Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.121263
Revised: April 17, 2026
Accepted: May 19, 2026
Published online: December 9, 2026
Processing time: 203 Days and 4.2 Hours
UGT1A1-related disorders, including Crigler-Najjar syndrome (CNS) type I, type II, and Gilbert syndrome (GS), disrupt bilirubin metabolism, resulting in uncon
To evaluate the prevalence of UGT1A1-related disorders and compare clinical features, genetic variations, management, and outcomes across the three pheno
We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Department of Pediatrics, Sal
The estimated national disease prevalence was 2.2 per 100000 individuals. GS was the most common phenotype (n = 27, 77.1%), followed by CNS-II (n = 7, 20.0%) and CNS-I (n = 1, 2.9%). Parental consanguinity was reported in 40.0% of cases. CNS-I was diagnosed earlier, at 6 months of age, than CNS-II [11.3 (0.3-16.8) years] and GS [13.4 (11.9-16.9) years]. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency was the most common coexisting condition (48.6%). Total bilirubin level at presentation was higher in CNS-I (409 μmol/L) than CNS-II (105.3 ± 46.2 μmol/L) and GS (88.2 ± 53.8 μmol/L). Homozygous (TA)7/7 polymorphism in the UGT1A1 promoter was the most common variant (91.4%). CNS-I required continuous phototherapy then liver transplantation, achieving sustained bilirubin normalization over 16.7 years of follow-up. Among patients with CNS-II, 85.7% were treated with phenobarbital, whereas 48.1% of patients with GS received phenobarbital before diagnosis, with poor adherence in 78.9% of cases. In CNS-II, there was no significant difference between indirect bilirubin level at presentation and at follow-up (92.3 ± 47.6 μmol/L vs 90.9 ± 58.0 μmol/L, P = 0.969).
Although rare, UGT1A1-related disorders represent important causes of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in Bahrain, with GS being the most prevalent phenotype. Genetic testing is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management, particularly in patients with coexisting hematological conditions.
Core Tip: This first study from Bahrain demonstrated that UGT1A1-related disorders represent important causes of persistent unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, affecting 2.2 per 100000 individuals. Gilbert syndrome (GS) was the most common phenotype, followed by Crigler-Najjar syndrome (CNS) type I and type II. Early genetic testing is crucial for diagnosis, particularly in patients with parental consanguinity and those with associated hematological disorders, mainly glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Homozygous (TA)7/7 was the most common variant. CNS-I requires lifelong phototherapy or liver transplantation, whereas CNS-II is treated with phenobarbital; however, treatment adherence remains challenging. No treatment is required for GS.
- Citation: Isa HM, Abdulaal FA, Busehail MY, Kamal MH, Alaswad HA, Alshaikh FY, Aljassmi AA, Hijris AJ. UGT1A1-related disorders in Bahrain: A genetic and clinical overview of Crigler-Najjar and Gilbert syndromes. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 121263
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i4/121263.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.121263
Prolonged unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia can result from autosomal recessive inborn errors of metabolism caused by genetic defects in the UGT1A1 gene, which is located on chromosome 2[1-3]. The UGT1A1 gene encodes the enzyme uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UDP-GT)[3]. The absence or decreased activity of the UDP-GT enzyme leads to the development of three phenotypes that represent a spectrum of the same disorder[1,2,4,5]. Accordingly, UGT1A1-related disorders are classified into three types: Crigler-Najjar syndrome (CNS) type I, type II, and Gilbert syndrome (GS)[1,4,6]. The differentiation among these phenotypes is based on clinical severity, residual enzyme activity, genetic findings, and response to medical therapy[1,4,5].
CNS-I is a rare disorder with an estimated worldwide incidence of less than 1 in 1000000 newborns[1]. It is commonly caused by nonsense mutations, frameshift mutations, splice-site mutations, and, less frequently, missense mutations in the UGT1A1 gene, leading to complete enzyme deficiency. In contrast, CNS-II is commonly caused by point mutations in the UGT1A1 gene, resulting in reduced enzyme activity to less than 10% of normal levels[1,6,7]. GS is considerably more prevalent than CNS, with a reported worldwide prevalence of 8%-10%[5,6,8,9]. It is caused by genetic variants that modulate UGT1A1 transcription, particularly those within the promoter region of the gene[6,9]. These variants lead to a 10%-35% reduction in enzymatic activity[6,9].
CNS-I is a permanent genetic condition in which unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia persists throughout life[1,10]. Elevated bilirubin levels increase the risk of bilirubin-induced neurological dysfunction (kernicterus), which can be prevented by daily phototherapy to maintain serum bilirubin within a safe range[1,3,10]. Treated individuals may sur
CNS-II is considered a less severe form[8,12]. It has a later onset, typically within the first year of life[12]. Although unconjugated bilirubin levels are elevated, they usually do not exceed 20 mg/dL[13]. Unlike patients with CNS-I, those with CNS-II respond well to phenobarbital and generally have a favorable prognosis, allowing a normal quality of life[1,12,14].
Other pharmacological treatments for CNS include bilirubin-binding agents (calcium phosphate or orlistat), choleretics (ursodeoxycholic acid), and heme oxygenase inhibitors (tin protoporphyrin or zinc protoporphyrin)[12,15,16].
GS is a mild, intermittent condition in which jaundice appears during fasting, stress, or the use of certain medications[4,8,9]. The onset usually occurs after adolescence[9]. Serum unconjugated bilirubin levels fluctuate from less than 1 mg/dL to 5 mg/dL (17-85 μmol/L)[6,9]. Consequently, GS does not require dietary modification or specific medical therapy, as the prognosis is generally favorable[9].
The incidence of UGT1A1-related disorders is often higher in populations with increased rates of consanguineous marriage because of their autosomal recessive mode of inheritance[1,7,17]. This includes the Kingdom of Bahrain, where the overall rate of consanguineous marriages is 11.4%[18]. UGT1A1-related disorders have been studied in countries neighboring Bahrain and worldwide[1-3,19,20]. However, they have not been investigated in Bahrain. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and the clinical and molecular spectrum of UGT1A1-related disorders, with a focus on genotype–phenotype correlations, associated hemolytic comorbidities, management strategies, and clinical outcomes across the disease spectrum.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC), Government Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain, and included a review of medical records from March 24, 2004, to December 31, 2024. SMC is the largest tertiary healthcare facility in the country and serves as the sole national referral center for genetic services. Moreover, SMC is the only referral center in Bahrain for genetic testing in suspected cases of UGT1A1-related disorders (CNS and GS). Patients with persistent unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia received medical care either as inpatients or through outpatient gastroenterology and genetic clinics.
All patients with persistent hyperbilirubinemia who were genetically confirmed to have CNS-I, CNS-II, or GS were included in the study. Patients with persistent jaundice who did not undergo genetic testing, those whose test results were negative for UGT1A1-related disorders, and those who lacked biochemical results for bilirubin monitoring were excluded. The patient selection process is illustrated in Figure 1. Of the 55 patients with persistent hyperbilirubinemia, 35 were genetically confirmed to have UGT1A1-related disorders. The genetic diagnosis was established by targeted sequencing of the UGT1A1 gene, performed at external laboratories (Centro de Genética Clínica Genetics Unilabs, Portugal, or the Scottish Molecular Genetic Consortium, Human Genetics Unit, Department of Pathology, Level 6, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom).
After genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to target the promoter region, including the A(TA)nTAA variant, as well as the coding regions and intron-exon boundaries (± 8 bp) of the UGT1A1 gene. During library preparation, tagmentation (QXT, Agilent Technologies, CA, United States) was used to simultaneously fragment the DNA samples, followed by next-generation sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina, San Diego, United States), with variant analysis performed using the DRAGEN workflow (Illumina, San Diego, United States). When necessary, Sanger sequencing was performed for regions with coverage below 15 ×. All variants were confirmed by independent PCR amplification and sequencing.
Data were retrieved from patients’ medical records, including archived paper-based files and the hospital’s electronic database (I-SEHA). Demographic variables, including sex, nationality, age at diagnosis, age at the time of the study, gestational age, birth weight, family history of jaundice or UGT1A1-related disorders, and parental consanguinity, were collected. Symptoms such as jaundice, changes in urine and stool color, pruritus, and cosmetic concerns related to yellowish skin discoloration were documented, as were physical findings including hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly. Associated conditions, particularly hematological disorders such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) defi
Patients’ data were entered into a Microsoft Excel 2016 spreadsheet and subsequently transferred to the SPSS [IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, United States] for further analysis. Categorical variables were presented as n (%). Continuous variables were expressed as means ± SD for normally distributed data or as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for nonnormally distributed data. The three types of UGT1A1-related disorders were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, associated conditions, biochemical and genetic findings, medical and surgical therapies, and outcomes. The CNS-I group included only one patient. Accordingly, comparative analyses were conducted between the CNS-II and GS groups, and the single patient with CNS-I was excluded from these analyses. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test and Student’s t-test were used to compare continuous variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was also applied to compare indirect bilirubin levels at the last follow-up visit between patients who received phenobarbital therapy and those who did not. In patients with CNS-II, serum indirect bilirubin levels at initial presentation and at the last follow-up visit were compared using paired t-tests. The CI was set at 95%, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), as revised in 2000, and was approved by the Research and Research Ethics Committee, Government Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain (No. 42080523). As this was a retrospective study, the requirement for informed consent was waived.
From March 2004 to December 2024, 55 patients were suspected of having UGT1A1-related disorders. Of these, 43 (78.2%) underwent genetic testing, and 35 patients (63.6%) from 34 unrelated families were genetically confirmed to have UGT1A1-related disorders and were included in the study. CNS-I was identified in one patient (2.9%), CNS-II in seven patients (20.0%), and GS in 27 patients (77.1%). Based on Bahrain’s population statistics for June 2024, the total population was 1588670[21]. Accordingly, the overall estimated prevalence of UGT1A1-related disorders in Bahrain was 2.2 cases per 100000 individuals (0.002%), corresponding to 0.06 cases for CNS-I, 0.4 cases for CNS-II, and 1.7 cases for GS per 100000 individuals. Most cases were identified during the last five years (2020-2024) (Figure 2). The average annual incidence of UGT1A1-related disorders was 4.022 cases per 100000 live births, including 0.128 for CNS-I, 0.792 for CNS-II, and 3.101 for GS per 100000 live births.
Most patients were male (n = 27, 77.1%), with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 3.4:1 (Table 1). The majority were Bahraini nationals (n = 32, 91.4%), whereas the remaining three patients (8.6%) were non-Bahraini nationals (one each from Ireland, Pakistan, and Jordan). The median age at diagnosis was 13.1 years (IQR: 9.0-16.8). The single patient with CNS-I presented during the neonatal period, and the diagnosis was genetically confirmed at the age of 6 months and 24 days. The median age at diagnosis was 11.3 years (IQR: 0.3-16.8) for patients with CNS-II and 13.4 years (IQR: 11.9-16.9) for those with GS.
| Clinical characteristics | Total, n = 35 (100) | CNS-I, n = 1 (2.9) | CNS-II, n = 7 (20.0) | GS, n = 27 (77.1) | P value1 |
| Demographics | |||||
| Sex | 1.0002 | ||||
| Male | 27 (77.1) | 1 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 20 (74.1) | |
| Female | 8 (22.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 7 (25.9) | |
| Nationality | 0.5112 | ||||
| Bahraini | 32 (91.4) | 1 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 25 (92.6) | |
| Non-Bahraini | 3 (8.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (7.4) | |
| Age at the time of diagnosis (years) | 13.1 (9.0-16.8) | 0.58 | 11.3 (0.3-16.8) | 13.4 (11.9-16.9) | 0.1103 |
| Age at the time of study (years) | 15.2 (13.3-19.0) | 21.4 | 15.3 (14.2-19.0) | 14.9 (13.1-18.5) | 0.7823 |
| Gestational age (n = 30) | 1.0002 | ||||
| Term | 26 (86.7) | 1 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 19/22 (86.4) | |
| Preterm | 4 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 3/22 (13.6) | |
| Birth weight (n = 27) | 3 (2.5-3.5) | 3.0 | 3.0 (2.5-3.5) | 3.0 (2.5-3.5) | 0.9543 |
| Family history of prolonged jaundice | 9 (25.7) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (57.1) | 5 (18.5) | 0.0612 |
| Parental consanguinity | 14 (40.0) | 1 (100) | 4 (57.1) | 9 (33.3) | 0.3872 |
| Clinical presentations | |||||
| Jaundice | 35 (100) | 1 (100) | 7 (100) | 27 (100) | N/A |
| Changes in urine color | 13 (37.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 11 (40.7) | 0.6822 |
| Pruritus | 10 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (42.9) | 7 (25.9) | 0.3942 |
| Changes in stool color | 5 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 4 (14.8) | 1.0002 |
| Splenomegaly | 13 (37.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 11 (40.7) | 0.6822 |
| Hepatomegaly | 7 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 6 (22.2) | 1.0002 |
| Associated diseases | |||||
| G6PD deficiency | 17 (48.6) | 1 (100) | 4 (57.1) | 12 (44.4) | 0.6812 |
| Sickle cell disease | 14 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 12 (44.4) | 0.6722 |
| Alpha-thalassemia | 5 (14.3) | 1 (100) | 1 (14.3) | 3 (11.1) | 1.0002 |
| Sickle-thalassemia | 3 (8.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (11.1) | 1.0002 |
| Sickle cell trait | 3 (8.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (7.4) | 0.5112 |
| Beta-thalassemia major | 2 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (7.4) | 1.0002 |
| Beta-thalassemia trait | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.7) | 1.0002 |
| Eczema | 10 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (42.9) | 7 (25.9) | 0.3942 |
At the time of the study, 24 (68.6%) patients were children (< 18 years) [19 (54.3%) with GS and five (14.3%) with CNS-II], whereas the remaining 11 (31.4%) were adults [eight (22.9%) with GS, two (5.7%) with CNS-II, and one (2.9%) with CNS-I]. A family history of prolonged jaundice was negative in the patient with CNS-I but positive in four patients (57.1%) with CNS-II (mother, brother, sister, and uncle; n = 1 each). Among patients with GS, five (18.5%) had at least one affected family member (two sisters and one each of father, brother, uncle, and cousin). One relative of a patient with CNS-II (a brother) was genetically confirmed to have CNS-II and was included in the study. The remaining family members had not undergone genetic testing at the time of the study. Parental consanguinity was reported in 40.0% of cases (n = 14).
All patients presented with yellowish discoloration of the skin and sclera; however, the severity of jaundice varied among individuals, and some patients had persistent jaundice that significantly affected their social lives. Jaundice-related cosmetic concerns were reported in 16 patients (45.7%), either by the patients themselves (n = 10, 28.6%), by family members (n = 4, 11.4%), or by both (n = 2, 5.7%). Splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were observed mainly in patients with GS (40.7% and 22.2%, respectively). G6PD deficiency was the most frequently associated condition (n = 17, 48.6%).
At presentation, all patients had low hemoglobin levels and elevated reticulocyte percentages (Table 2). The mean serum protein level was within the normal range in all groups; however, it was lower in the patient with CNS-I than in those with CNS-II or GS (62.0 g/L vs 70.3 ± 3.9 g/L vs 74.8 ± 5.9 g/L, respectively). After excluding the single patient with CNS-I, the difference between the CNS-II and GS groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.086, 95%CI: -9.1 to 0.62). Patients with CNS-I had higher total bilirubin levels than those with CNS-II and GS (409 μmol/L vs 105.3 ± 46.2 μmol/L vs 88.2 ± 53.8 μmol/L, respectively). The ALT level was elevated only in the patient with CNS-I. Vitamin D levels were low in 25 of the 27 tested patients (92.6%) [CNS-I (1/1, 100%), CNS-II (3/3, 100%), and GS (21/23, 91.3%)].
| Biochemical parameters | Normal range | Total, n = 35 (100) | CNS-I, n = 1 (2.9) | CNS-II, n = 7 (20.0) | GS, n = 27 (77.1) | P value1 (95%CI) |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.0-14.5 | 10.9 ± 2.1 | 10.9 | 11.0 ± 1.7 | 10.9 ± 2.2 | 0.955 (-1.8, 1.9)2 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 33-45 | 33.2 ± 5.8 | 32.1 | 33.9 ± 3.8 | 33.1 ± 6.4 | 0.721 (-4.3, 6.1)2 |
| RBC (× 1012/L) | 3.9-5.2 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 5.3 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 0.732 (-0.7, 0.9)2 |
| Reticulocyte (%) (n = 32) | 0.5-1.5 | 2.7 (1.9-5.6) | 1.9 | 1.8 (1.1-6.1) (n = 6) | 3.0 (2.1-5.3) (n = 25) | 0.3683 |
| Platelet count (× 109/L) | 150-400 | 286 (221-396) | 263 | 331 (259-403) | 282 (221-381) | 0.3383 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 57-82 | 74 ± 5.9 | 62.0 | 70.3 ± 3.9 | 74.8 ± 5.9 | 0.086 (-9.1, 0.62)2 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 38-54 | 44.5 ± 3.4 | 37.0 | 44.1 ± 5.3 | 44.7 ± 2.9 | 0.706 (-3.6, 2.4)2 |
| Total bilirubin at presentation (μmol/L) | 5-21 | 89.7 ± 52.7 | 409 | 105.3 ± 46.2 | 88.2 ± 53.8 | 0.447 (-28.2, 62.5)2 |
| Direct bilirubin (μmol/L) | ≤ 5.0 | 14 (10-18) | 4.0 | 15 (8-16) | 14 (11-19) | 0.4683 |
| Indirect bilirubin at presentation (μmol/L) | ≤ 18 | 72 (24-126) | 405 | 95 (40-122) | 68 (23-126) | 0.1943 |
| Maximum total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 5-21 | 147 (98-228) | 409 | 188 (121-227) | 133 (91-238) | 0.4063 |
| Maximum indirect bilirubin (μmol/L) | ≤ 18 | 122.7 (82-210) | 405 | 173 (109-210) | 119 (67-182) | 0.2973 |
| ALP (U/L) | 142-335 | 185 (132-254) | 246 | 254 (132-343) | 180 (118-204) | 0.3833 |
| ALT (U/L) | ≤ 33 | 17 (12-25) | 106 | 17 (11-25) | 17 (12-22) | 0.9833 |
| GGT (U/L) | ≤ 38 | 11 (8-20) | 20 | 15 (7-38) | 10 (9-16) | 0.9323 |
| Vitamin D level (nmol/L) (n = 27) | > 50 | 31.3 ± 11.5 | 48 | 31.7 ± 6.0 (n = 3) | 30.5 ± 11.8 (n = 23) | 0.871 (-13.3, 15.6)2 |
Table 3 summarizes the results of genetic testing. Apart from the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.161G>A (p.Gly54Val) variant, all other variants had been previously reported[2,7,22-25]. Genetic testing of the patient with CNS-I revealed a homozygous (TA)7/7 polymorphism in the promoter region, along with a homozygous missense pathogenic variant, UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg), in exon 3. Genetic screening of the parents revealed that both were heterozygous carriers of the same UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) variant; however, their promoter region status was not documented. All seven patients with CNS-II exhibited the (TA)7/7 polymorphism. Of these, six (85.7%) were homozygous, and one (14.3%) was heterozygous, in whom this finding was observed alongside additional genetic variants. Among the 27 patients with GS, 25 (88.8%) were homozygous for the (TA)7/7 promoter variant; one (3.7%) carried an additional homozygous UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.-3275T>G (p.?) variant; and two (7.4%) were compound heterozygous for the (TA)7/8 promoter polymorphism.
| Polymorphism | Zygosity | UGT1A1 variant | Location | Zygosity | Classification | Total, n = 35 (100) |
| CNS-I | 1 (2.9) | |||||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.1070A>G p.(Gln357Arg)[2,7,22] | Exon 3 | Homozygous | Pathogenic | 1 (2.9) |
| CNS-II | 7 (20.0) | |||||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.907G>A p.(Val303Met)[24] | Exon 2 | Homozygous | VUS | 2 (5.7) |
| (TA)7/7 | Heterozygous | c.161G>A p.(Gly54Val) | Exon 1 | Heterozygous | VUS | 1 (2.9) |
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.674T>G p.(Val225Gly)[23] | Exon 1 | Homozygous | LP | 1 (2.9) |
| c.907G>A p.(Val303Met)[24] | Homozygous | VUS | 1 (2.9) | |||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.674T>G p.(Val225Gly)[23] | Exon 1 | Homozygous | LP | 1 (2.9) |
| c.907G>A p.(Val303Met)[24] | Heterozygous | VUS | 1 (2.9) | |||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.674T>G p.(Val225Gly)[23] | Exon 1 | Heterozygous | LP | 1 (2.9) |
| c.907G>A p.(Val303Met)[24] | Heterozygous | VUS | 1 (2.9) | |||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.1070A>G p.(Gln357Arg)[2,7,22] | Exon 3 | Heterozygous | Pathogenic | 1 (2.9) |
| GS | 27 (77.1) | |||||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | 24 (68.6) | ||||
| (TA)7/8 | Compound heterozygous | 2 (5.7) | ||||
| (TA)7/7 | Homozygous | c.-3275T>G[25] | Homozygous | VUS | 1 (2.9) |
Abdominal ultrasound was performed in 26 patients (74.3%) before the genetic diagnosis of UGT1A1-related disorders; results were unavailable for three patients (11.3%). Notably, 20 of the 26 patients (76.9%) who underwent abdominal ultrasound had at least one associated inherited hematological disorder, including SCD (n = 13, 65.0%), reduced G6PD activity (n = 10, 50.0%), sickle-thalassemia (n = 3, 15.0%), alpha-thalassemia (n = 2, 10.0%), beta-thalassemia major (n = 2, 10.0%), and beta-thalassemia trait (n = 1, 5.0%). Among the 23 patients with available ultrasound results, 20 (86.9%) had abnormal findings, including splenomegaly (n = 11, 47.8%), hepatomegaly (n = 11, 47.8%), SCD-related nephropathy (n = 8, 34.8%), biliary sludge (n = 2, 8.7%), and fatty liver, prominent intrahepatic biliary ducts suggestive of biliary cirrhosis, dilated common bile duct, cholelithiasis, auto-splenectomy, hyperechoic splenic lesions, bilateral renal cysts, and a large left adrenal myelolipoma (n = 1, 4.4% each). Three patients (13.0%) had normal ultrasound findings. The patient with CNS-I had no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly. There were no statistically significant differences between CNS-II and GS in the presence of hepatomegaly [1/3 (33.3%) vs 10/20 (50.0%), respectively; P = 1.000] or splenomegaly [0/3 (0.0%) vs 11/20 (55.0%), respectively; P = 0.217].
Patient management is summarized in Table 4. Initially, before diagnostic confirmation, the patient with CNS-I received phototherapy in the neonatal intensive care unit in addition to phenobarbital therapy. No exchange transfusion was required during hospitalization. After discharge, the patient received home phototherapy for nearly 10 hours daily, and phenobarbital was discontinued once the genetic diagnosis was established. At the age of 3.7 years, he was referred overseas for auxiliary living-related LTx in Saudi Arabia, with his mother serving as the donor. Post-transplantation, bilirubin levels normalized rapidly, and phototherapy was discontinued. He was followed regularly in outpatient clinics and remained clinically stable on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. At 16.7 years after LTx, his indirect bilirubin level was 17 μmol/L. Among the seven patients with CNS-II, six (85.7%) were prescribed phenobarbital therapy; five (83.3%) demonstrated poor adherence, whereas one (16.7%) demonstrated good adherence. The reasons for poor adherence included patient refusal (n = 2/5, 40.0%), parental reluctance to administer the medication (n = 2/5, 40.0%), and discontinuation following consultation with adult gastroenterologists (n = 1/5, 20.0%). Before diagnosis and while awaiting genetic test results, 13 of the 27 patients with GS (48.1%) also received phenobarbital; adherence was poor in 10 (76.9%) and good in three (23.1%). Poor adherence was attributed to adverse drug effects (n = 4/10, 40.0%), such as lethargy and decreased concentration; discontinuation following consultation with adult gastroenterologists (n = 2/10, 20.0%); patient refusal (n = 2/10, 20.0%); symptom improvement (n = 1/10, 10.0%); and forgetfulness (n = 1/10, 10.0%).
| Patient management | Total, n = 35 (100) | CNS-I, n = 1 (2.9) | CNS-II, n = 7 (20.0) | GS, n = 27 (77.1) |
| Medications | ||||
| Phenobarbital | 20 (57.1) | 1 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 13 (48.1) |
| Folic acid | 20 (57.1) | 1 (100) | 3 (42.9) | 16 (59.3) |
| Vitamin D supplementation | 20 (57.1) | 1 (100) | 1 (14.3) | 18 (66.7) |
| Hydroxyurea | 16 (45.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 14 (51.9) |
| Ursodeoxycholic acid | 13 (37.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 12 (44.4) |
| Other medications1 | 16 (45.7) | 1 (100) | 1 (14.3) | 14 (51.9) |
| Medical/surgical procedures | ||||
| Blood transfusion | 15 (42.9) | 1 (100) | 2 (28.6) | 12 (44.4) |
| Phototherapy | 13/31 (41.9) | 1 (100) | 4/6 (66.7) | 8/24 (33.3) |
| Cholecystectomy | 8 (22.9) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 6 (22.2) |
| Splenectomy | 6 (17.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 5 (18.5) |
| Liver transplantation | 1 (2.9) | 1 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
The follow-up duration was available for 33 of 35 patients (94.3%) and was longer in CNS-I (16.7 years) than in CNS-II [3.2 years (IQR: 2.5-13.5)] and GS [1.2 years (IQR: 0.4-3.6)]. Patients with CNS-II had a significantly longer follow-up duration than those with GS (P = 0.021). Regardless of the UGT1A1 phenotype, the median indirect bilirubin level at the last follow-up visit was higher among patients who received phenobarbital than among those who did not [40.4 μmol/L (IQR: 20.3-87.0) vs 37.0 μmol/L (IQR: 26.9-87.0)]; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.934). In patients with CNS-II, there was no statistically significant difference between indirect bilirubin levels at presentation and at follow-up (92.3 ± 47.6 μmol/L vs 90.9 ± 58.0 μmol/L, P = 0.969).
This study demonstrated that genetically confirmed UGT1A1-related disorders are rare in Bahrain, with an estimated prevalence of 22 cases per million individuals (0.63 for CNS-I, 4.4 for CNS-II, and 17 for GS) and an average annual incidence of 40.22 cases per million live births (1.28 for CNS-I, 7.92 for CNS-II, and 31.01 for GS). CNS-I is extremely rare worldwide, with an estimated incidence of approximately 1 per 1 million live births[26]. To date, the highest reported incidence of CNS-I is in Tunisia (8 per million newborns), followed by Croatia (6 per million live births)[27,28]. The exact incidence of CNS-II remains unclear and requires further investigation. GS was the most prevalent UGT1A1-related disorder in this Bahraini cohort (0.0169%); however, this prevalence is lower than the reported global prevalence of GS, which ranges from 3% to 8.6%[9]. This discrepancy may be attributed to the higher prevalence of GS among White populations (approximately 10%) or to underdiagnosis[5].
The present study demonstrated that 88.6% of UGT1A1-related disorder cases were diagnosed during the last five years (2020-2024). However, this marked increase in the number of diagnosed patients is likely attributable to improved access to genetic testing and increased awareness among healthcare professionals regarding genetic disorders rather than to a true rise in incidence[18,29]. In Tunisia, Aronson et al[27] attributed the elevated incidence of CNS-I to high rates of consanguineous marriage (25%-60%) and to a founder effect. A founder effect was also reported by Koshy et al[2] in two children with CNS-I from Kuwait. Notably, these authors described the same molecular configuration observed in our patient with CNS-I, as both children carried the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) mutation located in exon 3. This mutation has been detected only in Arab populations and has consistently been associated with the (TA)7 promoter polymorphism[2]. These findings strongly support the association of CNS-I with a founder effect not only in Tunisia but also in other Arab countries. Haplotype analysis conducted by Petit et al[22] suggested that the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) mutation emerged approximately 32 generations ago in the Tunisian popu
Most patients in this study had GS (77.1%), followed by CNS-II (20.0%) and CNS-I (2.9%). However, none of the reviewed studies included all three phenotypes. Wu et al[8] from China reported 310 patients with isolated unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia; 232 (74.8%) had GS, and 78 (25.2%) had CNS-II. Similarly, in another study from China, Sun et al[30] evaluated 95 patients with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, of whom 59 (62.1%) were diagnosed with GS, 36 (37.9%) with CNS-II, and none with CNS-I. Five other studies included both types of CNS[14,15,20,23], whereas most previous studies examined only one phenotype, either CNS-I alone[1-3,7,16,22,28], CNS-II alone[4,13,31-33], or GS alone[9,19,34]. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the main clinical, biochemical, and genetic features of UGT1A1-related disorders reported in studies from neighboring countries and worldwide.
