Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2005; 11(31): 4843-4847
Published online Aug 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4843
Value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas using automated biopsy gun
Li Li, Li-Zhi Liu, Yun-Xian Mo, Chuan-Miao Xie, Lie Zheng, Lin Chen, Pei-Hong Wu, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
Qiu-Liang Wu, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Department of Pathology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Pei-Hong Wu, Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China. jrkzl@gzsums.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-20-87343270 Fax: +86-20-87343392
Received: December 2, 2004
Revised: February 15, 2005
Accepted: February 18, 2005
Published online: August 21, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas.

METHODS: From January 1999 to October 2004, CT-guided core-needle biopsies were performed in 80 patients with suspected malignant lymphoma. Biopsies were performed with an 18-20 G biopsy-cut (CR Bard, Inc., Covington, GA, USA) needle driven by a spring-loaded Bard biopsy gun.

RESULTS: A definite diagnosis and accurate histological subtype were obtained in 61 patients with a success rate of 76.25% (61/80). Surgical sampling was performed in 19 patients (23.75%) with non-diagnostic core-needle biopsies. The success rate of CT-guided core-needle biopsy varied with the histopathologic subtypes in our group. The relatively high success rates of core-needle biopsy were noted in diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL, 88.89%) and peripheral T-cell NHL (90%). However, the success rates were relatively low in anaplastic large cell (T/null cell) lymphoma (ALCL, 44.44%) and Hodgkin’s disease (HD, 28.57%) in our group.

CONCLUSION: CT-guided core-needle biopsy is a reliable means of diagnosing and classifying malignant lymphomas, and can be widely applied in the management of patients with suspected malignant lymphoma.

Key Words: Malignant lymphoma, Biopsy, Computed tomography



INTRODUCTION

CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy has become an important diagnostic tool and can minimize the need for open biopsy[1,2]. However, satisfactory sampling is essential for the diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphoma[3-5]. Percutaneous core-needle biopsy under the guidance of CT or ultrasound in evaluation of malignant lymphomas has a limited value[6-8]. The advantage of CT guidance is that the whole mediastinum or abdomen is visualized, allowing accurate planning of biopsy for deep and small lesions and avoiding damage to important organs and greater vessels[9,10]. In recent years, with the advance in new needle biopsy systems and technology of needle biopsy[11,12], CT-guided core-needle biopsy is widely used in the diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphoma[13,14]. Since 1999, CT-guided core-needle biopsy has been used as one of the routine sampling techniques for malignant lymphomas in our hospital. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the reliability of CT-guided core-needle biopsy for the diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphoma using an automated biopsy gun.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

From January 1999 to October 2004, 80 patients (51 men, 29 women) with suspected malignant lymphomas underwent CT-guided core-needle biopsy. They aged from 2.8 to 72 years (mean age, 48.5 years). In our series, six patients (7.5%) had a history of malignant lymphoma including two diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHLs), one peripheral T-cell NHL, one anaplastic large cell (T/null cell) NHL, one follicular B-cell NHL and one nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s disease (HD). The sites of core-needle biopsy are shown in Table 1. Repeated core-needle biopsies were performed in five patients (6.25%). Nineteen patients (23.75%) with non-diagnostic core-needle biopsy underwent surgery depending on the sites, dimensions, and clinical diagnosis (Table 2). The histological classification in our group was according to 2001 World Health Organization classification of malignant lymphoma[15].

Table 1 Sites of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in patients with lymphoma.
Number of patients%
Mediastinum4252.5
Retroperitoneum1417.5
Abdominal mass911.25
Spleen22.5
Liver22.5
Lung11.25
Kidney11.25
Chest wall45
Pelvic wall45
Extremity11.25
Total80100
Table 2 Management of non-diagnostic CT-guided core-needle biopsy.
Number of patients%
Mediastinoscopy315.79
Mediastinotomy421.05
Lymphadenectomy631.58
Exploratory laparotomy631.58
Total19100
CT scanning

CT scanning was performed for all patients with incremental scanning in cranial-to-caudal direction with 2.7-5 mm collimation on a CT twin flash scanner (Philips Co.). Before biopsies, all patients were subjected to enhanced CT to determine the exact tumor location, its degree of vascularity and the presence of necrosis. The optimal approach of needle was decided for deep or small lesions and lesions with extensive necrotic areas, avoiding damage to the important organs and relatively large vessels near the tumor (Figures 1A-C).

