Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2025; 16(6): 105910
Published online Jun 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.105910
Durable complete response to sintilimab plus chemotherapy in gallbladder cancer with extensive metastasis: A case report
Feng Wang, Xin-Lei Gong, Xin-Ni Chen, Xiao-Yuan Chu, Department of Oncology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China
Zhi-Hui Yang, Department of Pathology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China
ORCID number: Xiao-Yuan Chu (0009-0006-2382-5533).
Author contributions: Wang F and Chu XY had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for data integrity and the accuracy of data analysis; Gong XL contributed to the study concept and design; Wang F, Gong XL, Chen XN, Yang ZH, and Chu XY acquired, analyzed and interpreted data. Chen XN and Yang ZH supervised the analysis. All authors read, critically revised, and approved the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Yuan Chu, MD, Department of Oncology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No. 305 Zhongshan East Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China. chuxiaoyuan00@gmail.com
Received: February 18, 2025
Revised: April 11, 2025
Accepted: May 23, 2025
Published online: June 24, 2025
Processing time: 122 Days and 11.5 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. The prognosis for advanced gallbladder cancer remains poor, with limited options for effective treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 65-year-old male patient presented with a soft tissue mass in the gallbladder. Following laparoscopic exploration, he underwent radical surgery for gallbladder cancer, with the tumor staged as pT2N1M0 (stage III). Post-surgery, the patient received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, one month later, over 60 metastatic lesions were detected in the liver, lungs, and lymph nodes. In response to the widespread metastasis, he underwent six cycles of combination therapy consisting of sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin. After two cycles, a partial response was achieved. Maintenance therapy was initiated with a combination of sintilimab and albumin-bound paclitaxel for four cycles. Monotherapy with sintilimab was continued thereafter until October 2023. Complete remission was confirmed in September 2021. The patient sustained this complete response for more than three years, including an eleven-month period without disease progression following the discontinuation of sintilimab. Genetic analysis revealed a tumor mutational burden of 15.4 mutations/megabase, which indicates a potentially favorable response to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates the potential of combining immunotherapy (sintilimab) with chemotherapy to achieve durable remission in metastatic gallbladder cancer, even in a patient with extensive metastasis. In addition, it indicated the importance of tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy.

Key Words: Gallbladder cancer; Immunotherapy; Sintilimab; Complete response; Tumor mutational burden; Extensive metastasis; Case report

Core Tip: We present a rare case of metastatic gallbladder cancer with over sixty liver, lung, and lymph node metastases achieving durable complete remission via sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin. Following six cycles, complete response was maintained for over three years, including eleven months post-treatment. High tumor mutational burden (15.4 mutations/megabase) predicted immunotherapy efficacy. This highlights the potential of programmed death-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in advanced disease and emphasizes tumor mutational burden’s role as a predictive biomarker.



INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder cancer is a highly malignant and insidiously progressing tumor, with early diagnosis often being challenging. As a result, only about 20% of patients are eligible for radical resection. Most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages when surgical intervention is no longer an option, leading to a poor prognosis. The disease is highly aggressive, frequently metastasizes systemically, and has a five-year survival rate of less than 10%. Effective postoperative adjuvant therapies are critical to prevent or delay recurrence and metastasis. The capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer[1] and Japan Clinical Oncology Group 1202 studies[2] have established the value of capecitabine and S-1 as adjuvant treatments following radical surgery for biliary tract cancers. Additionally, gemcitabine or fluorouracil, either as monotherapy or in combination, are also considered viable postoperative options. For advanced gallbladder cancer, systemic therapy remains the primary treatment approach. However, traditional chemotherapy has limited efficacy, with median survival typically under one year[3]. Recently, programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, when combined with the gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen, have demonstrated promising results in advanced biliary tract cancers, becoming the first-line treatment for such cases[4,5]. Despite these advances, there is still no established standard for second-line therapy. Phase II studies and real-world evidence suggest that albumin-bound paclitaxel-based regimens may offer some efficacy in this setting[6,7]. We present a rare case of recurrent gallbladder cancer with extensive metastasis in which the patient achieved a durable complete response and long-term disease-free survival following treatment with sintilimab combined with chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel and cisplatin), followed by maintenance therapy with sintilimab and albumin-bound paclitaxel and monotherapy with sintilimab.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

In October 2019, a 65-year-old male underwent a routine ultrasound during a local health check-up, which revealed the presence of a “gallbladder mass” (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Summary of disease course and treatment procedure.
History of present illness

Subsequently, on October 17, 2019, he was admitted to the Department of Surgical Oncology of Affiliated Jinling Hospital for further evaluation and management.

