Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2014; 5(1): 17-39
Published online Feb 15, 2014. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i1.17
Table 1 Prevalence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy as reported in major studies
Ref.YearCountryN of subjectsType of DMPopulation characteristicsDiagnostic testCriteria appliedPrevalence(%)Comments
O’Brien et al[111]1991United Kingdom506IDDMMean age 45 yr, mean DM duration 15 yr, female 42%HRV in response to (1) rest (2) single deep breath (3) Valsalva manoeuvre or (4) standingAt least two positive of the tests mentioned in the previous column17Prevalence of CAN was associated with the presence of other DM complications
Ziegler et al[223]1992Germany130Newly diagnosed IDDMCV of HRV, low- and mid- frequency bands of spectral analysis, MCR, Valsalva manoeuvre or lying-to standingAt least three positive of the tests mentioned in the previous column7.7
Austria647Total IDDM25.3
Switzerland524Non-IDDM34.3
Kennedy et al[11]1995United States290IDDMListed pancreas transplantation recipientsHRV Valsalva manoeuvre90 88
DCCT research group[19]1998United States1441IDDM (1) primary prevention cohort (absence of end–organ damage such as retinopathy and microalbuminuria) (2) secondary intervention cohort (mild/ moderate retinopathy +/- microalbuminuria)Mean age 27 yr, female 47% duration of DM 1-5 yr (mean 2.6) primary prevention cohort 1-15 yr (mean 8.8) secondary intervention cohortHRVR-R variation < 151.6-6.2These figures represent baseline characteristics
Valsalva manoeuvreValsalva ratio < 1.55.5-6.3
Postural BPDiastolic BP drop > 10 mmHg0
Kempler et al[28] (EURODIAB IDDM)200216 European countries3250T1DMMean age 32 yr, mean DM duration 14 yr, female 49%(1) R-R response to standing (2) Postural BPR-R ratio < 1.04 or drop > 20 mmHg in systolic BP36Correlation with age, DM duration and HbA1c
Gaede et al[5,224] (the Steno type 2 study)2003Denmark160T2DMMean age 55 yr, female 27%, HbA1C 8.8% at baseline(1) R-R response to breathing (2)Postural BPR-R variation < 6 or drop > 25 mmHg in systolic BP27.5This figure represents baseline findings
Valensi et al[27]2003France245T1DMMean age 39.6 yr, mean DM duration 8.6 yr, female 43%R-R response toCriteria for abnormal tests were based on Armstrong et al[225]Rate of moderate/severe CAN was higher in T1DM (18.2% and 4.8%) than in T2DM (12.3% and 2.3%) (P = 0.031)
151T2DM(1) deep breathing21.2
(2) Valsalva and20.7
(3) standing33.5
At least two positive tests (classed as moderate CAN)20
Low et al[23]2004United States83T1DMMean age 59 yr, white 99%, female 48%(1) Sudomotor axon-reflex test (2) Valsalva manoeuvre (3) BP and HR response to standing (4) R-R response to deep breathingCASS ≥ 1 in two domains or ≥ 2 in one domain (sudomotor, cardiovagal, adrenergic)54This study focuses on DAN but encompasses several cardiac autonomic tests
148T2DM73
Pop-Busui et al[18] (DCCT/EDIC study)2009United States620IDDM-former intensive Tx group IDDM-former conventional Tx groupMean age 47 yr in both groups, mean DM duration 26 yr, female 49% and 46% respectivelyR-R response to (1) deep breathing (2) Valsalva manoeuvre (3) postural BPR-R < 15 or R-R 15-19.9 and Valsalva ratio < 1.5 or drop > 15 mmHg in diastolic BP2913/14 yr post closeout of DCCT
59135
Table 2 Observed mortality in significant studies in the last two decades
Ref.CountryN ofsubjectsType of DMFUp (yr)Diagnostic test for CANCriteria appliedMortality figures(expressed in HR, RR and incidence)Comments
Veglio et al[226]Italy316T1DM5(1) Resting heart rate (2) HRV during deep breathing (3) BP response to standing≥ 2 abnormal testsRelative risk: 3.55 (1.4-8.9) and 2.21 (0.62-7.84, P = 0.22) after multivariate analysis for all-cause mortalityThe mortality rates were 13% and 4% in the presence and absence of CAN respectively
Gerritsen et al[164] the Hoorn StudyNether-lands446Non-DM9Seven parameters assessing HRV and BP response to: (1) 3-min breathing and (2) six deep breathsCut–off set as the lowest 25th percentile of non-diabetic groupOnly E/I had a statistically significant association with mortality- Relative Risk: 2.25 (1.13–4.45) for all cause and 2.04 (0.74–5.65) for CVD mortalityAn additional four parameters showed a tendency (P < 0.10) for association with acc- cause mortality: mean NN, LF power, HF power, and BRS
Chen et al[227]Taiwan159T2DM7.7HRV response to: (1) single deep breath (2) six consecutive breaths (3) standing, (4) Valsalva manoeuvre≥ 3 abnormal testsAll cause mortality: 29% vs 12% with and without CAN respectively CVD mortality: 9% vs 2% in pts with and without CANThe 8-yr survival rate for pts with abnormal CAN tests was 63.6% in males and 76.4% in females, compared with 80.9% and 93.3% for patients with normal CAN tests
612T2DM
Wheeler et al[228]United States843T1DM and T2DMHRV response to deep breathing and postural BPDrop in BP ≥ 30 mmHg and HRV divided into 5 quintiles HRV < 10 bpm at baseline abnormal E/IHazard Ratio: 1.49 (1.01-2.19) for all-cause mortality and 1.08 (0.69-1.70) for CVD mortality in the lowest quintile of HRV. Relative Risk for orthostatic hypotension: 0.65 (0.69-1.70) Relative risk: 4.9 (2.1-11.5, P < 0.0001) after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors Hazard Ratio: 0.92 (0.87–0.98, P = 0.005) for HRV (1 beat/min increase)Of the 142 patients for whom cause of death was available, 75 deaths (49.7%) were due to CVD. The lowest quintile of HRV was associated with a 50% increase in mortality after adjusting for other risk factors During follow-up, 33 Patients died from cardiovascular causes, During follow-up 54 of 104 patients died: 41 patients (80.4%) with diabetic nephropathy and 13 patients (24.5%) with normoalbuminuria. Thirty patients (55%) died from cardio-vascular causes
Astrup et al[229]Denmark388T1DM (197 with macro-, 191 normo- albuminuria)10.1HRV to deep breathing
Astrup et al[230]Denmark104T2DM (51 with nephropathy, 52 with normal albuminuria)9.2HRV to deep breathing
Soedamah- Muthu et al[115] the EURODIAB PCS16 European countries2787T1DM7HRV response to standing and postural BPR-R ratio of < 1.04 and drop in systolic BP ≥ 20 mmHgHazard Ratio: 3.61 (1.49–8.76) for CVD mortality and 2.83 (1.82–4.38) for all-cause mortality.Autonomic neuropathy and microalbuminuria were the most important independent predictors of mortality
Lykke et al[231]Denmark391T1DM10HRV and QTcAll cause mortality Hazard Ratio: 2.5 (0.9–6.8, P = 0.071) in pts with abnormal HRV and 2.3 (1.3-4.0, P = 0.005) in those with abnormal QT combined hazard ratio 6.7 (1.8-25, P = 0.005)Out of 34 patients with both tests abnormal, 15 died in the 10 yr period (14 from cardiovascular causes)
Ziegler et al[232] MONICA/ KORA Augsburg Cohort studyGermany1560Non-DM9HRV, QTc interval and QTDGroup (1) Lowest quartile for SDNN, CV and max-min R-R intervals Group (2) QTc > 440, Group (3) QTD > 60 msAll-cause mortality Relative Risk: 0.93 (0.65-1.34)/2.02 (1.29-3.17)/0.98 (0.60-1.60) in patients without DM and 1.74 (0.95-3.18)/3.00 (1.34-6.71)/0.42 (0.06-3.16) in patients with DM for group 1/2/3 respectivelyProlonged QTc interval was an independent predictor of mortality both in patients with and without DM, Low HRV trended towards an increased risk of mortality by 73% in patients with DM but not the population without DM
160DM
Beijers et al[233] the Hoorn StudyNether-lands376Non-DM13.6HRV and BP response to: (1) 3-min breathing, (2) six deep breaths (3) standingCalculated z-score for each parameter and averaged into a total CAD scoreRelative risk: 2.54 (1.60–4.04) for CVD mortality and 2.11 (1.58–2.81) for all cause mortality,CAN was associated with all-cause and CVD mortality independent to other CVD risk factors and microalbuminuria
114T2DM
Pop-Busui et al[29]United States and Canada8135T2DM3.5HRV and QTI computed from 10-s resting electrocardiogramsCAN1: lowest quartile of SDNN and highest QTI quartile, CAN2: CAN1 and resting heart rate, CAN3: CAN1 and peripheral neuropathyHazard ratios: 1.55 (1.09-2.21)/2.14 (1.37-2.37)/2.07 (1.14-3.76) for all-cause and 1.94 (1.20-3.12)/2.62 (1.40-4.91)/2.95 (1.33-6.53) for CVD mortality in CAN1/CAN2/CAN3 respectivelyCAN was independently associated with overall and CVD mortality after adjusting for baseline CVD, DM duration, traditional CVD risk factors and medications