Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2022; 14(8): 311-318
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i8.311
Triple rule-out computed tomography angiography: Evaluation of acute chest pain in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department
Suzan Bahadir, Department of Radiology, Baskent University, Antalya 07000, Turkey
Sonay Aydın, Erdal Karavas, Düzgün Can Şenbil, Department of Radiology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan 24100, Turkey
Mecit Kantarci, Department of Radiology, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25100, Turkey
Edhem Unver, Department of Chest Disease, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan 24100, Turkey
ORCID number: Suzan Bahadir (0000-0002-0019-5851); Sonay Aydın (0000-0002-3812-6333); Mecit Kantarci (0000-0002-1043-6719); Edhem Unver (0000-0002-0322-8102); Erdal Karavas (0000-0001-6649-3256); Düzgün Can Şenbil (0000-0003-0233-7371).
Author contributions: Aydın S, Bahadır S, Kantarcı M, and Karavas E designed the research study; Bahadır S, Ünver E, Şenbil DC, and Karavas E performed the research; Aydın S and Bahadır S contributed new reagents and analytic tools; Aydın S, Karavas E, and Şenbil DC analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (Erzincan Binali Yıldrım University Faculty of Medicine protocol number kaek-ebyu-2020/03/14) and as it was a retrospective study, written informed consent was waived.
Informed consent statement: Patients were not required to give informed consent to the study because the analysis used anonymous clinical data that were obtained after each patient agreed to treatment by written consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No author has any conflict of interest to declare in this study.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Düzgün Can Şenbil, MD, Academic Research, Doctor, Department of Radiology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Hacı Ali Akın Street, Erzincan 24100, Turkey. can.senbil@erzincan.edu.tr
Received: April 11, 2022
Peer-review started: April 11, 2022
First decision: May 30, 2022
Revised: May 30, 2022
Accepted: August 5, 2022
Article in press: August 5, 2022
Published online: August 28, 2022

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to define clinical evidence supporting that triple rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO CTA) is a comprehensive and feasible diagnostic tool in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) for acute chest pain. Optimizing diagnostic imaging strategies in COVID-19 related thromboembolic events, will help for rapid and noninvasive diagnoses and results will be effective for patients and healthcare systems in all aspects.

AIM

To define clinical evidence supporting that TRO CTA is a comprehensive and feasible diagnostic tool in COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the ED for acute chest pain, and to assess outcomes of optimizing diagnostic imaging strategies, particularly TRO CTA use, in COVID-19 related thromboembolic events.

METHODS

TRO CTA images were evaluated for the presence of coronary artery disease, pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), or acute aortic syndromes. Statistical analyses were used for evaluation of significant association between the variables. A two tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included into the study. In 31 patients (65.9%), there was not any pathology, while PTE was diagnosed in 11 patients. There was no significant relationship between the rates of pathology on CTA and history of hypertension. On the other hand, the diabetes mellitus rate was much higher in the acute coronary syndrome group, particularly in the PTE group (8/31 = 25.8% vs 6/16 = 37.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of dyslipidemia was significantly higher in the group with pathology on CTA while compared to those without pathology apart from imaging findings of the pneumonia group (62.5% vs 38.7%, P < 0.001). Smoking history rates were similar in the groups. Platelets, D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were higher in COVID-19 cases with additional pathologies.

CONCLUSION

TRO CTA is an effective imaging method in evaluation of all thoracic vascular systems at once and gives accurate results in COVID-19 patients.

Key Words: COVID-19, Pulmonary thromboembolism, Coronary artery disease, Acute aortic syndromes, Triple rule-out computed tomography angiography

Core Tip: Acute chest pain might be due to pneumonia itself or accompanying vascular events in novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. Triple rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO CTA) is an effective and non-invasive diagnostic method in COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain. TRO CTA is an imaging method that evaluates all thoracic vascular systems at once and gives accurate results in the COVID-19 patient group with acute chest pain, which has been proven to be susceptible to thrombotic events.



