Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2024; 16(3): 717-730
Published online Mar 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.717
Predicting short-term major postoperative complications in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease: A machine learning-based study
Fang-Tao Wang, Yin Lin, Xiao-Qi Yuan, Ren-Yuan Gao, Xiao-Cai Wu, Wei-Wei Xu, Tian-Qi Wu, Kai Xia, Yi-Ran Jiao, Lu Yin, Chun-Qiu Chen, Diagnostic and Treatment Center for Refractory Diseases of Abdomen Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China
ORCID number: Fang-Tao Wang (0000-0003-3193-4108); Chun-Qiu Chen (0000-0002-4248-7414).
Author contributions: Wang FT contributed to the manuscript writing, data collection and analysis; Lin Y, Yuan XQ, Gao RY, Wu XC, Xu WW, Wu TQ, Xia K, and Jiao YR collected data; Yin L and Chen CQ were involved in the conceptualization and supervision of this manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript.
Supported by Horizontal Project of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, No. DS05!06!22016 and No. DS05!06!22017.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital (SHSY-IEC-5.0/24K3/P01).
Informed consent statement: Patients were not required to give informed consent to the study because the analysis used anonymous clinical data that were obtained after each patient agreed to treatment by written consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Chun-Qiu Chen, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Chief Doctor, Diagnostic and Treatment Center for Refractory Diseases of Abdomen Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai 200072, China. chenchunqiu6@126.com
Received: September 27, 2023
Peer-review started: September 27, 2023
First decision: December 28, 2023
Revised: January 12, 2024
Accepted: February 18, 2024
Article in press: February 18, 2024
Published online: March 27, 2024

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Due to the complexity and numerous comorbidities associated with Crohn’s disease (CD), the incidence of postoperative complications is high, significantly impacting the recovery and prognosis of patients. Consequently, additional studies are required to precisely predict short-term major complications following intestinal resection (IR), aiding surgical decision-making and optimizing patient care.

AIM

To construct novel models based on machine learning (ML) to predict short-term major postoperative complications in patients with CD following IR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data derived from a patient cohort that underwent IR for CD from January 2017 to December 2022. The study participants were randomly allocated to either a training cohort or a validation cohort. The logistic regression and random forest (RF) were applied to construct models in the training cohort, with model discrimination evaluated using the area under the curves (AUC). The validation cohort assessed the performance of the constructed models.

RESULTS

Out of the 259 patients encompassed in the study, 5.0% encountered major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) within 30 d following IR for CD. The AUC for the logistic model was 0.916, significantly lower than the AUC of 0.965 for the RF model. The logistic model incorporated a preoperative CD activity index (CDAI) of ≥ 220, a diminished preoperative serum albumin level, conversion to laparotomy surgery, and an extended operation time. A nomogram for the logistic model was plotted. Except for the surgical approach, the other three variables ranked among the top four important variables in the novel ML model.

CONCLUSION

Both the nomogram and RF exhibited good performance in predicting short-term major postoperative complications in patients with CD, with the RF model showing more superiority. A preoperative CDAI of ≥ 220, a diminished preoperative serum albumin level, and an extended operation time might be the most crucial variables. The findings of this study can assist clinicians in identifying patients at a higher risk for complications and offering personalized perioperative management to enhance patient outcomes.

Key Words: Crohn’s disease, Postoperative complications, Nomogram, Random forest, Intestinal resection

Core Tip: Given the unique characteristics of Crohn’s disease (CD), the incidence of postoperative complications is notably high. Previous studies, while identifying risk factors influencing these complications, often yield inconsistent results due to the heterogeneity of patient populations. This machine learning-based study included data from a single center over a relatively short period in China. Novel models employing logistic regression and random forest were developed to inform individualized perioperative management of patients with CD. The models, particularly the random forest, demonstrated robust performance, highlighting the significance of preoperative CD activity index, serum albumin levels, and operation time as crucial predictors.



INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibits a high incidence and prevalence in Western developed countries, being a more common gastrointestinal disease in Europe and North America. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the incidence of IBD in European and American countries has gradually stabilized, while in non-Western countries, particularly in Asia, South America, and Eastern and Southern Europe, the incidence of IBD has exhibited an upward trend[1,2]. In China, the number of IBD cases has demonstrated a substantial growth trend over the past two decades[3]. Particularly in densely populated developed cities, the incidence of Crohn’s disease (CD) has increased significantly, ranging from 0.07/100000 to 1.27/100000[4].

Despite advances in medical therapy, 70% to 90% of patients with CD necessitate surgery in their lifetime[5], and postoperative complications are prevalent[6]. Special attention should be directed towards major postoperative complications, including intra-abdominal sepsis complications (IASC), bleeding, anastomotic fistula, and intestinal obstruction. Such complications can result in prolonged hospital stays, heightened healthcare costs, and adverse patient outcomes[7]. Identifying risk factors for these complications is crucial for optimizing the care of patients with CD undergoing surgery.

Several studies have explored the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with CD, yet the results have been inconsistent, frequently constrained by heterogeneous patient populations. Additionally, these studies encompass a relatively broad inclusion period, during which medical therapy and management approaches have been enhanced[8-10]. Furthermore, the mesentery in patients with CD tends to undergo thickening, significantly elevating the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. Nevertheless, the majority of prior studies examining the risk factors for postoperative complications concentrated solely on anastomotic fistula and IASC, neglecting postoperative bleeding[11-14]. Furthermore, prior studies on the factors influencing postoperative complications in patients with CD were exclusively grounded in traditional regression models and did not employ advanced machine learning (ML) models. In recent years, ML technologies have gained widespread application in the field of intelligent healthcare, bearing significant practical and societal significance in clinical decision-making and clinical diagnosis[15,16]. ML-based models have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting medical outcomes and identifying high-risk patients[17,18].

In this study, we aimed to identify factors that may elevate the risk of overall short-term major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) and prolonged hospital stays following intestinal resection (IR) for CD. Additionally, besides constructing a nomogram predictive model using the logistic model, we utilized an improved ML model, specifically random forest (RF) analysis, to identify key factors influencing short-term major postoperative complications in CD. Through enhancing the identification and management of postoperative complications, we can ultimately improve patient outcomes and alleviate the burden of CD on healthcare systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

A retrospective analysis of a surgical database involving CD patients who underwent IR at our center from January 2017 to December 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of CD confirmed by histology or clinical presentation. Exclusion criteria encompassed incomplete medical records. The study was registered in the Chinese clinical trial database with the registration number ChicTR-InR-16009321 and obtained approval from the Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital Ethics Committee (SHSY-IEC-5.0/24K3/P01). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Methods

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the occurrence of short-term major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III), defined as surgical complications within 30 d, including anastomotic fistula, IASC, bleeding, and intestinal obstruction. The secondary outcome was the length of postoperative hospital stay. The dataset was randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. χ2 tests or independent sample t-tests were used for univariate analysis to identify risk factors for major postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for major postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent factors affecting postoperative hospital stay. Models were constructed using the training cohort, including a nomogram predictive model based on logistic regression analysis and an improved ML approach, specifically a RF analysis model. The area under the curves (AUC) was utilized to evaluate the discriminatory performance of the model, while the validation cohort was employed to assess the overall performance. DeLong’s test was applied to compare differences between two AUCs. Additionally, calibration curve was performed to evaluate the calibrating ability of the nomogram model. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were then utilized to quantify the importance of each feature in the RF analysis by calculating the contribution of each feature to the predicted outcome. Significance was considered for P < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using R software version 4.3.2.

RESULTS
Patients’ characteristics and surgical outcomes

A total of 259 CD patients who underwent IR during the study period were included in the analysis and randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 181) and a validation cohort (n = 78). All surgeries, including elective and emergency procedures, were performed by the same team of surgeons specializing in IBD surgery at our center. The indications for all CD patients to undergo surgery were the presence of one or more complications. Among the 259 patients, there were a total of 13 cases with major surgical complications, including 1 case (0.9% of all patients with anastomosis) of anastomotic leakage, 5 cases (1.9%) of intra-abdominal sepsis, 1 case (0.4%) of ileus, and 6 cases (2.4%) of bleeding. Intestinal obstruction and 2 cases of intra-abdominal bleeding were treated with reoperation, 2 cases of intestinal bleeding were treated with endoscopic intervention, and anastomotic leakage and intra-abdominal sepsis were managed with irrigation, drainage, and antibiotics. The remaining postoperative complications were treated conservatively with symptomatic drugs. All patients were discharged after recovery. The average length of postoperative hospital stay for all patients was 9.8 ± 3.8 d.

Factors related to major postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay

The patients in the training cohort were further divided into the major postoperative complication group and the non-major postoperative complication group. Univariate analysis identified that patients who developed major postoperative complications had a lower preoperative serum albumin level, and most experienced moderate to severe preoperative CD activity index (CDAI) staging (CDAI ≥ 220). Moreover, the conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was higher in the group with major postoperative complications, and they were more likely to have a longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss (Tables 1 and 2; all P < 0.05). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for major postoperative complications. The results showed that a lower level of preoperative serum albumin [odds ratio (OR) = 0.826, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705-0.968], a preoperative CDAI of ≥ 220 (OR = 10.084, 95%CI: 1.011-100.626), conversion to laparotomy surgery (OR = 7.000, 95%CI: 1.118-41.244), and a longer operation time (OR = 1.026, 95%CI: 1.008-1.045) were all significantly correlated with the occurrence of major postoperative complications (Table 3).

