BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 124924
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124924
Table 1 Summary of included studies on indirect threat exposure, media-induced stress, and psychological outcomes
Ref.
Design
Population
Exposure
Outcomes
Key findings
Relevance to model
Lisa Mccann and Pearlman[1]ConceptualCliniciansIndirect trauma exposurePsychological impactIntroduced the vicarious trauma frameworkFoundational for indirect exposure
Figley[2]ConceptualCare providersSecondary traumaEmotional fatigueDefined compassion fatigueTheoretical basis
Pfefferbaum and North[3]Narrative reviewGeneral populationPandemic stressAnxiety; distressDescribed widespread mental health burden during the pandemicPopulation-level context
Holman et al[4]LongitudinalUnited States adultsMedia exposure after Boston Marathon bombingAcute stressHigher media exposure was associated with greater stress; in some cases exceeding direct exposureCore evidence
Holman et al[5]LongitudinalAdultsTrauma-related mediaMental health; functioningMedia exposure predicted distress and functional impairmentCore evidence
Silver et al[6]LongitudinalUnited States population9/11 media exposurePTSD symptoms; distressShowed persistent psychological effects across the populationCore evidence
Pfefferbaum et al[7]Systematic reviewMixed populationsDisaster media exposurePsychological outcomesReported a consistent link between disaster media exposure and distressMeta-level support
Garfin et al[15]Conceptual reviewGeneral populationCOVID-19 media exposureStress; anxietyProposed that media exposure may amplify public health consequencesConceptual bridge
Racine et al[16]Meta-analysisChildren and adolescentsPandemic-related stressAnxiety; depressionReported increased prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptomsVulnerability subgroup
World Health Organization[8]Policy reportGlobal populationInfodemic exposureDistressHighlighted potential harm from information overload and misinformationInfodemic concept
Gao et al[9]Cross-sectionalChinese populationSocial media exposureAnxiety; depressionHigh social media exposure was linked to poorer mental healthModern empirical support
Bendau et al[10]Cross-sectionalAdultsCOVID-19 media consumptionAnxiety; depressionMedia use correlated with symptoms of anxiety, depression, and COVID-related fearStrong modern evidence
Olagoke et al[11]Cross-sectionalAdultsNews exposureDepression; risk perceptionExposure to coronavirus news was associated with higher distressSupports exposure effect
Satici et al[12]Mediation analysisAdultsUncertaintyAnxiety; wellbeingIntolerance of uncertainty and rumination mediated distressMechanism: Uncertainty
Garfin et al[22]Systematic reviewMixed populationsAcute stress exposureHealth outcomesAcute stress predicted later health outcomesStress pathway
McEwen[18]ReviewGeneralStressNeurobiological impactDescribed allostatic load as a cumulative biological burdenBiological plausibility
Arnsten[19]ReviewNeurobiologyStressPrefrontal cortex dysfunctionStress impairs prefrontal/executive controlMechanism
LeDoux[20]ReviewNeurobiologyThreat processingEmotional circuitsDescribed amygdala-based threat processingMechanism
Chao et al[13]Cross-sectionalGeneral populationCOVID-19 media exposureAnxiety; stressMedia use was linked to acute psychological outcomesStrong synthesis
Thompson et al[17]Cross-sectionalUnited States adultsEbola media exposureDistress; worryMedia exposure predicted distress during a global health crisisPopulation evidence
Buchanan et al[14]ExperimentalAdultsDoomscrolling vs positive contentAffect; optimismNegative content produced immediate emotional decline; positive content did notMechanistic support


Write to the Help Desk