Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2020; 8(15): 3314-3319
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3314
Figure 1
Figure 1 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed an abnormal mass signal in the distal duodenum; B: MRCP revealed duodeno-duodenal intussusception; C: Location of mass and intussusception after MRCP recombination.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Computed tomography. A: Computed tomography (CT) revealed an abnormal mass signal in the distal duodenum; B: CT revealed duodeno-duodenal intussusception.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Ascending part of the duodenum and diameter of the adenoma. A: Intussusception of the descending part of the duodenum entered the horizontal part and combined closely; B: Diameter of the longitudinal axis of the adenoma was approximately 3.5 cm; C: Diameter of the transverse axis of the adenoma was approximately 5.0 cm.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Postoperative routine pathology revealed tubular-villous adenoma with low-grade glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (local high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia).