As medical treatments advance, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) becomes more prevalent, occurring at a rate of 14 to 19 cases per 100,000 individuals. We present a unique case of a female patient with Crohn's disease developing autoimmune-like hepatitis during infliximab treatment. Autoimmune-like hepatitis can pose diagnostic challenges when distinguishing it from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis. The diagnostic journey, including the absence of distinct pathognomonic criteria, is discussed. The only discriminative factor observed was the absence of relapse in autoimmune-like hepatitis patients after discontinuation of immuno-suppressive therapy. The case highlights the importance of recognizing this adverse event in clinical practice and underscores the challenges in balancing the benefits and risks of powerful immunomodulatory agents.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

The differentiation between drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be confusing and challenging. We present a case of DI-ALH characterized by positive autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and histology characteristics of giant cell hepatitis.

A liver biopsy was performed for etiology clarification, DI-ALH was diagnosed. Following treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine, the patient's liver function remained normal without recurrence.

Distinguishing DI-ALH from AIH based on the possibility of discontinuing immunosuppression and the histological features. Clinicians need to investigate patient's medical history, serological tests, and pathological changes to establish a correct diagnosis.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare immune-mediated chronic liver disease that is diagnosed based on a combination of biochemical, immunologic, and histologic features and the exclusion of other causes of liver disease. According to the new consensus criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Pathology Group (IAIHPG), the likely histologic features include a chronic hepatitis pattern of injury with a lymphoplasmacytic portal infiltrate, interface activity, and portal-based fibrosis. More than mild lobular hepatitis with any of the above features can also be diagnosed as likely AIH in the absence of features of another liver disease. Centrilobular injury with prominent hepatocellular necrosis and mononuclear inflammation may represent an acute-onset disease and indicate possible AIH in the absence of concurrent liver disease. Kupffer cell hyaline bodies and portal lymphocyte apoptosis are significantly associated with AIH, whereas emperipolesis and hepatocellular rosette formation are nonspecific features indicative of disease severity. Liver histology is an integral part of the clinical diagnostic scoring system and is required to confirm or support AIH diagnosis. Substitution of the histologic component of the simplified AIH scoring system with the consensus IAIHPG criteria has been proposed to optimize clinical diagnosis. This review explores the significant role of histopathology in AIH by analyzing its main features and current histologic diagnostic criteria, different AIH presentations, differential diagnosis, assessment of concurrent liver disease, and identification of AIH variants with primary cholangiopathy.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare condition characterized by hepatotoxic damage, identified through the elevation of liver function tests associated with a specific drug. Statins are among the medications linked to DILI, although this association is infrequent. Recently, reports and case series have described a relationship between atorvastatin-induced DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), two conditions not commonly associated. Because there are no established clinical or diagnostic criteria for this overlap, recognition is complex and relies on the clinical course, a timeline of causality, and the exclusion of alternative diagnoses. This report presents the case of a patient in the seventh decade of life who developed atorvastatin-induced DILI, meeting the diagnostic criteria for AIH. We discuss the therapeutic approach and review the relevant literature on this rare association.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

The present study aimed at comparing simplified and modified histologic criteria alone and along with other indicators in the diagnosis of chronic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

In this cross-sectional study, 48 cases were selected from slides and paraffin blocks of patients suspected of chronic AIH according to clinical and laboratory data, including serology and autoantibody findings and viral hepatitis test results. Then, scores equal to 1 (compatible hepatitis), 2 (typical hepatitis), ≤6 (probable hepatitis), and ≥7 (definite hepatitis) were calculated based on the simplified histologic criteria, modified histologic criteria, and these two criteria, along with other indicators including antinuclear antibodies (Ab), smooth muscle Ab or liver-kidney microsomal Ab or soluble liver antigen (Ag) and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and absence of viral hepatitis.

The results of this study revealed that based on the simplified histologic criteria, 43.8% and 56.3% of these cases were assigned a score of 1 and 2 points, respectively. However, calculating the total score using the simplified criteria along with other indicators showed that 60.4% and 39.6% of cases were assigned a score ≤6 and ≥7 points, respectively. Moreover, the modified histologic criteria indicated that 25% and 75% of cases were assigned a score of 1 and 2 points, respectively.

According to the findings of the present study, the modified histologic criteria compared to the simplified histologic criteria identified a higher percentage of patients assigned a score of 2 points. Moreover, modified histologic criteria, along with other indicators, were more accurate in detecting definite AIH (score ≥7 points).