Figure 1
Figure 1 CT-guided core-needle biopsy for paratracheal mass (A), large anterior mediastinal mass (B), and retroperitoneal mass (C).
Biopsies

Biopsies were performed during the scanning with an 18-20 G biopsy-cut (CR Bard, Inc., Covington, GA, USA) needle driven by the spring-loaded Bard biopsy gun. The Bard biopsy gun consists of a hand-held device that triggers rapid firing of an 18 (20)-G cutting needle. When the gun is fired, an inner trocar with its 1.7 cm sample notch thrusts forward, followed by its outer cannula which shears a core of tissue with minimum crushing of the specimen[11,16]. For a satisfactory sampling, an average of three specimens was obtained during each CT-guided core-needle biopsy.

CT scanning was performed immediately after the biopsies to evaluate the possible complications such as bleeding or pneumothorax. Patients were kept under observation for 2 h and discharged, if there were no significant complications, and encouraged to contact their physicians if any evidence of complications developed subsequently.

Histologic analysis

All the samples were fixed in 40 g/L formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Routine immunohistochemical studies were performed using antibodies to leukocyte common antigen, cytokeratin, and vimentin. Histological subtyping of NHL was made using antibodies (CD3, CD8, CD15, CD30, CD43, CD79a, L26, UCHL-1, ALK, EMA).

A biopsy was considered successful, if the definite diagnosis and accurate classification of malignant lymphoma could be established and sufficient information was provided for a therapeutic decision.

RESULTS

No serious complications were noted in all the 80 patients who underwent CT-guided core-needle biopsy. A definite diagnosis and an accurate histological subtype were made in 61 patients with a success rate of 76.25%, including 80.82% (59/73) in NHL and 28.57% (2/7) in HD (Table 3). Nineteen patients (23.75%) with non-diagnostic core-needle biopsies were subjected to surgical interventions including mediastinoscopy, mediastinotomy, lymphadenectomy, and exploratory laparotomy. The main reasons for unsuccessful biopsy were extensive necrosis and unsatisfactory sampling.

Table 3 Success rate of CT-guided core-needle biopsy.
Number of patients%
HD2/728.57
NHL59/7380.82
Total61/8076.25

The final histopathologic subtypes in 80 patients are listed in Table 4, including 63 NHLs and 7 HDs. In the diagnostic patient group, the majority of NHL subtypes were diffuse large B-cell NHL (n = 32) and peripheral T-cell NHL (n = 9). The remaining subtypes included one lymphocyte-predominant HD, one lymphocytic depletion HD, six marginal zone B-cell NHLs, two diffuse small lymphocytic NHLs, three mantle B-cell NHLs, one follicular B-cell NHL, two angioimmunoblastic T-cell NHLs, and four anaplastic large cell (T/null cell) NHLs (ALCL).

Table 4 Histologic classification in CT-guided core-needle biopsies.
Number of diagnosesNumber of non-diagnoses
HD25
Lymphocyte-predominant12
Lymphocytic depletion1
Nodular sclerosis3
B-cell NHL447
Diffuse large B-cell324
Marginal zone B-cell61
Small lymphocytic2
Mantle B-cell3
Burkitt’s1
Follicular NHL11
T-cell NHL157
Peripheral T-cell91
Anaplastic large cell (T/null cell)45
Angioimmunoblastic21
Total6119

The non-diagnostic patient group included two lymphocyte-predominant HDs, three nodular sclerosis HDs, four diffuse large B-cell NHLs, one mantle B-cell NHL, one follicular B-cell NHL, one Burkitt’s NHL, one peripheral T-cell NHL, one angioimmunoblastic T-cell NHL, and five anaplastic large cell NHLs (ALCL, Table 4).