INTRODUCTION

Acute chest pain is one of the major complaints among the admissions to the emergency department (ED)[1,2]. In some patients, diagnoses can be made by electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, elevated cardiac laboratory biomarkers, and typical symptoms. However, a normal ECG or cardiac biomarkers do not rule out acute cardiovascular disease and symptoms might be atypical[3]. Moreover, after the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it has been more complicated to make a differential diagnosis list of acute chest pain in the ED. To date, many studies have presented that COVID-19 causes hypercoagulability[4]. Hypercoagulability is attributed to endothelial cell dysfunction, hypoxia-induced pathways, and increased blood viscosity[5]. Therefore, to make a rapid and accurate diagnosis in COVID-19 patients presenting with acute chest pain is of utmost importance.

Triple rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO CTA) covers all thoracic vascular systems and has advantages in the detection of coronary artery disease, pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), or acute aortic syndromes[6]. TRO CTA has ability to rule out pathology in all three vascular systems, particularly in COVID-19 patients who have already increased risk of thrombosis and myocardial injury[7].

The aim of this study was to define clinical evidence supporting that TRO CTA is a comprehensive and feasible diagnostic tool in patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the ED for acute chest pain. Optimizing diagnostic imaging strategies in COVID-19 related thromboembolic events, will help for rapid and noninvasive diagnoses and results will be effective for patients and healthcare systems in all aspects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and as it was a retrospective study, written informed consent was waived. No author has any conflict of interest to declare in this study. Our radiology archiving system was searched for patients who applied to the ED for acute chest pain and underwent TRO CTA between September 2020 and January 2021. Patients older than 18 years, who had COVID-19 pneumonia and applied to the emergency department for acute chest pain, and underwent TRO CTA for further evaluation were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: Unreachable clinical or laboratory data and incomplete documentation of imaging data or inadequate imaging quality. Six of the patients were excluded from the study and the remaining 47 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Medical records were used for the collection of demographics and clinical and laboratory findings. TRO CTA images were evaluated for the presence of the coronary artery disease, PTE, or acute aortic syndromes.

In our center, TRO CTA examination is performed according to the eligibility criteria in the article of Eltabbakh AR et al[8].

TRO-CTA protocol

All TRO CTA scans were acquired using a third-generation dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Force, Siemens Healthineers). The protocol begins with a noncontrast prospectively ECG-triggered acquisition between the levels of the carina and the base of the diaphragm for coronary artery calcium scoring. After this, CTA was acquired from the lung apices to the diaphragm after the administration of intravenous contrast. According to patients’ condition, prospectively ECG-triggered, retrospectively ECG-gated, or prospectively ECG-triggered high pitch spiral acquisition was used. An intravenous iodinated contrast material of 60 to 90 mL was administered at an injection rate of 4 to 6 mL/s, followed by a saline chaser of 50 mL. Nitroglycerin or beta-blocker administration was not used. Primarily, the coronary arteries were opacified during image acquisition, while homogeneous enhancement of the pulmonary arteries happened. For the evaluation of the maximum intensity projection of the aorta, coronary and pulmonary arteries, curved planar and volume-rendered reconstructions were obtained; findings were then confirmed on the axial CT source images.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 20 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Normal distribution of the data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Numerical variables with a normal distribution are shown as minimum-maximum values. Categorical variables are shown as percentages. Differences in normally distributed variables between groups were evaluated using Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were evaluated by the chi-square test between groups.

A two tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In this study, 53 patients who were previously diagnosed with laboratory-proven (real-time PCR) COVID-19 pneumonia and underwent triple rule-out computed tomography angiography due to sudden chest pain between September 2020-January 2021, were retrospectively searched. Six of these patients were excluded from the study because of insufficient quality of the images or because the necessary laboratory and/or clinical data could not be reached. The study population consisted of 47 patients. The creatinine values of 47 patients included in the study were within the physiological range.

