Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2019; 10(2): 101-114
Published online Feb 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i2.101
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
Acute scaphoid fracturesScaphoid Fracture Delayed Union or Non-Union
Elite or recreational athletesNo sporting outcome data reported
Return rates to sporting activity reportedPaediatric fractures (age under 15)
Time to return to sporting activity reportedConcomitant upper or lower limb fractures
Two or more fractures reportedReviews, case reports, abstracts or anecdotal articles
Peer-reviewed journalsAnimal, cadaver or in vitro studies
English language
Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies
Ref.Study locationnFracture type/ locationGender (count)Mean ageStudy designTreatmentSport activityLevel of sport
Adolfsson et al[10] (2001)Linkoping & Lund, Sweden5Waist (5)N/A31 (15-75)RCTPSF (3); Conservative (2)Soccer (3); Swimming (1); Squash (1)National level
Bedi et al[25] (2007)Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States6B2 (6)N/A25 (16-62)RCSORIF (6)Sport (6)Collegiate/ Professional
Ellsasser and Stein[27] (1979)St. Louis, Missouri, United States2-M: 2N/ACSConservative (2); Returned immediatelyAmerican football (2)Professional
Huene[28] (1979)Fresno, California, United States4-N/AN/ACSORIF (4)Sport (4)N/A
McQueen et al[9] (2008)Edinburgh, United Kingdom55B1 (1); B2 (54)M: 50 F: 1029.4 (17-65)RCTPSF (28); Conservative (27)N/AN/A
Muramatsu et al[24] (2002)Yamaguchi, Japan10A2 (3); B2 (6); B3 (1)M: 1017.3 (13-22)RCSORIF (10)Badminton (1); Baseball (2); Basketball (2); Boxing (2); Handball (1); Judo (2); Rugby (1); Soccer (16); Tennis (1); Track (2)N/A
Rettig et al[22] (1994)Indianapolis, Indiana, United States30MT (30)M: 25 F: 518.3RCSORIF (18); Conservative (12); Returned immediatelySport (30)N/A
Rettig and Kollias[23] (1996)Indianapolis, Indiana, United States12MT (10) PT (2)M: 11 F: 121 (17-31)RCSORIF (12)Baseball (2); Basketball (8); Archery (2)N/A
Riester et al[21] (1985)Syracuse, New York, United States14MT (11) PT (3)M: 13 F: 1N/ARCSConservative (14); Returned immediatelyAmerican Football (12); Basketball (1); Soccer (1)Intercollegiate/ High school
Robertson et al[26] (2012)Edinburgh, United Kingdom20MT (11); PT (4); DT (5)M: 2026.1RCSPSF (2); Conservative (18)Soccer (20)N/A
Robertson et al[29] (2014)Edinburgh, United Kingdom2MT (1); DT (1)M: 221CSConservative (2)Rugby (2)N/A
Table 3 Scaphoid fractures - only fractures with follow-up data included (mean values unless otherwise stated).
