Brief Article Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2013; 19(40): 6883-6887
Published online Oct 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6883
Expression and significance of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in benign and malignant ascites
Jing Lu, Xiao-Feng Li, Li-Xia Kong, Su-Huan Liao, Department of Gastroenterology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China
Lin Ma, Department of Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China
Chang-You Jiang, Health Bureau of Jinwan District, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: Lu J performed the research and drafted the article; Li XF designed the research and revised the article; Kong LX and Ma L critically revised the article; Liao SH and Jiang CY analyzed the data and interpreted the results.
Supported by Fund of Science and Technology Plan Project in Zhuhai, No. PC20061084
Correspondence to: Dr. Lin Ma, Department of Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China. linma1227@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-756-2528845 Fax: +86-756-2528845
Received: June 2, 2013
Revised: August 8, 2013
Accepted: September 3, 2013
Published online: October 28, 2013

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the mRNA expression of cyclooxygensae-2 (COX-2) in benign and malignant ascites, and to explore the difference in COX-2 mRNA expression among different diseases.

METHODS: A total of 36 samples were collected from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University and divided into two experimental groups: benign ascites (n = 21) and malignant ascites (n = 15). Benign ascites included cirrhotic ascites (n = 10) and tuberculous ascites (n = 5). Malignant ascites included oophoroma (n = 7), cancer of colon (n = 5), cancer of the liver (n = 6), gastric cancer (n = 2), and bladder carcinoma (n = 1). The mRNA expression of COX-2 in ascites was examined with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology, and the positive rate of COX-2 mRNA was compared between different diseases.

RESULTS: The positive rate of COX-2 mRNA in malignant ascites was 42.9% (9/21), which was significantly higher than in benign ascites, 6.7% (1/15), difference being significant between these two groups (χ2 = 4.051, P = 0.044). The proportion of the positive rate in the malignant ascites was as follows: ovarian cancers 57.1% (4/7), colon cancer 40.0% (2/5), liver cancer 33.3% (2/6), gastric cancer 50.0% (1/2), and bladder cancer 0.00% (0/1). However, there was no significant difference in COX-2 mRNA expression among various tumors with malignant ascites (χ2 = 1.614, P = 0.806). Among the benign ascites, COX-2 mRNA levels were different between the tuberculous ascites (0/5) and cirrhotic ascites (1/10), but there was no significant difference (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION: COX-2 mRNA, detected by RT-PCR, is useful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ascites, which also has potential value in the clinical diagnosis of tumors.

Key Words: Ascites, Cyclooxygensae-2 mRNA, Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Malignant tumor

Core tip: Ascites is a common symptom caused by a variety of diseases, the differential diagnosis between benign ascites and malignant ascites is one of the most important issues in clinical practice. Cytologic examinations and ascites tumor markers can provide important evidence, but their sensitivity and specificity are far from satisfactory. Our study aimed to explore the difference in cyclooxygensae-2 (COX-2) mRNA expression among different diseases. Our research suggests that COX-2mRNA can be detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, but there are no significant differences in the expression of COX-2 mRNA among various disease types with benign or malignant ascites.



INTRODUCTION

Ascites is a gastroenterological term for an accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, which might result from cirrhosis, tuberculous peritonitis or a malignant tumor.

The detection of exfoliated ascites cells is often used to identify these diseases in the clinic, but there is no economic, practical, or effective index with a high specificity. Therefore, it is important to discriminate benign from malignant ascites for clinical diagnosis and treatment[1,2].

In recent years, cyclooxygensae-2 (COX-2) has been extensively studied as an inducible expression protein, and has been detected in various tumor tissues in epidemiologic and cytologic researches[3,4], such as pancreatic cancer, colorectal carcinoma, non-small lung cancer and so on. Research has found that COX-2 expression is unregulated in precancerous lesions and preinvasive carcinoma and positively correlates with tumor invasion and lymphatic metastasis[5,6]. Therefore, increasing expression of COX-2 might occur in the early stages of the tumor and the detection of COX-2 level is helpful for early diagnosis.

However, there are only few studies regarding COX-2 expression in benign and malignant ascites. We employed reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology to detect the expression level of COX-2 in benign and malignant ascites, and analyzed the difference in mRNA expression of COX-2 among different diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects

A total of 36 patients with ascites who underwent abdominocentesis at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between August 2011 and March 2012 were selected. The subjects were divided into benign and malignant groups according to medical history, physical examination, B ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), pathology and the presence of exfoliated tumor cells. There were 15 patients with benign ascites, including nine males and six females, aged 43-75 years with an average age of 62.5 ± 1.8 years; the patients consisted of 10 cases of cirrhosis and five cases of tuberculous peritonitis according to disease type. There were 21 patients with malignant ascites, including 11 males and 10 females, aged 41-79 years with an average age of 58 ± 2.3 years; the patients consisted of seven cases of ovarian cancer, five cases of colon cancer, six cases of liver cancer, two cases of gastric cancer and one case of bladder cancer according to disease type.