| Main features | CNS-I | CNS-II | GS |
| Prevalence | Ultra-rare[26] | Unclear (no record) | Prevalent (8%-10%)[5,6,8,9] |
| UGT1A1 enzyme activity | 0%[5] | < 10%[6] | 10%-30%[9] |
| Age at presentation | Neonatal period[1,28] | Infancy or childhood[33] | Adolescence or adulthood[8] |
| Triggers of jaundice | None | Fasting, illness or stress[4,6] | Fasting, illness, or stress[5,8] |
| Clinical severity; unconjugated bilirubin range (µmol/L) | Severe[28,33]; 340-850[33] | Moderate[33]; 85-340[33] | Mild[8,33]; < 85[33] |
| Kernicterus risk | High[1,3,6,10] | Low[7] | None[5] |
| Medical therapy | Phototherapy[1,26], plasma phoresies[1,26], or liver transplantation[3,11] | Phenobarbital[33] | No treatment needed[5] |
| Outcome | Poor if not treated[1,3,10] | Good[33] | Excellent[6] |
| Country | Ref. | n | Sex (M:F) | Promotor variant | UGT1A1 mutation | Zygosity | Location | Additional variant | Zygosity |
| CNS-I | |||||||||
| Saudi Arabia | Nazer et al[1], 1998 | 12 | 8:4 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Kuwait | Koshy et al[2], 2004 | 2 | 0:2 | (TA)7/7 | 1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) | +/- | Exon 3 | NR | NR |
| Turkey | Ozçay et al[3], 2009 | 4 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Tunisia | Abdellaoui et al[7], 2022 | 12/17 | NR | (TA)7/7 | c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) | +/+ | Exon 3 | NR | NR |
| 5/17 | NR | (TA)8/8 | c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) | +/+ | Exon 3 | NR | NR | ||
| Tunisia | Petit et al[22], 2008 | 23 | 6:17 | (TA)7/7 | c.1070A>G (p.Gln357Arg) | +/+ | Exon 3 | NR | NR |
| Germany | Schröder et al[14], 2021 | 12/13 | 10:3 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Netherlands | Hafkamp et al[15], 2007 | 7/16 | 5:11 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| China | Li et al[4], 2015 | 6 | 6:2 | (TA)7/7 | c.221G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| Croatia | Kovačić Perica et al[28], 2023 | 2/8 | 4:4 | (TA)7/7 | c.717_718delAG (p.Q239fs*256) | NR | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| 1/8 | (TA)7/7 | c.722_723delAG (p.Glu241Glyfs*16) | NR | Exon 1 | NR | NR | |||
| 2/8 | (TA)6/6 | c.1021C>T (p.Arg341*) | NR | Exon 3 | NR | NR | |||
| 1/8 | N/A | c.1021C>T (p.Arg341*) | NR | Exon 3 | NR | NR | |||
| 1/8 | Not performed | Confirmed by chromatographic bile analysis | NR | NR | NR | NR | |||
| 1/8 | Lost result | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | |||
| Iran | Mohammadi Asl et al[20], 2013 | 4/12 | 2:2 | NR | c.238_240delAG | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| c.479T>A (p.Val160Glu) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR | |||||
| Iran | Maruo et al[23], 2015 | 2 | 1:1 | NR | c.381insGG (p.C127Wfs*23) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| United States | Strauss et al[16], 2006 | 17/20 | NR | NR | c.222C>A (p.Tyr74Ter) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| 1/20 | c.1069C>T (p.Gln357Ter) | +/+ | Exon 3 | NR | NR | ||||
| 1/20 | c.1305-1G>A, c.877_890delinsT | +/-, +/- | Exon 4, Exon 2 | NR | NR | ||||
| CNS-II | |||||||||
| Japan | Maruo et al[31], 2006 | 1 | 1:0 | (TA)7/7 | c.115C>G (p.His39Asp) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| Iran | Maruo et al[23], 2015 | 1 | 1:0 | (TA)7/7 | c.381insGG (p.C127Wfs*23) | +/- | Exon 1 | c.674T>G (p.Val225Gly) | +/- (Exon 1) |
| France | Labrune et al[32], 2002 | 1 | 0:1 | (TA)8/8 | c.1213A>G (p.Asn400Asp) | +/+ | Exon 4 | NR | NR |
| Germany | Schröder et al[14], 2021 | 1/13 | 10:3 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Netherlands | Hafkamp et al[15], 2007 | 9/16 | 5:11 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| China | Li et al[4], 2015 | 1/11 | 8:3 | NR | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+ | NR | c.1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) | +/+ |
| 1/11 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | NR | c.1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) | +/+ | ||||
| 1/11 | c.1091C>T (p.Pro364 Leu) | +/+ | NR | c.-40_-39insTA | +/- | ||||
| 1/11 | c.1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) | +/- | NR | c.1253del (p.Met418Argfs*6) | +/- | ||||
| 2/11 | c.715C>T (p.Gln239*) | +/- | NR | c.-40_-39insTA | +/+ | ||||
| 1/11 | c.1091C>T (p.Pro364 Leu) | +/- | NR | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | ||||
| 1/11 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | NR | c.-40_-39insTA | +/- | ||||
| NR | c.-3279T>G | +/- | |||||||
| 2/11 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | NR | c.-3345delC | +/- | ||||
| 1/11 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | NR | NR | NR | ||||
| China | Wu et al[8], 2024 | 78/310 | 50:28 | (TA)7/7 (TA)7/6 (TA)6/6 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+, +/- | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| Japan | Yamamoto et al[13], 1998 | 5/7 | 3:4 | (TA)7/7 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+ | Exon 1 | c.1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) | +/+ (Exon 5) |
| 1/7 | (TA)7/7 | c.625C>T (p.Arg209Trp) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR | |||
| 1/7 | (TA)7/7 | c.686C>A (p.Pro229Gln) | +/- | Exon 1 | NR | NR | |||
| Taiwan | Huang et al[33], 2006 | 1/3 | 0:1 | NR | c.479T>A (p.Val160Glu) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| 1/3 | 0:1 | NR | c.610A>G (p.Met204Val) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR | ||
| 1/3 | 0:1 | NR | c.1456T>G (p.Tyr486Asp) | +/+ | Exon 5 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/- | ||
| Iran | Mohammadi Asl et al[20], 2013 | 8/12 | 4:4 | NR | c.238_240delAG | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| c.479T>A (p.Val160Glu) | +/+ | Exon 1 | NR | NR | |||||
| GS | |||||||||
| Africa | Horsfall et al[19], 2011 | 2616 | NR | (TA)7/7, (TA)7/8 | NR | NR | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| Sri Lanka | Premawardhena et al[34], 2003 | 229 | 115:114 | (TA)7/7 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| China | Wu et al[8], 2024 | 232/310 | 166:66 | (TA)7/7, (TA)7/6, (TA)6/6 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+, +/- | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
| China | Gu et al[9], 2022 | 117 | NR | (TA)7/7 | c.211G>A (p.Gly71Arg) | +/+, +/- | Exon 1 | NR | NR |
This study demonstrated an overall male predominance of 77.1%, which was consistent across the three types of UGT1A1-related disorders. However, the number of cases was limited, and the observed sex difference did not reach statistical significance; therefore, no causal inferences can be drawn. Similarly, Sun et al[30] reported a male predominance in 69.5% (n = 66/95) of their patients, including 43 with GS and 23 with CNS-II. A worldwide cohort study by Aronson et al[27], which included 221 patients with CNS from 13 countries, also reported a slight male predominance, with 54.3% (n = 120/221) males and 45.7% (n = 101/221) females. The single patient with CNS-I in our study was male. This finding is consistent with reports from Saudi Arabia[1] and Germany[14], where 66.6% (n = 8/12) and 75.0% (n = 9/12) of patients with CNS-I were male, respectively. In contrast, a study from the Netherlands reported a female predominance in CNS-I (n = 5/7, 71.4%)[15], whereas a study from Croatia reported an equal sex distribution among patients with CNS-I[28]. In the present study, 85.7% (n = 6/7) of patients with CNS-II were male, which is comparable to data from China, where 72.7% (n = 8/11) of patients with CNS-II were male[4]. Conversely, the Dutch study reported a female predominance in CNS-II (n = 6/9, 66.0%)[15]. However, both types of CNS are generally considered autosomal recessive disorders in which sex is not a determining factor[1,3,4-7,10,12]. CNS-II was historically considered to possibly follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance or pseudodominance[1]. However, similar to CNS-I and GS, recent studies have described CNS-II as an autosomal recessive condition[4,5-7,10,12,13,17].
