In AIH, ANA, SMA, and LKM-1 Abs can differentiate the severity of the disease. The existence of detectable hepatitis C viral load with or without circulating antibodies specific to HCV can often be used to differentiate CHC from AIH[12]. These two conditions, CHC and AIH involve different management strategies; chronic HCV infection has until recently often been treated with interferon-α (IFN-α) which can provoke liver auto-immunity. The HCV infection can, in a few cases, develop into AIH, suggesting that the liver cells are damaged not only by the infection but also by an immune reaction to self[13,14]. AIH on the other hand requires immunosuppression, a treatment that could induce viral replication in cases of co-infection[11,14].

In this study, we have assessed the prevalence of ANA, SMA and LKM-1 Abs in CHC and AIH patients and correlated this with markers of liver disease to determine any overlapping features. In the study, disease severity, immunoglobulin levels and disease duration were assessed. We found that the auto-Ab profile was directly associated with severity of disease in both groups of patients and that subgroups within the patients showed a significant overlap in respect to the laboratory markers assessed.


A total of 70 patients and 20 healthy controls were recruited during the duration of this study (Table 1). These included 50 patients diagnosed with CHC and 20 patients with AIH. Approval of the study was received from the Ethics board and the Office of the Vice President for Scientific Affairs and Postgraduate Studies at the Sulimani University. CHC patients were diagnosed based on anti-HCV antibody positivity and by assessment of their HCV RNA viral load. Patients with liver damage due to excessive alcohol consumption, hepatotoxic drugs, or human immunodeficiency virus infections were excluded from the study. Patients diagnosed positive for hepatitis B surface antigen were also excluded. The diagnosis of AIH was based on the criteria established by the international AIH group. This includes predominant elevation of serum aminotransferase and IgG, exclusion of viral hepatitis, toxic or alcoholic liver injury and with a liver biopsy confirming lymphocyte infiltration indicative of autoimmune disease[15]. Some patients were diagnosed for the first time when enrolled in the study while others had been undergoing treatment for between two and 11 years. Information of age and gender was recorded for each patient. Twenty healthy gender- and age-matched blood donors served as controls.

Table 1 Distribution of study group according to age and gender.
ParameterCHC (n = 50)AIH (n = 20)HC (n = 20)
Age (yr), mean ± SD
mean ± SD33 ± 2.3837 ± 3.2237 ± 3.22
Gender, n (%)
Female24 (48)15 (75)15 (75)
Male26 (52)5 (25)5 (25)
Age (yr), mean ± SD
Female34 ± 2.2835 ± 3.4235 ± 3.42
Male33 ± 2.3847 ± 3.1247 ± 3.12
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and other assays

SMA, ANA and LKM-1 Ab in serum were assayed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (CUSABIO, Wuhan, China). Total IgG and IgM was estimated quantitatively using a biochemical assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (VITAL Diagnostics, Puteaux, France). Serum AP, ALT, AST, serum albumin and total serum bilirubin (TSB) was quantitatively determined using a biochemical assay (BIOLABO, Maizy, France).

Statistical analysis

Analysis of data was performed by using software package SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 21. Normal distribution of the data was determined using D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical differences were determined by Duncan’s test for multiple comparisons after analysis of variance. Significant differences between groups were determined using the χ2 test. A P value less than 0.05, 0.01 or 0.001 respectively, were considered statistically significant at the different levels.


In the aim of discovering overlapping features comparing CHC and AIH cases such patients were recruited and sera gathered for analysis of auto-Ab levels and levels of markers of liver damage. Table 1 shows the demographics of the CHC-, the AIH- and the healthy control-group (HC). The CHC group included 50 patients (48% female) and the mean age were 33.4 ± 2.4 years. In agreement with other studies, AIH was more common among females (gender ratio 3:1) with males being older when diagnosed (47.0 ± 3.1 years). There were no significant differences in age or gender comparing patients and HC.