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) presents unique challenges in clinical practice. While some types of DILI are mild and resolve quickly after removing the drug, other situations are more complex, with competing aetiologies or underlying liver disease. Guidelines from professional societies agree that the liver biopsy retains a role in understanding and managing DILI in certain situations. Liver biopsy allows characterization of the histological pattern of injury as well as assessment of severity. Inflammatory infiltrates, bile duct injury or loss and vascular injury are all revealed by liver biopsy. Communication between the hepatopathologist and clinical team with clinicopathological correlation of the findings is necessary for the best determination of causality and differentiation from other diseases of exclusion, like autoimmune hepatitis and graft-versus-host disease. This review highlights important aspects of the role of liver biopsy in DILI evaluation.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a growing clinical problem. Antibiotics remain the most common cause of DILI in Europe. Their clinical spectrum is very broad, from asymptomatic to acute liver failure. Currently, DILI is categorized as hepatocellular (R ≥ 5), cholestatic (R ≤ 2) or mixed (R = 2-5) injury based on the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ratio. DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion and requires a wide differential diagnosis. The most important step in management is discontinuation of the drug suspected of causing liver damage. The list of specific antidotes that eliminate the effects of hepatotoxins is unfortunately very short. In symptomatic treatment, glucocorticosteroids and ursodeoxycholic acid have been used in selected cases. Liver transplantation is an optional treatment in patients with acute liver failure.

Background/Objectives:Catha edulis, also known as Khat, is a stimulant with hepatotoxic properties. Studies reporting laboratory patterns are scarce. The aim was to assess the patterns associated with hepatic dysfunction due to Khat usage. Methods: Patients with liver injury and self-reported Khat consumption presenting to the gastroenterology department at the King Fahad Central Hospital in Jazan between January 2017-May 2024 were retrospectively included in the study. Patients with any signs of cirrhosis or viral hepatitis were excluded to have a more homogenous inclusion. Normal distribution was not assumed; data were presented as the median (IQR or %). Results: Sixty-three patients (of which 62 (98.4%) were male) aged 35 (29-41) years were included in the study. An IgG > 20 g/L was present in 41 (61.5%) patients, and the majority (n = 48, 76.2%) had a hepatocellular injury pattern based on an R-factor > 5. Over half of the patients had at least one positive autoantibody(ANA 47.6%; SMA 55.6% and AMA 4.8%), while 57 (90.5%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusions: Khat-induced liver injury seems to be predominantly AIH-like in nature, given the IgG elevation, hepatocellular injury pattern, and relatively high rate of autoantibody positivity.

Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) is a potentially life-threatening condition that can lead to acute liver failure and necessitate liver transplantation. While the association between certain drugs and DI-ALH has been documented, a comprehensive analysis of drug-related signals in a large, real-world pharmacovigilance database is lacking. This study aimed to systematically identify drugs linked to DI-ALH by analyzing adverse event reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

We searched the FAERS database for the term "autoimmune hepatitis" and extracted DI-ALH reports from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. Positive signal drugs were identified using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). To confirm a significant drug-adverse event association, each method had to meet predefined thresholds: for PRR and ROR, values were considered significant if the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) was greater than 1 and at least three reports were identified; for BCPNN, an Information Component (IC025) greater than 0 indicated a signal; for EBGM, a value greater than 2 for the lower 95% confidence interval (EBGM05) was used to denote a positive signal.

A total of 5,723 DI-ALH reports were extracted from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis identified 50 drugs with strong associations to DI-ALH, with biologics, statins, antibiotics, and antiviral drugs representing the most common categories. Among these, nitrofurantoin (ROR 94.79, CI 78.53-114.41), minocycline (ROR 77.82, CI 65.09-93.05), and nivolumab (ROR 47.12, CI 15.06-147.39) exhibited the strongest signals. Additionally, several previously unreported drugs, including mesalazine, aldesleukin, onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi, and nefazodone, were identified as having strong associations with DI-ALH. These findings were consistent across all four signal detection methods, further validating the robustness of the associations.

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of drugs associated with DI-ALH through a rigorous analysis of the FAERS database using multiple signal detection methods. By identifying both well-known and previously underreported drugs, this study contributes to a more complete understanding of drug-induced liver injury. The findings have important implications for pharmacovigilance strategies and clinical risk assessment. However, limitations inherent in the FAERS database, such as underreporting and the potential for reporting bias, should be considered. Further clinical validation is warranted to confirm these associations.

