Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2012; 3(8): 114-121
Published online Aug 18, 2012. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i8.114
Complications in the management of metastatic spinal disease
Eilis Catherine Dunning, Joseph Simon Butler, Seamus Morris
Eilis Catherine Dunning, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin Incorporating The National Children’s Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
Joseph Simon Butler, Seamus Morris, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin Incorporating The National Children’s Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
Author contributions: All authors contributed to this article.
Correspondence to: Dr. Joseph Simon Butler, PhD, Senior Specialist Registrar, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin Incorporating, The National Children’s Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. josephsbutler@hotmail.com
Telephone: +353-1-8032000 Fax: +353-1-8032000
Received: March 21, 2012
Revised: July 15, 2012
Accepted: August 7, 2012
Published online: August 18, 2012
Abstract

Metastatic spine disease accounts for 10% to 30% of new cancer diagnoses annually. The most frequent presentation is axial spinal pain. No treatment has been proven to increase the life expectancy of patients with spinal metastasis. The goals of therapy are pain control and functional preservation. The most important prognostic indicator for spinal metastases is the initial functional score. Treatment is multidisciplinary, and virtually all treatment is palliative. Management is guided by three key issues; neurologic compromise, spinal instability, and individual patient factors. Site-directed radiation, with or without chemotherapy is the most commonly used treatment modality for those patients presenting with spinal pain, causative by tumours which are not impinging on neural elements. Operative intervention has, until recently been advocated for establishing a tissue diagnosis, mechanical stabilization and for reduction of tumor burden but not for a curative approach. It is treatment of choice patients with diseaseadvancement despite radiotherapy and in those with known radiotherapy-resistant tumors. Vertebral resection and anterior stabilization with methacrylate or hardware (e.g., cages) has been advocated.Surgical decompression and stabilization, however, along with radiotherapy, may provide the most promising treatment. It stabilizes the metastatic deposited areaand allows ambulation with pain relief. In general, patients who are nonambulatory at diagnosis do poorly, as do patients in whom more than one vertebra is involved. Surgical intervention is indicated in patients with radiation-resistant tumors, spinal instability, spinal compression with bone or disk fragments, progressive neurologic deterioration, previous radiation exposure, and uncertain diagnosis that requires tissue diagnosis. The main goal in the management of spinal metastatic deposits is always palliative rather than curative, with the primary aim being pain relief and improved mobility. This however, does not come without complications, regardless of the surgical intervention technique used. These complication range from the general surgical complications of bleeding, infection, damage to surrounding structures and post operative DT/PE to spinal specific complications of persistent neurologic deficit and paralysis.

Keywords: Metastases, Spine, Complications