History of past illness

The patient has a medical history of cerebral infarction diagnosed in 2000, with no residual sequelae. He has been on long-term aspirin therapy since the diagnosis. He had no history of hepatitis.

Personal and family history

His lifestyle history included a ten-year smoking habit (ten cigarettes per day, quit two years ago) and twenty years of alcohol consumption (100 mL/day, quit two years ago). There was no family history of liver cancer or other malignancies.

Physical examination

The patient exhibited no fever and had stable vital signs.

Laboratory examinations

Blood tests for tumor markers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and alpha-fetoprotein were all within normal ranges.

Imaging examinations

Abdominal computer tomography (CT) imaging on October 22, 2019, revealed a soft tissue mass in the gallbladder, highly suggestive of gallbladder cancer, with mild dilation of the common bile duct (Figure 2A). Chest imaging showed no abnormalities.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Preoperative and postoperative imaging examinations and primary tumor pathological staining results. A: Preoperative contrast-enhanced computer tomography (October 22, 2019) shows a soft tissue mass (arrow) in the gallbladder suggestive of gallbladder cancer; B: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the primary tumor (× 100); C: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the primary tumor (× 200); D: Postoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (November 19, 2019) following radical gallbladder resection reveals no evidence of tumor recurrence.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

On October 23, 2019, the patient underwent laparoscopic exploration and radical gallbladder cancer surgery. Postoperative pathology revealed moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with necrosis (Figure 2B and C). The cancer infiltrated the full thickness of the gallbladder wall, but no residual cancer tissue was found at the gallbladder stump. R0 resection was achieved. Metastasis was detected in one of five lymph nodes from the “group 12” lymph node station. Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria, the tumor was classified as pT2N1M0, which corresponds to stage IIIB. A magnetic resonance imaging conducted on November 19, 2019, revealed no signs of tumor recurrence or metastasis (Figure 2D).

TREATMENT

Between November 20, 2019 and February 22, 2020, the patient completed four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1.4 g administered intravenously on days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 taken orally twice daily on days 1-14), repeated every three weeks for a total of four cycles. During chemotherapy, the patient experienced grade 2-3 leukopenia and neutropenia, which resolved following the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

On March 25, 2020, a CT scan revealed extensive metastatic disease, including more than sixty lesions in the liver, as well as metastatic deposits in the lungs and multiple lymph nodes located in both supraclavicular fossae, the right cardiophrenic angle, the anterior margin of the lower thoracic spine, the hepatogastric region, the hepatic hilum, and the retroperitoneal area (Figure 3). Subsequent tumor marker testing showed a markedly elevated CA125 level (330.9 U/mL), while carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, and alpha-fetoprotein remained within normal ranges. These findings confirmed a stage IVB (T2N1M1) gallbladder adenocarcinoma with liver, lymph node, and lung metastases. At the time of his disease relapse, the patient’s Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0, and the Child-Pugh score was 5 (Class A).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Computer tomography scans obtained on March 25, 2020, demonstrating extensive metastatic disease after surgery. A-C: Diffuse liver metastases; D and E: Lung metastases; F: Retroperitoneal lymph nodes.