Inflammation is a critical protective response in the body, essential for combating infections and healing injuries. However, chronic inflammation can be harmful and significantly contribute to the development and progression of chronic diseases, with macrophage-mediated responses being central to these processes. This study presents "SBR-Pel," a new therapeutic blend of Shinbaro tab (SBR), a traditional herbal formula, and pelubiprofen (Pel), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and investigated their combined anti-inflammatory effects to create a treatment that both improves efficacy and reduces side effects.

To this end, we performed both in vitro and in vivo analyses, utilizing a mouse model of inflammation. Viability and cytotoxicity assays, immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction assays, nociception assays, writhing tests, and blood biochemical analyses were performed.

In vitro, SBR-Pel synergistically reduced the production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. SBR-Pel also significantly attenuated paw edema in vivo in a Complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammation model in adult mice. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analyses showed that treatment with SBR-Pel reduced both the infiltration of CD68+ macrophages and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in inflamed tissues. Additionally, compared with individual treatment alone, SBR-Pel enhanced the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines CD206, TGF-β, and IL-10, indicating a synergistic effect. Our research demonstrates that SBR-Pel effectively diminishes inflammatory pain by reducing macrophage infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. Additionally, while 1.5 mg/kg of Pel alone increases levels of liver and kidney toxicity markers, such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and creatinine, combining it with SBR at a reduced dosage of 0.5 mg/kg maintains these markers at normal levels.

This combined effect highlights SBR-Pel's potential as an effective treatment for inflammatory diseases driven by heightened macrophage activity, while also minimizing side effects by reducing the Pel dosage.

Acute liver injury (ALI) has a clear requirement for novel therapies. One emerging option is the use of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs); a distinct subtype of macrophage with a role in liver injury control and repair. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview of the current limited options for ALI, and the potential advantages offered by AAMs. We describe the evidence supporting their use from in vitro studies, pre-clinical animal studies, and human clinical trials. We suggest why the first evidence for the clinical use of AAMs is likely to be found in acetaminophen toxicity, and discuss the specific evidence for AAM use in this population, as well as potential applications for AAMs in other patient populations. The key domains by which the performance of AAMs for the treatment of ALI will be assessed are identified, and remaining challenges to the successful delivery of AAMs to clinic are explored.

Histopathologic evaluation of liver biopsy has played a longstanding role in the diagnosis and management of liver disease. However, the utility of liver biopsy has been questioned by some, given the improved imaging modalities, increased availability of noninvasive serologic tests, and development of artificial intelligence over the past several years. In this review, we discuss the current and future role of liver biopsy in both non-neoplastic and neoplastic liver diseases in the era of improved noninvasive laboratory, radiologic, and digital technologies.

This study aimed to investigate and analyze the clinical and immunological features of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM) complicated with clinical liver dysfunction. A cohort of 85 patients diagnosed with MDA5 + DM admitted into Peking University People's Hospital from 2006 to 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Clinical characteristics and survival status were collected and analyzed. Clinical liver dysfunction occurred in 28% (24/85) of MDA5 + DM patients. Patients with clinical liver dysfunction were more likely to have muscle impairment (83.3% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.009) and rapidly progressive ILD (72.7% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.027). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (378.5 (296.0,453.8) U/L vs. 280.0 (218.0,355.0) U/L, P = 0.002) and ferritin (FER) (883.0 (279.8,2100.5) ng/mL vs. 293.5.0 (84.0,862.7) ng/mL, P = 0.040) were significantly elevated and total numbers of lymphocytes (827.2 ± 517.2 /μL vs. 1301.8 ± 720.9 /μL, P = 0.042), and CD4 + T cells (403.8 ± 315.9 /μL vs. 548.6 ± 257.7 /μL, P = 0.045) were significantly decreased in patients with clinical liver function. Muscle weakness (OR 5.184, 95% CI 1.305, 20.595, P = 0.019) was identified as an independent risk factor for clinical liver dysfunction. Clinical liver dysfunction was identified as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with MDA5 + DM (HR = 4.030, 95% Cl 1.233, 13.176, P = 0.021), with an 18-month survival rate of 69%. Liver dysfunction is one of the extramuscular manifestations in patients with MDA5 + DM and might be associated with a poor prognosis.

