Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. May 24, 2020; 11(5): 294-307
Published online May 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i5.294
Impact of primary tumour location on colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review
George Bingham, Alysha Shetye, Reena Suresh, Reza Mirnezami
George Bingham, Reena Suresh, Department of General Surgery, St. Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Alysha Shetye, Reza Mirnezami, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Bingham G and Shetye A have contributed equally. Bingham G, Shetye A, and Suresh R completed the initial literature review. Bingham G and Shetye A drafted the manuscript and tables. Mirnezami R developed the concept, led the editing process, and contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision, editing, and approval of the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Reza Mirnezami, FRCS, MBBS, PhD, Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom. reza.mirnezami@nhs.net
Received: December 31, 2019
Peer-review started: December 31, 2019
First decision: March 15, 2020
Revised: May 9, 2020
Accepted: May 14, 2020
Article in press: May 14, 2020
Published online: May 24, 2020
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer related death with liver being the most common metastatic site. It has been long suggested that left and right sided primary tumours exhibit different behaviour but relatively little has been written about how this relates specifically to outcomes in colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRCLM).

Research motivation

To improve current understanding regarding the impact of PTL on CRCLM given the relative paucity of information in this area. This in turn could have a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality.

Research objectives

To ascertain whether there is a significant difference in oncological outcome in patients with CRCLM depending on PTL and to present some hypotheses that may explain any differences found. This systematic review demonstrates a significant difference in outcomes based on PTL with inferior oncological outcome for patients with right-sided CRC. . Further work is needed to better characterise the mechanisms responsible for this variation in order to inform clinical decision making.

Research methods

A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane and Embase using the Terms “The medical subject heading terms and key words used are as follows: “Colon” or “rectal cancer”, “liver metastasis” or “liver metastases” or “hepatic metastasis” or “hepatic metastases” and “left” and “Right”. This search was combined with a bibliographic search to find the relevant publications and extract data from these papers. The methodology was based around the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ recommendations for systematic reviews

Research results

Twenty-one studies with a total of 18203 patients showed a statistically significant trend of improved overall survival in patient with left sided primary tumours undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases (l-CRCLM). Four studies including 3013 patients showed improved disease free survival (DFS) in l-CRCLM. Only five publications provided data on progression free survival (PFS). These studies including 2805 patients showed significantly improved PFS in l-CRCLM vs r-CRCLM. The findings of this review are congruent with the accepted premise of superior survival in left sided colorectal cancer, and uniquely show that this remains true in the context of metastatic liver disease. We highlight a number of factors that may contribute to this, including KRAS/BRAF mutational status, presence of mucinous elements, and impaired chemosensitivy –all which are shown to be associated with right-sided PTL. The exact interplay between these known factors, PTL, and the emerging new mutations and molecular markers is yet to be determined and work needs to be done to determine the importance of PTL within the conglomeration.

Research conclusions

The findings of this review indicate that PTL may have a role as an independent prognostic factor when determining treatment and disease surveillance strategies specifically in colorectal cancer that has metastasised to the liver. We find improved survival for both resected and unresectable l-CRCLM as well as a maintained trend after addition of biologics to established chemotherapy regimens. Hepatic recurrence after treatment of CRCLM appears to occur more aggressively with right-sided CRC, conferring significantly reduced survival. Explaining these variations in oncological outcome requires a deeper understanding of the underlying molecular and embryological differences associated with primary tumour sidedness. Microsatellite instability, interestingly, whilst more common in right-sided tumours, has been shown to be independently associated with improved survival – a finding somewhat incongruent with the overall picture of inferior survival in r-CRCLM. This suggests alternative mechanisms beyond MMR and microsatellite instability are likely to be involved. KRAS and BRAF mutational status, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and impaired chemosensitivity are all known to be significantly associated with right-sided CRC, and we show here that this association and the accompanying inferior survival persists in r-CRCLM. A better understanding of the role of PTL in the oncological outcomes of metastatic CRC may allow for improved risk stratification and redesigned patient pathways.

Research perspectives

There is a considerable amount of data available on the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for CRCLM, as related to PTL. This shows with convincing evidence that outcomes are superior for patients with l-CRCLM. Future research should be focused on gathering associated molecular and genetic data as related to PTL to better understand the tumour biology of right-sided CRC. This may allow the determination of ideal molecular markers, both for risk stratification/prognostication, and that may be used as potential therapeutic targets.