Ref.nMean follow-upColeman scoreReturn RateReturn rate by treatment modalityReturn rate to same level of sportReturn time (range)Return time (range) by treatment modalityRate of unionTime to union (range)Complications by treatment modality
Adolfsson et al[10] (2001)5-705/5C: 2/2; S: 3/3C: 2/2; S: 3/38.2 (6-12) wkC: 11.5 (11-12) wk; S: 6 wkC: 2/2; S: 3/3C: N/A; S: N/AC: Persistent radial border wrist pain (1); S: Nil
Bedi et al[25] (2007)698 (12-272) wk645/6S: 5/6S: 5/6N/AS: N/AS: N/AS: N/AS: Non-union (6%) ; Scar sensitivity (6%)
Ellsasser & Stein[27] (1979)2-422/2C: 2/2C: 2/20 wkC: 0 wkS: N/AS: N/AC: Nil
Huene[28] (1979)4-484/4S: 4/4S: 4/47 (6-8) wkS: 7 (6-8) wkS: N/AS: N/AS: SRNN (40%)
McQueen et al[9] (2008)551 yr8253/55C: 26/27; S: 27/28C: 26/27; S: 27/2810.9 (2-26) wkC: 15.5 (6-26) wk; S: 6.4 (2-20) wkC: 23/27; S: 27/28C: 13.9 (8-36) wk; S: 9.2 (8-18) wkC: Non-union (4); Malunion (3); AVN (2); CRPS (1); Radioscaphoid OA(1); S: Peri-operative breakage of the cannulated screwdriver (2) Symptomatic metalwork (1); Non-union (1)
Muramatsu et al[24] (2002)10-6610/10S: 10/10n/a10.7 (6-13) wkS: 10.7 (6-13) wkS: 10/10S: 9.2 (6–16) wkS: nil
Rettig et al[22] (1994)30C: 48.7 (9-136) wk; S: 49.3 (5-164) wk6329/30 (96.7%)C: 11/12; S: 18/18n/a6.6 (0-21) wkC: 4.3 (0-10) wk; S: 8 (3-21) wkC: 11/12; S: 18/18C: 14.2 (8-26) wk; S: 11.2 (4-24) wkC: Non-union (1); S: nil
Rettig & Kollias[23] (1996)122.9 yr6612/12 (100%)S: 12/12S: 12/125.8 (1-10) wkS: 5.8 (1-10) wkS: 11/12S: 9.8 (6-18) wkS: Non-union (1)
Riester et al[21] (1985)1447 mo (3.9 yr)6512/14C: 12/14 (85.7%)C: 12/140 wkC: 0 (0-0) wkC: 11/14C: N/AC: Non-union (3) (of which 2 patients required surgical intervention)
Robertson et al[26] (2012)2030 (24-36) mo4416/20C: 14/181; S: 2/2C: 13/181; S: 2/212.2 (6-24) wkC: 12.7 (6-24) wk; S: 8.5 (8-9) wkC: N/A; S: N/AC: N/A; S: N/AC: Non-union (3) (all 3 patient required delayed conversion to surgical fixation); S: Nil
Robertson et al[29] (2014)240 (34-46) mo442/2C: 2/2C 2/24 (4-4) wkC: 4 (4-4) wkC: N/AC: N/AC: Nil
Table 4 Summary of the return rates to sport and return times to sport by treatment modality
Mode of treatmentnReturn rates to sportMean return times to sportReturn rate to pre-injury level of sportUnion rateMean time to union
All[9,10,21-29]160150/160 (94%)[9,10,21-29]8.4 wk[9,10,21-24,26-29]110/120 (92%)[9,10,21,23,25-29]116/126 (92%)[9,10,21-24]11.3 wk[9,22-24]
Conservative[9,10,21,22,26,27,29]7769/77 (90%)[9,10,21,22,26,27,29]9.6 wk[9,10,21,22,26,27,29]57/65 (88%)[9,10,26,29]47/55 (85%)[9,10,21,22]14.0 wk[9,22]
Conservative - return in cast[21,22,27]2825/28 (89%)[21,22,27]1.9 wk[21,22,27]14/16 (88%)[21,27]22/26 (85%)[21,22]14.2 wk[22]
Conservative - return after cast[9,10,26,29]4944/49 (90%)[9,10,26,29]13.9 wk[9,10,26,29]43/49 (88%)[9,10,26,29]25/29 (86%)[9,10]13.9 wk[9]
Surgical[9,10,22-26,28]8381/83 (98%)[9,10,22-26,28]7.3 wk[9,10,22-24,26,28]53/55 (96%)[9,10,23,25,26,28]69/71 (97%)[9,10,22-24]9.8 wk[9,22-24]
ORIF[22-25,28]5049/50 (98%)[22-25,28]7.9 wk[22-24,28]21/22 (95%)[23,25,28]39/40 (98%)[22-24]10.3 wk[22-24]
PSF[9,10,26]3332/33 (97%)[9,10,26]6.5 wk[9,10,26]32/33 (97%)[9,10,26]30/31 (97%)[9,10]9.2 wk[9]