Liver biopsies have consistently contributed to our understanding of the pathogenesis and aetiologies of acute liver disease. As other diagnostic modalities have been developed and refined, the role of biopsy in the management of patients with acute liver failure (ALF), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and acute hepatitis, including acute liver injury (ALI), has changed. Liver biopsy remains particularly valuable when first-line diagnostic algorithms fail to determine aetiology. Despite not being identified as a mandatory diagnostic tool in recent clinical guidelines for the management of ALF or ACLF, many centres continue to undertake biopsies given the relative safety of transjugular biopsy in this setting. Several studies have demonstrated that liver biopsy can provide prognostic information, particularly in the context of so-called indeterminate hepatitis, and is extremely useful in excluding conditions such as metastatic tumours that would preclude transplantation. In addition, its widespread use of percutaneous biopsies in cases of less severe acute liver injury, for example in the establishment of a diagnosis of acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis or confirmation of a probable or definite drug-induced liver injury (DILI), has meant that many centres have seen a shift in the ratio of specimens they are receiving from patients with chronic to acute liver disease. Histopathologists therefore need to be equipped to deal with these challenging specimens. This overview provides an insight into the contemporary role of biopsies (as well as explant and autopsy material) in diagnosing acute liver disease. It outlines up-to-date clinical definitions of liver injury and considers recent recommendations for the diagnosis of AIH and drug-induced, autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AIH).

Histopathological characterization obtained by transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) may theoretically contribute to clarification of the exact aetiology of acute liver failure (ALF). It's unclear whether the histopathological information from TJLB, due to the small specimen size, significantly contributes to diagnosing ALF causes, guiding therapy decisions, or predicting overall prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to analyse safety and clinical significance of TJLB in patients with ALF.

This retrospective, monocentric study investigated safety and efficacy of TJLB in patients with ALF over a ten-year period at a tertiary care transplant-center. The predictive value of various clinical and laboratory characteristics as well as histopathological findings obtained by TJLB on 28-day liver-transplant-free survival were evaluated by calculating uni- and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression models. Additional univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the influence of degree of intrahepatic necrosis on the secondary endpoints intensive-care-unit (ICU) admission, need for endotracheal intubation, renal replacement therapy and high-urgency listing for LTX.

A total of 43 patients with ALF receiving TJLB were included into the study. In most cases (n = 39/43 cases) TJLB confirmed the initially already clinically presumed ALF aetiology and the therapeutic approach was unchanged by additional histological examination in the majority of patients (36/43 cases). However, in patients with a high suspicion for aetiologies potentially treatable by medical immunosuppression (e.g. AIH, GvHD), TJLB significantly influenced further treatment planning and/or adjustment. While the degree of intrahepatic necrosis showed significance in the univariate analysis (p = 0.04), it did not demonstrate a significant predictive effect on liver transplant-free survival in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.1). Only consecutive ICU admission was more likely with higher extent of intrahepatic necrosis (Odds ratio (OR) 1.04 (95% CI 1-1.08), p = 0.046).

Performance of TJLB in ALF led to a change in suspected diagnosis and to a significant change in therapeutic measures only in those patients with a presumed high risk for aetiologies potentially responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical assessment alone was accurate enough, with additional histopathological examination adding no significant value, to predict overall prognosis of patients with ALF.

The aim of this study is to describe the presenting features, genetic factors, and outcomes of 23 adults who developed liver injury after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination.

Patients with suspected COVID-19 vaccine hepatitis were enrolled into the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. Causality was assessed using the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network expert opinion score. High-resolution HLA sequencing was undertaken using Illumina platform.

Amongst the 16 high causality cases, median time to onset was 16 days, median age was 63 years, and 75% were female. The injury was hepatocellular in 75% with a median alanine aminotransferase of 497 U/L, and 37% had jaundice. An antinuclear antibody and smooth muscle antibody were detectable in 27% and 36%, but only 12% had an elevated immunoglobulin G level. During follow-up, 37% received a short course of corticosteroids, and 88% fully recovered by 6 months with no deaths observed. HLA alleles associated with autoimmune hepatitis were not overrepresented compared with controls, but an ERAP-2 variant (rs1263907) and the ERAP-1 Hap6 haplotype were significantly overrepresented in the high causality cases vs controls ( P = 0.026 and 5 × 10 -5 , respectively).

Acute liver injury may arise within 8 weeks of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that is generally mild and self-limited in most patients. The absence of an association with the AIH HLA alleles combined with the significant ERAP-2 and ERAP-1 Hap6 haplotype associations implicates a unique but very rare host immune response to vaccine-derived antigens in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 vaccine hepatotoxicity.

