Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2017; 9(9): 350-358
Published online Sep 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i9.350
Table 1 Characteristics of patients who had both 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and prostate magnetic resonance imaging studies
Age(yr)MRI before or after PET/CT?18F-FDG PET/CTindicationProstate SUVmaxProstate MRI indicationMRI resultPSA (ng/mL)Biopsy result
732 mo beforeBone metastases (prostate primary)3.4Negative TRUS biopsyT2aNxMx20.8Gleason 4 + 5 = 9
7211 mo afterNon-Hodgkin lymphoma2.7Elevated PSA, negative TRUS biopsyT2aNxMx8.8Gleason 5 + 3 = 8
623 mo afterCancer of unknown primary3.9Prostate cancer stagingT3bNxMx37Gleason 4 + 3 = 7
7546 mo afterHead and neck cancer3.4Active surveillanceT1NxMx2.28Gleason 4 + 3 = 7
766 mo beforeGastrointestinal stromal tumour3Elevated PSA, negative TRUS biopsyT2bNxMx150Gleason 3 + 4 = 7
7922 mo afterNon-Hodgkin lymphoma2.9Elevated PSAT2aNxMx5.4Gleason 3 + 4 = 7
6630 mo afterNon-Hodgkin lymphoma3.1Active surveillanceT2cNxMx4.8Gleason 3 + 4 = 7
7326 mo afterOesophageal cancer2.4Active surveillanceT2cNxMx7.8Gleason 3 + 3 = 6
6818 mo afterCancer of unknown primary3.9Elevated PSAT2aNxMx6.1Gleason 3 + 3 = 6
745 mo beforeOesophageal cancer3.9Elevated PSAT1NxMx7.3Gleason 3 + 3 = 6
685 mo beforeHodgkin lymphoma9.9Elevated PSA, negative biopsyNo focus of tumour4.7High-grade PIN
6539 mo beforeColorectal cancer5.2Elevated PSA, negative TRUS biopsyNo focus of tumour8.6High-grade PIN
7634 mo beforeNon-Hodgkin lymphoma4.2Elevated PSASuspicious foci bilaterally15Benign
674 mo beforeNon-Hodgkin lymphoma4.1Incidental prostatic 18F-FDG uptakeSuspicious foci bilaterally5.5Benign
7216 mo afterPyrexia of unknown origin2.7Chronic urinary infectionLikely prostatitisNot doneBiopsy not performed
781 mo afterNon-Hodgkin lymphoma3.1Elevated PSANo focus of tumour11.4Biopsy not performed
6112 mo afterLung nodule5.2Elevated PSA, positive family historyNo focus of tumour4.5Biopsy not performed
687 mo afterColorectal cancer8.8Incidental prostatic 18F-FDG uptakeNo focus of tumour3Biopsy not performed
Table 2 Sectorial analysis, case-control analysis and subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake
Mean SUVmaxMeanSUVmean
Sectorial analysis
MRI - normal prostatic sectors3.021.74
MRI - suspicious prostatic sectors3.11.89
Histopathology - benign prostatic lobe2.861.79
Histopathology - malignant prostatic lobe3.131.82
Case-control analysis
Age-matched controls3.091.83
Cases with prostate cancer3.261.81
Subgroup analysis
Biopsy not performed4.951.91
Benign disease and high-grade PIN5.852.86
Low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason ≤ 3 + 4)3.21.83
High-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3)3.351.78
Table 3 Characteristics of patients in whom elevated prostatic 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was investigated
Age (yr)18F-FDG PET/CT indicationProstate SUVmaxPSA (ng/mL)Urology referral madeUrology outcome
68Adrenal nodule10.43YesMRI - no suspicious foci
77Lung nodule4.52.78YesBiopsy - high-grade PIN
67Non-Hodgkin lymphoma4.55.5YesMRI - suspicious foci
Biopsy - benign
68Colorectal cancer5.93.04YesPSA monitoring
58Colorectal cancer7.61.38YesPSA monitoring
64Non-Hodgkin lymphoma5.41.84YesPSA monitoring
58Non-Hodgkin lymphoma19.97.44YesPSA monitoring
81Cholangiocarcinoma10.318YesLost to follow up
75Hepatic metastases (colorectal primary)8-YesLost to follow up
61Colorectal cancer141.47No - PSA normal
55Paraneoplastic syndrome4.80.62No - PSA normal
61Non-Hodgkin lymphoma5.82.85No - PSA normal
68Gastrointestinal stromal tumour13.21.48No - PSA normal
71Hepatic metastases (colorectal primary)9.24.9No - palliative care
87Oesophageal cancer5.311.86No - palliative care
82Colorectal cancer15.43.85No - palliative care
35Hodgkin lymphoma11.83.04No - suspected prostatitis
71Oesophageal cancer7.34.58No - likely urethral uptake