Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2014; 5(2): 69-79
Published online Apr 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.69
Table 1 Summary of the literature addressing muscle force output variability in older adults and those with osteoarthritis before and after total knee arthroplasty
StudyPopulationPurpose/hypothesisVariables assessedSignificant findings
Older adults with native, non-arthritic knees
Carville et al[50], 2007n = 44 (Young adults; Age range = 18-4 yr) n = 78 (Older adults; Age range > 70 yr)To investigate isometric and anisometric quadriceps contractions in healthy you and older adultsMuscle strength; CV of isometric force steadiness at 10%, 25%, and 50% of MVC; and SD of acceleration of anisometric steadiness during concentric and eccentric contractions against two external loads of 1 and 5 kg1. Non-significant trend for younger subjects to be most steady and fallers least study 2. Isometric force steadiness was unaffected by the level of force output. 3. Fallers were less steady than both young and non-fallers 4. Older adults were less steady during eccentric contractions than the younger adults and fallers were the least steady
Christou et al[51], 2002n = 24 (Young, active adults; Mean age = 25.3 yr) n = 24 (Older active adults; Mean age = 73.3 yr)To examine the ability to control knee-extension force during discrete isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractionsMuscle strength; Isometric force steadiness at 90 degrees of knee flexion; and Concentric and eccentric force steadiness at 25 deg/s1. CV of force steadiness for all contractions was greater in older subjects than younger subjects 2. Muscle strength was similar for all three types of contractions Young subjects were stronger than older subjects
Hortobágyi et al[52], 2001n = 27 (Older adults; Mean age = 72 yr) n = 10 (Young adults; Mean age = 21 yr)To compare the effects of low- and high-intensity strength training o maximal and explosive strength and on the accuracy and steadiness of submaximal quadriceps force in elderly humansMuscle strength Quadriceps force accuracy and steadiness during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions performed at 25 N target force1. Older subjects had significantly more force variability (i.e., were less steady) during eccentric and concentric, but not isometric contractions 2. Force variability and accuracy were correlated with each other, but not with maximal strength 3. Training significantly improved force accuracy and variability during eccentric and concentric contractions
Manini et al[53], 2005n = 50 (Healthy, older adults; Mean age = 76.2 yr)To determine how knee extensor steadiness during an isometric task is related to performing four everyday tasks that included chair rising, walking at a fast pace, and stair ascending and descendingIsometric knee extensor steadiness at 50%MVC; Chair rise time Time to ascend and descend stairs; and Walking velocityIsometric quadriceps force steadiness was not a predictor of functional performance in older subjects
Schiffman et al[54], 2001n = 19 (Healthy older adults; Mean age = 71.8 yr) n = 20(Healthy young adults; Mean age = 25.8 yr)To investigate the effects of motion on submaximal force control abilities in the knee extensorsIsokinetic force variability at two different force levels; 20% of MVC and 60% of MVC1. Isokinetic submaximal force control was equally diminished in both young and older adults compared to isometric force control 2. As the force level increased, force variability decreased for both young and older adults
Tracy et al[22], 2002n = 10 (Healthy young adults; Mean age = 22 yr) n = 10 (Healthy older adults; Mean age = 72 yr)To compare the steadiness and EMG activity of young and old adults while they were performing submaximal isometric and anisometric contractions with the knee extensor musclesMuscle strength; EMG of quadriceps muscles during experimental tasks; and Isometric, concentric, and eccentric force steadiness for 10-12 s at 2%, 5%, 10%, and 50% of MVC1. Steadiness of old adults was reduced compared with young adults during isometric, but not during concentric and eccentric contractions 2. Decline in steadiness was not associated with differences in EMG magnitude
Tracy et al[55], 2004n = 26 (Healthy, older adults; Mean age = 77.7 yr)To determine the effect of strength and steadiness training with heavy loads by old adults on the fluctuations in force and position during voluntary contractions with the quadriceps femoris musclesMuscle strength (MVC); Force fluctuations during isometric contractions at 2%, 5%, 10%, and 50% of MVC; Force fluctuations during concentric and eccentric contractions at 5%, 10%, and 50% of MVC; EMG activity of the quadriceps muscles during experimental tasks; and Physical function tasks including gait speed, chair rise, and stair ascent and descent1. Force fluctuations during submaximal isometric contractions did not change with training 2. Force fluctuations during submaximal anisometric contractions with a 50% load declined for both heavy and light training groups
