Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.107102
Revised: April 6, 2025
Accepted: May 27, 2025
Published online: June 26, 2025
Processing time: 95 Days and 19.3 Hours
Significant gaps in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) stem from shortages of cardiologists and advanced HF providers, as well as a lack of optimal HF management knowledge among hospitalists. This study compared the impact of optimal medical therapy in HF (OMT-HF) certification on GDMT implementation and patient outcomes between an intervention group (IG) of hospitalists and a standard-of-care comparison group (SOC-CG).
To evaluate if OMT-HF has a difference in GDMT and patients in outcomes be
This study was implemented from November 2022 to May 2023. Hospitalized car
IG patients had lower readmission rates [(9 (42.85%) vs 11 (17.46%), P = 0.03] and a decreased trend in mortality 30-day post discharge. IG patients also showed greater mean improvements in total (-27.03 ± 24.59 vs -5.85 ± 23.52, P < 0.001), physical (-13.8 ± 12.3 vs -2.71 ± 11.16, P < 0.001) and emotional (-4.76 ± 8.10 vs -1.42 ± 5.98) dimensions on the MLWHFQ compared to SOC-CG, however, change in emotional dimension did not reach statistical significance.
Hospitalist OMT-HF certification may lead to better 30-day outcomes in hospitalized HF patients including quality of life, mortality and readmission rates. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Core Tip: In patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction who are admitted to the hospital, seeing an optimal medical therapy in HF (OMT-HF) certified hospitalist can lead to improved guideline directed medical therapy scores, improved quality of life scores on the Milwaukee Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire 30 days post-discharge and lower 30-day readmission rates compared to those who did not see an OMT-HF certified hospitalist.