Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2021; 13(1): 29-39
Published online Jan 28, 2021. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v13.i1.29
Table 1 Number of patients and reasons for their exclusion from the study
The reason for exclusion
n
Spinal or cranial surgery history29
Poor image quality3
Spondylodiscitis2
Spinal metastasis1
Stenosis due to synovial cyst1
Total36
Table 2 Cross-sectional areas of the dural sac at lumbar intervertebral disc levels in patients with spinal stenosis without redundant nerve roots and with redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging
Intervertebral discal space levels
Cross-sectional area without redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina, mean ± SD dev (range) mm2
Cross-sectional area with redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina, mean ± SD dev (range) mm2
L2-L3130.85 ± 38.56 (48.68-240.56) 93.84 ± 34.63 (39.40-194.50)
L3-L4100.90 ± 31.50 (38.86-176.00)68.87 ± 31.23 (25.42-164.59)
L4-L578.92 ± 22.69 (21.03-126.02)61.05 ± 35.76 (14.94-163.92)
L5-S1102.56 ± 43.27 (17.57-251.53)97.11 ± 41.90 (15.05-211.13)
Table 3 Association of localization level of redundant nerve roots with relative length of redundant nerve roots and cross-sectional area
Localization level of redundant nerve roots
P value

Inferior (n = 7), mean ± SD
Superior (n = 30), mean ± SD
Inferior + Superior (n = 18), mean ± SD
Relative length of redundant nerve roots2.07 ± 0.67 (a)12.95 ± 1.09 (a)4.66 ± 0.73 (b)< 0.001
Cross sectional area (mm2)49.27 ± 8.06 (a)35.61 ± 9.78 (b)46.77 ± 14.73 (a)0.001
Table 4 The relationships between the disc herniation type at the stenosis levels causing redundant nerve roots, the relative length of redundant nerve roots, and the cross-sectional area of the dural sac of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina
Type of disc herniation
P value

Soft margin (n = 29), mean ± SD
Sharp margin (n = 26), mean ± SD
Relative length of RNRs 3.3 ± 1.423.5 ± 1.20.562
CSA of RNRs of the cauda equina (mm2)39.62 ± 12.0242.54 ± 13.620.401