One or more of the auto-Abs was detected in 36% of CHC patients’ serum (9 male, 9 female, Table 2). Reactivity for ANA was the most frequent (32%, 7 male, 9 female) while LKM-1 Ab was detectable in 22% (4 male, 7 female) and SMA in 8% (1 male, 3 female) of the cases. Also 20% of the healthy controls were positive for ANA (2 male, 2 female) but not for LKM-1 or SMA. A statistical analysis using the Chi-square test showed that there was no significant difference in the level of ANA comparing the control group and the CHC group. In AIH patients, 75% (3 male, 12 female) had at least one type of auto-Ab. ANA was also the most frequently detected, 65% (3 male, 10 female). LKM-1 Ab was identified in 9 cases (45%) all of which were female. SMA was not detected in any of the AIH patient’s serum. A statistical analysis showed significant differences between the AIH and CHC groups of patients regarding auto-Ab prevalence (AIH patients were more often positive for the auto-Abs, P = 0.0031, Table 2). The level of ANA and LKM-1, however, tended to be highest in CHC patients plasma (for ANA level in CHC: 4.6 ± 2.7 pg/mL and in AIH, 3.3 ± 1.8 pg/mL, for LKM-1, level in CHC: 4.9 ± 2.8 and in AIH: 4.0 ± 1.4 pg/mL).

Table 2 Distribution and comparison of autoantibodies between the chronic hepatitis C and the autoimmune hepatitis patient group n (%).
(n = 50)(n = 20)(n = 20)P value
SMA4 (8)0 (0)0 (0)
LKM-111 (22)9 (45)0 (0)
ANA16 (32)13 (65)4 (20)
Total31 (36)23 (75)4 (20)0.00311

Next, we assessed the level of IgG in the patients’ serum. As expected, the highest level was found in the serum from the AIH patients (Table 3). There was no significant difference in IgG level comparing CHC and AIH, but the levels were significantly higher than the healthy controls (Table 3). In contrast, although significantly higher than the healthy controls, the mean concentration of IgM remained within the normal range in the CHC and AIH groups. The AIH patients IgM level was significantly higher than the CHCs’ and the HCs’.

Table 3 Estimation of IgG and IgM and comparison between study groups (mean ± SD).
GroupsIgG (mg/dL)IgM (mg/dL)
CHC1841 ± 66.44176 ± 5.561
AIH2054 ± 152.62228 ± 5.561
HC1098 ± 57.691127 ± 4.801

All of the markers of liver damage (AP, ALT AST, and TSB) except serum albumin assessed in the serum were elevated above the level of the HC’s for both the AIH patients and the CHC patients (Table 4). However, in the AIH group, the levels of these markers were significantly higher than in the CHC group (Duncan’s test, P < 0.05). Only the level of TSB was at a similar level in both patient groups.

Table 4 Comparison of the markers of liver injury among study groups (mean ± SD).
GroupsAP (UI/L)ALT (UI/L)AST (UI/L)ALB (g/dL)TSB (mg/dL)
CHC296 ± 19.90130 ± 1.32145 ± 1.7113.8 ± 0.1121.0 ± 0.272
AIH373 ± 32.10137 ± 3.20156 ± 4.1013.3 ± 0.1514.0 ± 1.571
HC171 ± 8.30119 ± 1.00128 ± 1.2814.0 ± 0.0620.6 ± 0.052

To determine whether the presence of auto-Abs in the CHC group was associated with worse disease progression we compared the level of liver damage markers from patients with and without auto-Abs. We found that the duration of infection was twice as long for patients with auto-Abs compared to without. Furthermore, patients with auto-Abs had significantly higher levels of IgG, AP, AST, ALT and TSB (Table 5). This finding is in agreement with that of a previous study[9]. The age and gender of the patients, viral load, IgM, and serum albumin did, however, not differ in the two CHC subgroups.

Table 5 Comparison of different parameters in chronic hepatitis C with and without autoantibodies (mean ± SD).
ParametersCHC with autoantibodiesCHC without autoantibodiesP value
M/F (9/9)M/F (17/15)
Mean age (yr)33 ± 1634 ± 14.30.36 NS
Viral load (copy/mL)8.3 × 105± 10.4 × 1063 × 106± 19 × 1050.52 NS
Duration of infection (mo)21.3 ± 12.311 ± 7.30.0022
IgG (mg/dL)2109 ± 462.41630 ± 3230.0011
IgM (mg/dL)190 ± 25172 ± 45.30.3 NS
AP (U/L)428 ± 91.5221 ± 1040.0011
AST (U/L)52 ± 12.741 ± 9.810.0071
ALT (U/L)36 ± 9.727 ± 7.20.0071
S. Albumin (g/dL)3.8 ± 0.873.9 ± 0.720.47 NS
TSB (mg/dL)1.5 ± 3.10.8 ± 0.580.0011

The CHC patients with auto-Abs, the longest duration of infection and the highest level of markers of liver damage were directly comparable with the AIH patients (Table 5). These two groups were remarkably similar in respect to IgG levels and most markers of liver injury (Table 6). Only the levels of IgM and TSB were higher in the AIH patients (P < 0.05).

