This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Author contributions: Soe KK prepared the manuscript; Seto AH edited the manuscript into the final version; and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Kyaw Khaing Soe, MBBS, MD, Attending Doctor, Internal Medicine, Methodist Hospital of Southern California, 300 W Huntington Dr. TCU #52, Arcadia, CA 91007, United States. email@example.com
Received: May 29, 2021 Peer-review started: May 29, 2021 First decision: June 17, 2021 Revised: June 19, 2021 Accepted: July 6, 2021 Article in press: July 6, 2021 Published online: July 26, 2021
Classic electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia starting with peaked symmetrical T-waves are widely recognized in daily clinical practice but little evidence is documented how quickly it can evolve in real-time.
An elderly diabetic and hypertensive male presented with acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. He experienced cardiac arrest with moderate hyperkalemia despite medical treatment and hemodialysis. Telemetry changes were retrospectively studied and found to have significant rhythm changes that occurred just less than 10 minutes prior to the cardiac arrest.
In hyperkalemia, telemetry rhythm can change instantaneously in a significant way. Rapidly rising potassium could be life threatening and may require more than medical treatment.
Core Tip: We present a case of acute rhabdomyolysis and renal failure where the patient experienced cardiac arrest with moderate hyperkalemia despite medical treatment and hemodialysis. This case illustrates how quickly the telemetry rhythm can change in a short period of time (9 min).
Citation: Soe KK, Seto AH. Sliding with the sines − fatal hyperkalemia: A case report. World J Cardiol 2021; 13(7): 230-236
In rhabdomyolysis where massive tissue destruction could produce significant hyperkalemia, potassium levels are closely monitored and electrocardiographic changes would trigger immediate action even before the laboratory confirmation. Rapidly rising potassium levels are more likely to present with cardiac rhythm changes but the pace of those changes is rarely reported in the literature.
A 76-year old male presented to emergency department with generalized weakness and encephalopathy.
History of present illness
His generalized weakness gradually started over a few months and recently he was getting weaker and also confused for a few days.
History of past illness
His past medical history was significant for hypertension, diabetes and old ischemic stroke with residual right sided weakness.
Personal and family history
He was a non-smoker and non-drinker, and he lived in a house.
He was somnolent but arousable. He had dry mucous membranes and mild right hemiparesis which was his baseline.
Laboratory results were significant for serum potassium 6.7 mmol/L, serum creatinine 10.76 mg/dL, and serum creatine kinase 40673 U/L.
Computed tomography of the brain without contrast showed no acute changes. Electrocardiography (Figure 1) did not show any classic changes associated with hyperkalemia.
Figure 1 Electrocardiogram on admission.
Twelve lead electrocardiogram without any hyperkalemic manifestations.
Patient was diagnosed as hyperkalemia with acute renal failure possibly due to rhabdomyolysis.
The patient received intravenous calcium gluconate, furosemide, dextrose, insulin, and sodium bicarbonate, and albuterol by nebulizer. Emergent hemodialysis was arranged and performed in the intensive care unit uneventfully, resulting in potassium decreasing to 4.0 mmol/L. CK also trended down to 37586 U/L the following day. Further daily hemodialysis sessions were provided for oliguria.
Progress during hospital stay
On the third hospital day, CK increased to 206297 U/L but the potassium level remained stable at 4.7 mmol/L. Six hours after the hemodialysis session of the day, the repeat potassium was 6.9 mmol/L. The telemetry rhythm strip (Figure 2A) showed no hyperkalemic manifestations. The patient was again administered calcium gluconate, dextrose, insulin and sodium polystyrene. Despite these efforts, two hours later the patient suffered a cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity. The patient was resuscitated and the repeat potassium level which was taken just before the cardiac arrest was 7.4 mmol/L. On review of the telemetry, significant changes associated with hyperkalemia were noted just 9 min before the cardiac arrest (Figure 2B-G). The potassium levels, creatine kinase levels and the treatments patient received are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2 Telemetry strips (rate 25 mm/s).
The upper rhythm is lead II and lower rhythm is lead V5. A: At 4:00 AM. when potassium level started rising. T wave amplitude measuring 2-2.5 mm in lead II. PR interval 0.16-0.20 s. QRS 0.1-0.12 s. QT prolongation from hypocalcemia; B: At 6:50 AM. T waves in lead II seems to be slightly taller, maybe about 0.5 mm (half small square) than Figure 2. Similar measurements for PR interval and QRS. Non-specific T waves changes in V5; C: At 6:51 AM. ST and T waves changes more pronounced in V5. ST depression by 0.5-1 mm in V5. QRS slightly widened beyond 0.12 s in both lead II and V5; D: At 6:52 AM. QRS widened more with further ST depression. Transitioning into sine wave, more obvious in lead V5; E: At 6:53 AM. Complete loss of original QRS morphology in lead V5 and transforming into sine waves. P waves still visible with PR interval 0.16 s in lead II; F: At 6:57 AM. QRS morphology in lead II deformed with marked ST depression, transitioning into sine waves. QRS in V5 is showing left bundle branch block morphology at the similar heart rate; G: At 7:00 AM. Sinus pause over 2 s and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest.