Twenty-nine (61.7%) of 47 patients were men and 18 (38.3%) of them were women. Mean age was 61.7 ± 13.6 years and median age was 59 years (min-max: 47-84 years).

In 31 patients (65.9%), there was not any pathology except for parenchymal findings of COVID-19 pneumonia. PTE was diagnosed in 11 patients (Figure 1), significant stenosis in the coronary arteries diagnosed in 4 (Figures 2 and 3), and dissection in the descending aorta diagnosed in 1 (Figure 4). All coronary artery stenoses were observed in the left anterior descending artery and its branches. The patient with thoracic aortic dissection had a history of previous abdominal aortic dissection.

Figure 1
Figure 1 A 77-year-old male patient. Curved multiplanar reformatted image shows embolus in the right lung lower lobe artery (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2 A 73-year-old male patient. A: Diffuse calcific and soft plaque formations are seen in the left main, left anterior descending (LAD), and left circumflex arteries on axial maximum intensity projection image; B: Moderate stenosis (50% to 69%) is present (linear marker) in the proximal segment of LAD on curved multiplanar reformatted image.
Figure 3
Figure 3 A 63-year-old female patient. A: Moderate stenosis (50% to 69%; linear marker); B: Calcific plaque formations are seen in the right coronary artery on coronal maximum intensity projection images.
Figure 4
Figure 4 A 78-year-old male patient. Sagittal maximum intensity projection image depicts Stanford type B dissection.

Forty-one (41/47, 87.2%) of the patients included in this study had a history of hypertension. All patients with hypertension were using antihypertensive drugs and blood pressures were under control. There was no significant relationship between the rates of pathology on CTA and history of hypertension. When patients with findings on CTA and those without findings other than COVID-19 pneumonia on CTA were compared, HT rates were similar (normal group 14/16, 87.5% vs pathologic group 27/31, 87%, P = 0.09).

Fourteen patients had a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (14/47, 29.7%). Eight of these 14 patients were in the group with no imaging findings other than pneumonia, 5 of them were in the PTE group, and 1 was in the acute coronary syndrome group. When compared with those without any imaging findings other than pneumonia on CTA, the DM rate was much higher in the acute coronary syndrome group, particularly in the PTE group (8/31 = 25.8% vs 6/16 = 37.5%, P = 0.001).

Dyslipidemia was detected in the blood test taken just before (1-3 d) the CTA examination in 22 (22/47, 46.8%) patients. Nine of these patients also had a history of DM. Fourteen of these patients were previously aware of the history of hypercholesterolemia and were using statin derivatives.

The mean total cholesterol level of these patients was 243.9 ± 71.2 mg/dL, and the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 171.5 ± 42.6 mg/dL. All of the patients with significant findings on TRO CTA had a total cholesterol level above 240 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level above 175 mg/dL. Twelve of these 22 patients were in the group without imaging findings other than pneumonia, 7 were in the PTE detected group, 2 were in the acute coronary syndrome group, and 1 was in the group with aortic dissection. The rate of dyslipidemia was significantly higher in the group with pathology on CTA while compared to those without pathology apart from imaging findings of the pneumonia group (10/16 = 62.5% vs 12/31 = 38.7%, P < 0.001).

Nine of the patients included in this study (9/47, 19.1%) had a smoking history. There was not any significant relationship between smoking history and the rate of pathology detected using TRO CTA. Smoking history rates were similar in the group who had pathology on CTA, compared to those without pathology apart from imaging findings of the pneumonia group (3/16 = 18.7%, 6/31 = 19.3%, P < 0.08).

Two patients (2/47, 4.2%) had a history of cancer (breast cancer and lymphoma). There was not any pathology except for imaging findings of pneumonia detected on CTA in these patients.