Table 1 Demographic and Crohn’s disease data in patients undergoing intestinal resection.
Variables
Total (n = 181)
Major postoperative complication1
P value
Yes (10)
No (171)
Sex0.281
    Male127 (70.2)5 (50.0)122 (71.3)
    Female54 (29.8)5 (50.0)49 (28.7)
Age at surgery (yr)39.04 ± 13.036.7 ± 15.739.2 ± 12.80.558
Duration of disease (yr)4.9 ± 5.25.6 ± 4.74.8 ± 5.20.454
BMI (kg/m2)19.2 ± 3.418.0 ± 3.619.2 ± 3.40.137
Weight loss > 10% in 6 months prior to surgery      0.564
Yes66 (36.5)5 (50.0)61 (35.7)
No115 (63.5)5 (50.0)110 (64.3)
History of intestinal resection0.855
Yes41 (22.7)3 (30.0)38 (22.2)
No140 (77.3)7 (70.0)133 (77.8)
Mean preoperative laboratory values
C reactive protein serum level (mg/L)31.2 ± 43.218.8 ± 12.631.9 ± 44.30.901
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)31.0 ± 15.438.9 ± 12.330.6 ± 15.40.071
Platelets (× 109/L)295.2 ± 124.2330.4 ± 108.4293.2 ± 125.10.230
Hemoglobin level (g/L)115.5 ± 21.3114.8 ± 30.2115.5 ± 20.70.896
Serum albumin (g/L)36.3 ± 5.731.4 ± 5.936.6 ± 5.60.005a
Preoperative therapy (< 3 months before surgery)0.075
No preoperative therapy75 (41.4)4 (40.0)71 (41.5)
Steroids2/traditional immunosuppressant349 (27.1)0 (0.0)49 (28.7)
Biologicals45 (24.9)5 (50.0)40 (23.4)
Combo therapy12 (6.6)1 (10.0)11 (6.4)
Preoperative CDAI staging0.006a
Remission to mild (< 220)103 (56.9)1 (10.0)102 (59.6)
Moderate to severe (≥ 220)78 (43.1)9 (90.0)69 (40.4)
Age at diagnosis of CD (yr)0.601
A1 (< 17)10 (5.5)1 (10.0)9 (5.3)
A2 (17-40)122 (67.4)7 (70.0)115 (67.2)
A3 (> 40)49 (27.1)2 (20.0)47 (27.5)
Disease location0.604
L1 (ileal)35 (19.3)1 (10.0)34 (19.9)
L2 (colonic)12 (6.6)1 (10.0)11 (6.4)
L3 (ileocolic)134 (74.0)8 (80.0)126 (73.7)
Disease behavior0.080
B2 (stricturing)65 (35.9)1 (10.0)64 (37.4)
B3 (penetrating)91 (50.3)6 (60.0)85 (49.7)
B2P (structuring with perianal disease)7 (3.9)0 (0.0)7 (4.1)
B3P (penetrating with perianal disease)18 (9.9)3 (30.0)15 (8.8)
Table 2 Surgical data.
Variables
Total (n = 181)
Major postoperative complication1
P value
Yes (10)
No (171)
Surgical priority      0.065
Selective173 (95.6)8 (80.0)165 (96.5)
Emergency8 (4.4)2 (20.0)6 (3.5)
Surgical approach0.011a
Laparoscopic163 (90.1)6 (60.0)157 (91.8)
Open6 (3.3)1 (10.0)5 (2.9)
Conversion12 (6.6)3 (30.0)9 (5.3)
Type of resection0.309
ICR100 (55.2)5 (50.0)95 (55.6)
Right hemicolectomy25 (13.8)0 (0.0)25 (14.6)
Left-sided colectomy5 (2.8)0 (0.0)5 (2.9)
Subtotal colectomy21 (11.6)3 (30.0)18 (10.5)
Segmental resection of small bowel30 (16.6)2 (20.0)28 (16.4)
Stoma creation0.070
Yes104 (57.5)9 (90.0)95 (55.6)
No77 (42.5)1 (10.0)76 (44.4)
Operative time (min)147.7 ± 37.6182.0 ± 40.8145.7 ± 36.50.007a
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)133.1 ± 114.1195.0 ± 138.3129.5 ± 111.90.048a
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis results of factors associated with major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III).
VariableMultivariate analysis
OR
95%CI
P value
Preoperative CDAI
    Remission to mild (< 220)Reference
    Moderate to severe (≥ 220)10.0841.011-100.6260.490
Serum albumin (g/L)0.8260.705-0.9680.016a
Surgical approach
    LaparoscopicReference
        Open14.1610.830-241.5720.067
        Conversion7.0001.188-41.2440.032a
Operative time (min)1.0261.008-1.0450.005a