In our group, the success rates varied with the histopathologic subtypes. A relatively high success rate was obtained in diffuse large B-cell NHL (88.89%) and peripheral T-cell NHL (90%). However, the success rate was relatively low in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, 44.44%) and HD (28.57%) in our group.

DISCUSSION

A satisfactory sampling for histological examination is fundamental to the diagnosis and management of malignant lymphomas[5,17]. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies in the diagnosis of malignant lymphomas have been reported[18-20]. Core-needle biopsies were superior to FNA since histology is more reliable than cytology[21-23]. The use of CT guidance and improved histological diagnostic techniques have promoted the development of non-surgical sampling of tumor masses in almost any location[4,9]. Silverman et al[24], reported that image-guided biopsy of abdominal lymphoma provided an adequate tissue sample that enables treatment in 72% of patients. Pappa et al[14], have achieved a diagnostic rate of 83% lymphomas, and suggested that image-guided core-needle biopsy should become the procedure of choice for histological sampling in the absence of peripheral lymphadenopathy. de Kerviler et al[25], have reported, a relatively high success rate of 88%. Recently, Agid et al[4], reported, that CT-guided core-needle biopsies are sufficient to establish a diagnosis of 82.5% patients with lympho-proliferative disorders and suggested that it should be used as the first step in diagnosis of lymphomas. In our group, 61 of 80 (76.25%) patients had a definite diagnosis and histological classification, and subsequent treatment was performed on the basis of the results of core-needle biopsy. CT-guided core-needle biopsy is therefore widely regarded as a quick, safe, and efficient alternative to excisional biopsy in patients without enlarged superficial lymph nodes[10,14].

The core-needle can acquire a relatively large specimen, which allows a better immunohistochemical staining[26,27]. CT-guided core-needle biopsy obviates the need for surgical biopsy in the majority of cases[4,9,25]. Automated biopsy systems such as Bard biopsy gun (CR, Inc., Covington, GA, USA) are rapid, simple, and highly efficient in sampling[11] and have been used as the commonest tool for percutaneous CT-guided biopsy in our hospital. Guided by CT, an 18-20 G needle is driven forward by the spring-loaded gun, and a biopsy specimen with a size of about 1.5-cm in length is rapidly cut, which is sufficient for imm-ohistochemistry staining for complete subtyping[14,16]. The reliability of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas has largely been confirmed, and the opportunity of open biopsy or exploratory operation is greatly reduced[9,26].

In our study, 76.25% (61/80) of patients with malignant lymphoma underwent CT-guided core-needle biopsies and treated on the basis of biopsy results alone. However, the definite diagnosis and explicit histological classifications were not obtained by core-needle biopsy alone in 19 patients with malignant lymphomas. The most common reason for the failure of core-needle biopsy diagnosis is that satisfactory sampling is not obtained due to the extensive necrosis of the lesions[1,10]. In diagnosis of follicular lymphoma, very large follicular structures might potentially be missed by core-needle biopsy. However, this theoretical drawback is rarely encountered[16,28]. Also, primary diagnosis of uncommon lymphomas may be compromised by small samples obtained by needle biopsy, and as with biopsies negative for lymphoma, surgical intervention may be required[16,29]. Indeed, some subtypes of malignant lymphoma might not be definitely diagnosed and categorized by CT-guided core-needle biopsy alone[29,30]. Ben-Yehuda et al[31], suggested that the most problematic category is mixed small- and large-cell NHL, because of the difficulty in making a reliable assessment of the relative number of large cells present and distinguishing diffuse from nodular patterns in these cases.

