Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. May 19, 2025; 15(5): 98436
Published online May 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.98436
Table 1 Comparison of nutritional status and depression scores between the two groups of patients, mean ± SD
Ref.
Country
Study design
Population (diagnosis criteria)
Mean age (year)
Sex (% female)
Intervention
Control
Intervention duration
Outcome measures
Trial No.
Aslan Çİn et al[15], 2024TurkeyDouble-blind RCTDepressive symptoms (BDI)Probiotics: 45.4 ± 10.7; Prebiotic: 47.0 ± 11.1; Control: 46.0 ± 8.4Probiotics: 100.0; Prebiotic: 100.0; Control: 100.0Probiotics (n = 18); Prebiotics (n = 17)Placebo (n = 18)8 weeksBDINCT04607278
Nikolova et al[14], 2023United KingdomDouble-blind RCTMDD (HDRS-17 ≥ 13)Probiotics: 32.5 (24.3-39.0); Control: 27.0 (23.0-41.0)Probiotics: 75.0; Control: 84.0Probiotics (n = 24)Placebo (n = 25)8 weeks HDRS; IDSNCT03893162
Tian et al[16], 2022ChinaDouble-blind RCTMDD (HDRS-24 > 14)Probiotics: 51.32 ± 16.11; Control: 48.15 ± 13.96Probiotics: 70.0; Control: 64.0Probiotics (n = 20)Placebo (n = 25)4 weeksHDRS; MADRS; BPRSChiCTR2100046321
Zhang et al[17], 2021ChinaDouble-blind RCTMDD (DSM-V or HDRS-17 > 8)Probiotics: 45.8 ± 12.3; Control: 49.7 ± 9.6Probiotics: 63.2; Control: 64.5Probiotics (n = 38)Placebo (n = 31)9 weeksHDRS; BDIChiCTR1900025972
Haghighat et al[18], 2021 IranDouble-blind RCTMDD (HADS-14 > 8)Probiotics + Synbiotics + Control: 46.64 (10.69)Probiotics + Synbiotics + Control: 52.0Probiotics (n = 25); Synbiotics (n = 25)Placebo (n = 25)12 weeksHADSIRCT2017041233393N1
Reiter et al[19], 2020AustriaDouble-blind RCTMDD (M.I.N.I.)Probiotics: 43.00 (14.31); Control: 40.11 (11.45)Probiotics: 71.4; Control: 81.8Probiotics (n = 28)Placebo (n = 33)4 weeksHDRS; BDINCT03300440
Heidarzadeh-Rad et al[20], 2020IranDouble-blind RCTMDD (DSM-IV)Probiotics: 37.8 ± 7.9; Prebiotic: 36.6 ± 8.4; Control: 36.0 ± 8.5Probiotics: 71.4; Prebiotic: 80.0; Control: 60.0Probiotics (n = 28) or prebiotics (n = 25)Placebo (n = 25)8 weeksBDIIRCT2015092924271N1
Rudzki L et al[21], 2019PolandDouble-blind RCTMDD (DSM-IV)Probiotics: 39.1(10.0); Control: 38.9 (12.0)Probiotics: 76.7; Control: 66.7Probiotics (n = 30)Placebo (n = 30)8 weeksHDRSNCT02469545
Kazemi et al[23], 2019IranDouble-blind RCTMDD (ICD-10)Probiotics: 36.2 (7.9); Prebiotics: 37.4 (8.0); Control: 36.0 (8.5)Probiotics: 71.1; Prebiotics: 75.0; Control: 66.7Probiotics (n = 38); Prebiotics (n = 36)Placebo (n = 36)8 weeksBDIIRCT2015092924271N1
Chahwan et al[22], 2019AustraliaTriple-blind RCTClinical and sub-clinical depression (M.I.N.I.)Probiotics: 36.65 (11.75); Control: 35.49 (12.34)Probiotics: 21.0; Control: 28.0Probiotics (n = 34)Placebo (n = 37)8 weeksBDIACTRN12615001081505
Hadi et al[24], 2019IranDouble-blind RCTDepression (DASS-21)Synbiotics: 34.49 (6.02); Control: 36.64 (7.26)Synbiotics: 36.6; Control: 31.0Synbiotics (n = 30)Placebo (n = 29)8 weeksDASSIRCT20180201038585N3
Nishida et al[25], 2019JapanDouble-blind RCTDepressive moods (HADS)Postbiotics: 24.9 (0.5); Control: 25.3 (0.6)Postbiotics: 32.3; Control: 30.0Postbiotics (n = 31)Placebo (n = 29)24 weeksHADSUMIN000027303
Ghorbani et al[26], 2018IranDouble-blind RCTMDD (DSM-V and HDRS-17 of 17–23)Synbiotics: 34.5 (4.0); Control: 35.5 (5.27)Synbiotics: 70.0; Control: 70.0Synbiotics (n = 20)Placebo (n = 20)6 weeksHDRSNR
Romijn et al[27], 2017New ZealandDouble-blind RCTLow mood (QIDS-SR16 > 11; DASS-42-D > 14)Probiotics: 35.8 (14.0); Control: 35.1(14.5)Probiotics: 80.0; Control: 76.9Probiotics (n = 40)Placebo (n = 39)8 weeksMADRS; QIDS; DASSACTRN12613000438752