Univariate analysis of the entire data cohort showed several significant factors associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay. These were emergency surgery (P < 0.001), laparotomy approach (P < 0.001), small bowel segmentectomy (P = 0.039,vs ileocecal resection), longer operation time (P = 0.001), and more intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004). The independent risk factors significantly associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay in the multivariate analysis included a lower level of preoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.015), emergency surgery (P = 0.001), laparotomy approach (P < 0.001), and longer operation time (P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4 Related factors of postoperative hospital stay.
VariableLinear regression analysis
Univariate analysis P value
Multivariate analysis P value
Sex0.798      
Age at surgery (yr)0.444
Duration of disease (yr)0.449
History of intestinal resection0.631
BMI (kg/m2)0.132
Weight loss > 10% in 6 months prior to surgery0.328
Mean preoperative laboratory values
    C reactive protein serum level (mg/L)0.087
    Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)0.602
    Platelets (× 109/L)0.886
    Hemoglobin level (g/L)0.0560.015a
    Serum albumin (g/L)0.056
Preoperative CDAI staging0.061
Montreal classification
Age at diagnosis of CD (yr)0.574
Disease location0.342
Disease behavior0.947
Surgical priority< 0.001a0.001a
Surgical approach< 0.001a< 0.001a
Type of resection0.039a
Stoma creation0.504
Operation time (min)0.001a< 0.001a
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)0.004a
Construction and evaluation of nomogram predictive model for major postoperative complications

A nomogram predictive model was established based on these independent risk factors identified for the occurrence of major postoperative complications (Figure 1). In the training cohort, the AUC was 0.916 (95%CI: 0.853-0.978), with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.743 (Figure 2A). In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.960 (95%CI: 0.907-1.000), with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.933 (Figure 2B). The calibration curve showed good consistency between the predicted and actual probabilities, indicating that the nomogram had good predictive performance (Figure 2C).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Nomogram construction. The possibility of major postoperative complications was estimated by summing the scores corresponding to each risk factor. CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Evaluation of the nomogram predictive performance. A-C: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the nomogram for predicting the probability of postoperative complications in the training cohort (A) and the validation cohort (B). The area under ROC curve of the training cohort and the validation cohort reached 0.916 and 0.960, respectively, indicating the high predictive value of the model. The calibration curve of the nomogram is close to the front diagonal, indicating that the nomogram had good prediction performance (C). AUC: Area under the curve.
RF model based on improved ML

In the RF model, the AUC for the training cohort reached 0.965 (95%CI: 0.942-0.988), with a sensitivity of 1.000 and specificity of 0.833 (Figure 3A), significantly outperforming the AUC of the traditional logistic regression model (P < 0.05). In the validation cohort, the AUC of the RF model reached 0.924 (95%CI: 0.855-0.993), with a sensitivity of 1.000 and specificity of 0.880 (Figure 3B). The feature importance was illustrated in Figure 4. Preoperative CDAI, operation time, serum albumin, and body mass index (BMI) were identified as the top four important variables, whereas the surgical approach held the seventh position. Preoperative CDAI, operation time, and serum albumin were visibly higher than other indicators and aligned with the variables included in the logistic regression model, highlighting their prominent predictive role. Finally, SHAP was used to interpret the RF model, as shown in Figure 5. It was also observed that serum albumin, operation time, and preoperative CDAI played the most crucial role in predicting and explaining the RF model. Specifically, low preoperative serum albumin, prolonged operation time, and preoperative CDAI of ≥ 220 were associated with an increased likelihood of short-term major postoperative complications.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Performance of random forest model. A: The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) of the random forest (RF) model in the training cohort; B: The ROC of the RF model in the validation cohort. AUC: Area under the curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Feature importance ranking of the random forest model. CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; BMI: Body mass index; CD: Crohn’s disease.
Figure 5
Figure 5 SHapley Additive exPlanations summary plots of the random forest model. The y-coordinate of each point is determined by the feature it represents, while the x-coordinate is determined by its impact on the model’s output. The color of each point indicates its value from high to low, according to the color bar on the right. The features on the y-axis are ordered by their importance. CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; BMI: Body mass index; CD: Crohn’s disease; SHAP: SHapley Additive exPlanations.
DISCUSSION

ML has the advantages of dealing with big data, strong objectivity and reliability, and good repeatability. Previous studies have confirmed the application value of ML algorithms in clinical diagnosis and prognosis[19,20]. Moreover, ML algorithms play a crucial role in constructing predictive models, especially in assisting clinical decision-makers to precisely identify high-risk patients and offer timely and accurate treatment, thereby enhancing patient prognosis[21,22].

Previous studies only discussed risk factors related to postoperative complications of CD, such as a low preoperative serum albumin level, a high preoperative CDAI score, and primary anastomosis[12,23,24]. However, these studies didn’t build improved ML models for predicting postoperative complications for CD after surgery, although they might also build traditional logistic regression models. Therefore, this study is the first to use an improved ML algorithm, specifically the RF analysis model, to predict the likelihood of CD patients developing short-term major complications after IR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that a preoperative CDAI of ≥ 220, a diminished preoperative serum albumin level, conversion to autotomy surgery, and an extended operation time were important risk factors for short-term major postoperative complications in patients with CD. Although the prediction performance of the RF model is better than that of the logistic regression model, it is worth noting that three of the most important variables screened by the RF analysis are consistent with the logistic regression model, namely, serum albumin, preoperative CDAI, and operation time.

Hypoalbuminemia, indicative of malnutrition and systemic inflammation, can negatively impact wound healing, immune response, and overall recovery[25]. Recognizing the importance of preoperative nutritional optimization can help mitigate this risk factor and improve patient outcomes[23,26-29]. In our center, CD patients with poor nutritional status routinely receive enhanced nutritional support, including parenteral nutrition. This was also confirmed by the preoperative albumin level of 36.6 ± 5.5 g/L in this study cohort. However, the preoperative albumin level of patients undergoing emergency surgery was significantly lower than that of patients undergoing elective surgery (31.4 ± 4.4 vs 36.9 ± 5.4, P < 0.001). Therefore, in addition to doctors’ need to strengthen perioperative nutritional management of CD patients, patients themselves should also pay attention to disease monitoring to avoid emergency surgery.

In our cohort, preoperative moderate to severe CDAI staging emerged as a significant risk factor. The CDAI was developed in 1976 for the National Collaborative Study on CD[30]. While CDAI has been widely used in clinical practice because of the simplicity of its evaluation methods, it is important to note that some of its indicators are relatively subjective, ignoring objective indicators of inflammation, such as albumin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate[31]. Despite these limitations, CDAI remains a tool for assessing response to CD treatment and disease activity. Two recent studies have also shown that a higher preoperative CDAI score significantly increases postoperative complications[24,32]. The CDAI is derived based on the patient’s disease symptoms and recent nutritional status in the past week, which once again emphasizes the influence of the disease status and the patient’s nutritional status on surgical treatment. Therefore, effective perioperative inflammation control and nutritional support are both strongly needed to reduce CDAI score in order to prevent postoperative complications.

Another identified risk factor was the prolonged operation time, which was consistent with a previous meta-analysis[33] that found a 14% increase in the likelihood of complications for every 30-min increase in operation time. Longer operation time was also considered to be a risk factor for postoperative complications in the treatment for CD with repeat ileocolic resection in a recent study[34], which also indicated that longer operation time was only significantly associated with a higher BMI in patients. The prolonged operation time associated with increased complications should be a multifaceted result, including prolonged exposure to microbial and anesthesia, as well as increased surgeon fatigue. Moreover, the longer the operation time, the more complicated or difficult the surgical procedure, with which higher rates of complications are expected.

Additionally, the conversion to laparotomy surgery was found to be a risk factor for complications, which was also associated with a longer postoperative hospitalization time. However, in the RF model, it didn’t rank high in importance. Laparotomy, a more invasive surgical approach involving a larger incision, can lead to greater tissue trauma, prolonged operation time, and increased postoperative pain[35,36]. Previous studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery in patients with CD has a considerable or lower rate of postoperative short-term overall complications, including intra-abdominal abscesses and/or anastomotic leakage, as well as a lower rate of reoperation and significantly shorter hospital stay, compared with traditional open surgery[37,38]. Unlike previous studies, the logistic regression analysis in this study further indicated that the conversion to open surgery was more likely to result in postoperative complications, underscoring the importance of preoperative evaluation of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery. Nevertheless, the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive techniques in CD patients has been affirmed by multiple studies[39-43], even in complex and repeat surgery cases. The experience at our center also confirmed that minimally invasive surgery was the first choice after adequate preoperative nutritional support and comprehensive preoperative examination[44], as it could accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce the incidence of abdominal adhesions, which was more conducive to the needs of CD patients for secondary abdominal surgery.

Surgical strategies for CD include IR with primary anastomosis or temporary stoma creation followed by delayed anastomosis. The latter is intended to reduce the occurrence of serious complications such as IASC and anastomotic fistula, especially for penetrating disease[45-47] and colonic CD[48,49]. In the cases included in this study, 59.1% of patients underwent staged surgery, and neither penetrating disease nor colectomy was found to be an independent risk factor for major postoperative complications, which again indicates that reasonable selection of staged surgery can effectively reduce postoperative IASC.

Some authors have found that repeat bowel resection increases the risk of postoperative anastomotic fistula in patients with CD[50,51], but as with two other recent studies[46,52], this did not appear in our study. We believe that even complex surgeries, including repeated bowel resection and anastomosis, can be performed with low postoperative morbidity, as long as perioperative preparations are made carefully. In most respects, the factors that affect postoperative complications and hospitalization time were consistent, but there were also some differences. In our cohort, a lower preoperative hemoglobin level, emergency surgery, laparotomy approach, and longer operation time were associated with longer hospitalization time. Although emergency surgery increased postoperative hospitalization time, it did not increase the risk of postoperative complications. However, this again emphasizes the importance of dynamic monitoring of patients with CD to avoid emergency procedure.

The nomogram model developed in this study provides a valuable tool for predicting the probability of major postoperative complications in patients with CD undergoing IR. By incorporating the identified risk factors into a visual and easily interpretable format, the nomogram enables clinicians to estimate an individual patient’s risk level. More importantly, in this study, we built a RF model based on an improved ML algorithm. Through combined analysis with the traditional logistic regression model, the risk factors affecting the short-term major complications of patients with CD can be more accurately identified. This personalized risk assessment enhances clinical decision-making and facilitates tailored perioperative management, including interventions and close monitoring for high-risk patients. This proactive approach can lead to improved patient outcomes, reduced morbidity, and enhanced overall healthcare quality.