Table 6 Autoantibody positive chronic hepatitis C and autoimmune hepatitis, comparison of different parameters (mean ± SD).
ParametersAutoantibody positive CHC (n = 18)Autoantibody positive AIH (n = 20)P value
IgG (mg/dL)2109 ± 2492053 ± 710.50.42 NS
IgM (mg/dL)190 ± 26.8227 ± 63.10.0271
AP (U/L)428 ± 37.9373 ± 166.10.33 NS
AST (U/L)52 ± 8.4257 ± 18.640.42 NS
ALT (U/L)36 ± 5.537 ± 15.60.81 NS
TSB (mg/dL)1.5 ± 4.14.0 ± 7.00.00332
Albumin (g/L)3.8 ± 0.783.3 ± 0.690.12 NS

Further, we found that the LKM-1 Abs present only in sera of female patients in the AIH group. LKM-1 Ab positive AIH patients are often young females with worse prognosis[16,17]. In our study, 22% of the CHC patients were positive for LKM-1 Ab. However, such positivity was found among both male and female subjects (5 male, 6 female). Importantly, our immunological and biochemical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between these two subgroups of LKM-1+ CHC and AIH in respect of IgG, AP, AST, ALT, albumin or TSB. The only difference was the concentration of IgM (Table 7).

Table 7 Comparison between liver/kidney microsomal-1 positive patients in chronic hepatitis C and autoimmune hepatitis groups (mean ± SD).
P value
LKM-1+ in AIHLKM-1+ in CHC
M/F (0/9)M/F (5/6)
Mean age (yr)31 ± 1035 ± 190.51 NS
IgG (mg/dL)2205 ± 566.12522 ± 295.60.34 NS
IgM (mg/dL)262 ± 41.21185 ± 26.260.0011
AP (U/mL)404 ± 146.7472 ± 30.57 NS
AST (U/mL)64 ± 12.7157 ± 37.920.22 NS
ALT (U/mL)41 ± 9.6440 ± 5.410.45 NS
S. Albumin (g/dL)3.4 ± 0.83.9 ± 0.90.5 NS
TSB (mg/dL)3.4 ± 4.971.9 ± 3.900.06 NS

In this study, we have shown that certain patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection develop an auto-Ab profile similar to that of AIH. This group of patients had longer disease duration and more extensive liver damage, thereby sharing many features of AIH. The comparison of LKM-1 Ab positive patient emphasised the similarity between severe cases of CHC and the AIH group. Only IgM levels discriminated these two groups of patients. Such knowledge is important when interpreting biomarker results from patients with liver disease. Furthermore, the findings suggest an underlying similarity in disease aetiology in these cases of auto-Ab positive CHC and AIH patients.

It is important to differentiate between CHC and AIH as their treatment is completely different[18]. Thus although auto-Abs and elevated liver enzymes might suggest a diagnosis of AIH, patients require further investigation to exclude CHC. When comparing NOSA production from the CHC and AIH patients in our study there was a significant difference, underscoring the overall more severe progression of the disease in the patients with autoimmune disease. In other studies of CHC 6%-41% was positive for ANA, 5%-66% for SMA, and up to 86% for LKM-1 Abs[12,19-22]. There are several reasons to explain why such a variation in levels of auto-Abs has been observed. ANA measured by indirect immune-fluorescence of Hep-2 cells or by different ELISAs produce variable results dependent on the method used[23]. Regional differences in prevalence of autoimmune manifestations in HCV might influence the results[5,24]. Furthermore, differences in auto-Ab levels might be due to the local ethnic background. Hence, in HCV infected patients from Crete or Sweden, very few showed positivity for LKM-1[25,26].

It is not known why 36% of the CHC infected patients in our study develop auto-Abs. Liver damage in CHC cases results in release of auto-antigens to which the immune system can react[27]. As stated above, infection duration might be one factor in the development of auto-Abs. Other studies have, however, failed to identify an association between infection duration and NOSA levels[9,28]. Other factors such as presence of the HLR-DR3 genotype might be more important for auto-Ab development[29].

