Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 124924
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124924
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124924
Table 1 Summary of included studies on indirect threat exposure, media-induced stress, and psychological outcomes
| Ref. | Design | Population | Exposure | Outcomes | Key findings | Relevance to model |
| Lisa Mccann and Pearlman[1] | Conceptual | Clinicians | Indirect trauma exposure | Psychological impact | Introduced the vicarious trauma framework | Foundational for indirect exposure |
| Figley[2] | Conceptual | Care providers | Secondary trauma | Emotional fatigue | Defined compassion fatigue | Theoretical basis |
| Pfefferbaum and North[3] | Narrative review | General population | Pandemic stress | Anxiety; distress | Described widespread mental health burden during the pandemic | Population-level context |
| Holman et al[4] | Longitudinal | United States adults | Media exposure after Boston Marathon bombing | Acute stress | Higher media exposure was associated with greater stress; in some cases exceeding direct exposure | Core evidence |
| Holman et al[5] | Longitudinal | Adults | Trauma-related media | Mental health; functioning | Media exposure predicted distress and functional impairment | Core evidence |
| Silver et al[6] | Longitudinal | United States population | 9/11 media exposure | PTSD symptoms; distress | Showed persistent psychological effects across the population | Core evidence |
| Pfefferbaum et al[7] | Systematic review | Mixed populations | Disaster media exposure | Psychological outcomes | Reported a consistent link between disaster media exposure and distress | Meta-level support |
| Garfin et al[15] | Conceptual review | General population | COVID-19 media exposure | Stress; anxiety | Proposed that media exposure may amplify public health consequences | Conceptual bridge |
| Racine et al[16] | Meta-analysis | Children and adolescents | Pandemic-related stress | Anxiety; depression | Reported increased prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms | Vulnerability subgroup |
| World Health Organization[8] | Policy report | Global population | Infodemic exposure | Distress | Highlighted potential harm from information overload and misinformation | Infodemic concept |
| Gao et al[9] | Cross-sectional | Chinese population | Social media exposure | Anxiety; depression | High social media exposure was linked to poorer mental health | Modern empirical support |
| Bendau et al[10] | Cross-sectional | Adults | COVID-19 media consumption | Anxiety; depression | Media use correlated with symptoms of anxiety, depression, and COVID-related fear | Strong modern evidence |
| Olagoke et al[11] | Cross-sectional | Adults | News exposure | Depression; risk perception | Exposure to coronavirus news was associated with higher distress | Supports exposure effect |
| Satici et al[12] | Mediation analysis | Adults | Uncertainty | Anxiety; wellbeing | Intolerance of uncertainty and rumination mediated distress | Mechanism: Uncertainty |
| Garfin et al[22] | Systematic review | Mixed populations | Acute stress exposure | Health outcomes | Acute stress predicted later health outcomes | Stress pathway |
| McEwen[18] | Review | General | Stress | Neurobiological impact | Described allostatic load as a cumulative biological burden | Biological plausibility |
| Arnsten[19] | Review | Neurobiology | Stress | Prefrontal cortex dysfunction | Stress impairs prefrontal/executive control | Mechanism |
| LeDoux[20] | Review | Neurobiology | Threat processing | Emotional circuits | Described amygdala-based threat processing | Mechanism |
| Chao et al[13] | Cross-sectional | General population | COVID-19 media exposure | Anxiety; stress | Media use was linked to acute psychological outcomes | Strong synthesis |
| Thompson et al[17] | Cross-sectional | United States adults | Ebola media exposure | Distress; worry | Media exposure predicted distress during a global health crisis | Population evidence |
| Buchanan et al[14] | Experimental | Adults | Doomscrolling vs positive content | Affect; optimism | Negative content produced immediate emotional decline; positive content did not | Mechanistic support |
- Citation: Amiri D, Briziarelli L, Amiri S, Karlsson B, Shah SJ, Rahimi Danesh H. Beyond direct trauma: Vicarious exposure, media-induced stress, and external stress overload as emerging public mental health challenges. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124924
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/124924.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.124924