In this study, the single patient with CNS-I was genetically confirmed at the age of 6 months and 24 days. In contrast, the median age at diagnosis was 11.3 years (IQR: 0.3-16.8) for CNS-II and 13.4 years (IQR: 11.9-16.9) for GS. This diag
All patients in this study presented with persistent jaundice. The patient with CNS-I had neither hepatomegaly nor splenomegaly, whereas patients with CNS-II and GS exhibited hepatomegaly (14.3% and 22.2%, respectively) and splenomegaly (28.6% and 40.7%, respectively). Similarly, Kovačić Perica et al[28] reported no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly in three patients with CNS-I. In contrast, Li et al[4] reported that none of their patients with CNS-II had a palpable liver or spleen. GS typically does not present with organomegaly unless it is associated with coexisting hematological or hepatic disorders[36]. In the present study, all patients with CNS-II and GS who had hepatomegaly or splenomegaly also had SCD or thalassemia.
Beyond the physical manifestations of UGT1A1-related disorders, jaundice-related cosmetic concerns were reported in 45.7% of patients, who experienced emotional and social challenges that prompted them to seek medical advice. A similar observation was reported by Dhawan et al[11] in patients with CNS-I. Public misconceptions that jaundice is invariably caused by infectious diseases may lead to discrimination against patients with UGT1A1-related disorders. However, the psychosocial impact of these disorders warrants further investigation.
In this study, all patients had low hemoglobin levels and elevated reticulocyte percentages, suggesting hemolytic anemia. However, Erlinger et al[6] and Sun et al[30] reported that UGT1A1-related disorders are not typically associated with overt hemolysis. Similarly, Kovačić Perica et al[28] described eight patients with CNS-I, and Maruo et al[31] reported a case of CNS-II; in both reports, no evidence of hemolysis was observed. This discrepancy may be attributed to the high prevalence of hemolytic disorders in our cohort.
To date (April 7, 2026), the ClinVar database has identified 440 UGT1A1 gene variants[37]. Of these, 210 are missense mutations, 13 nonsense mutations, 34 frameshift mutations, and 14 variants located in the untranslated regions. Re
In this cohort, genetic testing of the patient with CNS-I revealed homozygosity for the (TA)7/7 promoter polymor
In the present study, all seven patients with CNS-II carried the (TA)7/7 promoter polymorphism; 85.7% were homozygous, and 14.3% were compound heterozygous, in combination with the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.161G>A (p.Gly54Val) variant in exon 1 and other variants. Maruo et al[23] from Iran reported a patient with compound heterozygous variants, UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.674T>G (p.Val225Gly) and c.381_382insGG (p.Cys127Trpfs*23), along with the A(TA)7TAA promoter variation. The UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.161G>A (p.Gly54Val) variant has not been previously described in the literature. It affects a highly conserved residue, and bioinformatic analysis predicts a deleterious effect. Based on the currently available evidence, this variant should be classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Similarly, the UGT1A1(NM_000463.3):c.907G>A (p.Val303Met) variant has been classified in ClinVar as a VUS[38]. To date, no associations between the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.161G>A (p.Gly54Val) or the UGT1A1 (NM_000463.3):c.907
For GS, the most prevalent variant in this study was homozygosity for the (TA)7/7 promoter polymorphism in the UGT1A1 gene, with no additional variants detected (n = 24/27, 88.9%). Homozygosity for (TA)7/7 in the promoter region without additional pathogenic variants is the most frequently reported genetic cause of GS[4,8,19,34]. Gu et al[9] evaluated 117 Chinese patients with GS and reported that the most common pathogenic variants were the promoter A(TA)7TAA insertion and the p.Gly71Arg missense variant. Only two patients with GS (7.4%) in our cohort were compound heterozygous for (TA)7/(TA)8, whereas one patient harbored an additional variant. The (TA)8 allele is extremely rare in Caucasian populations[39]. Iolascon et al[39] reported a case of a girl with GS from Taranto (Apulia), Italy, who was compound heterozygous for (TA)7/(TA)8. Coelho et al[40] also described a 5-year-old Portuguese Cau
Management of UGT1A1-related disorders varies depending on the patient’s clinical condition. Patients with CNS-I may require exchange transfusions, long-term phototherapy, or LTx, whereas those with CNS-II are typically managed with lifelong phenobarbital therapy[1-4,10,11,14,15,20,27]. Patients with GS generally do not require medical intervention because of its milder phenotype, with serum bilirubin levels usually ranging from normal to 85 μmol/L[33]. In the present study, the single patient with CNS-I initially received hospital-based phototherapy combined with phenobarbital before diagnostic confirmation. He subsequently continued home phototherapy until the age of 3.7 years, when he underwent auxiliary living-related LTx, which resulted in rapid normalization of serum bilirubin levels. Sambati et al[17] noted that management of CNS-I requires intensive interventions, including phototherapy and plasmapheresis, whereas phenobarbital, which induces UGT1A1 enzyme expression, is ineffective because of the complete absence of functional UGT1A1 activity in CNS-I[5]. Whole-body phototherapy should be initiated as early as possible after birth[41], ideally following exchange transfusion if indicated[1,11]. Adherence to phototherapy imposes a substantial burden on both patients and caregivers[11]. CNS-I has a significant emotional impact on children, as they face limitations in social interactions and may feel stigmatized because of their appearance[11]. Moreover, caregivers and parents of children with CNS-I experience financial, psychological, and emotional hardship due to the demands of continuous phototherapy and the requirement to keep toddlers under blue light exposure for 10-12 hours daily[3,11,16,26,41]. This was also observed in our patient with CNS-I before LTx. Moreover, phototherapy becomes less effective with increasing age because of increased skin pigmentation and thickness, a less favorable surface area-to-body weight ratio, limited hepatobiliary clearance of lumirubin, and decreased adherence[12,16]. To enhance the effectiveness of nocturnal phototherapy, ursodeoxycholic acid (15-30 mg/kg/day) and a lipid-rich bedtime snack have been recommended, as they may stimulate bile flow and promote hepatic clearance of lumirubin[17]. However, LTx remains the only definitive treatment, particularly when phototherapy and plasmapheresis are no longer effective[17]. Two main LTx approaches are commonly performed: Orthotopic LTx (OLT) and auxiliary partial OLT[11]. In the largest cohort reported by Aronson et al[27], 11.8% (n = 26/221) of patients with CNS underwent LTx at a median age of 9 years (range: 0-32), resulting in a significant reduction in total bilirubin levels. In Croatia, LTx was performed in 50% of patients with CNS-I (n = 4/8) at the ages of 5.5, 7, 9.5, and 10 years[28]. Although the optimal timing of LTx in patients with CNS-I remains controversial, transplan
In the present study, 85.7% (n = 6/7) of patients with CNS-II received phenobarbital therapy. Phenobarbital induces UGT1A1 gene transcription, thereby increasing UDP-GT activity and reducing plasma unconjugated bilirubin concentrations by 30% or more[12,41]. Phenobarbital is recommended as long-term therapy for patients whose serum bilirubin levels exceed 15 mg/dL or for those with jaundice that affects their quality of life[42]. The recommended dose is 2 mg/kg administered two to three times daily for children or 60-180 mg/day for adults, divided into two doses[42]. Our study demonstrated a modest reduction in mean indirect bilirubin levels following phenobarbital therapy. Nonetheless, adherence to lifelong medication remains challenging, particularly among adolescents[11]. Adherence to phenobarbital was poor in 83.3% of patients with CNS-II. The reasons for poor adherence included patient refusal, parental reluctance to administer the medication, and discontinuation of therapy following consultation with adult gastroenterologists. Moreover, in our hospital, caregivers are required to attend outpatient clinics every two months to refill phenobarbital prescriptions, a policy that may negatively affect adherence and, consequently, treatment outcomes. In addition, the use of lower-than-recommended doses of phenobarbital may reduce therapeutic effectiveness. Social stigma associated with the use of anticonvulsant medication was also observed in our cohort, contributing to parental refusal to initiate therapy. However, the clinical manifestations of CNS-II are heterogeneous; therefore, not all patients require continuous pheno
Although patients with GS generally do not require treatment[9], phenobarbital is occasionally used[5], as the potential adverse effects of the medication may outweigh the benefits of treating such a benign degree of jaundice. In our study, 48.1% (n = 13/27) of patients with GS received phenobarbital therapy to reduce the cosmetic impact of jaundice before diagnosis while awaiting genetic test results. Historically, phenobarbital administration was used as a diagnostic test to confirm GS before the availability of genetic testing, to distinguish GS from CNS-I and CNS-II. Other diagnostic approa
In the present study, 22.9% (n = 8/35) of patients with UGT1A1-related disorders underwent cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis. However, it remains unclear whether cholelithiasis was attributable to hemolytic anemia secondary to associated hematological disorders or to UGT1A1-related disorders. Strauss et al[26] reported that 43% (n = 12/28) of patients with CNS-I were diagnosed with cholelithiasis; all underwent cholecystectomy, which revealed multiple small pigment stones.