AIH is known to induce liver damage[11]. CHC patients with auto-Abs and long-standing disease had liver damage at the same level as the AIH cases. The appearance of auto-Ab positive CHC patients can show such high similarity to AIH that they can be misdiagnosed. This is especially the case for patients with extrahepatic symptoms[10,11]. The presence of circulating antibodies specific to HCV is chief for correct diagnosis[12]. The liver damage experienced during AIH is induced by infiltrated inflammatory cells which can be visualized by a liver biopsy[11]. Indeed a liver biopsy is necessary for confirmation of AIH. Immune cells are, however, present in the liver albeit to a lesser extent also in CHC patients with serum auto-antibodies[30]. We speculate that the severe disease seen in AIH and CHC with auto-Abs is mediated by similar mechanisms and that the auto-Abs can contribute to liver damage in these cases.

Sixty-five percent of the AIH patients had any of the three auto-Abs investigated in this study. As previously reported, ANA was the most prevalent auto-Ab[9]. LKM-1 Ab is a serological marker for one subtype of the autoimmune disease, AIH-2 which is more prevalent among adolescent women and young girls[16,17]. In this study LKM-1 Ab was detected in 45% of samples which is an unusually high proportion. This might be explained by that the study contained many young women. It is also possible that the genotype associated with the development of LKM-1 antibodies is more prevalent in the area from where patients were recruited[31]. LKM-1 has been shown to recognize CYP2D7 which is expressed on the surface of hepatocytes. Such self-recognition, unique for LKM-1 among NOSA, could explain the worse disease in these patients[32]. Possibly of importance, epitopes within CYP2D7 share homology with HCV proteins[33]. CYP2D6 epitopes can induce both poly-reactive B cells and T cells[34]. It has been proposed that polymorphisms in the CYP2D6 gene lead to altered amino acids sequences and more immunogenic epitopes[35]. It is not known whether CYP2D6 polymorphisms could differentiate AIH-1 and AIH-2. There are, however, other differences between the AIH subtypes; AIH-2 share an antibody profile with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 which is caused by a mutation in the AIRE gene, leading to a break in tolerance[31]. In this study the levels of both ANA and LKM-1 tended to be higher in CHC than in AIH. Other studies have detected higher level of LKM-1 in AIH-2, than in CHC[36]. Further studies are required to explain why LKM-1 and ANA is higher in sera from the CHC patients than from AIH patients in this study. High level of LKM-1 Ab in CHC has previously been reported in paediatric cohorts[37]. Similar to our findings, LKM-1 Ab have previously been reported in HCV where the titre is associated with disease severity[38]. It is not known whether there is any relationship between patients with CHC, AIH and LKM-1 Ab or whether these CHC cases are more prone to develop AIH. Although no longer commonly used, it has been proposed that IFNα therapy for CHC, can induce autoimmune symptoms in LKM-1+ individuals[39].

SMA was detected in none of the patients in the AIH group, which is in disagreement with previous studies. As many as 70% to 80% of AIH cases have been described as SMA positive[40]. The successful treatment of our patients might be one explanation for the lack of SMA+ patients as this is this is associated with the disappearance of serum ANA and SMA[41]. It should be pointed out that seronegativity in AIH have been described in 1%-34% of cases (in our study 25%) underscoring the heterogeneity of this autoimmune disease[42].

High IgG levels are a distinctive feature of AIH[43-45]. In our study, however, there was no significant difference in levels comparing AIH and CHC. Other studies have reported elevated levels of IgG in both AIH and CHC patients[38]. The level of IgG has previously been associated with severity of disease among chronic HCV infected patients which is in line with our findings. Both diseases are characterized by activation of B cells and a large number of plasma cells[6]. We speculate that many of these released auto-Abs are of the IgG subclass which can explain the elevated level of these Abs in serum from both patient groups. This polyclonal activation is likely taking place either as a consequence of chronic antigen stimulation or due to loss of immune regulation[46,47]. Our interest is in Th17 cells that have an established pathogenic function in autoimmune diseases[48]. Th17 cells are present in the liver of both AIH and CHC patients[30]. Further studies will determine whether these cells could contribute to B cell activation or generation of an inflammatory environment that promotes auto-Ab production[49,50].