The mean PLT value of the whole population was 231.99 ± 64.15 (x 109/L), the D-dimer value was 854.75 ± 347.65 µg/L , the fibrinogen value was 333.05 ± 66.3 mg/dL, the C-reactive protein (CRP) value was 37.31 ± 2.01 mg/dL, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value was 55.9 ± 8.2 mm/h (Table 1).

Table 1 Mean values and statistical significance according to subgroups.

Normal group
Pathological group
P value
PLT (× 109/L)202.18 ± 45.59289.75 ± 109.680.003
D-Dimer (µg/L)651.53 ± 167.711248.49 ± 520.110.001
Fibrinogen (mg/dL)307.49 ± 61382.59 ± 80.10.002
CRP (mg/dL)28.75 ± 3.0253.91 ± 2.20.001
ESR (mm/hr)43.1 ± 7.381.23 ± 12.20.003
DISCUSSION

Our study revealed that TRO CTA is an effective and non-invasive diagnostic method in COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the ED with acute chest pain. Acute chest pain might be due to pneumonia itself or accompanying vascular events which are related to an increased risk of thrombosis, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial injury in COVID-19 cases[5,7,8].

TRO CTA accelerates the precise diagnosis and utilizes the evaluation of the aorta, coronary arteries, and pulmonary vascular systems with a single examination for safe and rapid decisions[9]. However, it requires a larger amount of contrast medium and higher radiation dose, and might not be easily reachable in all centers[10]. But still instead of separate examinations, it is plausible to choose TRO CTA not only for acute thoracic vascular emergencies but for parenchymal pathologies in COVID-19 patients. Because the correct diagnosis of PTE, acute coronary syndrome, and aortic dissection, influences early treatment and thus, it is life-saving[11].

It has been previously emphasized that COVID-19 increases the risk for pulmonary thromboembolic events, so the thromboprophylaxis is suggested to prevent PTE[12]. Being a common cause of acute chest pain, coronary vascular pathologies can be encountered as a potential differential diagnosis for COVID-19. In addition to being an alternative diagnosis, coronary vascular pathologies can also increase the mortality of COVID-19 cases[13]. The results of the current study demonstrated that pathologies that can be easily diagnosed via the TRO CTA method, such as PTE and coronary vascular pathologies, were also frequently encountered in COVID-19 cases. Therefore, easy, accurate, and rapid diagnosis of accompanying pathologies can help guide treatment and reduce mortality/morbidity rates. Moreover, the effective use of TRO CTA in the ED can enable clinicians to both detect comorbidities and eliminate the mimickers of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Performing TRO CTA in every patient with acute chest pain might be challenging and it will not be a cost-effective method. According to our results, accompanying pathologies were mostly seen in COVID-19 patients with DM and dyslipidemia. These data can help the clinicians to select the more eligible patients for TRO CTA examinations. In addition to clinical properties, laboratory parameters can also help to define suitable patients. We showed that PLT, D-dimer, fibrinogen, CRP, and ESR values ​​were higher in COVID-19 cases with additional pathologies other than pneumonia. The relationship between D-dimer and fibrinogen levels with thromboembolic events, and the relationship between CRP/ESR levels with severity of inflammation and the course of disease were previously studied for COVID-19 cases[14]. Hence, it would be a wise choice to prefer TRO CTA examinations in cases with severe inflammation and who are prone to thromboembolic events.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no research to date that has examined the TRO CTA findings in COVID-19 cases and related them to the clinical features. By examining the TRO CTA findings, performed in the emergency setting of COVID-19 cases, the current study might increase the awareness about the diagnostic utility and effectiveness of the technique, and increase its use.

The limitations of this study are that it is a retrospective single-center study with a small sample size. Although our center is a third-level university hospital and has a wide variety of facilities, future studies in larger populations are required to support the use of TRO CTA in COVID-19 patients with acute chest pain. Subsequently in times to come, our findings should be confirmed in well-powered clinical studies in multicenter hospitals. Since our study was retrospective, ECG data of some patients could not be accessed.

CONCLUSION

Our study has shown that TRO CTA is an imaging method that evaluates all thoracic vascular systems at once and gives accurate results in the COVID-19 patient group with acute chest pain, which has been proven to be susceptible to thrombotic events.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The aim of this study was to define clinical evidence supporting that triple rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO CTA) is a comprehensive and feasible diagnostic tool in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were admitted to the emergency department for acute chest pain. Optimizing diagnostic imaging strategies in COVID-19 related thromboembolic events, will help for rapid and noninvasive diagnoses and results will be effective for patients and healthcare systems in all aspects.

Research motivation

Acute chest pain in COVID 19 patients becomes more difficult due to increasing differential diagnosis. TRO CTA helps diagnosis by excluding pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), coronary artery disease, and acute aortic syndrome at the same time.

Research objectives

To decrease the morbidity and mortality rates in patients.

Research methods

Our study is a retrospective study.

Research results

No pathology was detected in 31 of 57 patients included in the study. PTE was detected in 11 patients. The diabetes mellitus rate was much higher in the acute coronary syndrome group, particularly in the PTE group. The rate of dyslipidemia was significantly higher in the group with pathology on CTA while compared to those without pathology apart from imaging findings of the pneumonia group

Research conclusions

TRO CTA can be a useful method in the differential diagnosis of COVID-19 patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain.

Research perspectives

The use of TRO CTA will reduce mortality and morbidity as it will accelerate the diagnosis and treatment process in the future. Studies will proceed in this direction.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Country/Territory of origin: Turkey

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Luo W, China; Ren S, China A-Editor: Ferreira GSA, Brazil S-Editor: Wang LL L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Wang LL

References
1.  Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, Gibler WB, Moll FL, Doevendans PA. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011;7:2-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1187-1195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 341]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 353]  [Article Influence: 14.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1163-1170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1327]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1205]  [Article Influence: 50.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:844-847.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3992]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3849]  [Article Influence: 962.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Gupta N, Zhao YY, Evans CE. The stimulation of thrombosis by hypoxia. Thromb Res. 2019;181:77-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 227]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 342]  [Article Influence: 68.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Lee HY, Yoo SM, White CS. Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain: triple rule-out protocol vs dedicated coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:319-326.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054-1062.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 459]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
8.  Eltabbakh AR, Dawoud MA, Langer M, Moharm MA, Hamdy EA, Hamisa MF. ‘Triple-rule-out’CT angiography for clinical decision making and early triage of acute chest pain patients: use of 320-multislice CT angiography. Egypt J Radiol Nuc M. 2019;50:1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Chae MK, Kim EK, Jung KY, Shin TG, Sim MS, Jo IJ, Song KJ, Chang SA, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Lee SH, Kim SM, Eo H, Choe YH, Choi JH. Triple rule-out computed tomography for risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:291-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Yoon YE, Wann S. Evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department: "triple rule-out" computed tomography angiography. Cardiol Rev. 2011;19:115-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Takx RAP, Wichmann JL, Otani K, De Cecco CN, Tesche C, Baumann S, Mastrodicasa D, Litwin SE, Bayer RR 2nd, Nance JW, Suranyi P, Jacobs BE, Duguay TM, Vogl TJ, Carr CM, Schoepf UJ. In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging. 2020;35:198-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Sakr Y, Giovini M, Leone M, Pizzilli G, Kortgen A, Bauer M, Tonetti T, Duclos G, Zieleskiewicz L, Buschbeck S, Ranieri VM, Antonucci E. Pulmonary embolism in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 127]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 25.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Dan S, Pant M, Upadhyay SK. The Case Fatality Rate in COVID-19 Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Global Health Challenge and Paradigm in the Current Pandemic. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2020;1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Eljilany I, Elzouki AN. D-Dimer, Fibrinogen, and IL-6 in COVID-19 Patients with Suspected Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020;16:455-462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60]  [Article Influence: 15.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]