Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2021; 12(5): 301-309
Published online May 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.301
Published online May 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.301
Table 1 Comparison of critical shoulder angle measurements between methods and observers
| Observer 1 (Smith GCS) | Observer 2 (Mah D) | Combined | |
| Means (SD) | |||
| Radiographs | 32.42° (4.58°) | 32.88° (3.96°) | 32.55° (4.26°) |
| CT-based method | 29.86° (3.61°) | 29.79° (3.41°) | 29.82° (3.49°) |
| Inter-method | |||
| Difference (LOA) | 12.46° (-3.05° to +7.24°) | 12.99° (-3.15° to +7.97°) | 12.73° (-2.17° to +7.63°) |
| Pearson’s r | 10.769 | 10.725 | 10.748 |
- Citation: Mah D, Chamoli U, Smith GC. Usefulness of computed tomography based three-dimensional reconstructions to assess the critical shoulder angle. World J Orthop 2021; 12(5): 301-309
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i5/301.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.301