It is essential to acknowledge the limitations of this study. The retrospective nature and single-center design may restrict the generalizability of the findings. External validation in diverse patient cohorts is necessary to assess the novel models’ reliability and applicability in different healthcare settings. Additionally, the study focused on short-term major postoperative complications within 30 d, and long-term complications were not considered.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, both nomogram model and RF model had good predictive ability in identifying high-risk CD patients with major short-term postoperative complications. ML models can help us filter out the most important influences more accurately and provide clinicians with a personalized risk assessment tool that can guide decision-making and optimize perioperative management. Implementing the novel models in routine clinical care can lead to improved patient outcomes, enhanced patient-centered care, and contribute to ongoing quality improvement efforts in surgical practice.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The high incidence of postoperative complications in Crohn’s disease (CD) has prompted an urgent need for predicting postoperative risks, especially in perioperative decision-making. The improved machine learning (ML)-based models have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting medical outcomes and identifying high-risk patients.

Research motivation

Short-term major postoperative complications in CD deserve particular attention to enhance the accuracy of perioperative decision-making and the expected patient recovery.

Research objectives

This study aimed to clearly identify the key risk factors for short-term major postoperative complications in CD patients, construct and verify the logistics regression model and random forest (RF) model based on ML, so as to enhance the accuracy of surgical decision-making.

Research methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on surgical data from CD patients between 2017 and 2022. Patients underwent rigorous screening before being randomly assigned to training and validation groups. Independent risk factors for short-term postoperative major complications were determined by logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed. Concurrently, RF analysis was conducted to screen important factors for short-term postoperative major complications.

Research results

Among the included 259 CD patients, it was observed that 5.0% experienced major complications within 30 d postoperatively. CD activity index ≥ 220, longer operation time, and reduced preoperative albumin levels were identified as significant factors influencing the occurrence of major postoperative short-term complications in both models.

Research conclusions

Both the nomogram model and the RF model established in this study demonstrated good predictive performance, offering practical individualized risk assessment for clinical decision-making.

Research perspectives

The application of ML-based predictive models to assist personalized medical decision making in CD surgery is valuable. Predictive models across diverse clinical practices necessitate further integration, improvement, and promotion.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Lee KS, South Korea S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu ZH