The rapid rollout and uptake of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has been accompanied by a small yet noticeable accumulation of reports of liver injury occurring after vaccination. This review describes the present evidence surrounding COVID-19 vaccine-induced liver injury (VILI).

Liver injury occurring after the COVID-19 vaccine often presents clinically similar to autoimmune hepatitis, with positive autoantibodies and a portal and lobular inflammatory infiltrate and varying degrees of necrosis on biopsy. The overwhelming majority of patients recover, often spontaneously or with a limited course of immunosuppression. The overall incidence of this phenomenon appears to be exceedingly low.

Providers should remain vigilant for ongoing reports of VILI after COVID-19 and yet feel reassured by the low incidence and high likelihood of recovery. Ongoing genetic and histological study, as well as longer-term follow-up of presently identified cases, will shed further light on the clinical entity of VILI.

The incidence and prevalence of drug-induced liver injury appear to be increasing globally, for example, with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. Several reviews have been published in the last decade on the epidemiology of DILI, both among hospitalized patients and in the general population, as well as from retrospective and prospective studies on DILI. Most of these reviews have not focused on newly recognized agents that have recently changed the landscape of DILI. Apart from liver injury associated with antibiotics, oncological agents, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, are increasingly being recognized as causing liver injury. The type of liver injury associated with these agents is not idiosyncratic but rather an indirect type of injury. Furthermore, recently, COVID-19 vaccines and green tea extract have been found to lead to liver injury. Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of many malignancies, such as malignant melanoma, lung cancer, and renal cancer. Via the activation of T cells, they can increase immune activity against malignant cells, but at the same time, they can decrease immune tolerance and therefore lead to immune-related adverse effects in many organs. The most common adverse effect in clinical practice is liver injury. A recent prospective study demonstrated an 8% frequency of DILI due to the use of checkpoint inhibitors among patients with malignant melanoma and renal cancer. This rate is much higher than observed with drugs, leading to idiosyncratic liver injury. Shortly after the implementation of the worldwide vaccination program against COVID-19, several case reports were published on suspected vaccination-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis occurring shortly after the vaccination. At first, these reports were met with skepticism, but currently, around 100 reports have been published, and cases of positive recurrence have been reported. The clinical, biochemical, immunological, and histological features are indistinguishable from classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). These reactions are very similar to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) due to drugs such as nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and infliximab, which do not relapse after a short course of corticosteroids, which is the general rule in classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Green tea extract has been found to be a well-documented cause of acute hepatocellular liver injury with jaundice. A strong HLA association has been reported, showing a high prevalence of HLA-B*35:01 among patients suffering from green tea-induced liver injury. Overall, 3% of patients recruited in the DILIN study were supplemented with green tea extract as one of the ingredients. In a prospective population-based study from Iceland, green tea was implicated in approximately 8% of patients with DILI.

In the current article the aims for a constructive way forward in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) are to highlight the most important priorities in research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and better funded future for European DILI research. This Roadmap aims to identify key challenges, define a shared vision across all stakeholders for the opportunities to overcome these challenges and propose a high-quality research program to achieve progress on the prediction, prevention, diagnosis and management of this condition and impact on healthcare practice in the field of DILI. This will involve 1. Creation of a database encompassing optimised case report form for prospectively identified DILI cases with well-characterised controls with competing diagnoses, biological samples, and imaging data; 2. Establishing of preclinical models to improve the assessment and prediction of hepatotoxicity in humans to guide future drug safety testing; 3. Emphasis on implementation science and 4. Enhanced collaboration between drug-developers, clinicians and regulatory scientists. This proposed operational framework will advance DILI research and may bring together basic, applied, translational and clinical research in DILI.

Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AILH) is poorly defined and more data are required to better characterise and manage this disease entity.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, histology and long-term outcomes of DI-AILH compared with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

This retrospective cohort study reviewed 28 DI-AILH and 39 AIH patients in a single centre. The new (2022) and simplified (2008) AIH histology criteria were used to assess DI-AILH.