Seynnes et al[13], 2005n = 19 (Healthy older women; Mean age = 77.9 yr)To assess the relationship between knee-extensor force-control capacity, as measured by isometric force steadiness and accuracy, and functional limitations in healthy older adultsIsometric quadriceps force steadiness at 50% of MVC; MVC Rate of torque development; EMG activity; and Functional performance measures including walking endurance, chair rising, and stair climbing1. Isometric steadiness independently predicts chair-rise time and stair-climbing power 2. None of the accuracy measures were significantly associated with any of the functional performance tests Walking endurance was related to muscle strength, but not steadiness
Older adults with osteoarthritic knees
Hortobágyi et al[56], 2004n = 20 (Older adults with OA; Mean age = 57.5 yr) n = 20 (Controls; Mean age = 56.8 yr)To characterize the distribution of error in knee joint proprioception, quadriceps force accuracy and steadiness and muscle strength in patients with knee OAQuadriceps force accuracy and steadiness during a force target-tracking task during anisometric contractions. Muscle strength was measured during eccentric, isometric, and concentric contractions1. Knee OA subjects needed 67% more time to complete functional tasks, produced 82% more proprioception errors, and 89% more errors in accurately matching target forces 2. Knee OA subjects had 155% more force variability, with eccentric contractions being particularly unsteady
Sørensen et al[57], 2011n = 41 (Older adults with OA; Mean age = 62 yr)To investigate the relationship between quadriceps force steadiness and knee adduction moment during walking in patients with knee OASubmaximal isometric quadriceps force steadiness during a force target-tracking task. Peak knee adduction moment during ambulationQuadriceps force steadiness does not predict peak knee adduction moment
Older adults following total knee arthroplasty
Smith et al[14] ,2013n = 13 (Older adults with TKA; Mean age = 62.7 yr) n = 11 (Controls; Mean age = 62.2 yr)To compare muscle force steadiness of submaximal quadriceps force output in individuals with knee OA before and after TKA, and to a group of age-matched controls with native kneesMuscle strength; Quadriceps muscle force steadiness (MFS) during anisometric eccentric and concentric contractions at 50% MVIC1. Pre-operatively, quadriceps force steadiness for both concentric and eccentric contractions was significantly higher in the OA group relative to controls; and 2. Post-operatively quadriceps force steadiness for both concentric and eccentric contractions was significantly lower in the OA group relative to controls Muscle strength was significantly lower in the TKA group both pre- and post-operatively compared to controls
Table 2 Summary of the literature addressing gait variability in older adults and those with osteoarthritis before and after total knee arthroplasty
StudyPopulationPurpose/hypothesisVariables assessedSignificant findings
Older adults with native, non-arthritic knees
Brach et al[62], 2012n = 552 (Older adults; Mean age = 79.4 yr)1. Determine the magnitude of STV that discriminates individuals who currently have mobility disability. Determine the magnitude of STV that predicts a new onset of mobility disability at 1 yrGait Variability: Stance time variability Self-reported walking disability1. Values of STV may be useful in recognizing mobility disability and future disability 2. Recommend using 0.034 s as the cutoff
Brach et al[63], 2010n = 241 (Older adults; Mean age = 80.3 yr)1. To estimate clinically meaningful change in gait variability over time. Greater gait variability is a predictor of future falls and mobility disabilityGait Variability: Step width, Stance time, Swing time, Step lengthPreliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability, and 0.25 cm for step length variability
Brach et al[61], 2008n = 558 (Older adults; Mean age = 79.4 yr)1. CNS impairments will affect motor control and be manifested as increased stance time and step length variability. Sensory impairments would affect balance and manifest as increased step width variabilityGait Variability: Step width, Stance time, Step length, Strength Measures: Grip strength, Repeated chair standsCNS impairments affected stance time variability especially in slow walkers, while sensory impairments affected step width variability in fast walkers
