Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2013; 5(3): 49-50
Published online Mar 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.49
Oncological imaging of the abdomen and pelvis: Spectrum of trends and advances
Khaled M Elsayes, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
Author contributions: Elsayes KM wrote, reviewed and designed the editorial, as well as other contributing articles.
Correspondence to: Khaled M Elsayes, MD, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, United States. kmelsayes@mdanderson.org
Telephone: +1-713-7941191 Fax: +1-713-7944379
Received: June 11, 2012
Revised: January 20, 2013
Accepted: January 31, 2013
Published online: March 28, 2013

Abstract

Advancements in medical imaging have brought about unprecedented changes in the assessment, management and post-treatment follow-up of cancer. Sonography, positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are the primary tools being developed for oncological imaging. Advancements in these modalities, the introduction of new imaging and treatment techniques, as well as recent management of tumors, have led to continuous changes in diagnosis and treatment. Herein, we discuss the wide spectrum of imaging trends and advances.

Key Words: Oncology, Imaging, Sonography, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging



TEXT

In this special issue of the World Journal of Radiology, we have put together a group of expert faculty members to cover a spectrum of advances and trends in oncological imaging of the abdomen[1-9]. Because these advances cannot be covered in a single issue, we are covering several of these trends and state-of-the-art diagnostic algorithms to diagnose a spectrum of abdominal and pelvic cancers.

The first three articles[1,5,8] discuss examples of practical imaging techniques and their roles in abdominal and pelvic imaging; these techniques include intraoperative sonography and sonohysterography as examples of sonography techniques, computed tomography (CT) virtual colonoscopy as a CT technique, and diffusion-weighted imaging as a magnetic resonance imaging technique.

Sonohysterography enhances the endometrial visualization achieved with standard transvaginal sonography, which entails instillation of normal saline into the endocervical canal to enhance detection of endometrial abnormalities and further define potential abnormalities initially detected by standard transvaginal sonography[4].

The advent of new transducers with focal beam technology and a higher frequency has solidified the role of intraoperative sonography as an invaluable imaging modality in oncological surgery of the liver, kidneys and pancreas[1].

CT colonography was first introduced by Ganeshan et al[2] in 1994 as an alternative imaging method for evaluating the colon. In this technique, helical CT data are used to produce three-dimensional images to simulate a virtual endoluminal view (also called virtual colonoscopy). High sensitivity rates for colorectal cancer can be obtained using this method.

In the fifth article, Korivi et al[5] discuss the spectrum of cross-sectional work-up in adrenal imaging.

In the sixth article, Tamm et al[6] discuss state-of-the-art imaging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In the seventh and eighth articles, patterns of various tumors are discussed. Le[7] illustrates peritoneal spread patterns of various abdominal and pelvic tumors. Wasnik et al[8] illustrate the current work-up of benign and malignant cystic ovarian masses.

Finally, Peungjesada et al[9] at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center focus on current trends in the radiological evaluation of treatment response as a crucial task in oncology-one shared by clinicians, radiologists and pathologists.

We hope that this issue will stimulate your interest in oncological imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers George TJ, Valais IG S- Editor Cheng JX L- Editor Roemmele A E- Editor Zheng XM

References
1.  Marcal LP, Patnana M, Bhosale P, Bedi DG. Intraoperative abdominal ultrasound in oncologic imaging. World J Radiol. 2013;5:3-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Ganeshan D, Elsayes KM, Vining D. Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview. World J Radiol. 2013;5:13-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Morani AC, Elsayes KM, Liu PS, Weadock WJ, Szklaruk J, Khan A, Hussain HK. Abdominal applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Where do we stand. World J Radiol. 2013;5:20-32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Yang T, Pandya A, Marcal L, Bude RO, Platt JF, Bedi DG, Elsayes KM. Sonohysterography: Principles, technique and role in diagnosis of endometrial pathology. World J Radiol. 2013;5:33-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Korivi BR, Elsayes KM. Cross-sectional imaging work-up of adrenal masses. World J Radiol. 2013;5:40-49.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Tamm EP, Bhosale PR, Vikram R, de Almeida Marcal LP, Balachandran A. Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: State of the art. World J Radiol. 2013;5:50-57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Le O. Patterns of peritoneal spread of tumor in the abdomen and pelvis. World J Radiol. 2013;5:58-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Wasnik AP, Menias CO, Platt JF, Lalchandani UR, Bedi DG, Elsayes KM. Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: Review with an imaging based algorithmic approach. World J Radiol. 2013;5:65-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Peungjesada S, Chuang HH, Prasad SR, Choi H, Loyer EM, Bronstein Y. Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances. World J Radiol. 2013;5:78-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]