In conclusion, we found AIH-related auto-Abs associated with HCV infection. The emergence of auto-Abs in CHC might be infection duration dependent, but it is not related to gender, the age of patients and serum viral load. Auto-Abs, especially LKM-1, in CHC cases might have pathogenic role leading to more severe disease which is indicated by an alteration of liver function tests and elevation of total IgG. It is not known whether auto-Ab prevalence is due to prolonged disease or whether certain patients are more susceptible for their development. We conclude that auto-Ab levels in CHC may be important markers of disease severity and that these patients have a disease similar to AIH. Future studies will unravel any further associations between these two diseases, whether genetic or other.


Worldwide, 130-200 million individuals are infected with hepatitis C. Although current therapies control the disease rather well, 80% of the infected patients develop chronic hepatitis C (CHC). It is not known why some of the patients develop more severe disease. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of the liver that has a prevalence of 10-20/100000 individuals. This disease can be controlled by using immunosuppressive therapies. In this paper the authors show that the presence of non-organ specific autoantibodies (NOSA) in both CHC and AIH is associated with severe disease. Although overall CHC is less damaging to the liver than AIH cases, a subgroup can be defined with more severe pathology. This CHC subgroup is defined by liver/kidney microsomal-1 (LKM-1) positivity.

Research frontiers

In the field of autoimmunity, novel therapies have recently been developed as well as better understanding of the aetiology of disease. Recent discoveries of novel immune cells and their dysregulation in the autoimmunity have increased the knowledge of disease aetiology and provided prospect for development of novel therapies. Novel genome-, transcriptome- and epigenome-sequencing techniques have given important insight of autoimmune associations to certain genomic regions genomic and the immunological heterogeneity underlying disease. As some subpopulations of CHC patients have antibodies that react to self, we speculate that the analysis of novel immune cells and comparison of immune cells from CHC patients with AIH using novel genomic and epigenomic tools can provide disease related knowledge useful for novel future treatment-strategies of these patients.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Th17 cells have recently been implicated in the development of AIH and response to hepatitis C virus infection in the liver. Although it is not known how these cells confer pathology, studies from other autoimmune diseases has suggested that the cells support B cell germinal centre formation and production of auto-antibodies. This can be both through IL-21 production by Th17 cells and through transdifferentiation of Th17 cells to follicular T cells. Studies have shown that polymorphisms in the TNFα gene are associated with development of AIH. We are currently analysing how TNFα is suppressing Th17 cell expansion in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Future studies by authors would aim to determine the role of Th17 cells and possibly TNFα in the development of autoantibodies (auto-Abs) in AIH and LKM-1+ CHC.


The current study has characterized the immune response in CHC and AIH in homogenous patient cohorts. The findings differentiated CHC and AIH patients into different subgroups. These findings open the way for future studies of immune cell mediated induction of autoimmunity in CHC and AIH. We aim to characterize immune cells present in the liver and the peripheral blood of the patient cohorts. Further, genome wide association studies, analysis for expression quantitative trait loci and whole genome epigenome will be undertaken to gain better understanding of the autoimmune disease process which is regulating the immune cells. Findings from these studies will be correlated to disease severity, auto-Ab levels and other markers of liver disease. Importantly the knowledge gained will provide the possibility to discover overlapping genomic/epigenomic features between AIH and the subgroup of LKM-1 positive CHC patients with severe disease.


The manuscript by Amin et al compares the incidence of auto-Abs associated with AIH, immunoglobulin levels and markers of liver disease in groups of age-matched subjects with autoimmune hepatitis, CHC infection and healthy controls.


Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Sweden

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Grant MD S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: O’Neill M E- Editor: Zhang FF