Starting March 27, 2020, the patient received sintilimab, 200 mg intravenous on day 5; albumin-bound paclitaxel, 0.2 g intravenous on day 1 and 0.1 g intravenous on day 8; and cisplatin, 20 mg intravenous on days 2-6. Every three weeks as his first-line systemic treatment. After two treatment cycles, the patient’s CA125 levels normalized, and a follow-up CT scan on May 18, 2020, revealed significant shrinkage of metastases in the liver, lymph nodes, and lungs, with some lesions disappearing entirely. The patient was evaluated as having achieved partial response (Figure 4). After six cycles of treatment, the regimen was adjusted to maintenance therapy with sintilimab and albumin-bound paclitaxel for four cycles. However, due to peripheral neurotoxicity (numbness in hands and feet) and bone marrow suppression, albumin-bound paclitaxel was discontinued, and maintenance therapy was continued with sintilimab monotherapy. During monotherapy, the patient occasionally developed rashes or pruritus, which improved with oral loratadine.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Computer tomography evaluation after two cycles of first line treatment of sintilimab plus chemotherapy (May 18, 2020), assessed as partial response. A-C: Liver metastases reduced in size and number; D and E: Lung metastases reduced in size and number; F: Retroperitoneal metastatic lymph nodes reduced in size.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

On September 16, 2021, the patient was evaluated as having achieved complete response (Figure 5). The patient gradually extended the dosing interval of sintilimab after achieving the first complete remission, administering it once every 4-8 weeks, for a total of thirty-eight doses. On October 23, 2023, sintilimab was discontinued. Subsequent follow-up imaging assessments, including the latest on September 27, 2024, confirmed that the patient maintained complete response status. Genetic testing was performed on the original gallbladder tumor surgical specimen in March 2024. The results showed a PD-L1 tumour proportion score of < 1%, combined positive score of 3, and a tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 15.4 mutations/megabase.

Figure 5
Figure 5 Computer tomography evaluation indicates complete response (September 16, 2021) during maintenance therapy. A-C: Disappearance of liver metastases; D and E: Disappearance of pulmonary metastases; F: Disappearance of retroperitoneal lymph nodes.

On July 14, 2020, laboratory tests revealed elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at 89.50 IU/mL, reduced free triiodothyronine at 2.32 pmol/L, and free thyroxine levels below 5.15 pmol/L. Despite the absence of related symptoms, the patient was clinically diagnosed with subclinical hypothyroidism. Starting July 14, 2020, the patient was prescribed levothyroxine sodium tablets (Euthyrox) at an initial dose of 25 μg per day, gradually increased to 100 μg per day. By September 2020, TSH levels had normalized, and the patient continued oral Euthyrox therapy. Following the discontinuation of sintilimab on October 2023, no further episodes of rashes or skin itching occurred. In August 2024, the dose of Euthyrox was reduced to 50 μg per day. However, in September 2024, repeat testing showed elevated TSH levels at 48.48 mIU/L, prompting the resumption of Euthyrox at 100 μg per day.

DISCUSSION

This case report discusses a rare and clinically significant instance of long-term remission in a patient with metastatic gallbladder cancer treated with a combination of the PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab and chemotherapy. In this case, postoperative pathology revealed moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder, with cancer infiltrating the full thickness of the gallbladder wall and lymph node metastasis, placing the patient at high risk for recurrence or metastasis. The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with capecitabine but developed extensive metastases in the liver (more than 60 lesions), lungs, and multiple lymph nodes within five months post-surgery. After treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin, the patient achieved sustained complete response. Remarkably, the disease course has spanned five years since the initial diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. This case represents one of the few instances reported in the literature of such a long-term response to this therapeutic combination.

Systemic therapy is the primary treatment modality for advanced gallbladder cancer. The ABC-02 study established the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin as the first-line treatment standard for advanced biliary tract cancers[3]. Results from the phase III clinical trial TOPAZ-1 demonstrated that adding the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate compared to gemcitabine and cisplatin alone[4]. Similarly, the phase III KEYNOTE-966 trial showed that the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a first-line treatment for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer significantly improved overall survival compared to gemcitabine and cisplatin alone[5].

Based on these two studies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with the gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen have become the first-line treatment recommendation in domestic and international guidelines. In recent years, triplet or quadruplet regimens for biliary tract cancer have shown promising results. A phase II study reported that the combination of toripalimab, lenvatinib, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin achieved a response rate of 50% and a disease control rate of 93.3%[8].