The samples were centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 15 min immediately after collection from the patients, and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was stored in -80  °C refrigerator for total RNA extraction.

The sample collection was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital and all patients provided written informed consent.

RT-PCR

Primer design: The gene sequences of the primers were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 software according to the literature[5,6] and mRNA sequences for human COX-2 reported by NCBI; GAPDH was selected as the positive control primer for RT-PCR and synthesized by the Shanghai ShengGong Biological Engineering Co., Ltd., China (Table 1).

Table 1 Primer sequences of cyclooxygensae-2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes.
PrimerPrimer sequenceProduct size
COX-2Forward primer5’-CTTGGGTGTCAAAGGTAA-3’581 bp
Reverse primer5’-AGGGACTTGAGGAGGGTA-3’
GAPDHForward primer5’-GTGGGGCGCCAGGCACCA-3’146 bp
Reverse primer5’-CTCCTATGTCACGCACATTC-3’

Total RNA extraction: Total RNA was extracted from benign and malignant ascites with RNA extraction reagent (Trizol, Invitrogen, United States), and its content and purity were measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometry [1.9 < D(260)/D(280) < 2.1].

Synthesis of cDNA by reverse transcription: Reverse transcription was performed to synthesize cDNA with the Avian Myeloblastosis Virus (AMV) Reverse Transcriptase Kit, which contained AMV reverse transcriptase and olig(dt)18 primer. The RT-PCR reaction mixture of 10 μL contained 1 μL extracted total RNA, 2 μL MgCl2, 1 μL 10 × RNA PCR buffer, 3.75 μL RNase free dH2O, 1 μL dNTP mixture, 0.25 μL RNase inhibitor, 0.5 μL AMV reverse transcriptase and 0.5 μL Oligo dT-adaptor primer. The reaction conditions were set at 30 °C for 10 min, 50 °C for 30 min, 99 °C for 5 min and 5 °C for 5 min.

PCR amplification: After reverse transcription, cDNA was used as the template in PCR amplification with primers for COX-2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); a negative control was established. The PCR reaction mixture of 50 μL contained 3 μL MgCl2, 4 μL 10 × LA PCR buffer II (Mg² + free), 31.75 μL sterilized distilled water, 0.25 μL TaKaRa LA Taq and 1 μL the COX-2 or GAPDH primers. The PCR cycle consisted of the following steps: denaturing at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 1.5 min, which was repeated for 30 cycles. Amplification products were utilized for electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel, and were observed and photographed under ultraviolet light.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 13.0 software, and qualitative data was described by frequency and rate; the comparison between groups of qualitative data was made using the χ2 test with Yates’ continuity correction and Fisher’s exact probability test; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS
mRNA expression of COX-2 in benign and malignant ascites

The positive rate of COX-2 mRNA in malignant ascites was 42.9% (9/21), which was significantly higher than in benign ascites, 6.7% (1/15), the difference being significant between the two groups (χ2 = 4.051, P = 0.044), (Table 2).

Table 2 mRNA expression of cyclooxygensae-2 n (%).
GroupCOX-2 mRNA expression
χ2P value
PositiveNegative
In benign and malignant ascites14.0510.044
Benign ascites1 (6.7)14 (93.3)
Malignant ascites9 (42.9)12 (57.1)
Among different disease types in benign group21.000
Cirrhosis with ascites1 (6.7)9 (60)
Tuberculous ascites0 (0.0)5 (33.3)
Among different disease types in malignant group31.6140.806
Ovarian cancer4 (19.0)3 (14.3)
Colon cancer2 (9.5)3 (14.3)
Liver cancer2 (9.5)4 (19.0)
Gastric cancer1 (4.8)1 (4.8)
Bladder cancer0 (0.0)1 (4.8)
mRNA expression of COX-2 among different disease types in benign group

Among the benign ascites, COX-2 mRNA levels were different between the tuberculous ascites (0/5) and cirrhotic ascites (1/10), but the difference being not significant (P = 1.000), (Table 2).

mRNA expression of COX-2 among different disease types in malignant group

The proportion of the positive rate in the malignant ascites was as follows: ovarian cancers 57.1% (4/7), colon cancer 40.0% (2/5), liver cancer 33.3% (2/6), gastric cancer 50.0% (1/2), and bladder cancer 0.00% (0/1). However, there was no significant difference in COX-2 mRNA expression among various tumors with malignant ascites (χ2 = 1.614, P = 0.806; P > 0.05), (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