References
1.  Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Barkema HW, Kaplan GG. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:46-54.e42; quiz e30.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3134]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3262]  [Article Influence: 271.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
2.  Lovasz BD, Golovics PA, Vegh Z, Lakatos PL. New trends in inflammatory bowel disease epidemiology and disease course in Eastern Europe. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:269-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Gu WJ, Ning FL, Jin HR, Zhao ZM, Lyu J, Pei JP, Cao SY, Zeng YJ, Abe M, Nishiyama K, Zhang CD. Burden and Trends of IBD in 5 Asian Countries From 1990 to 2019: A Comparison With the United States and the United Kingdom. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66:567-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Ng SC, Kaplan GG, Tang W, Banerjee R, Adigopula B, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Wei SC, Lin WC, Lin HH, Li J, Bell S, Niewiadomski O, Kamm MA, Zeng Z, Chen M, Hu P, Ong D, Ooi CJ, Ling KL, Miao Y, Miao J, Janaka de Silva H, Niriella M, Aniwan S, Limsrivilai J, Pisespongsa P, Wu K, Yang H, Ng KK, Yu HH, Wang Y, Ouyang Q, Abdullah M, Simadibrata M, Gunawan J, Hilmi I, Lee Goh K, Cao Q, Sheng H, Ong-Go A, Chong VH, Ching JYL, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Population Density and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Population-Based Study in 13 Countries or Regions in Asia-Pacific. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:107-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140]  [Article Influence: 28.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Luglio G, Rispo A, Imperatore N, Giglio MC, Amendola A, Tropeano FP, Peltrini R, Castiglione F, De Palma GD, Bucci L. Surgical Prevention of Anastomotic Recurrence by Excluding Mesentery in Crohn's Disease: The SuPREMe-CD Study - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2020;272:210-217.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 21.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Luglio G, Pellegrini L, Rispo A, Tropeano FP, Imperatore N, Pagano G, Amendola A, Testa A, De Palma GD, Castiglione F. Post-operative morbidity in Crohn's disease: what is the impact of patient-, disease- and surgery-related factors? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37:411-419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Haugen AS, Wæhle HV, Almeland SK, Harthug S, Sevdalis N, Eide GE, Nortvedt MW, Smith I, Søfteland E. Causal Analysis of World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation Quality and Impact on Care Processes and Patient Outcomes: Secondary Analysis From a Large Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Norway. Ann Surg. 2019;269:283-290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Alves A, Panis Y, Bouhnik Y, Pocard M, Vicaut E, Valleur P. Risk factors for intra-abdominal septic complications after a first ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multivariate analysis in 161 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:331-336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 242]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 234]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Yamamoto T, Spinelli A, Suzuki Y, Saad-Hossne R, Teixeira FV, de Albuquerque IC, da Silva RN, de Barcelos IF, Takeuchi K, Yamada A, Shimoyama T, da Silva Kotze LM, Sacchi M, Danese S, Kotze PG. Risk factors for complications after ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease with a major focus on the impact of preoperative immunosuppressive and biologic therapy: A retrospective international multicentre study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:784-793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Penninck E, Fumery M, Armengol-Debeir L, Sarter H, Savoye G, Turck D, Pineton de Chambrun G, Vasseur F, Dupas JL, Lerebours E, Colombel JF, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Gower-Rousseau C; EPIMAD Group. Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-based Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:127-133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Zhang C, Zhang T, Shen Z, Zhong J, Wang Z. Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index and Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023;14:e00563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Wang K, Huang L, Huang W, Liu R, Chen X, Guo Z, Qian W, Yin Y, Li Y, Zhu W. Predictive Value of CT Enterography Index for Postoperative Intra-abdominal Septic Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Implications for Surgical Decision-Making. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;64:964-976.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Wu E, Duan M, Han J, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Cao L, Gong J, Guo Z, Li Y, Zhu W. Patients with Crohn's Disease Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: Clinical and Prognostic Evaluation Based on a Single-Center Cohort in China. World J Surg. 2022;46:450-460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Zhu F, Li Y, Guo Z, Cao L, Feng D, Zhang T, Zhu W, Gong J. Nomogram to Predict Postoperative Intra-abdominal Septic Complications After Bowel Resection and Primary Anastomosis for Crohn's Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:629-638.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Xue B, Li D, Lu C, King CR, Wildes T, Avidan MS, Kannampallil T, Abraham J. Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e212240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 28.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784-791.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1394]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1663]  [Article Influence: 237.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Machiels K, Pozuelo Del Río M, Martinez-De la Torre A, Xie Z, Pascal Andreu V, Sabino J, Santiago A, Campos D, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A, De Hertogh G, Ferrante M, Manichanh C, Vermeire S. Early Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence in Crohn's Disease Is Characterised by Distinct Microbiota Recolonisation. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:1535-1546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Julien C, Anakok E, Treton X, Nachury M, Nancey S, Buisson A, Fumery M, Filippi J, Maggiori L, Panis Y, Zerbib P, François Y, Dubois A, Sabbagh C, Rahili A, Seksik P, Allez M, Lefevre JH; REMIND Study Group Investigators, Le Corff S, Bonnet A, Beyer-Berjot L, Sokol H. Impact of the Ileal Microbiota on Surgical Site Infections in Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16:1211-1221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Manandhar I, Alimadadi A, Aryal S, Munroe PB, Joe B, Cheng X. Gut microbiome-based supervised machine learning for clinical diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021;320:G328-G337.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Liu Y, Zhao S, Du W, Tian Z, Chi H, Chao C, Shen W. Applying interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors for permanent stoma in patients after TME. Front Surg. 2023;10:1125875.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Liu Y, Song C, Tian Z, Shen W. Identification of High-Risk Patients for Postoperative Myocardial Injury After CME Using Machine Learning: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:1251-1264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Sarrabayrouse G, Elias A, Yáñez F, Mayorga L, Varela E, Bartoli C, Casellas F, Borruel N, Herrera de Guise C, Machiels K, Vermeire S, Manichanh C. Fungal and Bacterial Loads: Noninvasive Inflammatory Bowel Disease Biomarkers for the Clinical Setting. mSystems. 2021;6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Jiang T, Jiang Y, Jin Q, Xu S, Fingerhut A, Shi Y, Zheng M, He Z. Role of perioperative nutritional status and enteral nutrition in predicting and preventing post-operative complications in patients with Crohn's disease. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1085037.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Lee JS, Kim HJ, Cho HM, Lee KM, Kye BH. The importance of the Crohn's disease activity index in surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease. J Visc Surg. 2016;153:339-345.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Nguyen GC, Du L, Chong RY, Jackson TD. Hypoalbuminaemia and Postoperative Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the NSQIP Surgical Cohort. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:1433-1438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Ge X, Liu H, Tang S, Wu Y, Pan Y, Liu W, Qi W, Ye L, Cao Q, Zhou W. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in Crohn's disease patients with normal BMI: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;79:294-299.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Ghoneima AS, Flashman K, Dawe V, Baldwin E, Celentano V. High risk of septic complications following surgery for Crohn's disease in patients with preoperative anaemia, hypoalbuminemia and high CRP. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34:2185-2188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Meade S, Patel KV, Luber RP, O'Hanlon D, Caracostea A, Pavlidis P, Honap S, Anandarajah C, Griffin N, Zeki S, Ray S, Mawdsley J, Samaan MA, Anderson SH, Darakhshan A, Adams K, Williams A, Sanderson JD, Lomer M, Irving PM. A retrospective cohort study: pre-operative oral enteral nutritional optimisation for Crohn's disease in a UK tertiary IBD centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022;56:646-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ferrandis C, Souche R, Bardol T, Boivineau L, Fabre JM, Altwegg R, Guillon F. Personalized pre-habilitation reduces anastomotic complications compared to up front surgery before ileocolic resection in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106815.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F Jr. Development of a Crohn's disease activity index. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:439-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Sandler RS, Jordan MC, Kupper LL. Development of a Crohn's index for survey research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:451-458.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Fontana T, Falco N, Torchia M, Tutino R, Gulotta G. Bowel perforation in Crohn's Disease: correlation between CDAI and Clavien-Dindo scores. G Chir. 2017;38:303-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B, Sadeghirad B, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2018;229:134-144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 211]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 357]  [Article Influence: 59.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Emile SH, Freund MR, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Silva-Alvarenga E, Wexner SD. Risk factors and predictors of 30-day complications and conversion to open surgery after repeat ileocolic resection of Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:941-949.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG, Gouma DJ, Hommes DW, Sprangers MA, Bemelman WA. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243:143-9; discussion 150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 226]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Ren J, Liu S, Wang G, Gu G, Ren H, Hong Z, Li J. Laparoscopy improves clinical outcome of gastrointestinal fistula caused by Crohn's disease. J Surg Res. 2016;200:110-116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Horsey ML, Lai D, Herur-Raman A, Amdur R, Chandler M, Ng M, Obias V. Open versus minimally invasive small bowel resection for Crohn's disease: a NSQIP retrospective review and analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:6278-6284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Pak SJ, Kim YI, Yoon YS, Lee JL, Lee JB, Yu CS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: Propensity-score matching analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27:7159-7172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Sampietro GM, Colombo F, Frontali A, Baldi C, Conti L, Dilillo D, Penagini F, Nebuloni M, D'Addio F, Fiorina P, Maconi G, Corsi F, Zuccotti G, Ardizzone S, Foschi D. Strictureplasties performed by laparoscopic approach for complicated Crohn's disease. A prospective, observational, cohort study. Dig Liver Dis. 2021;53:1286-1293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Ogino T, Sekido Y, Hata T, Miyoshi N, Takahashi H, Uemura M, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Eguchi H, Mizushima T. The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease: A comparative clinical study of over 100 consecutive patients. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022;6:405-411.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Abdalla S, Abd El Aziz MA, Calini G, Saeed H, Merchea A, Shawki S, Behm KT, Larson DW. Perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive ileocolic resection for complicated Crohn disease: Results from a referral center retrospective cohort. Surgery. 2022;172:522-529.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Connelly TM, Clancy C, Duraes LC, Cheong JY, Cengiz B, Jia X, Hull T, Holubar SD, Steele SR, Kessler H. Laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn's disease: perioperative and long-term results from a propensity matched cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37:1885-1891.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Sevim Y, Akyol C, Aytac E, Baca B, Bulut O, Remzi FH. Laparoscopic surgery for complex and recurrent Crohn's disease. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:149-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Wan J, Liu C, Yuan XQ, Yang MQ, Wu XC, Gao RY, Yin L, Chen CQ. Laparoscopy for Crohn's disease: A comprehensive exploration of minimally invasive surgical techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;13:1190-1201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
45.  Huang W, Tang Y, Nong L, Sun Y. Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications after surgery in Crohn's disease: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:293-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Galata C, Weiss C, Hardt J, Seyfried S, Post S, Kienle P, Horisberger K. Risk factors for early postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy for Crohn's disease: a single-center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:937-945.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Morar PS, Hodgkinson JD, Thalayasingam S, Koysombat K, Purcell M, Hart AL, Warusavitarne J, Faiz O. Determining Predictors for Intra-abdominal Septic Complications Following Ileocolonic Resection for Crohn's Disease-Considerations in Pre-operative and Peri-operative Optimisation Techniques to Improve Outcome. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:483-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Iesalnieks I, Spinelli A, Frasson M, Di Candido F, Scheef B, Horesh N, Iborra M, Schlitt HJ, El-Hussuna A. Risk of postoperative morbidity in patients having bowel resection for colonic Crohn's disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:947-953.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  SICCR Current status of Crohn’s disease surgery collaborative. Surgical treatment of colonic Crohn's disease: a national snapshot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406:1165-1172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Johnston WF, Stafford C, Francone TD, Read TE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Ricciardi R. What Is the Risk of Anastomotic Leak After Repeat Intestinal Resection in Patients With Crohn's Disease? Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:1299-1306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Duan Y, Liu Y, Li Y. Previous Intestinal Resection Is Associated with Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease: A Cohort Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020;2020:2194382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Yang S, Prien C, Jia X, Hull T, Liska D, Steele SR, Lightner AL, Valente M, Holubar SD. Redo Ileocolic Resection Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leak in Recurrent Crohn's Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66:1373-1382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]