Due to its morphologic variations, anaplastic large cell (T/null cell) lymphoma (ALCL) might be mistaken for other lymphoid or non-lymphoid malignancies[32]. In general, ALCL is of T-cell phenotype and characterized by the classic “anaplastic” morphology and a peculiar CD30 expression. Its diagnosis relies on recognition of distinctive morphologic clues, such as the presence of occasional “hallmark” cells, especially around small vessels, as well as immunopositivity for CD30 and occasionally ALK protein. Therefore, a definitive diagnosis of ALCL is possibly based on careful interpretation of immunohistochemical features[32,33]. If the explicit diagnosis of ALCL cannot be made on the basis of a small size of samples obtained by core-needle biopsy, the relatively larger specimen obtained by open biopsy may be needed for definite diagnosis.

A common subtype of lymphomas such as diffuse large B cell lymphoma often yields a predominant population of large lymphoid cells with a high mitotic activity and a relatively high rate of diagnosis[13,32]. The success rate was as high as 88.89% (32/36) in our group. However, there were nine patients (11.25%) with ALCL in our group, and a definite diagnosis by core-needle biopsy alone was made in only four (44.44%). The main reason for this failure is due to the small size of samples obtained by core-needle biopsy.

Zinzani et al[13], and Pappa et al[14], have reported, relatively high success rates in diagnosis of HD using core-needle biopsy. However, there were a relatively small number of patients with HD in our group (8.75%), and only 28.57% (2/7) of patients with HD were definitely diagnosed by core-needle biopsy. Except for unsatisfactory sampling[25], our low success rate may largely be due to lack of experience of pathological diagnosis of HD on the basis of core-needle biopsy in our hospital.

In conclusion, CT-guided core-needle biopsy is a reliable diagnostic procedure for malignant lymphoma, and can be widely used in patients with suspected malignant lymphoma in absence of palpable, enlarged superficial lymph nodes.