Table 1 Potassium levels, creatine kinase levels and treatments received.
Potassium levels (mmol/L)
CK levels (U/L)
IV calcium gluconate 1 g once
Albuterol nebulization 10 mg once
IV furosemide 40 mg once
IV dextrose 50% 50 g once
IV regular insulin 5 units once
IV sodium bicarbonate 50 mEq once
IV sodium bicarbonate 8.4% continuous infusion was started
Electrocardiography following the resuscitation still showed the typical sine waves of hyperkalemia (Figure 3) with a repeat potassium level of 7.9 mmol/L.
Figure 3 Electrocardiogram after resuscitation.
Twelve lead electrocardiogram showing classic description of hyperkalemic manifestations, peaked T waves in V1, V2, widened QRS complexes, P waves not seen and sine waves in V4, V5, V6.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
The patient was intubated and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was initiated. Despite these interventions, the hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis continued to worsen and he eventually expired from ventricular fibrillation refractory to multiple defibrillation attempts. Repeat 12 Lead electrocardiography before the last cardiac arrest showed more pronounced sine waves from hyperkalemia with corresponding potassium level of 7.1 mmol/L (Figure 4).
Figure 4 Electrocardiogram showing typical sine waves of hyperkalemia.
Findings include loss of P waves, severe widening of QRS complexes resulting in fusion of QRS complexes and T waves, decrease in amplitudes of QRS complexes and T waves.
Traditionally, the electrocardiographic manifestations of hyperkalemia are sufficient to make emergent interventions indicated even prior to laboratory confirmation[1-4]. Continuous electrocardiographic telemetry is typically sufficient for monitoring cardiac rhythm. However, this patient did not demonstrate the classic peaked, symmetrical T waves on telemetry despite significant hyperkalemia. The amplitudes of T waves in lead II (Figure 2A) were less than half the height of QRS complexes and it had similar morphology on telemetry for the first three days. If a 12-lead electrocardiogram had been recorded prior to cardiac arrest, it might have shown some peaked T waves in the other non-monitoring leads.
Hyperkalemia is also associated with atrioventricular conduction disturbances[5,6] and we observed the left bundle branch block morphology just 3 minutes prior to cardiac arrest (Figure 2F).
Hyperkalemia is generally classified as moderate for the level between 6.5 mmol/L to 8.0 mmol/L and severe for the level above 8.0 mmol/L. Rapidly progressive hyperkalemia is more likely to present with cardiac rhythm changes. This patient only experienced moderate hyperkalemia but suffered cardiac arrest likely because of a rapidly rising potassium. Moreover, it is also notable that the sine waves were more dramatic with potassium level of 7.1 mmol/L (Figure 4) when he eventually demised than with potassium level of 7.9 mmol/L (Figure 3) from his first cardiac arrest.
Intravenous regular insulin 5 units with dextrose can reduce the potassium level by 0.54-1.04 mmol/L at one hour and a systematic review showed regular insulin 10 units could reduce the potassium by average of 0.78 ± 0.25 mmol/L in an hour. The beta-2 agonist, salbutamol 10 mg nebulization, is also another potent agent that can reduce the potassium by 0.62 ± 0.09 mmol/L after 120 min of administration but with the possible side effect of severe tachycardia and is limited in patients with heart failure or coronary artery disease. However, all of these treatments influence the potassium level by intracellular transfer without actually reducing total body potassium. Intravenous loop diuretics are largely ineffective in relieving hyperkalemia in oliguric patients. Oral agents that increase gastrointestinal potassium excretion, including sodium polystyrene, patiromer and sodium zirconium, have a slow onset of action. Sodium zirconium could potentially have incremental effect in treatment of hyperkalemia with potassium reduction of 0.41 mmol/L as early as 4 h after administration.
In addition to the above medical intervention, it is warranted to initiate renal replacement therapy in the setting of hyperkalemic emergency with rhabdomyolysis. Our patient, however, was already on daily hemodialysis with potassium level under control for two days. Nevertheless, his rebound hyperkalemia should have been managed aggressively with immediate hemodialysis rather than medical management and wait for another two hours for response.
After the medical management, potassium level should be repeated one to two hour after treatment. In our patient, it was scheduled to be repeated two hour after treatment which was reasonable. More aggressive approach to repeat the potassium at one hour or earlier might have shown worsening hyperkalemia which would have prompted more intervention.
Hemodialysis is the mainstay for the emergency management of hyperkalemia but daily intermittent hemodialysis may be inadequate as shown in this case. There is not enough evidence to suggest that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is superior to intermittent hemodialysis in management of rhabdomyolysis but CRRT has been found to remove myoglobin more effectively and is more practical in the setting of hypotension. Early initiation of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis along with aggressive potassium monitoring may be necessary for severe cases of rhabdomyolysis.
Frequent 12-lead electrocardiograms in addition to the close attention to continuous telemetry monitoring are necessary for patient with hyperkalemia from rhabdomyolysis. Despite appropriate support with daily hemodialysis, this case demonstrates how rapidly acute hyperkalemia can worsen and cause an evolution of the cardiac rhythm. Timely intervention and reassessment for clinical response are critical in the management of hyperkalemia.
Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript
Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems