Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2019; 7(13): 1611-1622
Published online Jul 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1611
Table 1 General confusion matrix
Predicted condition
Predicted negativePredicted positive
ConditionCondition negativeTrue negativeFalse positive
Condition positiveFalse negativeTrue positive
Table 2 Relationship between different pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grades and clinical variables
mean ± SDP value, vs G1P value, vs G2P value of binary
Gender (male / female)s0.3575
G114 / 18
G237 / 110.002
G34 / 70.6680.008
Age< 0.001
G152.47 ± 11.70
G249.19 ± 11.340.634
G350.00 ± 17.040.0820.039
ALT< 0.001
G134.95 ± 72.06
G233.97 ± 59.100.730
G3117.02 ± 143.740.0390.006
BIL< 0.001
G19.15 ± 3.65
G212.71 ± 9.560.009
G369.63 ± 67.56< 0.001< 0.001
AFP< 0.001
G12.27 ± 1.02
G23.34 ± 2.380.014
G33.47 ± 1.500.0350.606
CEA< 0.001
G11.51 ± 0.82
G22.19 ± 2.380.132
G311.77 ± 17.05< 0.001< 0.001
CA19-9< 0.001
G19.58 ± 7.57
G220.46 ± 24.740.007
G337.10 ± 39.40< 0.0010.118
CA1250.0146
G110.43 ± 5.60
G213.72 ± 12.220.039
G311.13 ± 4.750.9420.195
CA15-3< 0.001
G18.98 ± 4.34
G211.41 ± 5.490.361
G311.52 ± 3.800.5850.318
CA72-4< 0.001
G11.83 ± 1.43
G22.14 ± 1.500.217
G37.42 ± 7.85< 0.001< 0.001
Table 3 The highest F1 score, recall rate and precision rate scores of different models
F1 scoreRecall ratePrecision rate
LR0.800.800.81
SVM0.810.810.82
Linear SVM0.820.820.84
LDA-eigen10.850.850.86
LDA-lsqr10.850.850.86
LDA-svd0.820.820.84
MLP0.820.810.84
Table 4 F1 score, recall rate and precision rate of each grade in different models
ModelGradeF1Recall ratePrecision rate
LRG10.830.940.75
G20.80.730.88
G30.730.730.73
SVMG10.850.940.77
G20.810.750.88
G30.730.730.73
Linear SVMG10.850.940.77
G20.810.730.92
G30.80.910.71
LDA-eigenG10.850.940.77
G20.850.810.89
G30.840.731
LDA-lsqrG10.850.940.77
G20.850.810.89
G30.840.731
LDA-svdG10.850.970.76
G20.820.750.9
G30.760.730.8
LDA-svdG10.850.970.76
G20.820.750.9
G30.760.730.8
MLPG10.830.940.75
G20.810.750.88
G30.830.940.68