1.  Bogdanos DP, Invernizzi P, Mackay IR, Vergani D. Autoimmune liver serology: current diagnostic and clinical challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3374-3387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Elkon K, Casali P. Nature and functions of autoantibodies. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:491-498.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME, Meroni PL. Autoantibodies. Kindlington: Elsevier press, 2014. .  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Mackay IR, Leskovsek NV, Rose NR. Cell damage and autoimmunity: a critical appraisal. J Autoimmun. 2008;30:5-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Manns MP, Rambusch EG. Autoimmunity and extrahepatic manifestations in hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 1999;31 Suppl 1:39-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Yang DH, Ho LJ, Lai JH. Useful biomarkers for assessment of hepatitis C virus infection-associated autoimmune disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2962-2970.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Bogdanos DP, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Non-organ-specific autoantibodies in hepatitis C virus infection: do they matter? Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:508-510.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Himoto T, Nishioka M. Autoantibodies in liver disease: important clues for the diagnosis, disease activity and prognosis. Auto Immun Highlights. 2013;4:39-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Chrétien P, Chousterman M, Abd Alsamad I, Ozenne V, Rosa I, Barrault C, Lons T, Hagège H. Non-organ-specific autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis C patients: association with histological activity and fibrosis. J Autoimmun. 2009;32:201-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Gatselis NK, Zachou K, Papamichalis P, Koukoulis GK, Gabeta S, Dalekos GN, Rigopoulou EI. Comparison of simplified score with the revised original score for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis: a new or a complementary diagnostic score? Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:807-812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Oo YH, Hubscher SG, Adams DH. Autoimmune hepatitis: new paradigms in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Hepatol Int. 2010;4:475-493.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Cassani F, Cataleta M, Valentini P, Muratori P, Giostra F, Francesconi R, Muratori L, Lenzi M, Bianchi G, Zauli D. Serum autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis C: comparison with autoimmune hepatitis and impact on the disease profile. Hepatology. 1997;26:561-566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Badiani RG, Becker V, Perez RM, Matos CA, Lemos LB, Lanzoni VP, Andrade LE, Dellavance A, Silva AE, Ferraz ML. Is autoimmune hepatitis a frequent finding among HCV patients with intense interface hepatitis? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3704-3708.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Metwally K, Abdo SA, Badr S, Abdurrhman MA, Saafan NK, Abdel- Bary AM, Abbas MH. Serum Autoantibodies in Chronic Hepatitis C: Comparison with Hepatitis C/Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndrome in Egypt. J Lif Sci. 2012;9:1086-1091.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Sharma NK, Sherker AH. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Natural History of Chronic Hepatitis C. Chronic Viral Hepatitis. 2010;33-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Mackay IR. Autoimmune Hepatitis: From the Clinic to the Diagnistics Laboratory. Lab Med. 2011;42:224-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Salamunić I. Laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune diseases - new technologies, old dilemmas. Biochemia Medica. 2010;20:45-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Heintges T, Niederau C. Differentiation between autoimmune hepatitis and hepatitis C virus related liver disease. Z Gastroenterol. 1993;31:285-288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Bogdanos DP, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Non-organ-specific autoantibodies in children with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1505; author reply 1505-1506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Marconcini ML, Fayad L, Shiozawa MB, Dantas-Correa EB, Lucca Schiavon Ld, Narciso-Schiavon JL. Autoantibody profile in individuals with chronic hepatitis C. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46:147-153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Muratori P, Muratori L, Stroffolini T, Pappas G, Terlizzi P, Ferrari R, Loffreda S, Cassani F, Rapicetta M, Guadagnino V. Prevalence of non-organ specific autoantibodies in HCV-infected subjects in the general population. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;131:118-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Zeman MV, Hirschfield GM. Autoantibodies and liver disease: uses and abuses. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010;24:225-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Emlen W, O’Neill L. Clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies: comparison of detection with immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1612-1618.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Lenzi M, Johnson PJ, McFarlane IG, Ballardini G, Smith HM, McFarlane BM, Bridger C, Vergani D, Bianchi FB, Williams R. Antibodies to hepatitis C virus in autoimmune liver disease: evidence for geographical heterogeneity. Lancet. 1991;338:277-280.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Lindgren S, Braun HB, Michel G, Nemeth A, Nilsson S, Thome-Kromer B, Eriksson S. Absence of LKM-1 antibody reactivity in autoimmune and hepatitis-C-related chronic liver disease in Sweden. Swedish Internal Medicine Liver club. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:175-178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Drygiannakis D, Lionis C, Drygiannakis I, Pappas G, Kouroumalis E. Low prevalence of liver-kidney microsomal autoantibodies of type 1 (LKM1) in hepatitis C seropositive subjects on Crete, Greece. BMC Gastroenterol. 2001;1:4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Dalekos GN, Obermayer-Straub P, Bartels M, Maeda T, Kayser A, Braun S, Loges S, Schmidt E, Gershwin ME, Manns MP. Cytochrome P450 2A6: a new hepatic autoantigen in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2003;39:800-806.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Yee LJ, Kelleher P, Goldin RD, Marshall S, Thomas HC, Alberti A, Chiaramonte M, Braconier JH, Hall AJ, Thursz MR. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: correlates of positivity and clinical relevance. J Viral Hepat. 2004;11:459-464.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA. Histological findings in chronic hepatitis C with autoimmune features. Hepatology. 1997;26:459-466.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Oo YH, Banz V, Kavanagh D, Liaskou E, Withers DR, Humphreys E, Reynolds GM, Lee-Turner L, Kalia N, Hubscher SG. CXCR3-dependent recruitment and CCR6-mediated positioning of Th-17 cells in the inflamed liver. J Hepatol. 2012;57:1044-1051.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Mackay IR. A 50-year experience with autoimmune hepatitis: and where are we now? J Gastroenterol. 2011;46 Suppl 1:17-28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Muratori L, Parola M, Ripalti A, Robino G, Muratori P, Bellomo G, Carini R, Lenzi M, Landini MP, Albano E. Liver/kidney microsomal antibody type 1 targets CYP2D6 on hepatocyte plasma membrane. Gut. 2000;46:553-561.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Manns MP, Griffin KJ, Sullivan KF, Johnson EF. LKM-1 autoantibodies recognize a short linear sequence in P450IID6, a cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1370-1378.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Ma Y, Bogdanos DP, Hussain MJ, Underhill J, Bansal S, Longhi MS, Cheeseman P, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Polyclonal T-cell responses to cytochrome P450IID6 are associated with disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis type 2. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:868-882.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Bogdanos DP, McFarlane IG. Cytochrome P450 2A6 meets P450 2D6: an enigma of viral infections and autoimmunity. J Hepatol. 2003;39:860-863.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Lunel F, Abuaf N, Frangeul L, Grippon P, Perrin M, Le Coz Y, Valla D, Borotto E, Yamamoto AM, Huraux JM. Liver/kidney microsome antibody type 1 and hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 1992;16:630-636.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Gregorio GV, Pensati P, Iorio R, Vegnente A, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Autoantibody prevalence in children with liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998;112:471-476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Ferri S, Muratori L, Quarneti C, Muratori P, Menichella R, Pappas G, Granito A, Ballardini G, Bianchi FB, Lenzi M. Clinical features and effect of antiviral therapy on anti-liver/kidney microsomal antibody type 1 positive chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2009;50:1093-1101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Muratori L, Lenzi M, Cataleta M, Giostra F, Cassani F, Ballardini G, Zauli D, Bianchi FB. Interferon therapy in liver/kidney microsomal antibody type 1-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 1994;21:199-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Vergani D, Alvarez F, Bianchi FB, Cançado EL, Mackay IR, Manns MP, Nishioka M, Penner E. Liver autoimmune serology: a consensus statement from the committee for autoimmune serology of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. J Hepatol. 2004;41:677-683.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA, Moore SB. HLA DRB1*13 as a risk factor for type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in North American patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:522-528.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Czaja AJ. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:610-624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ, Parés A, Dalekos GN, Krawitt EL, Bittencourt PL, Porta G, Boberg KM, Hofer H. Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2008;48:169-176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Homberg JC, Abuaf N, Bernard O, Islam S, Alvarez F, Khalil SH, Poupon R, Darnis F, Lévy VG, Grippon P. Chronic active hepatitis associated with antiliver/kidney microsome antibody type 1: a second type of “autoimmune” hepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;7:1333-1339.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Manns MP, Czaja AJ, Gorham JD, Krawitt EL, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D, Vierling JM. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:2193-2213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Delogu LG, Deidda S, Delitala G, Manetti R. Infectious diseases and autoimmunity. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5:679-687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Sfriso P, Ghirardello A, Botsios C, Tonon M, Zen M, Bassi N, Bassetto F, Doria A. Infections and autoimmunity: the multifaceted relationship. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:385-395.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Bystrom J, Taher TE, Muhyaddin MS, Clanchy FI, Mangat P, Jawad AS, Williams RO, Mageed RA. Harnessing the Therapeutic Potential of Th17 Cells. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:205156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Mitsdoerffer M, Lee Y, Jäger A, Kim HJ, Korn T, Kolls JK, Cantor H, Bettelli E, Kuchroo VK. Proinflammatory T helper type 17 cells are effective B-cell helpers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14292-14297.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Jaffar Z, Ferrini ME, Herritt LA, Roberts K. Cutting edge: lung mucosal Th17-mediated responses induce polymeric Ig receptor expression by the airway epithelium and elevate secretory IgA levels. J Immunol. 2009;182:4507-4511.  [PubMed]  [DOI]