Currently, the approach and duration of maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for biliary tract tumors remain undefined. In the TOPAZ-1 study, the experimental group received a maximum of eight cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with durvalumab, followed by maintenance therapy with durvalumab monotherapy until disease progression. In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab monotherapy was used for maintenance, with a total treatment duration of thirty-five cycles. In clinical practice, given the highly aggressive biological behavior of biliary tract cancer, the efficacy of single-agent ICIs for maintenance may be suboptimal. Therefore, some clinicians may opt for a maintenance regimen combining ICIs with one of the chemotherapy agents used in the initial combination therapy.

In this case, after six cycles of albumin-bound paclitaxel, cisplatin, and sintilimab, the patient underwent four cycles of maintenance therapy with albumin-bound paclitaxel and sintilimab. Due to bone marrow suppression and neurotoxicity caused by albumin-bound paclitaxel, maintenance was switched to sintilimab monotherapy. The total duration of immunotherapy reached forty-three months, after which the treatment was discontinued. Subsequent imaging evaluations repeatedly confirmed sustained complete remission, with a survival period of five years since the initial diagnosis of gallbladder cancer.

With the widespread use of ICIs, immune-related adverse events have garnered significant attention. Endocrine and skin toxicities are among the most common immune-related adverse events and may be associated with improved survival outcomes[8]. In this patient, immune-related hypothyroidism developed four months after initiating sintilimab. Thyroid function normalized with levothyroxine (Euthyrox) treatment. Following discontinuation of sintilimab, the levothyroxine dose was briefly reduced, but TSH levels subsequently increased again, indicating that some patients may experience long-term or even permanent endocrine toxicities. During immune-chemotherapy, the patient also experienced recurrent reductions in white blood cells and platelets, which were successfully managed with standard treatments such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and thyroid peroxidase. Neurotoxicity (numbness in hands and feet) caused by albumin-bound paclitaxel resolved within six months after discontinuing the drug.

Accurately identifying patient populations that benefit most from immunotherapy remains a significant challenge. The results of the KEYNOTE-158 study showed that tumors with high microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair had a response rate of 30.8% to pembrolizumab, with a median duration of response of 47.5 months[9]. Whether combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy or targeted therapy could achieve better outcomes than immunotherapy alone in this subset of patients still requires clinical validation.

This case of gallbladder cancer is accompanied by diffuse liver metastasis, bilateral lung metastasis, and multiple lymph node metastasis. After treatment with combination therapy of sintilimab and chemotherapy, complete remission was achieved, and the efficacy lasted for more than four years, which is rare in clinical practice. Genetic testing of the tumor tissue revealed high TMB expression (15.4 mutations/megabase). At 15.4 mutations/megabase, the tumor’s mutational burden qualifies as high, exceeding the commonly used cutoff (≥ 10 mutations/megabase) for “TMB-high” status. High TMB has emerged as a predictive biomarker for response to ICIs. For example, TMB-high tumors showed significantly greater response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (pembrolizumab), leading to a tumor-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for TMB-high solid tumors. Mechanistically, tumors with very high mutation loads generate a larger pool of neoantigens that can be presented on major histocompatibility complex molecules, enhancing tumor immunogenicity and making them more recognizable to T cells under checkpoint inhibition. In biliary tract malignancies such as gallbladder cancer, TMB-high cases are relatively rare but when present this biomarker may identify patients more likely to benefit from immunotherapy, as illustrated by the favorable response in this case. It should be noted, however, that TMB is an imperfect biomarker: Its predictive value varies across tumor types (not all TMB-high tumors respond, and some lower-TMB tumors can still respond).

In recent years, significant breakthroughs have been made in the precision-targeted therapy of biliary tract tumors. Approved targeted therapies now address mutations such as IDH1, FGFR fusions, HER-2 overexpression/amplification, BRAF V600E mutations, and NTRK fusions[10], which are often used as second-line or later treatment options. The patient’s genetic testing did not detect any abnormalities in these targets. Targeted therapy is often used as a second-line or above treatment option. Whether targeted drugs can be used in first-line treatment and whether they have synergistic effects with immune drugs or chemotherapy requires further investigation through related clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our report highlights the potential of combining immunotherapy with traditional chemotherapy to achieve long-term remission, even in patients with advanced and metastatic disease. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance TMB as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy, providing valuable insights for future treatment strategies in gallbladder cancer.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade C

P-Reviewer: Xie DY S-Editor: Wu S L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

References
1.  Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, Anthony A, Corrie P, Falk S, Finch-Jones M, Wasan H, Ross P, Wall L, Wadsley J, Evans JTR, Stocken D, Praseedom R, Ma YT, Davidson B, Neoptolemos JP, Iveson T, Raftery J, Zhu S, Cunningham D, Garden OJ, Stubbs C, Valle JW, Bridgewater J; BILCAP study group. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:663-673.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 689]  [Cited by in RCA: 797]  [Article Influence: 132.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Nakachi K, Ikeda M, Konishi M, Nomura S, Katayama H, Kataoka T, Todaka A, Yanagimoto H, Morinaga S, Kobayashi S, Shimada K, Takahashi Y, Nakagohri T, Gotoh K, Kamata K, Shimizu Y, Ueno M, Ishii H, Okusaka T, Furuse J; Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-HBPOG). Adjuvant S-1 compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401:195-203.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in RCA: 120]  [Article Influence: 60.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273-1281.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2617]  [Cited by in RCA: 3119]  [Article Influence: 207.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
4.  Oh DY, Ruth He A, Qin S, Chen LT, Okusaka T, Vogel A, Kim JW, Suksombooncharoen T, Ah Lee M, Kitano M, Burris H, Bouattour M, Tanasanvimon S, McNamara MG, Zaucha R, Avallone A, Tan B, Cundom J, Lee CK, Takahashi H, Ikeda M, Chen JS, Wang J, Makowsky M, Rokutanda N, He P, Kurland JF, Cohen G, Valle JW. Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer. NEJM Evid. 2022;1:EVIDoa2200015.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 385]  [Cited by in RCA: 497]  [Article Influence: 165.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
5.  Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, Finn RS, Furuse J, Ren Z, Yau T, Klümpen HJ, Chan SL, Ozaka M, Verslype C, Bouattour M, Park JO, Barajas O, Pelzer U, Valle JW, Yu L, Malhotra U, Siegel AB, Edeline J, Vogel A; KEYNOTE-966 Investigators. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401:1853-1865.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 453]  [Cited by in RCA: 413]  [Article Influence: 206.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Shroff RT, Javle MM, Xiao L, Kaseb AO, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Raghav KPS, Iwasaki M, Masci P, Ramanathan RK, Ahn DH, Bekaii-Saab TS, Borad MJ. Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and nab-Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:824-830.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 201]  [Cited by in RCA: 336]  [Article Influence: 67.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Cheon J, Lee CK, Sang YB, Choi HJ, Kim MH, Ji JH, Ko KH, Kwon CI, Kim DJ, Choi SH, Kim C, Kang B, Chon HJ. Real-world efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021;13:17588359211035983.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Shi GM, Huang XY, Wu D, Sun HC, Liang F, Ji Y, Chen Y, Yang GH, Lu JC, Meng XL, Wang XY, Sun L, Ge NL, Huang XW, Qiu SJ, Yang XR, Gao Q, He YF, Xu Y, Sun J, Ren ZG, Fan J, Zhou J. Toripalimab combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX is a promising regimen as first-line treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:106.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in RCA: 72]  [Article Influence: 36.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Wan G, Chen W, Khattab S, Roster K, Nguyen N, Yan B, Rajeh A, Seo J, Rashdan H, Zubiri L, Hadfield MJ, Demehri S, Yu KH, Lotter W, Gusev A, LeBoeuf NR, Reynolds KL, Kwatra SG, Semenov YR. Multi-organ immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors and their downstream implications: a retrospective multicohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:1053-1069.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Lamarca A, Edeline J, Goyal L. How I treat biliary tract cancer. ESMO Open. 2022;7:100378.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 75]  [Article Influence: 25.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]