Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2020; 8(15): 3209-3217
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3209
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
Control group (n = 42)Intervention group (n = 46)t/ZP value
Age39.95 ± 11.6143.54 ± 12.27-1.351a0.177
Height173.41 ± 7.18169.83 ± 8.91-1.338a0.181
Weight85.81 ± 13.1384.13 ± 14.980.5570.579
BMI33.64 ± 2.3033.72 ± 2.30-0.165a0.869
Neck circumference41.21 ± 4.5740.65 ± 4.290.5950.553
Waist circumference101.52 ± 11.8398.41 ± 10.291.3190.191
Hip circumference106.79 ± 7.16107.54 ± 6.96-0.503a0.616
Table 2 Comparison of obesity-related indicators between the two groups of patients before and after intervention (mean ± SD)
ItemBefore intervention
tP valueAfter intervention
tP value
Control group (n = 42)Intervention group(n = 46)Control group (n = 42)Intervention group (n = 46)
Weight85.81 ± 13.1384.13 ± 14.980.5570.57985.33 ± 12.9479.80 ± 12.622.0280.046a
BMI33.64 ± 2.3033.72 ± 2.30-0.1650.86933.88 0± 2.4531.937 ± 3.153.2290.002 a
Waist circumference101.52 ± 11.8398.41 ± 10.291.3190.191101.33 ± 11.8195.91 ± 10.632.2670.026a
Neck circumference41.21 ± 4.5740.65 ± 4.290.5950.55340.75 ± 4.4038.70 ± 4.570.6120.035a
Hip circumference106.79 ± 7.16107.54 ± 6.96-0.5030.616106.57 ± 7.20104.91 ± 7.311.0710.287
Table 3 Complications in the two groups of patients, n (%)
Control group (n = 42)Intervention group (n = 46)χ2P value
Irritating cough10 (23.81)3 (6.52)5.2120.022a
Reflux9 (21.43)3 (6.52)4.1430.042a
Foreign body sensation8 (19.05)4 (8.70)1.9980.158
Table 4 Comparison of sleep status of the two groups of patients before and after the intervention (points, mean ± SD)
ItemsBefore intervention
tP valueAfter intervention
tP value
Control group (n = 42)Intervention group (n = 46)Control group (n = 42)Intervention group (n = 46)
SRSS26.29 ± 10.6626.20 ± 9.410.0420.96718.17 ± 8.6614.91 ± 6.112.0200.047a
ESS9.76 ± 6.828.39 ± 7.130.9210.3607.38 ± 6.424.72 ± 4.292.2650.027a