DI-AILH were more likely to present with jaundice (p = 0.004) and higher bilirubin levels (p = 0.04) than AIH. AIH patients had higher rate of immunosuppression (IS) use including second- and third-line agents, though the time to reach biochemical remission were comparable. AIH patients had more advanced fibrosis than DI-AILH (Ishak fibrosis score 3.5 vs. 1.9, p < 0.0001). DI-AILH more commonly had eosinophilic aggregates (18% vs. 3%, p = 0.031) and less commonly showed plasma cell aggregates (61% vs. 97%, p < 0.001) than AIH. The simplified AIH histology criteria identified 1 atypical histology within the DI-AILH cohort, although this patient required long-term IS. The new AIH histology criteria classified 23 (82%) as likely AIH and 5 (18%) as possible AIH. Two of the possible DI-AILH did not require IS and one patient had successful IS withdrawal. Four DI-AILH patients with fibrosis stage ≤3 had successful IS withdrawal compared with none in the AIH group. Four patients underwent liver transplantation (LT) in both cohorts with significantly shorter time to LT in DI-AILH as the indication was for (sub)acute liver failure. Two DI-AILH patients died within 60 days of LT.

The new AIH histology criteria may be better at identifying DI-AILH. Immunosuppression withdrawal in those without significant fibrosis may be considered. DI-AILH is at risk of (sub)acute liver failure and early discussions with a transplant centre would be desirable.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic, relapsing and remitting, immune-mediated liver disease that progresses to cirrhosis if left untreated. A significant number of patients may present with acute hepatitis or acute liver failure, which are often misdiagnosed as toxic liver injury. AIH shows a preponderance in young women but may be seen in children and the elderly. Diagnosis requires the integration of clinical, biochemical, and serologic parameters, along with supportive liver histology and exclusion of other causes of liver disease. Liver biopsy is a prerequisite for diagnosis of AIH, to assess severity and stage of disease, exclude other entities, and recognize any concurrent morbidities. No single biomarker or histologic feature is pathognomonic for AIH. The diagnostic and histologic criteria have undergone several modifications since the original scoring system was proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) in 1993. Recently, the IAIHG has proposed consensus recommendations for histologic criteria, relevant for both acute and chronic AIH. This review article will describe the evolving diagnostic criteria for AIH, with their limitations and utility, and with an emphasis on the role of liver histology in the diagnosis and management of AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a condition characterized by an autoimmune response resulting in chronic inflammatory liver disease. Its presentation is marked by significant increases in serum immunoglobulins and the production of active autoantibodies that target liver tissue. AIH is often associated with other autoimmune disorders, which can lead to overlapping clinical syndromes. However, alternative theories propose that exposure to specific environmental triggers can initiate this autoimmune cascade. We present the case of a 45-year-old male who sought evaluation for abdominal discomfort and was subsequently diagnosed with drug-induced AIH (DIAIH) following prolonged use of an over-the-counter male-enhancing supplement.

The histological criteria in the 1999 and 2008 scoring systems proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) have their inherent limitations in diagnosing autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). In this study, we evaluated the histology components of four scoring systems (1. revised original scoring system ["1999 IAIHG"], 2. simplified scoring system ["2008 IAIHG"], 3. modified histologic criteria ["2017 UCSF"], and 4. a new histologic criteria proposed by the International AIH Pathology Group ["2022 IAHPG"]) in AIH patients.

Medical records and liver biopsies were retrospectively reviewed for 68 patients from two independent medical institutions, diagnosed with AIH based on the 1999 IAIHG system between 2006 and 2016. The histological features were reviewed in detail, and the four histological scoring systems were compared.

Out of the 68 patients, 56 (82.4%) patients met the "probable" or "definite" AIH criteria of the 2008 IAIHG system, and the proportion of histologic score 2 (maximum) was 40/68 (58.8%). By applying the 2017 UCSF criteria, the number of histology score 2 increased to 60/68 (88.2%), and "probable" or "definite" AIH cases increased to 61/68 (89.7%). Finally, applying the 2022 IAHPG histology score resulted in the highest number of cases with histologic score 2 (64/68; 94.1%) and with a diagnosis of "probable" or "definite" AIH (62/68; 91.2%).

The recently proposed UCSF/IAHPG histological criteria increased the histology score of AIH. Substituting the histology component of the 2008 IAIHG system with the 2022 IAHPG criteria increased the sensitivity for diagnosing AIH (≥"Probable AIH") from 82.4% to 91.2%.

Causality assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials can be challenging, and liver biopsies are not routinely performed as part of this evaluation. While the field is moving away from liver biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, information not identified by non-invasive testing may be provided on histology.

To address the appropriate utilisation of liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment in this setting.

From 2020 to 2022, the Liver Forum convened a series of webinars on issues pertaining to liver biopsy during MASH trials. The Histology Working Group was formed to generate a series of consensus documents addressing these challenges. This manuscript focuses on liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment.

Expert opinion, guidance and recommendations on the role of liver biopsy as part of causality assessment of suspected DILI occurring during clinical trials for a drug(s) being developed for MASH are provided. Lessons learned from prior MASH programs are reviewed and gaps identified.

Although there are no pathognomonic features, histologic evaluation of suspected DILI during MASH clinical trials may alter patient management, define the pattern and severity of injury, detect findings that favour a diagnosis of DILI versus MASH progression, identify prognostic features, characterise the clinicopathological phenotype of DILI, and/or define lesions that influence decisions about trial discontinuation and further development of the drug.

Liver biopsy can provide critical information in patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Our study aimed to compare the histopathological features of DILI at different time points from the onset to liver biopsy.

We conducted a single-centre retrospective observational study. The clinical and follow-up data were extracted, and the pathological slides were reviewed.

129 patients were included. The median age was 52 and 75% were women. They were divided into <1 month, 1-3 months, and >3 months groups according to the durations from onset of the disorder to liver biopsy. The aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin levels showed no significant differences at onset but significantly decreased with time among the three groups (all p<0.05) at the time of liver biopsy. Histological injury patterns were significantly different among the three groups (p<0.01). Hepatocellular, canalicular, and cholestasis of Kupffer cells were significantly less frequent in the >3 months group (p<0.01). For patients taking herbs, bridging necrosis and cholestatic injury were significantly more frequent in the <1 month group (p<0.01). Furthermore, ductopenia, cholate stasis, and foam-like cells were equally distributed in the three groups but were significantly associated with poor prognosis.

Biopsy time significantly affects liver pathology: the earlier, the more acute cholestatic-hepatitic pattern, the later, the more chronic injury patterns. The prognostic features (ductopenia, cholate stasis, and foam-like cells) occurred equally in all three groups. Our study provides valuable information for liver pathologists aiding in their better interpretation of the liver biopsy from patients with DILI.

Some drug-induced liver injury (DILI) cases may become chronic, even after drug withdrawal. Radiomics can predict liver disease progression. We established and validated a predictive model incorporating the clinical characteristics and radiomics features for predicting chronic DILI.

One hundred sixty-eight DILI patients who underwent liver gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were recruited. The patients were clinically diagnosed using the Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method. Patients who progressed to chronicity or recovery were randomly divided into the training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts, respectively. Hepatic T1-weighted images were segmented to extract 1672 radiomics features. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for feature selection, and Rad-score was constructed using support vector machines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build a clinic-radiomics model incorporating clinical characteristics and Rad-scores. The clinic-radiomics model was evaluated for its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness in the independent validation set.

Of 1672 radiomics features, 28 were selected to develop the Rad-score. Cholestatic/mixed patterns and Rad-score were independent risk factors of chronic DILI. The clinic-radiomics model, including the Rad-score and injury patterns, distinguished chronic from recovered DILI patients in the training (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.87-0.92) and validation (AUROC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.91) cohorts with good calibration and great clinical utility.

The clinic-radiomics model yielded sufficient accuracy for predicting chronic DILI, providing a practical and non-invasive tool for managing DILI patients.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable reaction of individuals exposed to a certain drug, and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) presents a DILI phenotype that mimics idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) when considering the clinical, biochemical, serological and histological parameters. We present a case report of a 48-year-old male who was hospitalized due to severe hepatocellular liver injury two months after self-treatment with a muscle-building dietary supplement based on arginine-alpha-ketoglutarate, L-citrulline, L tyrosine, creatine malate and beet extract. His immunology panel was positive with increased IgG levels, and radiologic methods showed no signs of chronic liver disease. He underwent corticosteroid treatment with adequate response. After therapy withdrawal, a clinical relapse occurred. Seven months after the initial presentation, liver MR suggested initial cirrhotic changes in the right liver lobe. A liver biopsy revealed abundant lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with piecemeal necrosis and grade 2 fibrosis. He responded well to the corticosteroid treatment again, and was further treated with low-dose prednisone without additional relapses. Several years later, further management confirmed the presence of liver cirrhosis with no histological or biochemical signs of disease activity. DIAIH is a DILI phenotype that is difficult to distinguish from idiopathic AIH despite a wide armamentarium of diagnostic methods. It should always be considered among the differential diagnoses in patients presenting with hepatocellular liver injury.

Immune-related liver injuries are closely associated with the liver's fundamental state. Patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) have poor liver function. We evaluated the clinical data of immune-related liver injury in patients with advanced BTC and gastric cancer (GC) during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment between February 2019 and July 2022 at Peking University First Hospital. Twenty-five patients with advanced BTC were identified. Fifteen patients (60%) experienced immune-related liver injury during ICI treatment. We also evaluated the clinical status of patients with GC in another group receiving immunotherapy. The results demonstrated that the incidence of immune-related liver injury was higher in patients with BTC than in GC cancer (p=0.040). Multivariate analysis suggested that the type of malignant tumor and baseline liver function status were high-risk factors for grade 2 and higher immune-related liver injuries. Two patients were diagnosed with immune-related cholangitis. Both biliary enzymes can be decreased to a certain degree by corticosteroid and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy but are difficult to reduce to normal levels. Liver function normalized, and symptoms improved after local treatment for cholestasis (stent implantation or PTBD). We observed a higher incidence of immune-related liver injury after ICI treatment in patients with advanced BTC. Effect of baseline liver function on the incidence of liver injury associated with immunotherapy. Interventional therapy provides rapid relief from cholestasis and is an indispensable and effective approach to the treatment of immune-related cholangitis.

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a poorly understood form of drug-induced liver injury that presents with features mimicking autoimmune hepatitis. Statins, commonly prescribed for lowering cholesterol and for cardiovascular disease prevention, have been documented in rare cases as being responsible for DIAIH. In this case report, we detail a case where a patient developed DIAIH due to her atorvastatin. We also highlight the diagnostic approach and management strategies for DIAIH.

Liver injury after COVID-19 vaccination is very rare and shows clinical and histomorphological similarities with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Little is known about the pathophysiology of COVID-19 vaccine-induced liver injury (VILI) and its relationship to AIH. Therefore, we compared VILI with AIH.

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples from patients with VILI (n = 6) and from patients with an initial diagnosis of AIH (n = 9) were included. Both cohorts were compared by histomorphological evaluation, whole-transcriptome and spatial transcriptome sequencing, multiplex immunofluorescence, and immune repertoire sequencing.

Histomorphology was similar in both cohorts but showed more pronounced centrilobular necrosis in VILI. Gene expression profiling showed that mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative stress-related pathways were more and interferon response pathways were less enriched in VILI. Multiplex analysis revealed that inflammation in VILI was dominated by CD8+ effector T cells, similar to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis. In contrast, AIH showed a dominance of CD4+ effector T cells and CD79a+ B and plasma cells. T-cell receptor (TCR) and B-cell receptor sequencing showed that T and B cell clones were more dominant in VILI than in AIH. In addition, many T cell clones detected in the liver were also found in the blood. Interestingly, analysis of TCR beta chain and Ig heavy chain variable-joining gene usage further showed that TRBV6-1, TRBV5-1, TRBV7-6, and IgHV1-24 genes are used differently in VILI than in AIH.

Our analyses support that SARS-CoV-2 VILI is related to AIH but also shows distinct differences from AIH in histomorphology, pathway activation, cellular immune infiltrates, and TCR usage. Therefore, VILI may be a separate entity, which is distinct from AIH and more closely related to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis.

Little is known about the pathophysiology of COVID-19 vaccine-induced liver injury (VILI). Our analysis shows that COVID-19 VILI shares some similarities with autoimmune hepatitis, but also has distinct differences such as increased activation of metabolic pathways, a more prominent CD8+ T cell infiltrate, and an oligoclonal T and B cell response. Our findings suggest that VILI is a distinct disease entity. Therefore, there is a good chance that many patients with COVID-19 VILI will recover completely and will not develop long-term autoimmune hepatitis.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated liver disease of unknown origin. Its clinical presentation is heterogeneous and ranges from asymptomatic courses over several years to acute forms with acute liver failure. Accordingly, the diagnosis is only made at the stage of cirrhosis in about one third of affected individuals. Early diagnosis and a consistent, adequate, individualized, immunosuppressive therapy are crucial for the prognosis, which is excellent when treated properly. AIH is rare in the general population and can be easily overlooked due to its variable clinical picture and sometimes difficult diagnosis. AIH should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any unclear acute or chronic hepatopathy. The therapy initially consists of remission induction and subsequently maintenance therapy with (often lifelong) immunosuppressants.