Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2016; 7(10): 687-694
Published online Oct 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i10.687
Table 1 Baseline comparisons of intervention (volar locking distal radius plate) and control (other treatments) group
Intervention group n = 24Control group n = 26
Patient characteristics
Mean age (SD)51.1 (16.0)52.5 (16.5)
Gender F (M)15 (9)13 (13)
% Osteoporosis4347
% Diabetes mellitus54
% With medical condition12529
Dominant hand912
Fracture classification
A202
A347
B233
C176
C287
C321
Table 2 Functional and clinical outcomes at 3 mo
VLDRP groupn = 24Control groupn = 26P-value
DASH (points)40 (12)50 (24)0.063
PRWE (points)21 (20)47 (40)0.0071
Grip strength (% of grip strength of uninjured limb)
64 (29)42 (32)0.0121
Range of motion (in degrees)
Flexion60 (21)49 (22)0.072
Extension65 (48)48 (27)0.0211
Pronation70 (31)68 (26)0.805
Supination82 (25)79 (24)0.677
ADLs
Grade 119100.0361
Grade 215
Grade 347
Grade 402
Grade 502
Table 3 Radiological parameters at presentation, post reduction, and 3 mo follow-up
VLDRP group n = 24Control groupn = 26P-value
Injured wrist at presentation
Volar slope (degrees)-17.2 (17.2)-13.4(14.4)0.241
Radial inclination (degrees)8.7 (7.6)14.2 (9.4)0.021
Ulnar variance (mm)2.5 (2.2)2.3 (3.3)0.285
Injured wrist post-reduction
Volar slope (degrees)4.7 (5.4)0.08(7.25)0.011
Radial inclination (degrees)19.6 (4.5)18.69(4.52)0.45
Ulnar variance (mm)0.1 (0.6)0.4 (1.4)0.146
Injured wrist 3 mo
Volar slope (degrees)3.5 (4.6)-5.4 (11.6)0.0011
Radial inclination (degrees)19.3 (4.4)15.37 (7.0)0.0541
Ulnar variance (mm)0.9 (1.3)2.1 (1.9)0.0111