Brach et al[64], 2007n = 379 (Older adults; Mean age = 79 yr)To determine if gait variability adds to the prediction of incident mobility disability independent of gait speedGait speed, Step length, Stance time, STV1. After adjusting for gait speed and other comorbidities, only stance time variability remained an important indicator of disability 2. STV of 0.01 s was associated with a 13% higher incidence of mobility disability
Brach et al[65], 2005n = 503 (Older adults; Mean age = 79 yr)To examine the linear and nonlinear associations between gait variability and fall history in older persons and to examine the influence of gait speedCV of step width, CV of step length, CV of step time, CV of stance time, Gait speed, Fall history1. Step width variability had the highest correlation with fall history, which only existed in subjects that walked > 1.0 m/s 2. Step length, stance time, and step time variability were not associated with fall history
Callisaya et al[66], 2011n = 411 [Older adults; Mean age = 72.6 yr (lost to follow-up); 71.2 yr (no falls); 72.3 yr (single fall); 73.9 yr (multiple falls)]To investigate the associates of gait and gait variability measures with incident fall riskGait Variability: Step length, Step width, DSP, Gait speed, Cadence, Step timeAssociations with multiple falls were present for gait speed, cadence and step time variability
Maki et al[67], 1997n = 75 (Older adults; Mean age = 82 yr)To determine whether specific gait measures can predict the likelihood of experiencing future falls or whether they are more likely to be indicative of adaptations associated with pre-existing fear of fallingGait Variability: Stride length, Stride width, Stride period, Double-support, Stride velocity1. Stride-to-stride variability in gait is a predictor of falling 2. Wider stride does not increase stability but does predict an increased likelihood of experiencing falls
Older adults with osteoarthritic knees
Lewek et al[10], 2006n = 15 (Older adults with OA; Mean age = 48.7 yr); n = 15 (Controls; Mean age = 48.4 yr)Quantify the variability of knee motion in patients with medial knee OAJoint kinematics and kinetics, Knee motion variability, Knee joint laxity, Co-contraction indexPatients with medial knee OA displayed altered kinematics and kinetics
Kiss et al[68], 2011n = 90 (Older adults with moderate or severe OA; Mean age = 68.9 yr) n = 20 (Controls; Mean age = 70.7 yr)To clarify how the variability of gait parameters is influenced by the severity of knee OAGait variability: Stride length, Stride width, Speed, Cadence, Duration of double-support, Duration of support1. Variability of gait associated with knee OA is gender-dependent 2. Severity of OA affects step length, duration of support and cadence
Older adults following total knee arthroplasty
Kiss et al[69], 2012n = 45 (Older adults with TKA; Median age = 68.3 yr) n = 21 (Controls; Median age = 76 yr)To evaluate the influence of different surgical techniques on gait variability and stabilityGait Variability: Stride length, Stride width, Speed, Cadence, Duration of double-support, Duration of support1. Type of surgical technique influences gait variability and stability 2. Differences in the variability of angular parameters predict gait instability and increased risk of falling after TKA
Fallah-Yakhdani et al[11], 2010n = 16 (Older adults with TKA; Mean age = 62.3 yr) n = 12 (Healthy, older adults; Mean age = 62.0 yr)To evaluate treadmill walking at various speeds in OA patients pre- and post-TKA, to assess dynamic stability and variability of sagittal knee movementsKnee motion variability as measured by the angular velocity of sagittal knee movements; Walking speed; and Variability of knee movementsAfter TKA, knee motion variability decreased and was related to a reduction of fall risk. Stability control was also improved after surgery
Fallah-Yakhdani et al[70], 2012n = 14 (Older adults with TKA; Mean age = 62.3 yr) n = 12 (Healthy, older adults; Mean age = 62.0 yr) n = 15 (Healthy, young adults; Mean age = 22.9 yr)To identify the determinant of co-contractions during gait in patients with knee OA before and 1 year after TKAGait speed at seven different speeds (0.6-5.4 km/h) EMG activity Variability of angular velocity of sagittal knee movements over the first 30 strides at each speed1. Variability of sagittal plane knee movements (measured in deg/s) increased with speed; 2. Pre-operatively, the patients’ affected and unaffected legs were less variable than those of the young controls and the affected leg was less variable than the healthy peers 3. Post-operatively, variability in the knee OA group was further decreased to a level significantly below both control groups