COX, or prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PGH), is a major rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandin, which is able to metabolize arachidonic acid into prostaglandin products[7-9]. COX-2, an inducible protein expression, is absent in normal cells and tissues, but is rapidly synthesized and expressed under pathological conditions or after stimulation (such as inflammation, hypoxia, laser radiation, ultraviolet radiation, etc.). COX-2 is involved in a variety of pathophysiological processes, such as the occurrence and development of inflammation and cancer[10]. At present, mRNA expression of COX-2 in various tumor tissues has been extensively investigated; increasing numbers of research have demonstrated that COX-2 expression is unregulated in precancerous lesions and preinvasive carcinoma and positively correlates with tumor invasion and lymphatic metastasis[11-14]. Therefore, increased expression of COX-2 might occur in the early stage of the tumor and the detection of COX-2 level is helpful for early diagnosis[15,16].

Ascites is a common symptom of many diseases and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ascites is important in clinical practice. So far, smear tests of exfoliated cells from ascites and the detection of tumor markers, such as CA-125, CA19-9 and AFP, have been employed to identify ascites induced by malignant tumors, but these indices are far from satisfactory in terms of sensitivity and specificity, so it is important to search for a new indicator of benign and malignant ascites[17-21] Since COX-2 has a close relationship with tumors, its expression in malignant ascites has become an issue that is worth exploring.

We used RT-PCR to assess the mRNA expression of COX-2 in 21 cases of malignant ascites. The positive rate of COX-2 mRNA was 42.9% (9/21), which was significantly higher than in benign ascites, 6.7% (1/15) (P < 0.05). This result indicated that the measurement of COX-2 mRNA facilitates the identification of benign and malignant ascites and has a potential value for clinical diagnosis and screening of tumors. In previous studies on COX-2, its expression was usually detected in malignant tumor tissues[22-24], but our experiment used ascites as the samples. They were convenient to collect from patients, with less pain and being easy for clinical application. In addition, COX-2 is absent in normal cells and tissues as an inducible expression protein with specificity, so is a potential indicator for the identification of benign and malignant ascites, and an effective supplement to common indices, such as CA125, CA19-9 and AFP.

There were no significant differences in the expression of COX-2 mRNA among various disease types with benign or malignant ascites (P > 0.05), which was probably associated with the small number of samples and requires further confirmation. We employed one step RT-PCR, which was easy to perform, required little contact with experimental samples and avoided unnecessary contamination, and also facilitated further research and the development of clinical detection kits.

In conclusion, differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ascites is of importance and is helpful for designing a treatment plan. We hope our study can provide a new insight to explore this field in the future.

COMMENTS
Background

In recent years, cyclooxygensae-2 (COX-2) has been extensively studied as an inducible expression protein, and has been detected in various tumor tissues in epidemiological and cytological research. Therefore, increased expression of COX-2 might occur in the early stage of the tumor and the detection of COX-2 level is helpful for early diagnosis.

Research frontiers

At present, mRNA expression of COX-2 in various tumor tissues has been extensively investigated; more and more research has demonstrated that COX-2 expression is unregulated in precancerous lesions and preinvasive carcinoma and positively correlates with tumor invasion and lymphatic metastasis. Therefore, increased expression of COX-2 might occur in the early stages of the tumor and the detection of COX-2 level is helpful for early diagnosis.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This study employed RT-PCR to assess the mRNA expression of COX-2 in 21 cases of malignant ascites. The positive rate of COX-2 mRNA was 42.9% (9/21), which was significantly higher than in benign ascites, 6.7% (1/15), (P < 0.05). This result indicated that the measurement of COX-2 mRNA facilitates the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ascites and has a potential value for clinical diagnosis and screening of tumors.

Applications

Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ascites is of importance and is helpful for designing a treatment plan. The study can provide a new insight to this field in the future.

Peer review

This is an interesting manuscript about mRNA expression of COX-2 in benign and malignant ascites. The authors made a good research on this topic. Differences in COX-2 mRNA expression among different diseases were explored. The data is well present and discussed.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers Ehrenpreis ED, Kalambokis G S- Editor Wang JL L- Editor Ma JY E- Editor Zhang DN

References
1.  Metzgeroth G, Kuhn C, Schultheis B, Hehlmann R, Hastka J. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and immunocytology in carcinomatous effusions. Cytopathology. 2008;19:205-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Gu H, Deng XY, Yan L, Zhang GY. The diagnosis potential of the ratio for the differentiation between benign and malignant ascites by the combined measurement of ascites and serum tumor markers as well as the F/S ratio. Zhongguo Xiandai Yixue Zazhi. 2011;14:1595-1599.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Hill R, Li Y, Tran LM, Dry S, Calvopina JH, Garcia A, Kim C, Wang Y, Donahue TR, Herschman HR. Cell intrinsic role of COX-2 in pancreatic cancer development. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:2127-2137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Jiang H, Wang J, Zhao W. Cox-2 in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;419:26-32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Lurje G, Vallbohmer D, Collet PH, Xi H, Baldus SE, Brabender J, Metzger R, Heitmann M, Neiss S, Drebber U. COX-2 mRNA expression is significantly increased in acid-exposed compared to nonexposed squamous epithelium in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1105-1111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Strazisar M, Mlakar V, Glavac D. The expression of COX-2, hTERT, MDM2, LATS2 and S100A2 in different types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2009;14:442-456.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Li Q, Liu N, Shen B, Zhou L, Wang Y, Wang Y, Sun J, Fan Z, Liu RH. Helicobacter pylori enhances cyclooxygenase 2 expression via p38MAPK/ATF-2 signaling pathway in MKN45 cells. Cancer Lett. 2009;278:97-103.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Boutaud O, Oates JA. Study of inhibitors of the PGH synthases for which potency is regulated by the redox state of the enzymes. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;644:67-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Patrono C. The PGH-synthase system and isozyme-selective inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47 Suppl 1:S1-S6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Zhang JB, Gu XY, Zhu XH, He S, Zhou JY, Yu L. The clinical significance of PTEN, Survivin and COX-2 protein expressions in breast carcinoma tissues. Zhonghua Zhongliu Fangzhi Zazhi. 2010;17:1927-1930.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Zou TN, Hu FD, Chen Y, Tang YY. The expressions and correlation of COX-2 and ERmRNA in breast carcinoma tissues and their relevant research. Zhonghua Zhongliu Fangzhi Zazhi. 2008;15:758-761.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Xia W, Zhao T, Lv J, Xu S, Shi J, Wang S, Han X, Sun Y. Celecoxib enhanced the sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs by inhibition of the expression of P-glycoprotein through a COX-2-independent manner. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:181-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Wu ZL, Sun GP, Wu Q, Fan LL, Fu WZ. Expression and its correlation of Cox-2 and Her-2/neu in gastric carcinoma tissues. Anhui Yiyao. 2010;14:1171-1173.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Salimi M, Esfahani M, Habibzadeh N, Aslani HR, Amanzadeh A, Esfandiary M, Sedaghati B, Bidgoli SA, Ghahremani MH. Change in nicotine-induced VEGF, PGE2 AND COX-2 expression following COX inhibition in human oral squamous cancer. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2012;31:349-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Hua TB, Meng XY, Wang GY, ZhangQ , Ren J, Jiu J, Chen G. Detection of COX-2, MMP-9, VEGF and RET in thyroid tissues and significances in primary diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Jilin Daxue Xuebao. 2011;37:712-717.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Huang YQ, Song YF, Yi JG. The expression and clinical significance of cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-C in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Linchuang Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi. 2011;27:337-339.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Chen BP, Ling SJ. Value of Combined Detection of CEA, CA 19-9 and 125 in Differential Diagnosis Between Benign and Malignant Ascites. Linchuang Xiaohuabing Zazhi. 2010;22:208-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Passebosc-Faure K, Li G, Lambert C, Cottier M, Gentil-Perret A, Fournel P, Pérol M, Genin C. Evaluation of a panel of molecular markers for the diagnosis of malignant serous effusions. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6862-6867.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Yu JR, Wu YJ, Fu PF, Lv KZ, Gao Y, Xie HY, Zheng SS. The clinical significance of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA detection in the peritoneal washes of stomach neoplasms patients. Zhonghua Putongwaike Zazhi. 2004;19:771.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Lin YY, Li JJ, Chang CH, Lu YC, Hwang JJ, Tseng YL, Lin WJ, Ting G, Wang HE. Evaluation of pharmacokinetics of 111In-labeled VNB-PEGylated liposomes after intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in a tumor/ascites mouse model. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009;24:453-460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Horton HM, Dorigo O, Hernandez P, Anderson D, Berek JS, Parker SE. IL-2 plasmid therapy of murine ovarian carcinoma inhibits the growth of tumor ascites and alters its cytokine profile. J Immunol. 1999;163:6378-6385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Zhang Q, Mu YS, Wang ZF, Wang XL, Gao F. Correlation of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA expression with occurrence and development of esophageal carcinoma. Zhonghua Zhongliu Fangzhi Zazhi. 2008;15:178-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Shao N, Feng N, Wang Y, Mi Y, Li T, Hua L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COX-2 expression and polymorphisms in prostate cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:10997-11004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Dixon DA, Blanco FF, Bruno A, Patrignani P. Mechanistic aspects of COX-2 expression in colorectal neoplasia. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2013;191:7-37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]