Footnotes

Co-first-authors: Qiu-Liang Wu

Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References
1.  Sklair-Levy M, Polliack A, Shaham D, Applbaum YH, Gillis S, Ben-Yehuda D, Sherman Y, Libson E. CT-guided core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:714-718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Mintzer DM, Mason BA. On the need for biopsy confirmation at suspected first recurrence of cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003;26:192-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Demharter J, Müller P, Wagner T, Schlimok G, Haude K, Bohndorf K. Percutaneous core-needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes in the diagnosis and subclassification of malignant lymphomas. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:276-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Agid R, Sklair-Levy M, Bloom AI, Lieberman S, Polliack A, Ben-Yehuda D, Sherman Y, Libson E. CT-guided biopsy with cutting-edge needle for the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma: experience of 267 biopsies. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:143-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Gupta RK, Naran S, Lallu S, Fauck R. The diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the assessment of palpable supraclavicular lymph nodes: a study of 218 cases. Cytopathology. 2003;14:201-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Zeppa P, Marino G, Troncone G, Fulciniti F, De Renzo A, Picardi M, Benincasa G, Rotoli B, Vetrani A, Palombini L. Fine-needle cytology and flow cytometry immunophenotyping and subclassification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a critical review of 307 cases with technical suggestions. Cancer. 2004;102:55-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Vicandi B, López-Ferrer P, Hardisson D, Viguer JM. Value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the initial diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease. Analysis of 188 cases with an emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 2001;45:300-306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Gong JZ, Williams DC, Liu K, Jones C. Fine-needle aspiration in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: evaluation of cell size by cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:880-888.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Libicher M, Nöldge G, Radeleff B, Gholipur F, Richter GM. Value of CT-guided biopsy in malignant lymphoma. Radiologe. 2002;42:1009-1012.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Goldschmidt N, Libson E, Bloom A, Amir G, Paltiel O. Clinical utility of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnostic re-evaluation of patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and suspected disease progression. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1438-1441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Haramati LB. CT-guided automated needle biopsy of the chest. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:53-55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Hartzel JS, Potok PS. CT percutaneous biopsy guns: comparison of end-cut and side-notch devices in cadaveric specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:195-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Zinzani PL, Corneli G, Cancellieri A, Magagnoli M, Lacava N, Gherlinzoni F, Bendandi M, Albertini P, Baruzzi G, Tura S. Core needle biopsy is effective in the initial diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma. Haematologica. 1999;84:600-603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Pappa VI, Hussain HK, Reznek RH, Whelan J, Norton AJ, Wilson AM, Love S, Lister TA, Rohatiner AZ. Role of image-guided core-needle biopsy in the management of patients with lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2427-2430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW.  World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haemopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press 2001; 111-235.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Whelan JS, Reznek RH, Daniell SJ, Norton AJ, Lister TA, Rohatiner AZ. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) guided core biopsy in the management of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 1991;63:460-462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Wakely P, Frable WJ, Kneisl JS. Soft tissue aspiration cytopathology of malignant lymphoma and leukemia. Cancer. 2001;93:35-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Landgren O, Porwit MacDonald A, Tani E, Czader M, Grimfors G, Skoog L, Ost A, Wedelin C, Axdorph U, Svedmyr E. A prospective comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas. Hematol J. 2004;5:69-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Civardi G, Vallisa D, Bertè R, Giorgio A, Filice C, Caremani M, Caturelli E, Pompili M, De Sio I, Buscarini E. Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the spleen: high clinical efficacy and low risk in a multicenter Italian study. Am J Hematol. 2001;67:93-99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Singh NG, Kapila K, Dawar R, Verma K. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disease of the breast. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:739-743.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Wallace MB. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36:397-401.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 179]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 195]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Wotherspoon AC, Norton AJ, Lees WR, Shaw P, Isaacson PG. Diagnostic fine needle core biopsy of deep lymph nodes for the diagnosis of lymphoma in patients unfit for surgery. J Pathol. 1989;158:115-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Lieberman S, Libson E, Maly B, Lebensart P, Ben-Yehuda D, Bloom AI. Imaging-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy using a 20- or 22-gauge cutting-edge core biopsy needle for the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1025-1027.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Silverman SG, Lee BY, Mueller PR, Cibas ES, Seltzer SE. Impact of positive findings at image-guided biopsy of lymphoma on patient care: evaluation of clinical history, needle size, and pathologic findings on biopsy performance. Radiology. 1994;190:759-764.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  de Kerviler E, Guermazi A, Zagdanski AM, Meignin V, Gossot D, Oksenhendler E, Mariette X, Brice P, Frija J. Image-guided core-needle biopsy in patients with suspected or recurrent lymphomas. Cancer. 2000;89:647-652.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Gong JZ, Snyder MJ, Lagoo AS, Vollmer RT, Dash RR, Madden JF, Buckley PJ, Jones CK. Diagnostic impact of core-needle biopsy on fine-needle aspiration of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;31:23-30.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Nelson HA, Demlow TA, Wienstein RE, Dunkley BL. The role of percutaneous needle biopsies in the original diagnosis of lymphoma: a prospective evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6:947-952.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  West RB, Warnke RA, Natkunam Y. The usefulness of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma in bone marrow biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:636-643.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Mayall F, Darlington A, Harrison B. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of uncommon types of lymphoma. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:821-825.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Jiménez-Heffernan JA, González-Peramato P, Perna C, Alvarez-Ferreira J, López-Ferrer P, Viguer JM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;27:371-374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Ben-Yehuda D, Polliack A, Okon E, Sherman Y, Fields S, Lebenshart P, Lotan H, Libson E. Image-guided core-needle biopsy in malignant lymphoma: experience with 100 patients that suggests the technique is reliable. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2431-2434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Ng WK, Ip P, Choy C, Collins RJ. Cytologic and immunocytochemical findings of anaplastic large cell lymphoma: analysis of ten fine-needle aspiration specimens over a 9-year period. Cancer. 2003;99:33-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Creager AJ, Geisinger KR, Bergman S. Neutrophil-rich Ki-1-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a study by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:709-715.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]