Several limitations should be acknowledged. The retrospective, single-center design resulted in some missing data and limits the generalizability of the findings. However, this center serves as the national and sole referral center for genetic services in Bahrain, receiving referrals from other tertiary hospitals; therefore, the cohort likely represents genetically confirmed UGT1A1-related disorder cases evaluated nationwide. Nonetheless, prevalence estimates should be inter
Despite these limitations, the findings of this study are clinically relevant. This is the first study from Bahrain to address UGT1A1-related disorders, encompassing key aspects ranging from disease prevalence and genetic characterization to clinical outcomes, including all three phenotypes. The results may assist healthcare providers in the diagnosis and management of patients with UGT1A1-related disorders. These findings may also provide a foundation for future research exploring various aspects of this rare condition. In addition to the physical impact of the disease, physicians should address the mental and psychological well-being and quality of life of patients with UGT1A1-related disorders and their caregivers to ensure comprehensive care.
This study found that UGT1A1-related disorders are an important cause of persistent indirect hyperbilirubinemia in Bahrain. Among these disorders, GS was the most common phenotype, followed by CNS-II and CNS-I. Despite its higher prevalence, GS likely represents only the visible portion of the burden, as it remains largely underdiagnosed because of its typically mild and often unnoticed clinical manifestations. GS is frequently misdiagnosed as CNS-II, a less common condition, which may lead to unnecessary treatment with phenobarbital. Although extremely rare, CNS-I has severe clinical consequences because of markedly elevated bilirubin levels and the associated risk of kernicterus. Management often involves prolonged phototherapy, which can substantially impair quality of life, and LTx, which carries considerable risks. Diagnostic evaluation for UGT1A1-related disorders, including enzyme assays and comprehensive genetic sequencing, should be prioritized in patients with inherited hematological disorders, particularly those with G6PD deficiency and SCD, especially in populations with high rates of consanguinity, to minimize delays in diagnosis. Further research is needed to develop novel therapeutic approaches for CNS-I, such as hepatocyte transplantation and gene therapy. In addition, future studies should evaluate phenobarbital treatment strategies (continuous vs intermittent administration), treatment adherence in patients with CNS-II, and the psychosocial impact and long-term outcomes in individuals with GS.
The authors gratefully acknowledge all healthcare professionals who provided care for patients with genetic and hematological conditions in the Department of Pediatrics, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Government Hospitals, Kingdom of Bahrain.
| 1. | Nazer H, Al-Mehaidib A, Shabib S, Ali MA. Crigler-Najjar syndrome in Saudi Arabia. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79:12-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 2. | Koshy A, Bosma PJ, Oude-Elferink RP. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 associated with combined 1070A-->G, Q357R and (TA)7 mutation in Kuwaiti Bedouin families indicate a founder effect in Arabs. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:465-467. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Ozçay F, Alehan F, Sevmiş S, Karakayali H, Moray G, Torgay A, Arslan G, Haberal M. Living related liver transplantation in Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:2875-2877. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in RCA: 20] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 4. | Li L, Deng G, Tang Y, Mao Q. Spectrum of UGT1A1 Variations in Chinese Patients with Crigler-Najjar Syndrome Type II. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126263. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in RCA: 17] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 5. | Strassburg CP. Hyperbilirubinemia syndromes (Gilbert-Meulengracht, Crigler-Najjar, Dubin-Johnson, and Rotor syndrome). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:555-571. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 141] [Cited by in RCA: 114] [Article Influence: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 6. | Erlinger S, Arias IM, Dhumeaux D. Inherited disorders of bilirubin transport and conjugation: new insights into molecular mechanisms and consequences. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1625-1638. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 208] [Cited by in RCA: 168] [Article Influence: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 7. | Abdellaoui N, Abdelmoula B, Abdelhedi R, Kharrat N, Tabebi M, Rebai A, Bouayed Abdelmoula N. Novel combined UGT1A1 mutations in Crigler Najjar Syndrome type I. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36:e24482. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Wu L, Li Z, Song Y, Li Y, Zhang W, Zhong X, Wang X, Huang J, Ou X. Analysis of UGT1A1 genotype-phenotype correlation in Chinese patients with gilbert and crigler-Najjar II syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2024;71:104962. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Gu L, Han Y, Zhang D, Gong Q, Zhang X. Genetic testing of UGT1A1 in the diagnosis of Gilbert syndrome: The discovery of seven novel variants in the Chinese population. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2022;10:e1958. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Lodoso Torrecilla B, Palomo Atance E, Camarena Grande C, Díaz Fernández MC, Hierro Llanillo L, De la Vega Bueno A, Frauca Remacha E, Muñoz Bartolo G, Jara Vega P. [Crigler-Najjar syndrome: diagnosis and treatment]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2006;65:73-78. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in RCA: 10] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Dhawan A, Lawlor MW, Mazariegos GV, McKiernan P, Squires JE, Strauss KA, Gupta D, James E, Prasad S. Disease burden of Crigler-Najjar syndrome: Systematic review and future perspectives. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:530-543. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in RCA: 33] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 12. | Al-Shurafa HA, Bassas AF, Broering DC, Rogiers XG, Wali SH, Burdelski MM. Management of Crigler-Najjar Syndrome type I. Saudi Med J. 2001;22:486-489. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 13. | Yamamoto K, Soeda Y, Kamisako T, Hosaka H, Fukano M, Sato H, Fujiyama Y, Adachi Y, Satoh Y, Bamba T. Analysis of bilirubin uridine 5'-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase gene mutations in seven patients with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II. J Hum Genet. 1998;43:111-114. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in RCA: 28] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Schröder H, Junge N, Herden U, Deutschmann A, Weidemann SA, Krebs-Schmitt D, Grabhorn EF. Outcome of liver transplantation and prevalence of liver fibrosis in Crigler-Najjar syndrome. Clin Transplant. 2021;35:e14219. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | Hafkamp AM, Nelisse-Haak R, Sinaasappel M, Oude Elferink RP, Verkade HJ. Orlistat treatment of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in Crigler-Najjar disease: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:725-730. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in RCA: 18] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Strauss KA, Robinson DL, Vreman HJ, Puffenberger EG, Hart G, Morton DH. Management of hyperbilirubinemia and prevention of kernicterus in 20 patients with Crigler-Najjar disease. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:306-319. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 118] [Cited by in RCA: 96] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 17. | Sambati V, Laudisio S, Motta M, Esposito S. Therapeutic Options for Crigler-Najjar Syndrome: A Scoping Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:11006. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 12] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 18. | Al-Arrayed S, Hamamy H. The changing profile of consanguinity rates in Bahrain, 1990-2009. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44:313-319. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 19. | Horsfall LJ, Zeitlyn D, Tarekegn A, Bekele E, Thomas MG, Bradman N, Swallow DM. Prevalence of clinically relevant UGT1A alleles and haplotypes in African populations. Ann Hum Genet. 2011;75:236-246. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 51] [Cited by in RCA: 44] [Article Influence: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 20. | Mohammadi Asl J, Tabatabaiefar MA, Galehdari H, Riahi K, Masbi MH, Zargar Shoshtari Z, Rahim F. UGT1A1 gene mutation due to Crigler-Najjar syndrome in Iranian patients: identification of a novel mutation. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:342371. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 21. | Information and eGovernment Authority. [cited 14 May 2026]. Available from: https://www.bahrain.bh/wps/portal/en/BNP/GSX-UI-AllEntities/GSX-UI-EntityDetails?entityID=1. |
| 22. | Petit FM, Bézieau S, Gajdos V, Parisot F, Scoul C, Capel L, Stozinic V, Khrouf N, M'Rad R, Koshy A, Mollet-Boudjemline A, Francoual J, Labrune P. The Tunisian population history through the Crigler-Najjar type I syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:848-853. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 23. | Maruo Y, Behnam M, Ikushiro S, Nakahara S, Nouri N, Salehi M. Two Different UGT1A1 Mutations causing Crigler-Najjar Syndrome types I and II in an Iranian Family. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2015;24:523-526. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in RCA: 6] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 24. | El-Karaksy H, Mogahed EA, Baroudy S, Ghita H, Enayet A, El-Sharkawy M, Radwan NA, Hosny H, Elmonem MA. Unfolding the genetic map of monogenic liver diseases in Egypt. Hum Genet. 2025;144:1053-1070. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 25. | Guo Z, Qu Z, Guo Z, Chen J, Zeng Q, Cao X, Liao M, Wang L, Tan J, Liu L, De Q, Wang X, Yang H, Gong Q. Analysis of UGT1A1 Polymorphism and Clinical Risk Factors for Neonatal Jaundice in Chinese Tibetan Newborns: Comparison with Han Newborns. 2025 Preprint. Available from: Research Square. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 26. | Strauss KA, Ahlfors CE, Soltys K, Mazareigos GV, Young M, Bowser LE, Fox MD, Squires JE, McKiernan P, Brigatti KW, Puffenberger EG, Carson VJ, Vreman HJ. Crigler-Najjar Syndrome Type 1: Pathophysiology, Natural History, and Therapeutic Frontier. Hepatology. 2020;71:1923-1939. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in RCA: 34] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 27. | Aronson SJ, Junge N, Trabelsi M, Kelmemi W, Hubert A, Brigatti KW, Fox MD, de Knegt RJ, Escher JC, Ginocchio VM, Iorio R, Zhu Y, Özçay F, Rahim F, El-Shabrawi MHF, Shteyer E, Di Giorgio A, D'Antiga L, Mingozzi F, Brunetti-Pierri N, Strauss KA, Labrune P, Mrad R, Baumann U, Beuers U, Bosma PJ; CureCN Consortium. Disease burden and management of Crigler-Najjar syndrome: Report of a world registry. Liver Int. 2022;42:1593-1604. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 28. | Kovačić Perica M, Todorić I, Marčinković N, Džepina P, Aničić MN, Mrzljak A, Vuković J. Case report: Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 in Croatia-more than a one in a million: a case series. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1276349. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 29. | Al-Arrayed S, Hafadh N, Amin S, Al-Mukhareq H, Sanad H. Student screening for inherited blood disorders in Bahrain. East Mediterr Health J. 2003;9:344-352. [PubMed] |
| 30. | Sun L, Li M, Zhang L, Teng X, Chen X, Zhou X, Ma Z, Qi L, Wang P. Differences in UGT1A1 gene mutations and pathological liver changes between Chinese patients with Gilbert syndrome and Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8620. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in RCA: 33] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 31. | Maruo Y, Topaloglu AK, Takahashi H, Mori A, Iwai M, Duzovali O, Yamamoto K, Matui K, Sato H, Takeuchi Y. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II caused by a homozygous triple mutation [T-3279G, A(TA)7TAA, and H39D] of UGT1A1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;42:236-239. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 32. | Labrune P, Myara A, Chalas J, Le Bihan B, Capel L, Francoual J. Association of a homozygous (TA)8 promoter polymorphism and a N400D mutation of UGT1A1 in a child with Crigler-Najjar type II syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2002;20:399-401. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in RCA: 14] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 33. | Huang CS, Tan N, Yang SS, Sung YC, Huang MJ. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 2. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105:950-953. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 34. | Premawardhena A, Fisher CA, Liu YT, Verma IC, de Silva S, Arambepola M, Clegg JB, Weatherall DJ. The global distribution of length polymorphisms of the promoters of the glucuronosyltransferase 1 gene (UGT1A1): hematologic and evolutionary implications. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2003;31:98-101. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 105] [Cited by in RCA: 101] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 35. | Mohammed AM, Al-Hilli F, Nadkarni KV, Bhagwat GP, Bapat JP. Hemoglobinopathies and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in hospital births in Bahrain. Ann Saudi Med. 1992;12:536-539. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in RCA: 32] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 36. | Vítek L, Tiribelli C. Gilbert's syndrome revisited. J Hepatol. 2023;79:1049-1055. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in RCA: 52] [Article Influence: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 37. | National Center for Biotechnology Information. ClinVar, UGT1A1 gene. [cited 5 May 2026]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/?gene=Ugt1a1&term=%22Ugt1a1%22%5BGENE%5D. |
| 38. | National Center for Biotechnology Information. ClinVar; VCV003357495.1. [cited 5 May 2026]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/VCV003357495.1. |
| 39. | Iolascon A, Faienza MF, Centra M, Storelli S, Zelante L, Savoia A. (TA)8 allele in the UGT1A1 gene promoter of a Caucasian with Gilbert's syndrome. Haematologica. 1999;84:106-109. [PubMed] |
| 40. | Coelho H, Costa E, Vieira E, Branca R, dos Santos R, Barbot J. A new case of (TA)8 allele in the UGT1A1 gene promoter in a Caucasian girl with Gilbert syndrome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004;21:371-374. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 41. | Bortolussi G, Muro AF. Advances in understanding disease mechanisms and potential treatments for Crigler–Najjar syndrome. Expert Opin Orphan D. 2018;6:425-439. [RCA] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in RCA: 19] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 42. | Liu WL, Li F, He ZX, Jiang HY, Ai R, Chen XX, Huang K. Analysis of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene mutations in an unusual Crigler-Najjar syndrome patient. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6:667-669. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |